Tag: Supreme court of India

  • Indian Defense Ministry Forges Court Orders

    There are quite a few scams that go unnoticed, like the Thorium being stolen in Tamil Nadu.

    Forging Court Orders
    Defense Ministry Forges

    Please read my post on this.

    We also know of Adarsh Scam,2G,ISRO, Antrix Devas,CWG,Maharashtra Irrigation.Kalaignar TV,Mining scams in Goa Karnataka……. the list is endless, not to forget Westland Helicopter scam in which Sonia Gandhi was named in an Italian Court.

    Most of us imagine that if the Court delivers a verdict or instructs the Government the issue is taken care of.

    It is another matter that the Government through CBI may with draw, close the case or even the Courts fudging the issue.

    But how many of us know that the Government, after receiving Court Orders does not follow the action advised by the Court but worse, changes Court’s orders?

    Or that it simply ignores them merrily and goes ahead exactly in the opposite direction?

    The Ministry o f Defense ,India , through its Secretary changes the Court’s Order to suit the Government!

    And the black listed Firms for Corruption are not blacklisted but are on the active list of approved vendors?

    Read this fraud perpetrated on the Defence Personnel.

    Shashi Kant Sharma, erstwhile Defence Secretary (now CAG) is to stand in the Supreme Court on 13th February 2014 along with his other cronies from MaD in response to SC summons in wake of a 49-page contempt petition filed by the Retired Defence Officers Association (RDOA) in the apex court over non-implementation of the court’s September 2012 order – summons that came in wake of non-implementation of the SC order to MoD (read MaD) to pay the dues it owes to the former defence officers vide the said SC order. It is quite public by now that the ‘rank pay case’ was initially fought by Major Dhanapalan and later RODA too took up the case and moved the court. After years of legal battle, the SC had envisaged re-fixation of pay for all affected military officers for Rank Pay with effect from 1st January 1986 – the date of implementation of the Fourth Pay Commission. However, the MaD in its implementation order of the December 2012, based on the SC verdict, very mischievously changed it to “as on 1st January 1986” – while Shashi Kant Sharma was the Defence Secretary. The SC summons say, “You shall attend the court in person and shall continue to attend the court on all days thereafter to which the case against you stands adjourned and until final orders are passed on the charge against you. Herein fail not.”

    Whether Shashi Kant Sharma will be present in SC on 13th February or feign a heart attack like Musharraf is not known but what he and his MaD cronies symbolize is the essence of the MaD Club’s contempt to those in uniform plus those who have hung up their boots. This is also the reason why they have been stonewalling all attempts to rectify the politico-military disconnect. There was talk of rewarding Sharma’s services to the mafia in breaking the institutional integrity of the military and concert with Goolam Vahanvati, the Attorney General. While the latter got an extended tenure, this can hardly be the only reason for Sharma to be appointed CAG anyway. The surprising part is that despite willfully committing contempt of the SC order with respect to the rank pay case and the fact that the contempt notice was sent when Sharma was still the Defence Secretary, he was still appointed to the high constitutional post of CAG. So the services that Sharma rendered to the ‘supreme mafia’ must have been of very exceptional order indeed. The real reasons perhaps will never been known but maybe one of the reason could be that Sharma happened to be the DG (Acquisition) of MoD when the Augusta Westland Helicopter deal was signed in 2010. Now it quite logical that it is the DG (Acquisition) who signs papers, negotiates the cuts and decides who gets what including the delivery mode. So when India has already paid 45 percent of the deal value, it is no way the deal would have been signed without the ‘cuts’ on the total deal (100 percent) having been delivered at required destinations. So, no one is fooled by the amount mentioned with respect to the Tyagi brothers which is small pocket change. Then, the Augusta Westland helicopter scam is a recent case. Shashi Kant Sharma was in the MaD club for over a decade. So, his ‘exceptional services’ would have gone way beyond the above two issues when so many more major defence acquisitions were made.

