Ramanisblog

Tag: Theory of Relativity

  • Million Year Proven History Of India A Lie? No. Details

    Million Year Proven History Of India A Lie? No. Details

    Timeline of Indian History is staggering and unbelievable.

    Ramayana,one of the two great Epics of India is now dated around 5114 BC.

    The dating of Ramayana based on Astronomy ,Flora and Fauna descriptions found in the Valmiki Ramayana,pushes its date to million years.

    Hindu texts mention Ramayana date to be in Treta Yuga,which is agreement with Million year dating.

    The same with Mahabharata which took place around six thousand years ago,Dwapara Yuga.

    The remains of Dwaraka city has been dated now at 32,000 years.

    And one finds the deaths of Lord Rama and Krishna are separated by only 200 years!

    But according to Purchase, these two events were separated by about a Million years!

    The Indian language  Tamil is dated around two thousand years ago.

    The remains of the city of Poompuhar,Tamil Nadu pushes the date to 11,000 years ago.

    This is based on ocean floor mapping and carbon dating.

    We find Million year old Kannada Brahmi script in Karnataka.

    Bengal is dated over 25000 years ,so is Thiruvananthapuram,Kerala,India.

    Thiruvannamalai is dated 3.94 Billion years.

    Thirupathi 2100 Million years.

    The point is that all the above conclusions are based from scientific study using advanced methods and equipments in Astronomy,Geology,Infra Red ,Sea floor Mapping,Study of Glaciers and Tectonic shifts.

    Yet,

    If we accept these dates,then we have to discard the present history taught on Evolution,Geology and Anthropology,because during the dates mentioned as Million years the earth was hot and there could have been no life.

    But more evidence compels one to rethink the present history taught.

    Obviously either the world evolved much later as is being taught,or that it  evolved over millions of years  earlier ,as revealed by Hindu texts.

    Interestingly the Age of Earth as explained in Hindu texts is accepted by Geology,that is over a three billion years ago .

    The civilization called Hindu existed as found in Vedic texts.

    Which is true?

    One has to understand the concept of Time and the inadequacy of our Knowledge and Equipments.

    Carbin dating is useless for dating objects over 50,000 years.

    Infra red,Geo Mapping, Tectonic study become useless for Atomic blasts allter the atmosphere and our readings from them are fallacious.

    To our knowledge ,there has been an Atomic blast in Hiroshima and Nagasaki during Second World War.

    We know countries have been conducting Nuclear tests.

    So the evidence from these sources are,as stated earlier, are not reliable.

    So what is the truth?

    This drives one to the Concept of Time.

    We consider Time as Linear.

    That is Time moves forward and in a straight line.

    That is we have yesterday,today and tomorrow.

    Can we say when a day ends and a new day begins?

    We have kept 12 midnight as the end of one day and the beginning of a New Day.

    Why?

    If we had kept 10 am  instead of 12 midnight what will happen?

    Nothing.

    We will be beginning the new day at 10am.

    Then what happened to this 12 ‘o’ clock business?

    Nothing.

    It never was, nor has it disappeared.

    It is only our way of understanding Time by imagining and fixing a cut off time to mark the passage of Time.

    Then we have different Time Zones in the world and some Nations have more than one ,for instance the US.

    Which is the correct Time?

    The Time where we Live is taken as the correct Time for our Environment.

    So our conception of Time is Relative.

    This is the concept of Time as Linear.

    In absolute terms there is no beginning for/of Time or Space.

    Our Mind is not equipped to understand them as they Are.

    Space and Time are the two spectacles through which we Perceive anything.

    You can never think of anything without referring these,Time and Space.

    So in Absolute terms Time and Space can not even be imagined.

    For instance the diameter of Large Cluster Galaxies.

    Their diameter is about 200 to 300 Crore Light years!

    That is 3000000000* the velocity of Light!

    ( light velocity Kilo meters per Hour 1080 million (1.08×109)!

    That we can not imagine it,does not alter the fact.

    So what we understand is limited.

    This applies to everything in the Universe.

    So what is the Truth?

    Time is beginningless ,endless.

    It is indescribable.

    Avaktavya.

    We know it is there but can not describe it.

