Tag: patients

  • Doctors Admit Giving Useless Medicine To Patients

    I posted a blog yesterday defending Doctors in a case where the Doctor was accused of negligence when a boy died of Anesthesia overdose during Cosmetic Surgery in Bangalore,India.

    It is not that I am always on the side of Doctors.

    Useless Medicines prescribed.
    Useless Medicines prescribed.

    I have posted a couple of blogs on Doctor’ unethical practices including administering useless medicine to patients.

    Now Doctors, in a study conducted on Doctors selected at random, for medical practice, have admitted to giving useless medicine like

    like low-dose drugs, vitamins, nutritional supplements or an unnecessary exam.

    Story:

    The surveyed doctors said they prescribed them to induce a “placebo effect,” to reassure patients or because patients pushed for a treatment.

    “For authorities to put their heads in the sand and pretend (placebo treatments) are not being given out is not helpful,” said Jeremy Howick of Oxford University, one of the authors of the study, which was published online Wednesday in the journal PLoS One. “We need to think of ways to maximize the benefits of using placebos,” he said.

    Howick and colleagues used a Web-based survey and got 783 responses. The sample was drawn from a list that included 71 percent of all doctors registered with the General Medical Council, the governing body for doctors in the U.K.

    The survey asked doctors if they had ever used a true placebo, like a sugar pill or another kind of dummy treatment such as a drug not meant for the patient’s condition or a non-essential examination including blood tests and X-rays. Nearly all of the doctors — 97 percent — reported having used some kind of placebo treatment at least once, while 12 percent reported having used a fake pill.

    About 77 percent of doctors said they used some kind of placebo treatment every week; more than 80 percent of them said their use in some circumstances was ethical.

    The “placebo effect” treatments included unnecessary physical exams, joint injections, physical therapy, peppermint pills for a sore throat and antibiotics for infections where they would not be effective.

    Dr. Tony Calland, chairman of the British Medical Association’s Ethics Committee, said he was disappointed by the findings. “Prescribing something that you know is of no value is not ethical,” he said.

    A previous study found about half of U.S. doctors regularly give their patients treatments that probably won’t work without telling them, and the practice has been reported elsewhere, including Canada, Denmark and Switzerland. The American Medical Association says physicians may only use placebos if the patient is aware.

    In 2011, the German Medical Association recommended doctors use fake pills and other placebo treatments more often and said patients didn’t necessarily need to be told.

    Some small studies have found dummy pills work even when patients are explicitly told what they’re getting and others have documented the fake treatments can spark a biological effect in the body.

    “For illnesses where there is no truly effective treatment, a placebo or alternative therapy is a fine thing to do,” said Dr. Walter Brown, a clinical professor of psychiatry at Brown University and author of a recent book on placebos. He was not connected to the new study”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/many-uk-doctors-give-patients-useless-drugs-treatments-authorities-say-thats-unethical/2013/03/20/da5f1376-9194-11e2-9173-7f87cda73b49_story.html

    Let me add some more practices, at the ground level , indulged by the Doctors in India.

    1.Most of the Doctors do not examine the patients at all.

    They hear the symptoms and immediately scribble some Tests.

    These ‘Tests’ have financial implications for the Doctor and the Corporate Hotels, sorry Corporate Hotels.

    A scan , in general costs Rs.2000.

    But a patient is charged any where between  6000 -8000!

    50 % of this , between 3000- 4000 goes to the Doctor.

    He gives a cut to the Hospital whee he is a Consultant.

    2.The use two different types of pens or inks to write a prescription.

    For a a particular type of pen or ink used, the Labs do not conduct any Tests and give a normal parameter Report.

    Of course the patient is charged!

    Suggesting useless procedures.

    This happens mainly in Appendicitis cases.

    Appendicitis procedure involves the removal of the Appendix.

    Till date no body knows what function Appendix serves and te side effects of removing them.

    The patient is threatened that the bursting of Appendix would poison the syste,.which is true.

    But that it might be ruptured is a decision for a Doctor to make.

    Removal of Uterus.

    On unsuspecting patients, i have seen doctors, suggesting removal of the Uterus even for Urine Infection!

    Blood Tests.

    Same test is repeated for the same patient in a gap of a day!

    Useless Drugs, and at times Procedures .

    Physicians recommend against many procedures patients have come to expect, including imaging for low back pain (unless it has lasted more than six weeks) and any cardiac screening, including EKGs, in patients without heart symptoms.