    The Augusta Westland deal has been cancelled and probably one odd guy will be asked to return his / her cut that will be quietly made known to the environment, like it happened when the Eurocopter deal was cancelled and just one fellow was asked to return a few million Euros but then immediately given solid immunity by moving him as Governor. So in the Augusta Westland helicopter deal too, the balance will retain the moolah as part of future investment that is adjustable at the international arms industry level. And yes, the probe agencies would not dare to question top bureaucrats like Defence Secretary without government approval but then who do you think constitutes the ‘supreme mafia’? If you still are wondering then perhaps you need to read Gen. VK Singh’s autobiography that tells you that the corruption trail from MoD goes right up to the PMO. You would probably dub it a flight of fancy especially since we have such a clean Defence Minster but then you get wondering if the reported losses in crores of Air India includes the Rs 28 crores paid to the Defence Minister’s spouse by AAI for four of her paintings to be put up at civil airports. The appointment of CAG is arbitrary by the government, whereas the selection should be through a committee / collegiums constituted for the purpose. Then what about the Defence Minister’s penchant to ban firms at the drop of a hat and pray what is the criteria for lifting the blacklisting? Who does the inquiry and examination? Since it is all in-house you can well assume what the main criteria would be? This was a classic query with regard to the 155mm gun displayed at DEFEXPO 14 by Denel, a firm till recently blacklisted. Look at the manner in which the procurement of the Barak anti-air systems approved in 1997 for our Navy was kept in abeyance for several years.

    Historically, the foundation of MaD can be traced to the Nehru’s disdain for the military and Krishna Menon, his blue-eyed Defence Minister who masterminded the first defence scam of independent India (Jeep Scandal), brought the country to shame in 1962 by ignoring basic military equipping, and yet ended up with a road in the heart of New Delhi Krishna Menon Marg) replete with his bust installed on a pedestal and an annual garlanding ceremony.

     http://www.theindianrepublic.com/tbp/secrets-mad-100026533.html#sthash.EyaTzQxN.dpufD

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Radia 2 G Tapes Trigger Corporate IT Involvement Probe

    I have written some posts,about 80, filed under Radia Tapes,Karunanidhi providing a detailed analysis  of the 2 G scam and the other criminality involved.

    It has taken years for the Supreme Court of India to realize that there has been sleaze all around.

    The Corruption, manipulation and absolute misuse of Government machinery by the Corporate Houses is mind-boggling confirming the fact that the country is for the taking  by the moneyed, aided by the Bureaucrats and politicians.

    Corporate corruption, India.
    2 G Scam triggers more probes

    Now the Supreme Court has asked the CBI to investigate some more case, which involves Corporate and the Income Tax Department.

    It has come to light, which should have been at the first instance of listening to the Tapes,that there have been more deals fixed by Radia than the mere 2 G fraud.

    Income Tax department went out-of-the-way to favor her, even after the 2G Scam surfaced and the trial was on!

    These are the cases , where the Supreme Court case feels that there is a prima facie ground for a detailed inquiry.

    ‘ It is that the court has prima-facie found sufficient reason for a more detailed probe into these deals. They are:

    * Supply of low-floor buses by Tata Motors to Tamil Nadu Government under the Centre’s JNNURM scheme

    * Appointment of Pradip Baijal, ex-chairman of TRAI, as chairman Pipeline Advisory Committee

    * Allotment of coal blocks to Anil Ambani Group’s Sasan Ultra Mega Power Project

    * Allotment of iron ore mines at Ankua, Singhbhum district of Jharkhand, to Tata steel

    * Favours shown by V K Sibal, then Director General of Hydrocarbon to RIL and quid pro quo received

    * Fudging of subscribers base/record by Reliance Communication, ADAG company and submission of the same to Bombay Stock Exchange and TRAI to save money

    * Working of touts middlemen and kickbacks in the aviation sector

    * Market manipulation and hammering of stocks of Unitech

    “The conversations between Ms Nira Radia and her associates with various persons suggest that unscrupulous elements have used corrupt means to secure favours from the Government officers, who appear to have acted for extraneous considerations,” the bench said as it set a 60-day deadline for the CBI to look into the controversial deals.

