Tag: youth

  • Self Injury-Cases and Causes.

    Lack of Family warmth is the primary reason.

    Gregariousness and communicating with others is one of the Basic Instincts of man  along with Instincts  of

    Survival

    Thirst

    Hunger

    Sex.

    When clash of instincts takes place, the outlet is provided by Gregariousness.

    If  the process of sharing Conflict is thwarted,many abnormal behavior is noticed.

    Individual craves for attention , not for the act per se, but sends out a message that ‘I am in trouble,I want to share’

    Family and friends perform that function.

    With skewed up values on Familial System, the problem becomes serious in acts like these.

    People need to be brought up in an emotionally secure environment:they need to interact with people;children should play , not with Computer and Gadgets but with children of their Age Group.

    More importantly they should have a mooring in some Faith;it could be Atheism as well.

    Setting impossible targets for the individual and too much of planning in Life are also contributing factors.

    They should be taught that losing is a part of Life  and none can get all they desire.

     

    When Canadian researchers plugged the terms “self-injury” and “self-harm” into YouTube‘s search engine, 5,000 videos popped up. They selected the 100 most-viewed videos. Wonder who in the world would watch explicit images of someone hurting herself?

    Apparently lots of people. Viewers clicked on the videos in question more than 2 million times and designated them as a “favorite” more than 12,000 times. (More on Time.com: Gallery: Self-Injury in Japan)

    Up to a quarter of teens and young adults intentionally hurt themselves by self-cutting or burning; the medical term for such behavior is nonsuicidal self-injury, or NSSI, which refers to intentionally injuring oneself with no intention of committing suicide.

    Many of the videos chronicle personal timelines — “I started self-injuring when I was 14,” a video might begin — while others present statistics about NSSI. The information conveyed in the videos was pretty evenly split between the factual or educational and hopeless stories of woe. Nearly all the videos contained images of self-injury; 28% of the videos that featured a person actually included in-action footage. More than half the videos contained no warning about graphic, violent content. (More on Time.comHow to Find the Best Drug Treatment for Teens: A Guide for Parents)
    ..YouTube contacted the researchers and requested the URLs of the videos they’d studied; the website has since flagged many of the videos for mature content and removed others.  But even if all 100 were taken down — and not all 100 were — what about the other 49,900?

    Q: Why do people intentionally hurt themselves?

    A: People self-injure in order to cope with difficult emotional experiences — lots of sadness, stress, anxiety. Usually self-injury is a marker or sign that something is not going very well for a young person.

    Q: How does it help them cope?

    A: A lot of people do report it provides temporary relief from negative emotions. But what happens is it becomes repetitive, and it’s used as a negative coping strategy.

    Q: Do girls engage in self-injury more than boys?

    A: It was previously believed that by far more females self-injured than males. However, more recent research suggests that males self-injure as well, and many studies report no sex differences in rates of self-injury.

    Q: It’s called NSSI — non-suicidal self-injury. People who self-injure don’t want to kill themselves?

    A: Based on research, we can distinguish self-injury from suicide. It’s about the intent behind the act itself. Many people are adamant this is not about suicide. It’s about dealing or coping with negative emotions.

    Q: Are people who self-injure just seeking attention?

    A: It’s a myth that it’s about getting attention because many young people don’t want to tell anyone about it.

    Q: What might treatment involve?

    A: We try to foster more adaptive coping strategies for when those negative emotions arise — different types of distraction techniques, physical exercise or just talking to someone when the urge arises. It’s important to help a young person identify what triggers the urge to self-injure.

    http://healthland.time.com/2011/02/23/self-mutilation-videos-on-youtube-may-cause-kids-to-hurt-themselves/#ixzz1FS9qJY2J

    http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1809157,00.html

    Related:

     

    Self-injury (SI) is any deliberate, non-suicidal behavior that inflicts physical harm on one’s body to relieve emotional distress.
    Self-injury does not involve a conscious intent to commit suicide, though many believe that people who harm themselves are suicidal.
    People who SI are often trying to:
    * Distract emotional pain
    * End feelings of numbness
    * Calm overwhelming feelings
    * Maintaining control
    * Self-punish
    * Express thoughts that cannot be put into words
    * Express feelings for which there are no words
    Who engages in self-injury?
    There is no simple portrait of a person who intentionally self-injures. This behavior is not limited by gender, race, education, age, sexual orientation, socio-economics, or religion. However, there are some commonly seen factors:
    * Self-injury more commonly occurs in adolescent females.
    * Many self-injurers have a history of physical, emotional or sexual abuse.
    * Many self-injurers have co-existing problems of substance abuse, obsessive-compulsive disorder or eating disorders.
    * Self-injures tend to have been raised in families that discouraged expression of anger, and tend to lack skills to express their emotions.
    * Self-injurers often lack a good social support network.
    What are the types of self-injury?
    * Cutting
    * Burning
    * Picking at skin
    * Interfereing with wound healing
    * Hitting
    * Scratching
    * Pinching
    * Biting
    * Head-banging
    Treatment
    Self-injury is often misunderstood. Self-injurers trying to seek medical or mental health treatment frequently report being treated badly by emergency room doctors and nurses, counselors, police officers and even mental health professionals.

     

     

  • Neet problem ‘may be worse than previously thought’


    Reasons are:
    -Shaky families
    -Selfish parents.
    -Too much reliance on Gadgets like calculators and Internet.
    -Lopsided curriculum
    Unless these basic issues are sorted out at the social and individual adult level , this problem will become worse.
    Story:

    More teenagers in England may be out of education, training or work (Neet) and for longer periods than previously thought, a study has suggested.

    An Audit Commission of 10 areas suggested that one-in-four 16- to 18-year-olds were categorised as Neets at some point in a two-year period.

    Of those – dubbed ‘forgotten teens’ in the report – 43% were Neets for at least six months.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/education/10524288.stm

  • American Youth in the 21st Century: Pathologized, Criminalized and Disposable.

    Issues raised are two.
    One is of racist discrimination and another is of disintegration society because of loss of Family values.In the garb of individual freedom,decency has been given a go by , moral values lost and family as the bedrock of Society is fast losing its grip.Drugs,Gun culture,free sex,living together,single parent, dumping parents in old age homes ,sexual disloyalty, loss of Faith and crass consumerism and materialism are the order of the day Unless this trend is arrested, there is no solution or salvation.Build solid family values, follow moral principles and give freedom of the individual a rest for some time.

    Story:
    Editor’s note: the following is an excerpt from Henry Giroux’ new book, Youth in a Suspect Society: Democracy or Disposability? (Palgrave MacMillan).

    Punishment and fear have replaced compassion and social responsibility as the most important modalities mediating the relationship of youth to the larger social order. Youth within the last two decades have come to be seen as a source of trouble rather than as a resource for investing in the future, and in the case of poor black and Hispanic youth are increasingly treated as either a disposable population, cannon fodder for barbaric wars abroad, or the source of most of society’s problems. Hence, young people now constitute a crisis that has less to do with improving the future than with denying it. As Larry Grossberg points out, “It has become common to think of kids as a threat to the existing social order and for kids to be blamed for the problems they experience. We slide from kids in trouble, kids have problems, and kids are threatened, to kids as trouble, kids as problems, and kids as threatening.” This was exemplified when the columnist Bob Herbert reported in the New York Times that “parts of New York City are like a police state for young men, women, and children who happen to be black or Hispanic. They are routinely stopped, searched, harassed, intimidated, humiliated and, in many cases, arrested for no good reason.” No longer “viewed as a privileged sign and embodiment of the future,” youth are now increasingly demonized by the popular media and derided by politicians looking for quick-fix solutions to crime and other social ills. While youth have always had to bear the misplaced fear and distrust of adults, how youth are represented, talked about, and treated has changed dramatically in the last two decades.