    The widely used “DEXA” X-ray screening for osteoporosis landed in rheumatologists’ crosshairs. It should not be done more than once every two years, they advise, because changes in bone density over shorter periods are typically less than the machines’ measurement error, which can cause women to think they’re losing bone mass when they’re not.(life,national post)

    If you’re having surgery, you may wonder if you need an imaging test of your heart to make sure it is safe for you to have the surgery. But if you are not having heart surgery—and you haven’t had a stroke and don’t have a severe heart condition, diabetes, or kidney disease—the imaging tests usually aren’t helpful. Here’s why:

    The tests usually aren’t necessary before low-risk surgery.

    Some imaging tests use sound waves to take pictures of the heart. This is called echocardiography. Other tests use a small amount of radioactive material. These can be called either a nuclear or CT scan.

    Doing a heart imaging test can show whether you’re at risk of having a heart attack or another serious complication when you have surgery. The test results may lead to special care during or after surgery, delaying surgery until the problem is treated, or changing the kind of surgery.

    But the risk of heart complications from minor surgeries, such as a breast biopsy, eye or skin surgery, or any “same-day” surgery, is very low. There really isn’t anything doctors can do to lower the risk further. In other words, heart-imaging tests are not likely to change anything. In fact, even major surgery is safe for most healthy people who feel well and are physically active.

    Unless you have heart disease or other risk factors, usually all you need before surgery is a careful medical history and physical exam.

    Heart imaging tests can pose risks.

    The tests are usually very safe, and some can be done with little or no radiation. But if your risk of having a heart problem is low, the tests can produce a false-positive result that could cause anxiety and lead to more tests and an unneeded delay of surgery.

    For example, you might have a follow-up coronary angiography (cardiac catheterization). During this test, a catheter is inserted into the heart through a vein, dye is injected, and x-rays are taken. The risks are low, but exposure to radiation adds up over your lifetime, so it’s best to avoid x-rays whenever you can.

    Imaging tests can cost a lot.

    An imaging stress test costs between $500 and $2,000, and a cardiac CT scan costs $500 to $600. If abnormal results lead to coronary angiography, that can add about $5,000 to the cost. So the tests should only be used when the results would change the way your surgery is done.

    Check this site for more before you take any decision on Tests for you and discuss with your Doctor.

    It is your right.

    http://www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/heart-imaging-tests-before-surgery/

    Please watch this clip on Medical expenses from STAR Vijay.

     

  • The Hippocratic Oath-Do we have Physicians now?

    I shall
    -rely on Diet.
    – shall not prescribe deadly drugs.
    -not use knife
    -perform abortion.
    -not engage in sex with patients, both male and female.
    -keep patients’ information secret.
    -shall treat Teacher as my parent and his children as my brothers and sisters.
    Do we have a species called physician now?
    Echoes of Charaka and Sustruta of India (5000 BC)

    Here is a modern translation of the Hippocratic Oath:

    I swear by Apollo the Physician and Asclepius and Hygeia and Panaceia and all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will fulfill according to my ability and judgment this oath and this covenant: To hold him who has taught me this art as equal to my parent and to live my life in partnership with him, and if he is in need of money to give him a share of mine, and to regard his offspring as equal to my brothers in male lineage and to teach them this art–if they desire to learn it–without fee and covenant; to give a share of precepts and oral instruction and all other learning to my sons and to the sons of him who has instructed me and to pupils who have signed the covenant and have taken an oath according to the medical law, but to no one else. I will apply dietetic measure for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice. I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and in holiness I will guard my life and my art. I will not use the knife, not even on sufferers from stone, but will withdraw in favor of such men as are engaged in this work. Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all mischief and in particular of sexual relations with both female and male persons, be they free or slaves. What I may see or hear in the course of the treatment or even outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account one must spread abroad, I will keep to myself holding such things shameful to be spoken about. If I fulfill this oath and do not violate it, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and art, being honored with fame among all men for all time to come; if I transgress it and swear falsely, may the opposite be my lot. [Edelstein 6]

  • Couple’s son, 2, taken into care by social workers after they ‘refused to feed him junk food’

    It is the Doctor who is to be prosecuted and his licence to practice canceled.
    Story:
    A two year-old boy was taken away by social services and put into foster care after his parents, Paul and Lisa Hessey, refused to follow doctors’ orders and feed him junk food, they have claimed.
    The Derbyshire couple, both 48, had been concerned about heath of their son, Zak as he was not eating properly.
    Mrs Hessey and her lorry driver husband, took their son, who weighed just 17 lbs, to Chesterfield Royal Hospital in July.