    Besides, the bench has also sent notice to the chief vigilance officer, ministry of mines, for taking appropriate action on “allotment of iron ore mine to Reliance ADAG group without having any steel plant.”

    A Chartered Accountant, who was working as a tout of the IT department  is to be probed as well(PTI in Twitter)

    These scams are like Sindbad’s story, never-ending.

    I am sure nothing will come out of this. excepting some high decibel debates in the News Channels, a farce of an enquiry and the corruption juggernaut rolls on.

    More on this from Business Standard.

    The court has ordered Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry into 14 most serious cases, involving top industrialists and bureaucrats. One issue, which relates to corruption/malpractice in judiciary/judges/tribunals, etc, has been referred to the Chief Justice of India, while another, on “allotment of iron ore mine to Reliance ADA group without having any steel plant”, will be looked into by the Chief Vigilance Officer of the mines ministry.

    These issues were brought out in two reports prepared at the instance of the court, one consisting of officials from the Department of Revenue of the finance ministry and the other by an inter-ministerial committee. They had prepared 17 such issues. (SC ORDER EXPLAINED)

    A Bench of judges G S Singhvi and Justice V Gopal Gowda directed CBI to make inquiries and file its report within two months.

    CBI’s reports will be given to a new Bench on December 16 that will not include Justice Singhvi, who retires on December 11.

    The issues to be probed include favours allegedly shown to top corporate houses like Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Industries Ltd, Anil Ambani’s Reliance ADA Group and the Tatas, working of touts, kickbacks in the aviation sector, manipulation of Unitech’s stocks and illegal gratification paid to tax officers.

    Holding that the taped conversations suggest “unscrupulous elements have used corrupt means to secure favours from government officers”, the court has directed the probe on various issues, including “favours” shown by V K Sibal, the then director general of hydrocarbons, to RIL and quid-pro-quo received. It has also ordered a CBI probe into the allotment of coal blocks to the Sasan ultra mega power project, run by Reliance ADA Group, and allotment of Iron ore mines at Ankua, in Singhbhum District of Jharkhand to Tata Steel.”

    http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/radia-tapes-sc-asks-cbi-to-probe-six-companies-and-tax-officials-113101900542_1.html

    Related:

    The Radia Tapes and Transcript.

    Following is the available 140 tapes of Radia .( with transcripts)

    As the tapes are being removed from  most of the sites, I am publishing them here.

    All the 140 available audio — a work in progress with transcripts getting added on an ongoing basis and names being identified, added and corrected.

    https://ramanisblog.in/2011/02/26/140-radia-tapes-audio-with-transcripts/

    https://ramanisblog.in/category/radia-tapes-2/

     

  • Aarushi Murder Tehelka In Defence of Talwars

    Aarushi Murder Case.
    Aarushi Murder Case.

    The Aarushi double murder case has been bewildering  from the beginning.

    I have been posting on the developments as they unfolded.

    I have in the last post mentioned that Rajesh Talwar’s DNA had to be checked and matched with the DNA found on Aarushi’s pillow.

    This does not have come t pass.

    The CBI though wanted to close due to insufficient evidence in the first attempt’ later charge sheeted the Talwars as the accused.

    Now Tehelka comes with a piece questioning the decision of the CBI Court, Magistrate Court and the Supreme Court on the ground that thirteen witnesses, asked to be examined by the Talwars were not allowed to be examined.

    The article also says that two explosive discoveries on the Narco tests on Krishna were found and states that it would deal with them later in the story.

    But no further information on this is provided.

    The main arguments that the Talwars are not guilty , apart from a syrupy wailing prose are

    1.That “So: two parents with no former history of dysfunctionality or rage are accused of butchering their only child.”

    So if you can be punished only if you have a history of Dysfunctionality or Rage?

    2.That they have not been allowed to cross-examine 13 witnesses, when after the case is over in the first instance and in the second after a thorough examination of witnesses, some 39 of them.

    If one keeps on asking for witnesses as an afterthought after the case is over , or even closed. when will a trial end?.

