On the eve of World War II, SBC was the recipient of large influxes of foreign funds for safekeeping. Just prior to the outbreak of World War II, in 1939, Swiss Bank Corporation made the timely decision to open an office in New York City.[6] The office was able to begin operations, located in the Equitable Building, just weeks after the outbreak of the war and was intended as a safe place to store assets in case of an invasion.[7] During the war, the bank’s traditional business fell off and the Swiss government became its largest client.[3] Overall, SBC saw its business grow as a result of its wartime government underwriting business…..
Decades after the war, it was demonstrated that Swiss Bank Corporation likely took an active role in trading stolen gold, securities and other assets during World War II.[8]
This Bank held the money of Nazis during World War II and dealt with Nazis and had the Deposits of Gold that has been robbed by the Nazis from the Jews.
In 1997,World Jewish Congress filed a Law suit against Swiss Bank Corporation and the Bank through its successors settled a sum of $1.25 Billions.
Such is the Company Rajiv Gandhi,Karunanidhi,A.Raja,P.Chidambaram and Kalanidhi Maran keep!
The truth is visible to everybody except the Government of India.
Instead of taking action it is hiding behind euphemisms like ‘secret, ‘bilateral arrangements,diplomatic relations’ etc.’
Story:
India’sunderground economy is closely tied to illicit financial outflows. The total present value of India’s illicit assets held abroad ($462 billion) accounts for approximately 72 percent of India’s underground economy. This means that almost three-quarters of the illicit assets comprising India’s underground economy—which has been estimated to account for 50 percent of India’s GDP (approximately $640 billion at the end of 2008)—ends up outside of the country. (vii, 19)
The finding that only 27.8 percent of India’s illicit assets are held domestically support arguments that the desire to amass wealth illegally without attracting government attention is one of the primary motivations behind the cross-border transfer of illicit capital. (vii, 19)
In the post-reform period of 1991-2008, deregulation and trade liberalization accelerated the outflow of illicit money from the Indian economy. Opportunities for trade mispricing grew and expansion of the global shadow financial system—particularly island tax havens—accommodated the increased outflow of India’s illicit capital flight. (Introduction)
There is a statistical correlation between larger volumes of illicit flows and deteriorating income distribution. (35)
Recommendations.
Tax evasion is a major component of the underground economy, which in turn is a primary driver of India’s illicit outflows. Expanding India’s tax base and improving tax collection has high potential to curtail illicit flows.
Illicit financial flows cannot be curtailed without the collaborative effort of both developing and developed countries. Economic reforms key to stemming the outflow of illicit money from India and the developing world in general include:
curtail trade mispricing (a widely utilized tax avoidance technique of international businesses);
New York —Nigeria might have lost $130 billion from 2000-2008 to illicit financial flows, a new report issued by US-based group, Global Financial Integrity, GFI, said.
The report entitled “Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2000-2009,” said Nigeria had the 10th highest measured illicit outflows in the developing world, an average of $15 billion per year.
The North America Correspondent of the News Agency of Nigeria, NAN, reports that the GFI report ranks countries according to magnitude of illicit outflows.
According to the report, China is ranked the highest country of measured illicit outflows in the developing world with 2.18 trillion dollars, followed by Russia; 427 billion dollars and Mexico, 416 billon dollars.
The report also shows the annual outflows for each country and breaks outflows down into two categories of drivers: trade mispricing and “other,” which includes “kickbacks, bribes, embezzlement, and other forms of official corruption.”
Others in the top 10 are Saudi Arabia $302 billion; Malaysia $291 billion; United Arab Emirates $276 billion; Kuwait $242 billion; Venezuela $157 billion and Qatar $138 billion.
Primary findings from the report said illicit outflows increased from $1.06 trillion in 2006 to approximately $1.26 trillion in 2008.
Seems that this is a plant to let the real culprits get away;typical Black Operation.
The money the accounts are supposedly holding, at least the Trusts, as CNN IBN points out is negligible when compared to the scams unearthed.
It is almost two years since the German Government had passed on the names and bank account details of eighteen Indians who had stashed their alleged ill-gotten wealth in the LGT bank of Liechtenstein, a well-known tax haven nation, 190 km from Munich, Germany.
TEHELKA has accessed 16 of the 18 names, of which we are putting out 15 right now. These names include individuals as well as trusts. At this point, we are putting out 15 names without disclosing details like their addresses, the businesses they are involved in and the total money they have stored away in Liechtenstein. Abiding by the basic journalistic principle of proving the accused an opportunity to present their side of story, TEHELKA has approached each of these individuals involved and is awaiting their response.
Once these individuals respond, we shall share the full details of who these people are and what they do. We shall also put out their responses. This, then, is the list.
The three trusts in this list are registered outside India.
The government has been claiming so far that a detailed investigation into all the bank account details provided by Germany is underway and making the names public would violate the agreement between two sovereign countries, India and Germany.
According to highly placed sources, the investigation into the 15 names that TEHELKA is disclosing, is close to completion and the Central Board of Direct taxes would soon prosecute these trusts and individuals under the relevant provisions of the Income tax Act.
The sources told TEHELKA that the two main charges proved against these individuals are of tax evasion and concealment of income.
The authorities also believe that some of these account holders could be fronts for high profile individuals. One name in particular is being investigated for suspected links with a well-known Indian politician.
The name of the chairman of a major Indian corporation is also part of the list, but TEHELKA is holding back his name until we have his full version.
According to Pranab Mukherjee, the German Government has provided the information under the strict confidentiality clauses of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and hence they could not be disclosed at the stage of investigation.
However, once the government launches prosecutions, the name would be made public, he had said.
These 18 names are part of the list of 1,400 clients, which were stolen from the databank of LGT Group, the Liechtenstein bank owned by the principality’s ruling family, and passed on to German tax authorities in 2008.
The German government had paid as much as €5 million, or $7.4 million, for information on German account holders in Liechtenstein on a disk provided by an informant to the German Federal Intelligence Service, or BND.
After this, Germany and England had launched massive investigations into the suspected tax evasions and have since prosecuted dozens of their citizens on charges of tax evasion and concealment of income.
The German Government alone had initiated action against over 600 of its tax payers.
Besides taking action against its own citizens, the German Government had also shared this information with other countries including India.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh: “Investigations are on”
But the Indian names figuring in LGT Bank list are only a tip of the iceberg. Experts estimate that Rs 65 lakh crores of ill-gotten wealth earned by Indians is stored in Swiss banks alone.
According to R Vaidyanathan, Professor of Finance at the Indian Institute of Management, Bengaluru, the average amount stashed away by Indians in offshore tax havens between 2002 and 2006 was $136.5 billion. “These illegal funds lying in tax havens are not just related to the issue of tax evasion. It is capital flight from India and part of a corrupt nexus between politicians, bureaucrats and corporate companies,” says Vaidyanathan.
Different Indian governments over the past 20 years have done little to bring this money back by making necessary changes in existing Indian taxation and foreign exchange management laws.
Besides, the government has been slow in renegotiating double taxation avoidance treaties with different tax havens and making provisions for clauses under which the governments and banks could be compelled to disclose the account details.
For instance, under the existing Indo-Swiss Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), information on the Swiss bank deposits of Indian residents could not to be revealed until the Indian Government furnishes evidence of criminality behind these banking transactions.
Pranab Mukherjee: “We can’t reveal the names”
India enters into DTAAs with other countries to encourage flow of foreign capital and technology, and also to check tax evasion. The purpose of a DTAA is to mitigate the hardship caused by dual taxation on the same source of income. Double taxation on a single source earned by an individual is possible under income tax, as taxation depends not on citizenship, but on residential status.
To date, India has signed comprehensive double taxation avoidance agreements with 77 countries.
“I have asked the revenue department to reopen negotiations for all 77 double tax avoidance agreements with all countries that we have entered into so far, so that we can have real time exchange of information on tax evasion and tax avoidance,” Mukherjee had said at the India Economic Summit in November 2009.
Since the recession hit the economies of developed countries, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has been leading a campaign for transparency in the international banking system, and making the tax havens to necessarily exchange information with other countries where tax evasions are involved.
The US in particular has been proactive in using the might of its economy to make different tax havens fall in line, and share the names of US citizens who have deposited money in these tax havens.
For instance, the UBS Bank, a Swiss bank and the world’s largest wealth management company, came under US scrutiny in June 2008 to uncover the identity of US nationals who maintained secret accounts in the bank and were defrauding the American revenue department.
When the US Government threatened to prosecute the USB Bank, the bank paid a fine of $780 million and also agreed to reveal the details of the hidden assets of US nationals within a fixed time frame failing which it would face prosecution.
The magazine claimed that the name of the chairman of a major Indian corporation is also part of the list, but it is holding back his name until they have his full version.
It is curious that the magazine should talk about 18 when the government had admitted before the Supreme Court that there were 26 such names.
A TV channel put out its own list, claiming that the list which was officially handed over to the Indian Government on March 18, 2009 includes 12 trusts and 26 beneficiaries.
The channel claimed that the list that Germany shared with India had 12 trusts out of which four belong to Indians.
The individuals listed by the channel included the following names:
Ishwerlal Gandhi
Madhu Gandhi
Mirav Gandhi
In addition, one of the names Chintan Gandhi was repeated twice in the TV channel’s list. So that makes a total of 15 (12 by the magazine + 3 by the TV channel) out of the 26 individuals, leaving out the suspense on the other 11, which clearly would be more prominent names
The TV channel also listed the following trusts as belonging to Indians which are included in the German list:
Ambrunova Trust
Marline Management SA
Marnichi Trust and
Socalo Stiftung.
But the channel added that the money in the trust accounts totals to just Rs 52 crores. Clearly, the individuals concerned also would not let the money lying there, and the mystery over the 11 names therefore assumes even more importance because someone out there wanted some names revealed but at the same time ensured that others were kept hidden.
Another TV channel is providing account numbers and claims to have linked three of the Mehta names to the IPL Kochi bid.
New Delhi: CNN-IBN has accessed the list of Indians who hold accounts with Bank of Lichtenstein.The list which was officially handed over to the Indian Government on March 18, 2009 includes 12 trusts and 26 beneficiaries.But the money in the trust accounts totals to just Rs 52 crore – is this a black money whitewash?
The list that Germany shared with India had 12 trusts out of which four belong to Indians.
CNN-IBN has accessed the details of 13 beneficiaries in the four trusts which are the Ambrunova Trust, Marline Management SA, Marnichi Trust and Socalo Stiftung.
And list the beneficiaries include Hasmukh Gandhi, Ishwerlal Gandhi, Madhu Gandhi, Chintan Gandhi, Mirav Gandhi, Manoj Dhupelia, Rupal Dhupelia, Mohan Dhupelia, Chintan Gandhi, Dilip Mehta, Arun Mehta, Arun Kochar, Gunwanti Mehta, Rajnikant Mehta, Prabodh Mehta and Ashok Jaipuria.
Enforcement Directorate sources have told CNN-IBN that the accounts are fronts for some powerful people.
You must be logged in to post a comment.