Tag: Psychological tests

  • Psychological Experiments Went Wrong , Ruined Men Details.

    Homosexual aversion therapy
    Homosexual Aversion Therapy.

     

    Psychology is an  uncharted course even to-day.

    Most of the terms they use are undefined,……Personality,Intelligence,unconscious(by the way it is ‘unconscious’ because you are not conscious of it, then how do you say it is there?)

    I know funny explanations will flow.

    Now onto some psychological experiments that went wrong and ruined people.

    God save the  Patients!

    ( before some one pounces on me, unfortunately I hold a degree in the Subject!)

    I  also have observed that the Psychiatrists seem to be in need of Behavioural Therapy and counselling for their  odd behaviour and view of Life- well at least for some of them.

    One of my Psychiatrist friends admitted to this fact and said that it is due to to constant interaction with mentally disturbed people!

    Story:

    Psychology as we know it is a relatively young science, but since its inception it has helped us to gain a greater understanding of ourselves and our interactions with the world. Many psychological experiments have been valid and ethical, allowing researchers to make new treatments and therapies available, and giving other insights into our motivations and actions. Sadly, others have ended up backfiring horribly — ruining lives and shaming the profession. Here are ten psychological experiments that spiraled out of control.

    Stanford Prison Experiment.

    In 1971, social psychologist Philip Zimbardo set out to interrogate the ways in which people conform to social roles, using a group of male college students to take part in a two-week-long experiment in which they would live as prisoners and guards in a mock prison. However, having selected his test subjects, Zimbardo assigned them their roles without their knowledge, unexpectedly arresting the “prisoners” outside their own homes. The results were disturbing. Ordinary college students turned into viciously sadistic guards or spineless (and increasingly distraught) prisoners, becoming deeply enmeshed within the roles they were playing. After just six days, the distressing reality of this “prison” forced Zimbardo to prematurely end the experiment.

    The Monster Study:

    In this study, conducted in 1939, 22 orphaned children, 10 with stutters, were separated equally into two groups: one with a speech therapist who conducted “positive” therapy by praising the children’s progress and fluency of speech; the other with a speech therapist who openly chastised the children for the slightest mistake. The results showed that the children who had received negative responses were badly affected in terms of their psychological health. Yet more bad news was to come as it was later revealed that some of the children who had previously been unaffected developed speech problems following the experiment. In 2007, six of the orphan children were awarded $925,000 in compensation for emotional damage that the six-month-study had left them with.

    MK-ULTRA.

    The CIA performed many unethical experiments into mind control and psychology under the banner of project MK-ULTRA during the 50s and 60s. Theodore Kaczynski, otherwise known as the Unabomber, is reported to have been a test subject in the CIA’s disturbing experiments, which may have contributed to his mental instability. In another case, the administration of LSD to US Army biological weapons expert Frank Olson is thought to have sparked a crisis of conscience, inspiring him to tell the world about his research. Instead, Olson is said to have committed suicide, jumping from a thirteenth-story hotel room window, although there is strong evidence that he was murdered. This doesn’t even touch on the long-term psychological damage other test subjects are likely to have suffered.

    Elephant on LSD.

    In 1962, Warren Thomas, the director of Lincoln Park Zoo in Oklahoma City, injected an elephant named Tusko with 3,000 times the typical human dose of LSD. It was an attempt to make his mark on the scientific community by determining whether the drug could induce “musth” — the aggressiveness and high hormone levels that male elephants experience periodically. The only contribution Thomas made was to create a public relations disaster as Tusko died almost immediately after collapsing and going into convulsions.

    Milgram Experiment.

    n 1963, in the wake of the atrocities of the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to test the hypothesis that there was something special about the German people that had allowed them to participate in genocide. Under the pretense of an experiment into human learning, Milgram asked normal members of the public to ask questions to a man attached to an electric-shock generator and shock him in increasing measure when he answered incorrectly. The man was an actor, the shocks fake; but the participants didn’t know this. The terrifying part? People overwhelmingly obeyed the commands of the experimenter, even when the man screamed in apparent agony and begged for mercy. A little evil in all of us, perhaps?

     

    Toni  LaMadrid.

    Many medicated schizophrenics enrolled in a University of California study that required them to stop taking their medication in a program that started in 1983. The study was meant to give information that would allow doctors to better treat schizophrenia, but rather it messed up the lives of many of the test subjects, 90% of whom relapsed into episodes of mental illness. One participant, Tony LaMadrid, leaped to his death from a rooftop six years after first enrolling in the study.

    Pits of Despair.

    Psychologist Harry Harlow was obsessed with the concept of love, but rather than writing poems or love songs, he performed sick, twisted experiments on monkeys during the 1970s. One of his experiments revolved around confining the monkeys in total isolation in an apparatus he called the “well of despair” (a featureless, empty chamber depriving the animal of any stimulus or socialization) — which resulted in his subjects going insane and even starving themselves to death in two cases. Harlow ignored the criticism of his colleagues, and is quoted as saying, “How could you love monkeys?” The last laugh was on him, however, as his horrific treatment of his subjects is acknowledged as being a driving force behind the development of the animal rights movement and the end of such cruel experiments.

    The Third Wave.

