Why Vande Madaram Was Dropped As Indian National Anthem

I wrote an article that Indian National Anthem ‘Jana Gana Mana’ written by Rabindranath Tagore was originally written in praise of King George IV.


Vande Madaram by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee.


While there were favorable comments,there have been few criticisms.

I shall write on the explanation provided by Tagore in another post.

In the meanwhile there isca lot of heat with a group calling for Indians to hail India as ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’- Victory unto Bharat(India)’ , Mother.

Predictability Muslims refused this saying that they will not as their Religion forbids worshiping any one other than Allah.


The other side calls them unpatriotic.

During the Freedom Struggle the song Vande Madaram was sung to rouse people and it was quite popular.

There was a concerted move to have this song as Indian National  Anthem.

As expected Muslims objected to this.

Now read on,

But as communalism aggravated, its ‘importance’ got pumped up. The Hindu Mahasabha organised a ‘Vande Mataram Day’ in October 1937. In March 1938, Jinnah wrote: “Muslims all over [India] have refused to accept Bande Mataram… as a binding national anthem.” It was clear the freedom fighters would have to stall these ‘divide and rule’ tactics.

Subhas Chandra Bose and Jawaharlal Nehru approached Tagore for advice. In a remarkable letter to Bose, Tagore wrote: “The core of BM is a hymn to goddess Durga: this is so plain that there can be no debate about it… no Mussulman can be expected patriotically to worship the ten-handed deity as ‘Swadesh’….The novelAnandamath is a work of literature, and so the song is appropriate in it. But, Parliament is a place of union for all religious groups, and there the song cannot be appropriate…” In a post script, he added: “…[S]ince there are strong feelings on both sides, a balanced judgment is essential. In pursuit of our political aims we want peace, unity and good will — we do not want the endless tug of war…”

Not surprisingly, both Tagore and Gandhi came under attack from zealots. However, the national leadership stood firm. By end-October 1937, the Congress Working Committee, which included Nehru, Bose, Vallabhbhai Patel and Abul Kalam Azad, declared that “…[the first two stanzas] described in tender language the beauty of motherland… absolutely nothing in them to which objection could be from the religious or any other point of view…” However, they stated that “[the other stanzas] contain certain allusions and a religious ideology which may not be in keeping with the ideology of other religious groups in India. The Committee recognises the validity of the objection raised by Muslim friends to certain parts of the song… [T]aking all things into consideration therefore, the Committee recommend that wherever the BM is sung at national gatherings only the first two stanzas should be sung with perfect freedom to the organisers to sing any other song of an unobjectionable character…”

A sub-committee was constituted to decide which other songs could be sung at formal gatherings. Thus, while BM remained in use as a slogan, the song per se was sent into ‘retirement’ by the finest of Indians. This was no easy choice, given that many of them had a personal attachment to it. But they were pragmatic enough to banish their ‘musical weapon’ rather than allow the enemy to misuse it.’

This is it.

One should not waste time in trying to tell Muslims what  one should do.

They are beyond Nation.

Beyond country’s Laws.

One cacan not force a guest/ refugee to follow the Nation’s ethos.

For them their ‘Umma’ comes first.


Citation and reference.



  • Thanks my friend for the fine justification you have given. In our faith no one is superior to GOD, not even parents, even in sanathan dharm mother is said to be like God but not God itself. In Islam , technically if I have I need anything I have to directly pray to God without any intercessions, which means none next to God. Since you may understand Sanskrit, Vande Matar means I bow to you my motherland, referring to a form of prayer. Hence Muslims don’t prefer it. Also Bharat Mata ki Jay, is against our core faith, where only GOD the supreme being is ‘Jay ‘- the greatest, all praiseworthy.


  • It is a pity that Indians are shy of projecting the correct history. It is amazing to find that INTELLECTUALS are so foolish tha they cannot think of India other than FIFTEENTH CENTURY VIJAYANAGAR/PESHWA HINDUSTAN. Jambudwipa is the common name found in JAIN/BUDDHIST/HINDU LITERATURE. Further India was also known as BHARAKHANDA in all these lores. Tamil literature refer this only as NAVALANTHEEVU. North Indians are suffering from the phobia of HINDUSTANI–identification of MOGHUL INDIA rather than pre Moghul India. The earler geographers of GREEK AND EARLY CHRISTIAN TIMES considered INDIES a term referred to ETHIPIA and treated ony as an extention of ETHIPIA. Even now there is serious doubt about reference of India in GENESIS and whether India ia a part of PEOPLE OF BOOK–DESCENDENTS OF NOAH FROM HAM/SHEM/JAPYIT. AFRICANS are considered as descendents of HAM and HIDA referred as part of SHEEBA was considered as India under the control o Ethiopia. Even after these interpretations historians wantonly misinterpreted the term INDIA as referred to SINDH. Actually SINDHU in Sanskrit referred to MOON/WATER/OCEAN and later identified as SIND PROVINCE. Even during the time of MARCOPOLA GUZARAT/MALABAR/MABAR were separately identified. But the MOGHULS completely converted this country as HIND AND HINDUSTANI the reason is only known to them.Hind does not have historical background. On the other hand BHARATA has a long historical background in this country. That is why MANONMANIAM SUNDARANAR even early as 1898D uses this BHARATA in this famous THAMILTHAI VAZHTHU and further used by BHARATHIYAR before 1920 AD. The use of word BHARATA is in Southern region for more than at least one hundred and twenty five years old. Even MARUDU BROTHERS in the clarion call for ousting BRITISHERS uses this term as BHARATHA AND NAVALANTHEEVU.i.e., more than two hundred years old. The point is do the NORTH INDIAN MUSLIMS reject SOUTH INDIA in particular TAMILNADU as part of this great country. They should clarify. When the LTTE MASACCRED AND DRIVEN SRI LANKAN MUSLIMS the North Indian Muslim sremained silent and did not issue fatwa against LTTE. Why don’t North IndianMuslims object singing hymn praisisng TAMIL MOTHER? The inention is clear. They don’t bother about SOUTH INDIA particularly TAMILNADU. In their opinion HIND means only region north of VINDHYAS.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.