From Where Did The Brahmins Come?

One of the most controversial topics is whether the Aryans invaded India and later settled here and if so from where did they come from? I have already posted a blog .The Myth called Aryan Invasion' The scientific research proves that there is no Aryan Invasion at all. I will be adding some more points to disprove this Myth and before that there are some questions to be answered ,the questions arising out of Ramayana. Rama and the others ; hailing from the Northerner part of India and if the Ramayana is a fact,which it is( I have posts on this under Hinduism),Lord Rama and others should have been fair-skinned, But the description of Rama is Blue Black. This is based on the conception of Lord Vishnu as Black in color.while Lakshmi is Golden (Hiranya varnaam(Sri Suktham), Lord Shiva of Reddish Hue,Parvati of greenish hue, as per the Purana. But based on geographical origin and the present people living in North India Rama should have been fair-skinned. We have two options. 1.Ramayana was a fiction. This is incorrect as the Astronomical data provided in the Ramayana and other Purana stand the test of Science. Ramayana is a fact. So we are left with the other option that there have been other skinned people in India before Ramayana and there has been an a mix of various groups having different racial characteristics. Lord Rama could have been an exception as far as color is concerned. Others in the Ramayana were not of the same hue as Rama. Sita was fair-skinned. Against this Ravana was not described as dark-skinned and he is the brother of Kubera who is fair-skinned and Ravana is a Brahmin though he is described as a Dravidian! Therefore logic forces one to conclude that there were more races in India than one homogeneous Race in India which included Sri Lanka. Again if one refers to any of the Eighteen Purana, one would find descriptions of people both black and fair-skinned. And not all Brahmins were fair-skinned. For example, Aurava and you can find Brahmins of Dark hue in South India.

Robotic Weapons Replace Drones? Human Rights Watch

Now that Drone attacks are drawing flak, there is a move to induct Fully Autonomous Robotic Weapons, which do not need any Human input are on the anvil.
The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots is a coalition of weapons monitors and human rights groups leading an effort, formally since April, to establish an international ban on fully autonomous lethal weapons. Dubbed (by opponents) “killer robots,” it’s a technology that can kill targets (humans) without any human input. Whereas drones today have someone somewhere remotely determining where and when to fire, a fully autonomous air, land, or sea weapon could be making the decisions on its own...

It sounds like the stuff of sci-fi, but the technology is well within reach given existing weaponry. The U.S. Navy’s X-47B, a Northrop Grumman-developed drone, has taken off and landed on an aircraft carrier—one of the hardest maneuvers in aviation—entirely on its own, and it would only be a short step to add missiles to its weapons bay. In South Korea, a Samsung subsidiary designed—several years ago already—a stationary robot sentry that sits along the demilitarized zone and can identify and fire at a target on its own. It’s linked up with a human operator for now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMkV8E2re9U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NevCAx6zWNU

Human Rights Watch has called in for a Review of this development.

"

All governments should support international talks to address the threat posed by fully autonomous robotic weapons, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch and the Harvard Law School International Human Rights Clinic on October 21, 2013, issued a question-and-answer document about the legal problems posed by these weapons.

Pakistan Selected DroneTargets CIA Documents.

When the Drone strike involved the killing of the Civilians, it aroused Public Anger.

The West and in particular the US was supremely indifferent.

Drone attacks can not distinguish Civilians, Terrorists and most importantly the Westerners.

When the Drone strike involved the killing of a UK national, there started a Hue and cry and Human Rights issue.

Ironically these votaries of Human Rights were silent when Pakistani civilians were killed!

Now as the issue has become a Human Rights controversy, the CIA, with the sanction of the White House, is releasing the information that Pakistan was a Party to Drone Strikes.

They could have done this when Pakistani civilians were being killed.

This is how contradictory international policies work out.

Story:

In time, the CIA identified so many suspected al-Qaeda and militant compounds that it gave them coded designations, including MSC 215 for a Miran Shah compound where explosives were manufactured and SC 5 for Spailpan Compound No. 5 in South Waziristan.