Faulty Breast Implants for 40,000 – Silicon Rupture Scare

Use of substandard /Industrial Silicon for Breast Implant has erupted into a scandal and about 40,000 women are reported to have done Breast Implant.

The manufacturers are being called into question ans the health hazard is expected to be larger than these figures as European Nations have been affected.

Many Companies are not taking responsibility!

Not to hurt the sentiments of the Business Lobby, the politicians in Power are very circumspect in charging th Companies, by calling this as ‘Faulty goods!’

Women should know better than to go in for these type of surgeries, even if it is reported to be safe for once you meddle with nature, you get a reaction.

Good looks do not last forever, notwithstanding Cosmetic surgeries.

This applies to all Surgeries, including heart Surgeries.

People who opt for Surgeries get more complications than the disease!

 

Around 40,000 British women were known to have been given PIP breast implants that were filled with industrial silicone meant for matress filling.

A further 7,000 women are now thought to be affected by the scandal, the Department of Health said, after it was found that the French company accused of frauduently switching to unauthorised silicone, did so years earlier than previously thought.

It was known that implants made by Poly Implant Prosthese from 2001 contained industrial silicone, but now it is thought the sub-standard material was used prior to this.

Women who have PIP implants, or those who do not know the make of their implants, are being urged to visit their GP for advice.

Most cosmetic surgeons are now offering to remove the faulty implants for free but several large companies are refusing to do so….

So far, it has cost the NHS at least £500,000 with 4,534 women seeking help from the health service.

Most breast implants need to be replaced after ten to 15 years so a proportion of the faulty implants may already have been removed as part of routine replacement operations.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has advised that there is no need to replace the PIPs unless they have ruptured, however most women are so concerned they are asking for them to be taken out.

This week a credit card company refunded the cost of surgery under the Faulty Goods Act.

The Department of Health has ordered two reviews into the situation, one looking specifically at how the PIP implants were approved and the safety of them. The second will look at the regulation of cosmetic surgery more widely.

In December the French authorities decided to recommend that all women there who had PIPs should have them removed and that the Government would pay for the surgery.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9146091/7000-more-British-women-have-faulty-breast-implants-officials-warn.html

 

Silicon Ruture.
Research from the United States has suggested ruptures are more common than is generally reported – often women with an implant experience a ‘silent rupture’ without knowing about it Photo: Patrice Coppee/ ABACAPRESS.COM

“Brussels, 2 February 2012 – Following today’s publication of the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) on the safety of silicone products manufactured by the Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) Company, the European Commission requested to conduct further in-depth study on the potential health impact of faulty breast implants.

The Commission will also discuss with the Member States how surveillance of the medical devices can already be reinforced immediately within the existing legislative framework. In parallel a “stress test” of the legislation on medical devices is under way in order to identify how best the questions raised by this issue can be addressed in the revision of this framework already foreseen for 2012..

Health and Consumers Commissioner, John Dalli said: “In the current situation, patients’ health remains the priority. The opinion published today sums up the current scientific knowledge on this case”. To add : “Furthermore, the Commission will discuss with the Member States a series of immediate measures to strengthen the existing surveillance and safety controls on medical devices already on the market. The capacity to detect and minimize the risk of fraud must be increased”. To conclude : “We had already been working on a revision of the Medical Devices Directive, envisaged for adoption  this spring.  We will now also take into account the lessons learnt from this case and take them on board in redrafting our legislation, in particular with regard to market surveillance, vigilance and functioning of notified bodies.”

Scientists concluded that data available today was insufficient to lead to firm conclusions regarding the health risk for women with PIP silicone breast implants.

The SCENIHR report (requested by the Commission in early January) stresses that, based on the limited data currently available, there is some concern regarding the possibility of inflammation induced by ruptured PIP silicone implants. The report concludes that each case needs to be assessed individually, so theadvice remains that women who are worried should contact their surgeon.

Scientists also recommend that further work be undertaken as a priority to establish with greater certainty any health risks associated with PIP silicone breast implants, in order to ensure that potential risks are properly established, quantified and managed.

With regard to the question of whether the breast implants manufactured by PIP are more prone to failure than those of other manufacturers, SCENIHR said thatPIP implants have been found to vary considerably in composition and as a result are likely to vary substantially in performance characteristics.

SCENIHR concluded on the basis of available data, that many PIP implants were manufactured from non-medical grade silicone. This type of silicone may contain some components that can weaken the implant shell and diffuse into the body tissues.”

http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/12/96&language=EN

 

 Timeline of The Scandal.

January 2001 PIP starts using industrial silicone.

2006 FDA lifts the ban on silicone implants.

2007 Brook Berry, a surgeon in Durham, advises against using PIP implants.

Feb 2009 UK regulatory authority is warned of a number of medical claims.

March 2010 British surgeons ordered to stop using PIP’s silicone implants.

October 2010 Regulators tell surgeons to identify women who were given the implants.

December 2011 French recommend removal of implants, but Britain insists there is no need for such action. Yesterday the Health Secretary ordered an urgent review of safety data.

January 2012 Jean-Claude Mas, the founder of Poly Implant Prothese is arrested as France launches investigation into the scandal

February 2012 NHS bill for dealing with women who had faulty breast implants put in by private clinics reaches £500,000

March 2012 Department of Health announces 7,000 more British women are affected

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9146338/Breast-implant-scandal-timeline-of-how-events-unfolded.html

Comments

One response to “Faulty Breast Implants for 40,000 – Silicon Rupture Scare”

  1. Breast Augmentation in Orlando Avatar

    Interesting article and thanks for sharing. I will repost this on our Twitter, soon.

Leave a Reply

More posts

Discover more from Ramanisblog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading