There are a couple of things to propagate religion.
One is by the strength of its tea
chings.
By its principal followers, normally the first, as in Christianity.
Then depending on what your Religion says use force or Carrots to convert.
Allocate funds as you would for sales promotion in a Multi National to promote a product.
This can be POPs like Building places of worship.
Then comes streamers buntings etc.
Christianity is doing everything under the Book.
It had its original followers,had sent it people abroad,built churches,waged wars, allocated/allocate funds, spends crores in Mass Healing(?),distribute Pamphlets, runs TV Channels.
On the web too , with the Pope on Twitter.
Now they have gone more ingenious!
They have decided that it’s time to promote Christianity to youth through what their current fad is!
Tattoos!
Read.
What’s the best way to share Christianity with as many people as possible? This is the question Texas resident David L. Miller had in mind when he hired advertising firm RD Thomas to help him develop a “new way to share the Bible’s teachings through contemporary marketing methods” last summer.
Their answer: Jesustattoo.com. The site features explainers about Christianity, video testimonials of people sharing their views on faith, and information about how to get in contact with someone from the site to “start a conversation.”
Last summer, Miller reached out to the company that sells ad space at Lubbock Independent School District‘s football stadium, hoping to purchase rights to post an image (partially featured above) on the stadium’s jumbotron. Although the sales representative, Beverly McBeath, was initially enthusiastic (“THANKS for the business! Woohoo—great way to start the week,” she wrote in an email), the school district eventually reneged on the deal, arguing that “the District is prohibited from authorizing this public religious speech …using the jumbotron, which is governmental property, at a school-related event based on the Establishment Clause.”
Now, Miller is suing Lubbock‘s school district. Represented by a lawyer from the Alliance for the Defense of Freedom, the suit claims that Lubbock has allowed other religious groups—including a church, a university, and a pre-school—to advertise in the stadium, so Miller’s site should also be permitted to purchase jumbotron ad time.
To be sure, there’s an interesting question here about free speech: Should a public school let a religious organization advertise on its property under any circumstances? The suit claims that the other organizations were allowed to hang signs around Lubbock school properties that used explicitly religious language, including a church that advertised itself as “the place where we move men from religion to relationship.” A cursory look at a one-sided account of the facts suggests that Lubbock has given religious groups at least some kind of presence in its schools. This case might be less a question of whether Miller should get to advertise and more of whether other groups shouldn’t.”
Source:
Related articles
