Christian proselytising is one thing,aping customs of other Religions,especially Hinduism,is another.
The way Christianity apes and follows Hinduism is laughable.
We have Pastors,calling themselves Sadhus,like Sadhu Chellappa,
Calling Bible as Vedaagamam,without understating the meaning of the terms,Veda or Agama,
Using Sanskrit terms in the Bible and conducting Upavasa Japan(!),
Conducting Agni Camp, for preaching,(tell me,what has Christ to do with Agni,Fire),
Calling their preachers as Sastrigal(Purohits),
Conducting Christian Festivals,including at Velankanni,with Dwajarohana(hoisting ceremonial flag at the temple before a festival),
…….
Now they have started,in addition to Jesus Sahasranama and Astotra,Jesus Suprabhatha!
Watch the Video below.
One must remember that what is in use today becomes History tomorrow.
If we fail to check and record these atrocious attempts to seek legitimacy to Christianity,sometime in future Christians will claim Christ is Vedic God!
In fact, Thirupparnkundram,One of the six special abode of Murugan,Subrahmanya,is called as Sikhander Mountain by Muslim groups and the hill in Kashmir where Adi Shankaracharya meditated,has been called as Suleiman Hills by the Department of Archeology,India.
Time people recorded these frauds so that future generations are not presented with false History.
I am of the view that Mother Teresa is a creature appointed by The Vatican to proselytize , promoted by the Media in a slick manner and swallowed hook line and sinker by the gullible
Mother Teresa’s Mission was to convert. people of other faith to Christianity, making use of the economic backwardness and poor health of the People.
Note Teresa’s concentration on the North Eastern parts of India and her popular Office is in Kolkata with easy access to the North east of India.
I have been told by people whom I met ( of Her Order) that she used to ill-treat the patients , had tantrums thrown in private but in Public she was the personification of Sobriety and ,Piety and concern for the sufferings of the Poor while she glorified ‘Suffering’ in private.
This has been confirmed by a Study by a Canadian Group.
Also it is worth remembering how she was ‘beatified’ by The Vatican even when thee were murmurs against it.
I have always looked down on ‘beatifying’ people by The Church!’
How an Institution which earmarks billions of Dollars for religious Conversion, goes about the task of converting people and setting targets for Conversion can ‘beatify’ if not as an incentive for future people to convert more.
Please read my post on the spending of Money by the Vatican.
Now Read on.
Mother Teresa
A study conducted by Canadian researchers has called Mother Teresa “anything but a saint”, a creation of an orchestrated and effective media campaign who was generous with her prayers but miserly with her foundation’s millions when it came to humanity’s suffering.
The controversial study, to be published this month in the journal of studies in religion/sciences called Religieuses, says that Teresa — known across the world as the apostle of the dying and the downtrodden — actually felt it was beautiful to see the poor suffer.
According to the study, the Vatican overlooked the crucial human side of Teresa — her dubious way of caring for the sick by glorifying their suffering instead of relieving it.
Instead, the Vatican went ahead with her beatification followed by canonization “to revitalize the Church and inspire the faithful especially at a time when churches are empty and the Roman authority is in decline”.
Researchers Serge Larivee and Genevieve Chenard from the University of Montreal‘s department of psychoeducation, and Carole Senechal of the University of Ottawa’s faculty of education, analysed published writings about Mother Teresa and concluded that her hallowed image, “which does not stand up to analysis of the facts, was constructed, and that her beatification was orchestrated by an effective media campaign”.
According to Larivee, facts debunk Teresa’s myth. He says that the Vatican, before deciding on Teresa’s beatification, did not take into account “her rather dubious way of caring for the sick, her questionable political contacts, her suspicious management of the enormous sums of money she received, and her overly dogmatic views regarding … abortion, contraception, and divorce.”
At the time of her death, Teresa had 517 missions or “homes for the dying” as described by doctors visiting several of these establishments in Kolkata. They welcomed the poor and sick in more than 100 countries. Two-thirds of the people coming to these missions hoped to a find a doctor to treat them, while the other third lay dying without receiving apt care.
If a Religion is strong in its fundamentals , it does not need money to propagate it.
One of my reader friends in a comment stated that God’s words needs to be propagated
I disagree.God , if He needs propagation, He is no God.
Religion’s strength lies not in numbers but in the solace offered to Man.
Fixing targets for conversion and calling ‘Age of Asia’ is anathema to Religion.
While some religions resort to sword some resort to bribing.
Story:
This report is released by the Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI, & gives details
of Contribution received by the NGO’s under the Foreign Contribution
Regulation Act 1976:-
1 crore (100,00,000) = 10 million (10,000,000)
1. Highest receivers of Foreign Contribution state-wise:
TAMIL NADU — Rs 2244 crores
DELHI — Rs 2186 crores
ANDHRA PRADESH — Rs 1,211 crores
2. Highest receivers of Foreign Contribution city-wise:
CHENNAI — Rs 928 crores
MUMBAI — Rs 891 crores
RANCHI — Rs 653 crores
3. Largest Donors:
USA — Rs 2971 crores
GERMANY — Rs 1650 crores
UK — Rs 1425 crores
4. List of foreign Donors topped by:
MISEREOR POSTFECH, GERMANY — Rs 1243 crores WORLD VISION INTERNATIONAL, USA — Rs 469 crores
FUNDACION VICENTE FERRER, SPAIN — Rs 399 crores
5. The Highest Contribution received by:
RANCHI JESUITS RANCHI JHARKHAND — Rs 621 crores
SONTHOME TRUST OF KALYAN NEAR MUMBAI — Rs 333 crores
SOVERGEIN ORDER OF MALTA DELHI — Rs 301 crores
To know more about the amounts received by the NGOs for Evangelisation
in India, read the FCRA Report 2006-07, Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI:
Apart from the issue of US behind Egypt, what is of interest is the pressure it seems to have applied to Religious conversions.
Come to think of it , US is more active when Christians are involved.
It becomes vociferous in Human Rights only when Christians are involved or if it needs the elblow room to convert people to Christianity.It does not mater to US if Muslims are killed.
Add this as well to Oil as US’s agenda.
Is it the U.S., under Obama’s watch that is putting an end to the 30-year rule of Egypt’s Mubarak? The Egyptian revolution is sending shock waves through the Middle East. Read this recent WikiLeaks release of Feb. 25, 2010 from the U.S. Ambassador to Egypt, Margaret Scobey, to Washington. The cable states that the government of Egypt (GOE) is “displeased” with U.S. pressure for Egypt to end its State of Emergency imposed by Mubarak nearly 30 years ago.
VZCZCXRO3347
RR RUEHROV
DE RUEHEG #0253/01 0561513
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 251512Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY CAIRO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0427
INFO ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 CAIRO 000253
SIPDIS
FOR NEA/ELA, DRL/NESCA, DRL/MLGA AND IO/RHS
GENEVA FOR CASSAYRE, MANSFIELD
E.O. 12958: DECL: 2035/02/25
TAGS: PRELPGOVPHUMUNKIRFEG
SUBJECT: UPR REACTION: GOE DISPLEASED WITH THE U.S., ACTIVISTS
CRITICIZE THE GOE
REF: 10 CAIRO 187; 09 CAIRO 2395; 09 CAIRO 2277; 09 CAIRO 1948
09 CAIRO 1433
CLASSIFIED BY: Margaret Scobey, Ambassador; REASON: 1.4(B), (D)
¶1. KEY POINTS
-- (C) GOE officials, including presidential advisor Soliman Awad,
expressed displeasure with the number and the tone of U.S.
recommendations at the February 17 UN Human Rights Council's
Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Egypt's human rights record.
-- (C) The MFA noted it had accepted U.S. recommendations to lift
the State of Emergency and replace it with a counterterrorism law
guaranteeing civil liberties, and to amend the legal definition of
torture to be consistent with its obligations under the UN
Convention Against Torture.
-- (C) Human rights activists criticized the GOE for "wrongly"
rejecting U.S. recommendations, and "denying the facts of its human
rights violations." Activists said they would follow up with the
GOE on implementing recommendations although the GOE's commitments
are non-binding.
-- (U) In local media coverage, independent outlets reported
western countries' recommendations for the GOE to improve its human
rights record, while the pro-government media emphasized GOE
officials' responses to the recommendations.
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
GOE Displeased with U.S. Recommendations
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
¶2. (C) On February 24, presidential advisor Soliman Awad expressed
concern to the Ambassador over the number of U.S. recommendations.
Awad said the U.S. should focus on principles regarding religious
freedom, not conversions and proselytizing which "makes Egyptians
suspicious," he claimed. MFA Deputy Director for Human Rights Omar
Shalaby told us the GOE was displeased with both the number and the
tone of U.S. recommendations, "especially in light of recent
bilateral cooperation in the UN Human Rights Council." He said
that on instruction from the MFA, Ambassador Shoukry had conveyed
this message to Vice President Biden's staff during a meeting to
discuss the Vice President's planned upcoming visit to Cairo, and
the Egyptian Permanent Representative in Geneva had made these
points to the U.S. Mission. Shalaby explained that although
European countries made many of the same recommendations, the GOE
was "less bothered" because it does not enjoy "the same level of
cooperation with the Europeans."
¶3. (C) Shalaby disputed the U.S. recommendation to eliminate legal
and bureaucratic restrictions on an individual's choice of
religion, claiming that the obstacles are practical, not legal. We
pushed back, noting court rulings against converts from Islam to
Christianity. "The number of recommendations in itself is an
issue," Shalaby noted, and he said the high number led to GOE
speculation over U.S. motives. According to Shalaby, some in the
GOE wondered whether the U.S. was under "external pressure" to be
more "hawkish" on human rights in Egypt, or whether the U.S.
intervention was "retribution" for U.S.-Egyptian differences over
procedure during the 2009 Israel UPR. We told Shalaby that the
recommendations reflect U.S. concern over a broad range of human
rights issues in Egypt. (Note: The MFA's February 18 public
statement did not mention U.S. recommendations. The statement
welcomed the UPR process as an opportunity to demonstrate "Egypt's
human rights progress," and rejected recommendations "by a few
CAIRO 00000253 002 OF 003
western countries" on "issues related to homosexuals," and marriage
and divorce. End note.)
http://johnharding.com/2011/01/29/wikileaks-u-s-behind-egypts-unrest/
Top Five Recipients of NGO Funds in IndiaPlease check the link as well.
If a Religion is strong in its fundamentals , it does not need money to propagate it.
One of my reader friends in a comment stated that God’s words needs to be propagated
I disagree.God , if He needs propagation, He is no God.
Religion’s strength lies not in numbers but in the solace offered to Man.
Fixing targets for conversion and calling ‘Age of Asia’ is anathema to Religion.
While some religions resort to sword some resort to bribing.
Story:
This report is released by the Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI, & gives details
of Contribution received by the NGO’s under the Foreign Contribution
Regulation Act 1976:-
1 crore (100,00,000) = 10 million (10,000,000)
1. Highest receivers of Foreign Contribution state-wise:
TAMIL NADU — Rs 2244 crores
DELHI — Rs 2186 crores
ANDHRA PRADESH — Rs 1,211 crores
2. Highest receivers of Foreign Contribution city-wise:
CHENNAI — Rs 928 crores
MUMBAI — Rs 891 crores
RANCHI — Rs 653 crores
3. Largest Donors: USA — Rs 2971 crores
GERMANY — Rs 1650 crores
UK — Rs 1425 crores
4. List of foreign Donors topped by:
MISEREOR POSTFECH, GERMANY — Rs 1243 crores WORLD VISION INTERNATIONAL, USA — Rs 469 crores
FUNDACION VICENTE FERRER, SPAIN — Rs 399 crores
5. The Highest Contribution received by:
RANCHI JESUITS RANCHI JHARKHAND — Rs 621 crores
SONTHOME TRUST OF KALYAN NEAR MUMBAI — Rs 333 crores
SOVERGEIN ORDER OF MALTA DELHI — Rs 301 crores
To know more about the amounts received by the NGOs for Evangelisation
in India, read the FCRA Report 2006-07, Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI: http://www.mha.gov.in/fcra/annual/ar2006-07.pdf
Note:-
1. We are not talking of the money that comes from the Arab world which I presume
comes mostly through the Hawala route.
