That Nehru was naive with Chou en Lai, vacillating and a puppet in the hands of V.K.Krishna Menon, people are aware.
This new evidence is shocking.
“There is no reason why the Indian Army cannot rise again and give a much better account of itself. I hope when the day comes, it happens under my escutcheon.
This was what Gen J N Chaudhuri wrote in a 40-page covering note while forwarding the Henderson Brooks-PS Bhagat report on the 1962 military debacle to the Defence Ministry…
The report was commissioned by Gen Chaudhuri, who took over as Army Chief after the war, as an internal Army report to look into just the conduct of military operations since hostilities began in early October 1962 till November 20 when China announced a unilateral ceasefire.
For the job, he picked Lt Gen Henderson Brooks who was GOC 11 Corps in Jalandhar and had not participated in the operations. The report was submitted in April 1963 and sent to the Defence Ministry with Chaudhuri’s detailed covering note….
Coming down heavily on the military leadership, the report is particularly critical of the then Chief of General Staff Lt Gen B M Kaul, who was made GOC of the newly created 4 Corps just before the war. He was based out of Tezpur, but was evacuated to Delhi on account of illness just as hostilities broke out in what was then called NEFA.
The report records him “dashing in and out” of his York Road (now Motilal Nehru Marg) residence, issuing orders from his bed, and the top brass letting him do so instead of finding a successor. These have all been cited as examples of poor generalship.
Similarly, a copy Kaul’s letter to Nehru at the height of the conflict, urging him to approach the Americans for assistance, has been mentioned and included in the annexures to underscore the loss of nerves among senior officers.
Significant space, sources said, has been given to the retreat of 4 Infantry Division which had been quickly reconstructed after the Namka Chu defeat and posted to defend the fallback line along the Se La-Senge-Dhirang axis in Arunachal Pradesh. This was after Tawang had been overrun by advancing Chinese forces. It was decided that this axis is where the Army would fight a dogged and prolonged defensive battle for which resources and logistics had been built up. The idea was that longer the campaign stretched, the more difficult it would get for the Chinese to sustain operations.’
But 4 Div withdrew without fighting, a fact that is officially confirmed and documented in the report. This entire episode of the “collapse and rout of the 4 Infantry Division” has been described in the report as “a shameful incident” of a “renowned division collapsing and retreating without putting up a fight”.
Fifty years after the Sino-Indian war, the Henderson Brooks-Bhagat report remains under wraps but
The Sunday Express has learnt that around four pages of this covering note focus on wartime Defence Minister V K Krishna Menon’s interference in military matters, particularly on the shuffling of senior generals in the run-up to the month-long war.
The covering note, according to sources aware of the contents of the report, is the only place where there is a comment on the political leadership of the Defence Ministry. There is no direct comment on then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru anywhere in the letter or in the report, which confines itself to the conduct of military operations.
The important revelatory aspect of the Brooks-Bhagat report is its conclusion that shortages in ammunition and equipment were not among the primary reasons for the defeat.
Hi Ramanan,
I have seen these videos little back and seems that they are boosted by communists. In video is said in such a way that India initiated the attack and then for the defense purpose China retreated.
Even the 7th brigade commander John P Dalavi can be seen in video. I have read his book Himalayan Blunder.
VKK, as you may be aware. was a Communist in the garb of a Socialist.
The role of Nehru government about China was negative, to say the least.They were concerned about hiding the truth from the country rather them taking them into confidence.The mystery of using “sovereignty” in place of “suzernity” has never been solved.Sardar Patel, in his life time, and then R.S.S. chief M.S.Golvalkar ji had warned about the dangers of China’s aggressive attitude towards Tibet.But Nehruji did not listen to any advice.He was supportive of his fellow Kashmiri Gen B.M.Kaul despite his fleeing from the battle front.Nehru created so many problems for the country. His role needs a critical appraisal.Partition at the behest of Edwina Mountbatten, Surrender of Tibet to China, keeping alive the issue of Kashmir are his glaring blunders.
Than you.
Many are not aware of many facts especially of Nehru’s Naivety and lack of administrative skills.
He is one of the Holy Cows, along with Gandhi, Ambedkar.