    3.Insinuation by a Journalist ,As Avirook Sen, a journalist who has been attending the trial regularly, writing sharp reports for the Mumbai Mirror, says, “According to me, the  never intended to go for a trial. But when a trial was ordered, they just had to extemporise the evidence along the way. Now, with each passing day in court, they are getting more and more invested in their own story.’

    Is no ground for acquittal.

    4.Why there are no answers for some questions I have raised?On Feb 10,2011.

    Why don’t you answer the following questions?

    Why do you communicate with your daughter through  email when she is in the next room?

    How was the evidence dressed up?

    Why Aarushi’s cuts bore the precision of a Surgeon?

    Why was the doctor asked not to report rape?

    If your conscience is clean you would not be talking like this, rather you would be cooperating with the authorities as a father would.

    Well, a Father would.(http://ramanisblog.in/2011/02/10/indiaa-banana-republic-aarushis-father/)

    Some more question I raised on 7 January 2012,

    Right from day one from the date of murder of Aarushi who was brutally murdered in New Delhi, the needle of suspicion has been pointing out the parents.
    The father was communicating with his daughter through emails though they lived in the same house .
    As the child was being murdered, she definitely have raised a hue and cry.
    Yet the parents did not hear them , though they were in their bed room next door!
    The body has been dragged to the top floor of the house and they did not hear any thing.
    The house was locked from the inside, yet there were no signs of forced entry.
    The father asked the Doctor doing the post mortem to tamper with the Report.
    The investigating Officer of the case was transferred.
    The parents made a show of despair ,hanks to TV Channels.

    At last the Supreme Court has sanctioned prosecution.
    It is imperative that the case be disposed of at the earliest(http://ramanan50.blogspot.in/2012/01/arushis-parents-to-be-indicted-at-last.html)

    4.Who had the Investigating officer removed, the domestic helps?

    5.There a whine that Narco Analysis Test results are not allowed  in the court.

    So…?

    The amount of power one can pull through Media is disgusting.

    Read the complete set of stories on Aarushi case, from my sites and elsewhere and decide for yourself whether a Father and Mother would have behaved the way the Talwars did, without answering any of the basic questions any one can sk, no legal training or Journalistic acumen is required.

    http://ramanisblog.in/2012/08/09/dna-on-aarushi-talwars-pillow-covermatch-rajesh-talwars/

    http://www.tehelka.com/framed-the-aarushi-hemraj-murder-case-an-investigation/

    http://mrwhatis.net/aarushis-story.html

  • Coal Scam Deleted Portions Implicate Manmohan Singh

    The tampering of the Records of the Coalgate scam.

     

    The Government doctored portions of the CBI Report for which the Supreme Court of India castigated the CBI , relate to the Coal block allocation made during the tenure of Manmohan Singh in 2006 and 2009.

    It is not strange for this is the ‘Honest’ Prime Minister who gave a clean chit to A.Raja for 2 G scam well ahead of the enquiry.

    He is also the Man who held ‘Paperless discussions with p.Chidambaram, then finance Minister and A.Raja!

    A careful reading of the deleted portions seem to convey the message that there isan attempt to impliacte and expose the Pm,Manmohan Singh

    Had people kept quiet on ‘the non existence of mechnaism’, the issue would not have surfaced!

    “Notably, most of the changes were made in the PE (preliminary enquiry) No. 2 which dealt with the allocations made during 2006 and 2009 when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was in charge of coal ministry.
    “Why was everybody interested in PE 2 only,” is the obvious query of the apex court….

    According to advocate and social activist Sudiep Shrivastava, the second PE was launched by the CBI on a CVC reference following complaints made by BJP MPs Prakash Javadekar and Hansraj Ahir, who were interested in exposing the irregularities committed only during 2006 and 2009.
    The CBI’s status report on preliminary enquiry (PE) 4 on coal block allocations made during 1993 and 2005 was also altered.
    Sinha disclosed in his affidavit that the CBI’s finding that there was no system during 2006 and 2009 regarding allocation of specific weightage/points was deleted by officials from the PMO and coal ministry.
    In contrast, both the joint secretary-level officials incorporated a sentence in the final status report on PE 4 highlighting the non-existence of approved guidelines for allocation of coal blocks…