    The couple rejected the medical advice to feed Zak a diet of junk food, to fatten him up.
    “They said we had been negative about eating. That was because they had been telling us we should feed Zak crisps, chocolate and cakes to get calories into him,” said Mrs Hessey.
    “I was questioning that approach. We eat proper home-made food at our house and just have chocolate and cakes as a treat.”
    Doctors said they wanted to undergo a series of tests over a fortnight and the couple, of Bolsover, near Chesterfield, agreed to have him put under observation.
    But in a decision that surprised the couple, a social worker from Derbyshire County Council later said that Zak needed to go into foster care so they could “assess his needs” and determine how he ate.
    The couple, who have four other children aged under 10, were told that if they challenged the decision, social services would “go straight to court” where “all your parental rights would be taken away”.
    “I was absolutely devastated, I broke down in tears,” said Mrs Hessey.
    “I was scared out of my wits.
    “They kept saying, ‘if you love Zak and you want the best for him, then you’ll agree to this voluntarily’.”
    After he was placed into foster care, they were later able to negotiate, through lawyers, to spend three hours a day with him during the following week, but only in the presence of social workers.
    “I thought I was doing the right thing going to the best people for advice when Zak began to lose weight,” Mrs Hessey said.
    “Instead they basically accused me of neglecting him and implied it was all my fault.”
    Eventually they went to court to try to get Zak back, and after four months, he was allowed to return home after gaining less than a pound in four months.
    Social services eventually said they were good and caring parents.
    A spokesman for Derbyshire County Council said: “We only take a child into our care either with the consent of the parents or following very careful consideration by a court.”
    A spokesman for Chesterfield Royal Hospital added: “While we understand Mr and Mrs Hessey’s distress, Zak’s welfare was paramount and we believe we acted in his best interest.”
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6713838/Couples-son-2-taken-into-care-by-social-workers-after-they-refused-to-feed-him-junk-food.html

  • Drug-resistant bacteria on increase in U.S.: study-Reuters.

    Could this be the mutated Strains of known Bacteria whose growth /mutation may be attributed to indiscriminate use of Antibiotics?
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Cases of a drug-resistant bacterial infection known as MRSA have risen by 90 percent since 1999, and they are increasingly being acquired outside hospitals, researchers reported on Tuesday.

    They found two new strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — MRSA for short — were circulating in patients and they are different from the strains normally seen in hospitals.

    Ramanan Laxminarayan of Princeton University in New Jersey and colleagues studied data on lab tests from a national network of 300 microbiology laboratories in the United States for their study.

    “We found during 1999-2006 that the percentage of S. aureus infections resistant to methicillin increased more than 90 percent, or 10 percent a year, in outpatients admitted to U.S. hospitals,” they wrote in a report published in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.

    “This increase was caused almost entirely by community-acquired MRSA strains, which increased more than 33 percent annually.”

    MRSA is now entrenched in U.S. hospitals. It was also known to be circulating in the community but it was not clear whether patients were carrying the infections out of hospitals, or the other way around.

    Laxminarayan’s team found that many more people were being diagnosed with the community-acquired strains, and these strains were not replacing the known hospital strains. Instead, they are just adding to the overall number of MRSA cases.

    “Our findings have implications for local and national policies aimed at containing and preventing MRSA,” they wrote.

    For one thing, new, fast tests are needed so patients can be diagnosed and treated quickly. It is possible to treat MRSA but doctors need to know straight away so they start patients on the correct antibiotics.

    “Lastly, infection control policies should take into account the role that outpatients likely play in the spread of MRSA and promote interventions that could prevent spread of MRSA from outpatient areas to inpatient areas,” they added.

    MRSA is one of the most common causes of hospital-acquired infections. It can also now be picked up in schools, at fitness centers and elsewhere.

    Symptoms range from abscesses to bloodborne infections that can kill quickly.

    The researchers estimate that 20,000 people in the United States die each year from MRSA, and treating MRSA can range from $3,000 to more than $35,000 per case.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE5AN0N020091124

  • Antibiotic overuse threatens modern medicine: experts-Reuters

    Despite repeated warnings people still pop up anti-biotics at the drop of a hat.
    Doctors who prescribe them immediately as soon as the patients come to them(this is a fact, at least in India),drug shops which issue them with out prescriptions and sales promotion by way of heavy advertising by Pharma companies are also equally responsible.

    Story:
    LONDON (Reuters) – Overuse of antibiotics in Europe is building widespread resistance and threatening to halt vital medical treatments such as hip replacements, intensive care for premature babies and cancer therapies, health experts say.

    Dominique Monnet of the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control’s (ECDC) scientific advice unit said the “whole span of modern medicine” is under threat because bugs are become resistant to antibiotics, rendering the drugs useless.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE5A927820091110?feedType=nl&feedName=ushealth1100