Racism Embedded In Brain Science. Krishna Says?

In the Bhagavad Gita, Arjuna informs Krishna,

 

‘Finally one  suffers because hePunya orPaapa.

Racist area of the Brain .jpg
The amygdala CLIPAREA/Shutterstock

 

Punya or Paapa is acquired because of performance of Actions, both Good and Bad.

 

So I have decided not to act, perform any act’

 

So no Punya,Paapa,no rebirth ‘Suffering or Death’

 

Krishna smiles and tells him,

 

‘May be you are right.

 

But facts seem to be otherwise.

 

No one can remain doing Nothing.

 

If you mean by sitting quiet means you do not perform an action, you are mistakes.

 

Your very Perception affects the Perceived , both Animate and Inanimate(This point has been proved by Quantum, please read my Post )

 

You have to eat.

 

What you eat has Life.

 

While breathing  you inhale and many Organisms die.

 

One can not avoid performing actions.

 

Because it is the Swabhava, Nature.

 

Look at Me.

 

There is Nothing in the World that I need for the World is in Me and me in the World.

 

Yet I perform actions.

 

Why?

 

Because once born one is controlled by the three Gunas, Satva, Rajas and Tamas.

 

So none can help doing what he does’

 

However Krishna later explains how to overcome this, by Abhyasa (Practice) and Vairagya (Right Determination)

 

On this Nature of Man, scientists have determined that racist tendencies are embedded in the Brain.

 

Read the story.

In a number of classic studies, research subjects are asked to complete a seemingly simple task, such as watching words pop up on a screen and quickly categorizing those words as either positive, like “happy,” or negative, like “fear.”

 

But right before the word appears, a face, either black or white, flashes on the screen. “What we find over and over again in the literature,” explains Amodio, “is that if a black person’s face was shown really quickly, then people are quicker at categorizing negative words than positive words that follow it. Versus if a white face was shown really quickly, people are usually quicker to categorize the positive words, compared with the negative words.”

 

These types of biases are quite prevalent.According to a research summary by Stanford University’s Recruitment to Expand Diversity and Excellence program, “about 75% of whites and Asians demonstrated an implicit bias in favor of whites compared to blacks.”

In other words, despite your best intentions, you might be a little bit racist. (Similar unconscious biases have been documented in people’s views of those of different genders, the elderly, and other groups.)

And why do these split-second negative responses exist?

The underlying problem is that our brains have evolved to see patterns in things that are complex, and to categorize the world in order to simplify it.

Thus, when we encounter another person, our brains rapidly and subconsciously try to figure out if he or she is friend or foe: in-group or out-group.

Source.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/05/inquiring-minds-david-amodio-your-brain-on-racism

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

3 responses to “Racism Embedded In Brain Science. Krishna Says?”

  1. rly1987 Avatar

    Yes, I think the potential for racism is definitely wired into us. It makes sense biologically too since it allows an organism to avoid interacting with what are deemed “inferior peoples.” Having said that, this can also backfire since cultural exchange and multi-culturalism are likely the most beneficial in the long term though maybe not as advantageous for any single person in the short-term.

    Excerpt from one of my posts where I criticize Dawkins for propogating the idea that anything that reproduces itself is selfish as he does in “The Selfish Gene” :

    “A tactic of selfish people is to convince everyone else that selfishness is all that exists and that people are supposed to be that way. Dawkins again shows confusion when he implies we should use our “free will” and “intellectual faculties” to choose against inherent selfishness. Where does this free will come from and why would organisms choose to do good if people are merely their biology? (Additional note: Being your biological programming is equivalent to the Eastern notion of people “being their karma” as discussed by Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita, in my opinion.) Does this free will and our intellectual faculties somehow arise independent of our genetic and neurological programming allowing us to act against such things? Where does this free will come from? In my opinion, our human decency and pathological willingness to do good or not do good is coded in our genes and neurological wiring and is not somehow miraculously independent of biology as Dawkins would have it. That these things could just magically spring forth to oppose our fundamental biology delves into superstition Dawkins purportedly does not believe in. (I do, however, believe that the illusion of free will is important and that we need to continue using our minds and intellect to make decisions. I just feel that people are much more “programmed” and limited in decision-making than they believe themselves to be.)”

    via http://groupselection.wordpress.com/2014/05/09/9-on-altruism/

    I feel there are two types of karma discussed in Hindu and Buddhist traditions (feel free to correct me if I’m wrong though):

    1) The notion of karma related to penalties the Universe doles out as a result of misdemeanours (ie. what most Westerners associate with the term karma.)

    2) Karma as a person’s biological and neurological programming. “Birds need to sing, fish need to swim…” eg. Some people’s karma are to serve wicked tyranny. Obviously all the intellectuals who were in support of the British occupation of India to “help” the Indian people had this as their karmic niche, in my opinion. People like that are programmed to find justification for imperialistic exploits and this is still glaringly obvious in our present day as well. Liu XiaoBo is the perfect example. His “karma” is to be self-sacrificial in service to aggressive power. He’ll imprison himself to make the West look good, but it’s phony because he obviously expects recognition, hero status, and eventual rescue from the West for his deed. And you can tell he is phony versus someone who would genuinely imprison themselves for virtuous reasons (like Nelson Mandela) based on his unwavering support for every US military campaign in history and his extreme unconsciously-chosen self-delusion that Israel has never had a single unprovoked attack against the Palestinians or other Middle Easterners. His level of extremism and intolerance for Islam because it is the religion of the weaker victim gives us a glimpse as to the type of human being he truly is, in my opinion.

    1. ramanan50 Avatar

      Thanks for the input. I shall be posting an article on this

  2. oogenhand Avatar

    Reblogged this on oogenhand.

Leave a Reply

More posts

Discover more from Ramanisblog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading