I have often wondered about terms like Domicile and migration.
If we understand History and follow it, we shall know that no one can claim to be a domicile of any place!
The movement of Humans from prehistoric times is so complex and changing, it is impossible to say who was in one place first.
Whenever we read History of Human migration we find that when people move from one place,it is stated that they mixed with the people in that place.
How did these people come to be there?
And from where?
If migration takes place it has to be from one place to another.
The place from where they moved from, how did they arrive there at the first place?
European History says that Asia served as a sort of reservoir for Humans to migrate from.
How did they come to be there at all?
European history says, in migration, people came in waves from Asian, through the Urals and Russia, through the landmass of mideast .
The group that came through Russia settled down and mingled with people over there.
The other group .
The first wave settled in Spain Pyrenees, North of Africa, in England,Scotland and Wales,and in Gaul.
The second wave settled in Bulgaria, Hungary
The third wave Huns, settled finally in Germany, after raiding all the ethnic groups settled before them.
Then there were the Vikings who raided the Gauls, Anglo-Saxon.
However all the information here are theories.
There is yet another theory that states that people migrated from Africa.
Curious is that while the west acknowledges that The Vedas are the first Literature of Mankind and were in existence at least from 5000 BC
no body bothers to check the refernces found in the Vedas , Puranas, and Ithihasas on people, culture and places.
There is another Language and civilisation found in India which is as old as the Vedas .
Tamil.
Tamil literature is at least 500o years old.
Puranas quote Tamils, Tamil Kings.
Ramayana and Mahabharata do the same.
References are found in Sanskrit Literature, Tamil Literature ,Vedas Puranas ,Ramayana and Mahabharata about people and places which are now Europe, US,Africa, Russia,
Middle east, Iran, Southeast Asia, Polynesia .
These references are not used, I presume, it hurts the pride of these scholars to accept India as a the cradle of Human Civilisation.
So overwhelming are the artifacts and archeological finds, they have to grudgingly accept Indus Valley civilisation!
They are yet to accept the Sarasvati Valley Civilisation.
The Tamil civilisation is totally ignored as also the influence of this culture in Huan Migration in world History.
I have also noticed a curious fact,
Hindu,Indian Religious, Cultural artifacts and archeological finds are found all over the world.
I have quite a few posts on this under Hinduism.
But not a single artifact or archeological find has been found in India relating to History or culture or Religion of the other civilisations in the world which predate Vedic period or Tamil culture.
I shall be examining the concept of Human migration from Dravida to rest of the world, including the Sarasvati Valley civilization.
This will be with help of Vedas, Puranas,Ramayana, Mahabharata, Tamil and Sanskrit Literature.
Leave a Reply