    A sentence dealing with the scope of inquiry with respect to legality of allocation even when  amendments to the law were in process, was also deleted by the then Minister himself.
    Both the drafts of the status report – before and after the doctoring – have been filed in the court in a sealed cover.
    If one refers to the Comptroller and Auditor General’s (CAG) report, it is noted that during the period 2006 and 2009, the screening committee made allocations of coal blocks to a particular allotee “in an arbitrary manner and for extraneous considerations”.
    The screening committee was to go by minutes of its meetings. “However, there was nothing on record in the said minutes or in other documents on any comparative evaluation of the applicants for a coal block, which was relied upon by the screening committee. Minutes of the committee did not indicate how each one of the applicants for a particular coal block was evaluated,” the CAG states.

    http://www.deccanherald.com/content/331818/cbi-its-masters-voice.html

    Related:

    This nails the recent statement of TRAI that it has not said anything about new set of Rules to DoT or Finance Ministry.

    The page could also contain information about the role of the then Finance Minister,P.Chidambaram.

    Is this a leak organised by Pranab Mukherjee after ‘patch up’ with Chidambaram.

    Note that these actions on the part of CBI are after Sonia became active.

    http://ramanisblog.in/2011/10/07/papers-missing-from-2g-filessupreme-court/

     

  • 2 G CBI Drops Mittal Name, More To Follow On Coal Gate.

    It is quite some time that I wrote on 2G, as there was a lull.

    But I was sure the news will pick up as the Elections draw near.

    One is necessity of Funds for The election and the other for Poll Alliances.

    The first is to fill up the party’s Coffers and the second to cajole or blackmail the allies or would be allies.

    It is learnt that the CBI has dropped the Name of Mittal from the charge sheet on the 2 G case.

    There is another news that the CBI officials met with the powers Be and the PMO and the law Ministry whetted the Chargesheet on Coalgate.

    Isn’t the Supreme Court of India monitoring the 2G case?

    Long live Democracy!

    Story:

    2G information
    2G information

    The CBI has come under fire following allegations that its former director A P Singh ordered the name of billionaire telecom tycoon Sunil Bharti Mittal to be dropped from the investigation into the 2G spectrum allocation scandal.

    The Telecom Watchdog moving the Supreme Court (SC) against the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for not including the billionaire’s name in the charge sheet.

    Telecom Watchdog in its affidavit has alleged that former CBI director AP Singh overruled the CBI’s investigating team to drop Mittal’s name from the case merely a week before his retirement.

    Teelcom Watchdog secretary Anil Kumar told Mail Today that the case would come up for hearing in the apex court on Monday and heard along with the bail plea filed by Mittal in the SC.

    The NGO has submitted photocopies of what it claims to be CBI’s documents to back its charge. It has alleged that the CBI team had gathered evidence to show that Mittal had played crucial role in getting the excess spectrum for Bharti Cellular, which is now known as Bharti Airtel, in 2002, when late Pramod Mahajan was the telecom minister and Shyamal Ghosh the telecom secretary.

    Telecom Watchdog has also alleged that CBI special director V K Gupta, who was in charge of the investigation, has in a letter to the new director Ranjit Sinha stated that he was kept out of the loop as the file was not put up to him at the crucial last stage.

    The CBI is in the process of filing an affidavit before the apex court accepting that the status report it filed last month had been vetted by both the law ministry as well as the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).

    This is in response to the Supreme Court asking the CBI director to state in an affidavit that the report had not been “shared with the political executive”.

    The CBI deserves praise for its move to come clean before the judiciary.

    Officials of the agency had resisted the law ministry’s efforts to change its contents but were prevailed upon to tone down the status report.

    While this may be explainable given the present system under which the agency functions, the CBI will be doing the cause of probity great service by accepting as much under oath.

    Such an admission is sure to bring the spotlight back on the United Progressive Alliance government which has consistently denied any wrongdoing even as it has been embroiled in a series of corruption scandals in recent years.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2308629/MAIL-TODAY-COMMENT-Government-influencing-CBI-report-gives-game-away.html#ixzz2QWyMlWd8