2. Hindus need to donate a lot more to worthwhile organizations. A friend recommended this
site: http://www.bharatheritagefoundation.org as an example of a samstha doing good work.
3. Amongst many others who are doing good work and need to be supported:
i) The Ramakrishna Mission,
ii) Friends of Tribal Society,
iii) Vivekananda Kendra,
iv) Chinmaya Mission,
v) Arya Samaj …
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
( Annual Report for 2006-07 )
*****
Introduction
Foreign Contribution is regulated under the provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976 and the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Rules, 1976. This Act came into force from 05th August 1976, to regulate the acceptance and utilization of foreign contribution with a view to ensure that institutions, associations and other voluntary organizations as well as individuals working in important areas of national life receive foreign contribution and foreign hospitality, respectively, in a manner consistent with India’s values as a sovereign, democratic republic.
Salient Features
Data pertaining to receipt of foreign contribution for 2006-07 has inter alia the following salient features:
I. As on 31-03-2007, 33937 associations were registered and 522 were granted prior permission during the year 2006-07.
II. For the year 2006-07, 18996, associations reported receipt of foreign contribution (including those which received NIL amount) amounting to Rs. 11336.97 crore.
III. Among the States and Union Territories, Delhi (Rs.2183.03 crore) reported the highest receipt of foreign contribution followed by Tamil Nadu (Rs 2117.71 crore) and Andhra Pradesh (Rs 1,210.82 crore).
IV. Among the districts in different States, Chennai (Rs. 908.09 crore) reported the highest receipt of foreign contribution, followed by Mumbai (Rs. 891.26 crore) and Bangalore (Rs. 628.48 crore).
V. The list of donor countries is headed by the USA (Rs.2,949.35 crore) followed by UK (Rs. 1427.50 crore) and the Germany (Rs. 1035.40 crore).
VI. The list of foreign donors is topped by World Vision International, USA (Rs. 703.75 crore) followed by Gospel for Asia, USA (Rs. 453.58 crore) and Fundacion Vicente Ferrer, Spain (Rs. 399.45 crore).
VII. Among the associations which reported receipt of foreign contribution, Sonthome Trust of Kalyan, Mumbai, Maharashtra (Rs. 332.86 crore) received the highest amount of foreign contribution followed by Sovereign Order of Malta, Delhi (Rs.300.79 crore) and World Vision of India, Chennai, Tamil Nadu (Rs. 256.06 crore).
VIII Among the purposes for which foreign contribution was utilised, the highest amount of foreign contribution was utilised for Establishment Expenses (Rs.3058.48 crore), followed by Relief/Rehabilitation of victims of natural calamities (Rs.2534.23 crore), Rural Development (Rs.1956.63 crore), Construction and maintenance of schools/colleges (Rs.1208.92 crore), and Welfare of Children (Rs.1184.38 crore).
(ii)
”
Nature of Use of Funds:
Significant portion of the received funds are used for ‘Establishment Expenses” which is against the basic cannon of charity work. It is expected that Charity involves lesser fixed assets creation particularly of the flamboyant nature. Also the jet setting aspect of the NGO’s provide clues to the nature of expenditure. Whether it is New York or Geneva we find members of Indian NGO community lobbying for some cause mostly of human rights. This creates a closed loop wherein they receive money to further some agenda and for that they receive more money…
Large amount of funds go to Christian organizations whose purpose is conversion. This act of “soul harvesting” or “planting of the Church” is an anachronistic practice of nineteenth century which is totally incongruous in the twenty first century where faith based political movements like the Church movements are disappearing from Europe their cradle of growth. Europe which has given up on the Church is trying to overcome its guilt by exporting Christianity to India. The recipient organizations may argue that they are serving poor but do they need European money to serve Indian poor.
Also some organizations like World Vision appear to be secular or non-denominational in India. But the fact of the matter is that is Christian in origin and membership. This has been affirmed by the Supreme Court of USA. We can take them as a representative example wherein they do not mention much about their exclusive Christian identity when campaigning for funds within India
World Vision was founded 60 years ago as a Christian humanitarian organization. Motivated by our faith in Jesus Christ, World Vision’s work with the poor and oppressed is a demonstration of God’s unconditional love for all people.
As a Christian organization, World Vision has virtually the same Statement of Faith included in its September 1950 articles of incorporation. While about 20 percent of our worldwide staff are of other faiths, all prospective staff at World Vision U.S. are required to sign that Statement of Faith or, as an alternative, the Apostles’ Creed.
Far from being narrow in scope, the Apostles’ Creed and World Vision’s Statement of Faith reflect the basic theological beliefs shared for millennia by the vast majority of orthodox Christian traditions — Roman Catholic, Mainline Protestant, Pentecostal, evangelical, or Orthodox.
Issues of the current court case
The issues at the center of the Spencer case — the plaintiffs’ denial of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus Christ — are central to Christianity. By definition, a Christian believes that Jesus Christ is the only son of God. World Vision believes one can be a good person, a moral person — even a religious person — without believing this. But World Vision believes that one cannot be a Christian unless one can confess, as the Apostle Peter did in Matthew 16:16 (NIV), “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
To be clear, we hire Christians, imperfect and flawed, not because we think they are superior, but because we believe that any real success will come only through the presence of Christ in each employee’s heart and His power through prayer in each staff member’s mind and hands.
The plaintiffs in this case signed the Statement of Faith when they were hired, but later changed their core beliefs. It was only when these staff members stopped attending World Vision’s weekly chapel services and instead began alternative worship and study sessions at work that the change in their beliefs became obvious. We regret the departure of our former colleagues, and we pray they have been able to find areas of humanitarian service that are compatible with their new beliefs.
Hiring people of shared beliefs
World Vision believes that staff commitment to core Christian beliefs as we understand them from the Bible is essential for maintaining our Christian identity. Organizationally, our humanitarian work is done as a reflection of — and an extension of — our Christian faith. We represent Christ in our work.
Hiring people of shared belief is a common practice among charitable institutions, many of whom receive federal funding. A non-profit that advocates for animal rights, for example, would be unlikely to hire a hunter or a non-vegetarian. An environmental organization is unlikely to hire a global warming skeptic. Non-profit organizations are defined by their core mission and motivation. To hire those uncommitted to that mission would be to undermine the organization
Who we are and how we serve
World Vision has worked hard to be clear with our donors in our communication and transparent about our Christian identity. We do not want to take donations under false pretences.
Similarly, World Vision always identifies itself as a Christian organization in the communities where we serve, including many where there are few, if any, Christians. World Vision works in many countries where the majority of people follow another religion, including some areas where Christian teaching is not welcome. In all cases, we respect the local culture and abide by local laws.
World Vision is a signatory to the Red Cross Code of Conduct and does not proselytize. That is, we never require aid recipients to listen to a religious message as a condition of our help, nor do we use aid as an inducement for recipients to change religion. We also never discriminate on the basis of religion in giving aid; we serve every child in need that we possibly can, of any faith …..
This is nothing new.Right from day one,be it Islam or Christianity,the bed rock of these religions have been conversions.Bible and Koran explicitly preach conversion;Christianity in the garb of saving(?) the heathens,while Islam is more aggressive by declaring even killing is justified of non believers.
Apologists for Islam will state that there is no such declaration is mentioned in Koran,can they substantiate it ?I can prove it to the contrary.same applies to Christianity.Weak religions need muscle power.
Express India , a news paper in India, has refused to publish the above comments as the comments contain ‘offensive words'(?)
The paper’s comment on my comment is as follows.
‘We are unable to publish this comment as this contains some offensive words.’
Why are people afraid of facing the Truth? http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Hindu-girl-forced-to-convert-to-Islam/610492/
Islamabad A Hindu
girl from Punjab province was kidnapped and forced to convert to Islam and is currently being held in a madrassa, leading Pakistani rights activist Ansar Burney said today.
Burney said his rights organisation, the Ansar Burney Trust International, had learnt that 15-year-old Gajri, the daughter of Mengha Ram, was abducted by a Muslim neighbour from her home at Katchi Mandi, Liaquatpur, in Rahim Yar Khan district on December 21, 2009.
You must be logged in to post a comment.