    Under the reign of neoliberal politics with its hyped-up social Darwinism and theater of cruelty, the popular demonization and “dangerousation” of the young now justifies responses to youth that were unthinkable 20 years ago, including criminalization and imprisonment, the prescription of psychotropic drugs, psychiatric confinement, and zero tolerance policies that model schools after prisons. School has become a model for a punishing society in which children who commit a rule violation as minor as a dress code infraction or slightly act out in class can be handcuffed, booked, and put in a jail cell. Racism, inequality, and poverty are on full display in the growing resegregation of public schools in the United States. Now more than ever, many schools either simply warehouse young black males or put them on the fast track to prison incarceration or a future of control under the criminal justice system. All across America, black and brown youth are being suspended or expelled at rates much higher than their white counterparts who commit similar behavioral infractions. For example, as Howard Witt writes in the Chicago Tribune, “In the average New Jersey public school, African-American students are almost 60 times as likely as white students to be expelled for serious disciplinary infractions. In Minnesota, black students are suspended 6 times as often as whites [and ] in Iowa, blacks make up just 5 percent of the statewide public school enrollment but account for 22 percent of the students who get suspended. . . . And on average across the nation, black students are suspended and expelled at nearly three times the rate of white students.” As schools become increasingly militarized, drug-sniffing dogs, metal detectors, and cameras have become common features in schools, and administrators appear more willing if not eager “to criminalize many school infractions, saddling tens of thousands of students with misdemeanor criminal records for offenses such as swearing[,] disrupting class,” or pushing another student. Trust and respect now give way to fear, disdain, and suspicion, creating an environment in which critical pedagogical practices wither, while pedagogies of surveillance and testing flourish. If young people were once defined as part of the vocabulary of innocence and compassion, they are now largely understood through the discourse of fear, guilt, and punishment.

    Clearly, there is more at stake under the current regime of neoliberal politics than an attack on children largely characterized by “negative labels and characterizations of youth [that] are falsely totalizing” and punitive laws and public policies. Youth have also become collateral damage for conservatives and neoliberal advocates who want to dismantle the social state and in doing so justify themselves by pointing to an alleged rise of a generation of disorderly and dangerous youth dependent upon government entitlements. Within this discourse, government support for young people is both undermined and inappropriately blamed for creating a generation of kids labeled as psychologically damaged, narcissistic, violent, and out of control. Scapegoating youth as both a generation of suspects and a threat to the social order allows conservatives and neoliberals to further privatize those public spheres that youth need, such as education and health care, while developing policies that move away from social investment to matters of punishment and containment. In this instance, the punishing state combines with the logic of the market to produce priorities and policies that disinvest in the future of children and assert a ruthlessness that largely treats them as reified commodities or disposable populations. Both childhood and the state are now being reimagined in ways that reveal the priorities of a society that has fully embraced the reckless abandon of casino capitalism, where the only rules that matter are made to order by powerful corporations and rich investors. How else to interpret neoliberal-inspired government programs that in the midst of deepening inequality, rising levels of poverty, catastrophic increases in failed mortgages, and growing unemployment invest more in prisons than in public and higher education?

    It is more necessary than ever to register youth as a theoretical, moral, and political center of concern, even as it is increasingly evident that youth are one of our lowest national priorities. It is crucial to connect the current crisis in democracy to the war against young people. Doing so will remind adults of their ethical and political responsibility to invest in youth as a symbol for not only securing a democratic future but also keeping alive those elements of civic imagination, culture, and education that subordinate economic principles to democratic values. The category of youth may be one of the most important referents for beginning a critical examination about the pernicious consequences of a society driven by market values, one that not only abstracts young people from the future but shapes the present in a theater of war in which youth become the most innocent victims. Youth provide a powerful touchstone for a critical discussion about the long-term consequences of neoliberal policies, which undermine any viable notion of justice, equality, and freedom, while also gesturing toward those conditions that make a democratic future possible. Many young people are part of social movements that not only address these crucial issues but also provide a politics, modes of resistance, and connective relations that adults should take seriously as part of their own civic and political formation at the beginning of the new millennium.
    http://www.alternet.org/politics/143875/american_youth_in_the_21st_century:_pathologized,_criminalized_and_disposable/?page=entire