    Much less understand It.

    When we Perceive,our Perception is limited to/by our senses.

    We Perceive what we can.

    As there are many indiduals,so are Perceptions.

    But our Mind categorises different perceptions of different people,assigns a general frame of1 reference which we accept as acceptable.

    This is to help the organism to Survive.

    From the point of view of the individual,The Limitless Time,Time,in the view of the Perceiver,recoils Itself.

    That Time is an endless cycle,a continuous Flow,

    That there is no past,present and Futre.

    All are either present or All are absent.

    In which case what has happened,continues to happen and will happen.

    So events that happened continue to happen to day and will happen in future.

    In common terms ,as an example,Ramayana,if it had happened is Happening now and will Happen tomorrow.

    And all of them at the same Time.

    This depends on the Perceiver.

    Where and how?

    Quantum mechanics has just proved that,

    An Atom can be present at more places than one At the Same Time,

    When you Perceive a thing yoy Alter it and it Alters you,

    That is one can be present at many places at the same Time.

    That is the dates arrived at for Ramayana, Mahabharata and other history by Indian Texs are true.

    Yet seem to be anamolies by our understanding.

    This is Hindu Thought and Advaita.

    Everything is Illusory ,yet at the same time Real for the Time Frame in which they are Perceived.

    That Everything never was,is Buddhism,Sunyavada.

  • Big Bang Theory Wrong Science

    Once there was Mass, a bunch of Matter.

     

    It became dense, so the Mass became More.

     

    So much More that its Gravity increased to such an extent that it does not allow even Light to escape from it,

     

    At a point of time, because of this immense density the Mass exploded, creating uneven particles.(Big Bang)

     

    Greater the particle, greater the Mass, hence greater density and this attracted more particles.

     

    This is the Big Bang Theory.

     

    Had this been narrated by ordinary people, people would have loved to laugh at the assumptions galore and lack of facts.

     

    Assumptions are made out as Axioms and you are asked to accept them without questioning.

     

    Theories are developed around this nonsense and to our surprise technology using these principle works!

     

     

    Reason Nature does not care nor is it bothered whether some one believes it or finds about it, for it is not obliged to divulge its secrets.

     

    It goes about its job.

     

    Blackhole in Milkyway Galaxy

     

    Fact is that Gravity works whether Ramanan believes it or not, Light waves travel whether you call it Wave, Particle.

     

    It takes another non sense paper to disprove the earlier theory.

     

    Now comes the paper that proves or attempts to prove that Big Bang Theory wrong.

     

    It takes a swipe at Einstein’s Theory as well, which, it is said, is proved.

     

    You do not expect Nature , whose Lifetime is immeasurable,to reveal its Nature, to Man whose average waking Lifetime is hardly 25 years.

     

    Even if you take the aggregate of entire Human population even from earliest civilization, even then it is negligible against Nature.

     

    The disapproval comes from Mathematics, which, though touted as the best Science,is based on Assumptions galore.

     

    ‘Let the children Play’- Nature.

     

    Story:

     

    • Scientist claims she has mathematical proof black holes cannot exist
    • She said it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity
    • Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton said she is still in ‘shock’ from the find
    • Previously, scientists thought stars much larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes when they died
    • During this process they release a type of radiation called Hawking radiation
    • But new research claims the star would lose too much mass and wouldn’t be able to form a black hole
    • If true, the theory that the universe began as a singularity, followed by the Big Bang, could also be wrong

     

     

    If most people know one thing about black holes, they probably know that nothing can escape from them, not even light.

    Yet this most basic tenet about black holes has actually been disproven by the theory of quantum mechanics, explains theoretical physicist Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, NJ, in an essay published online today (Aug. 2) in the journal Science.

    Black holes, in the classical picture of physics, are incredibly dense objects where space and time are so warped that nothing can escape from their gravitational grasp. In another essay in the same issue of Science, theoretical physicist Kip Thorne of Caltech describes them as “objects made wholly and solely from curved spacetime.”

    Yet this basic picture appears to con

    tradict the laws of quantum mechanics, which govern the universe’s tiniest elements.

    “What you get from classical general relativity, and also what everyone understands about a black hole, is that it can absorb anything that comes near, but it can’t emit anything. But quantum mechanics doesn’t allow such an object to exist,” Witten said in this week’s Science podcast.

    In quantum mechanics, if a reaction is possible, the opposite reaction is also possible, Witten explained. Processes should be reversible. Thus, if a person can be swallowed by a black hole to create a slightly heavier black hole, a heavy black hole should be able to spit out a person and become a slightly lighter black hole. Yet nothing is supposed to escape from black holes.

    To solve the dilemma, physicists looked to the idea of entropy, a measurement of disorder or randomness. The laws of thermodynamics state that in the macroscopic world, it’s impossible to reduce the entropy of the universe — it can only increase. If a person were to fall into a black hole, entropy would increase. If the person were to pop back out of it, the universal entropy tally would go down. For the same reason, water can spill out of a cup onto the floor, but it won’t flow from the floor into a cup.

    This principle seems to explain why the process of matter falling into a black hole cannot be reversed, yet it only applies on a macroscopic level

    Citation:http://www.space.com/16867-black-holes-quantum-mechanics-theory.html

     

     

     

    Related articles

  • Greater Gravitation, Live Indefinitely

     

    'Time Dilation'
    Time Dilation

    Einstein’s Theory that Time is not a Constant and and that it Dilates, relative to Gravitation has been proved.

    If the Gravitation pull is less you age slower and if more  you age faster.

    Let’s extend this Logic further.

    If you keep on increasing the G, your longevity increases.

    So at a particular point of Gravitation, you would live indefinitely.

    But the question is shall the object that exerts Gravitation  change with increase in Gravitational pull?

    Does it pull itself?

    What are its states vis-a-vis change in Pull?

    Does the object it pulls change its state based on the Pull exerted on it?

    To understand the seemingly paradoxical Nature of Time please read my Blog

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/einsteins-theory-is-proved–and-it-is-bad-news-if-you-own-a-penthouse-2088195.html  and check blogs under Time/Astrophysics.

    Story:

    The world’s most accurate clock has neatly shown how right Albert Einstein was 100 years ago, when he proposed that time is a relative concept and the higher you live above sea level the faster you should age.

    Einstein’s theory of relativity states that time and space are not as constant as everyday life would suggest. He suggested that the only true constant, the speed of light, meant that time can run faster or slower depending on how high you are, and how fast you are travelling.

    Now scientists have demonstrated the true nature of Einstein’s theory for the first time with an incredibly accurate atomic clock that is able to keep time to within one second in about 3.7 billion years – roughly the same length of time that life has existed on Earth.

    James Chin–Wen Chou and his colleagues from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colorado, found that when they monitored two such clocks positioned just a foot apart in height above sea level, they found that time really does run more quickly the higher you are – just as Einstein predicted.

    “These precise clocks reveal the effects of gravitational pull, so if we position one clock closer to a planet, you also increase the gravitational pull and time actually runs slower than for another, similar clock positioned higher up,” Dr Chou said. “No one has seen such effects before with clocks which is why we wanted to see if these effects are there. We would say our results agree with Einstein’s theory – we weren’t expecting any discrepancies and we didn’t find any,” he explained.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/einsteins-theory-is-proved–and-it-is-bad-news-if-you-own-a-penthouse-2088195.html

    Related:

    http://ramanisblog.in/2012/06/19/time-will-stop-completely/

     

     

  • Einstein Wrong? NO.

    These apparent contradictions are due to the assumption Light is the fastest particle known to us.

    This assumption need not be correct.

    I remember having read somewhere Einstein having said that if a particle were to travel faster than Light it no longer remains Matter.

    An interesting observation.

    The observable Universe/Light is possible when the Observer and the Observed remain in the same plane.

    If the velocity of the Observed is greater than the Observer He can not observe it, but can only deduce it.

    In that case it does not stand to verification by strict scientific standards.

    It moves then to the Realm of Philosophy, the Mother of Sciences.

    The present concept can be better understood if one were to accept the Cyclic Theory of Time,which allows for particles to exist at different planes,different velocities.

     Findings of Quantum Theory supports this Concept..

    Please read my blog, Time-non linear theory.

    Another point.