    Running along a similar theme similar to the Milgram experiment, The Third Wave, carried out in 1967, was an experiment that set out to explore the ways in which even democratic societies can become infiltrated by the appeal of fascism. Using a class of high school students, the experimenter created a system whereby some students were considered members of a prestigious order. The students showed increased motivation to learn, yet, more worryingly, became eager to get on board with malevolent practices, such as excluding and ostracizing non-members from the class. Even more scarily, this behavior was gleefully continued outside of the classroom. After just four days, the experiment was considered to be slipping out of control and was ceased.

    Homosexual Aversion Therapy.

    In the 1960s homosexuality was frequently depicted as a mental illness, with many individuals seeking (voluntarily or otherwise) a way to “cure” themselves of their sexual attraction to members of the same sex. Experimental therapies at the time included aversion therapy — where homosexual images were paired with such things as electric shocks and injections that caused vomiting. The thought was that the patient would associate pain with homosexuality. Rather than “curing” homosexuality, these experiments profoundly psychologically damaged the patients, with at least one man dying from the “treatment” he received, after he went into a coma.

    David Reimer.

    In 1966, when David Reimer was 8 months old, his circumcision was botched and he lost his penis to burns. Psychologist John Money suggested that baby David be given a sex change. The parents agreed, but what they didn’t know was that Money secretly wanted to use David as part of an experiment to prove his views that gender identity was not inborn, but rather determined by nature and upbringing. David was renamed Brenda, surgically altered to have a vagina, and given hormonal supplements — but tragically the experiment backfired. “Brenda” acted like a stereotypical boy throughout childhood, and the Reimer family began to fall apart. At 14, Brenda was told the truth, and decided to go back to being David. He committed suicide at the age of 38.

    http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2JVXx0/:1xty7B!q$:9TbxsTd_/brainz.org/10-psychological-experiments-went-horribly-wrong/

     

     

     

     

  • Totaled Recall: Is an Alzheimer’s Memory Screening Test Worth It?

    Good read.
    While Dementia is indicated in Alzheimer, all Dementia case need not necessarily be indicative of Alzheimer.
    The disease is due to faulty or absence of communication between neurons in the brain because of decay.
    This may be due to age,heredity or hedonistic habits or infection of the brain.
    Psychological tests are not to be relied upon as they are in the evolving stage still and the tests themselves do not always lead to correct prognosis.Details are are available at ramanan50.wordpress.com under Psychological tests.
    Right approach would be to consult the Family physician and relatives.
    Best way to manage would be to provide those afflicted with it, would be to provide them help with understanding.

    Story:
    Alzheimer’s disease and its associated dementia can be a scary prospect for individuals and families faced with it. Between 2.4 million and 4.5 million Americans suffer from this debilitating, incurable disease, according to the National Institutes of Health. That figure is expected to rise as the baby boomers age.

    Community memory screening events are becoming increasingly popular as individuals and their families seek to detect dementia in its earliest stages—before it destroys patients’ memories and thinking skills. But many physicians warn against these screenings, which are often ineffective when it comes to detecting dementia, and can leave test-takers feeling scared and powerless.

    There are thousands of memory screening tests available, some self-administered online, some given in the community by health care professionals—usually in the form of a questionnaire. The Alzheimer’s Foundation of America, the advocacy group that funds National Memory Screening Day, promotes screenings overseen by health care
    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=is-an-alzheimers-memory-screening-test-worth-it&page=2&posted=1#comments

  • Psychological Tests for Employment-Intrusion into Privacy?

    Psychological Tests are , at best , an educated guess work and no final word has been spoken on the veracity of the results obtained through these tests.They, right from early Stanford Test, are being constantly updated and the methodology adopted is open to question.They ignore ethnic,cultural backgrounds and the selection criteria of control group is also questionable.Also the factor of Heredity in behavior is not yet ascertained.You may read more on this in my blog filed under Psychological Tests.

    A new book shows the power corporations wield over their employees has gone too far. It’s time to take action.
    Editor’s Note: The following is an excerpt from Can They Do That? Retaking Our Fundamental Rights in the Workplace. An AlterNet review of the book by Liliana Segura follows the excerpt.

    Sibi Soroka was shocked. He had applied for a job as a security guard at the local Target to provide some steady income while he pursued his career as an actor. At the end of the process, he was required to take the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, a psychological test used by many employers. The tests included questions about his sex life, religious beliefs, intimate feelings about family members, and even his bathroom habits.

    “I couldn’t believe anyone would ask me such personal questions,” Soroka said. “These are questions you wouldn’t even answer for your own mother, let alone some personnel director at a company.” The more he thought about it the more upset he became. When the company called him to offer him the job, he told them to find somebody else; he didn’t want to work for a company that treated people this way.

    Soroka is not alone. An estimated 15 million Americans are required to take the MMPI every year, including two million people who are required to take it as part of applying for a job. Applicants who are forced to take the test range from doctors and priests to retail sales clerks. The test has been translated into 115 different languages, including Hmong, Turkish, and even sign language. The MMPI is only one of many psychological tests used by employers, According to the American Management Association, over 40 percent of employers nationwide use psychological tests, including eighty-nine of the Fortune 100.
    http://www.alternet.org/story/145035/can_they_do_that_how_you_get_screwed_at_work