    What we perceive is conditioned by Perception.

    The Concept of Perception is still not very clear.

    Hence what we perceive is  limited by Space and Time.

    None can form a thought with out reference to Space and Time.

    And we are yet to define Space and Time correctly.!

    So our knowledge is limited..

    Any Theory we have of anything is of Utilititarian value only.

    Our perception of the Universe does not change  the Universe and the frequent reversal of our theories of Physical Laws do not affect the Universe in the least .

    Please read my blog on Perception.

    However all Theories are correct from their Perspective, including Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and Finite Theory..

    If a finding released Thursday by scientists in Geneva proves to be true, the world’s most famous equation – Albert Einstein‘sE=MC2 – could be moot, undoing our current understanding of the physical world.

    Einstein revealed that equation in his special theory of relativityreleased in 1905. It asserted that energy equals mass times the speed of light squared, and helped shape our understanding of the physical world.

    The scientists in Geneva fired a beam of neutrinos – elementary particles which don’t hold an electrical charge and pass through ordinary matter with virtually no interaction – from CERN‘S particle accelerator to a lab in Italy about 730 kilometers away.

    The speed of light is 299,792.458 kilometers per second. The Geneva scientists found their sub-atomic particles traveled to Italy 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light – or 300,006 kilometers per second.

    That appears to break the limit set by Einstein.

    http://blogs.voanews.com/science-world/2011/09/23/was-einstein-wrong/

    Related.

    Theoretical Basis for Special Relativity

    Einstein’s theory of special relativity results from two statements — the two basic postulates of special relativity:

    1. The speed of light is the same for all observers, no matter what their relative speeds.
    2. The laws of physics are the same in any inertial (that is, non-accelerated) frame of reference. This means that the laws of physics observed by a hypothetical observer traveling with a relativistic particle must be the same as those observed by an observer who is stationary in the laboratory.

    Given these two statements, Einstein showed how definitions of momentum and energy must be refined and how quantities such as length and time must change from one observer to another in order to get consistent results for physical quantities such as particle half-life.  To decide whether his postulates are a correct theory of nature, physicists test whether the predictions of Einstein’s theory match observations. Indeed many such tests have been made — and the answers Einstein gave are right every time!

    The Speed of Light is the same for all observers.

    The first postulate — the speed of light will be seen to be the same relative to any observer, independent of the motion of the observer — is the crucial idea that led Einstein to formulate his theory. It means we can define a quantity c, the speed of light, which is a fundamental constant of nature.

    Note that this is quite different from the motion of ordinary, massive objects. If I am driving down the freeway at 50 miles per hour relative to the road, a car traveling in the same direction at 55 mph has a speed of only 5 mph relative to me, while a car coming in the opposite direction at 55 mph approaches me at a rate of 105 mph. Their speed relative to me depends on my motion as well as on theirs.

    Physics is the same for all inertial observers.

    This second postulate is really a basic though unspoken assumption in all of science — the idea that we can formulate rules of nature which do not depend on our particular observing situation. This does not mean that things behave in the same way on the earth and in space, e.g. an observer at the surface of the earth is affected by the earth’s gravity, but it does mean that the effect of a force on an object is the same independent of what causes the force and also of where the object is or what its speed is.

    Einstein developed a theory of motion that could consistently contain both the same speed of light for any observer and the familiar addition of velocities described above for slow-moving objects. This is called the special theory of relativity, since it deals with the relativemotions of objects.

    http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/relativity.html

  • Theory of Relativity visualized.

    Please visit the linked site.
    Also read my blog on this’Time-non-linear Theory’

    http://www.spacetimetravel.org/Story:
    Relativity visualized
    The theory of relativity holds a certain fascination for many people. At the same time it is often regarded as very abstract and difficult to understand.

    Part of the difficulties in understanding relativity are due to the fact that relativistic effects contradict everyday experience. Motion, for example, is a familiar process and everybody “knows from experience” that it entails neither time dilation nor length contraction. A flight with half the speed of light could correct this misjudgement but is not on offer.

    A possible alternative are simulations. Images, films and virtual reality let us in a sense experience relativistic flights, gravitational collapse, compact objects and other extreme conditions