Tag: Evolution

  • Hanuman Vanaras Existed 2,50,000 Years Ago? Homo Heidelbergensis

    Hanuman Vanaras Existed 2,50,000 Years Ago? Homo Heidelbergensis

    Ancestors of Homo sapiens were Homo heidelbergensis.

    Home sapiens were our ancestors.

    Hanuman is described as Chiranjeevi, Immortal.

    Vanaras, to which he is reported to belong were not Apes.

    Valmiki observes that they could speak and were intelligent

    Hanuman had authored Sanskrit Grammar before Panini.

    Hanuman is described as Wise.

    There are Mantras that are addressed to Hanuman for better communication skills and mental strength.

    In the light of following information could it be that Vanaras as a species existed 2,50,000 years ago?

    In India?

    Indian Thought does not support Darwinian Theory of Evolution

    Species co existed.

    This is being proved by recent researches in Biology and Archeology.

    I had written earlier about Hanuman being possibly the equivalent of Neanderthals.

    Hanuman is described as Immortal, Chiranjeevi

    .Asia remained as reservoir of all races moving in to Europe.

    2.For reasons not very known’ Humans started pushing towards Europe, this is presumed to be due to a cataclysmic event like flood or long dry periods.

    3.Access to Europe was easy as the Russian plains were there to cross over effortlessly.

    4.The complex structure of European geological features made these groups entering into Europe to become small groups settling n pockets.

    The Basques settled in the North of Pyrenees, Celts in Wales,Ireland and north-west of Scotland,Lombard in Italy,

    In the Fourth Century AD, out of Asia came the Huns,predecessor of Germans),Tatars.’

    https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/ramanan50.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/hanuman-vanaras-are-neanderthals-of-india/amp/

    heidelbergensis

    Where Lived: Europe; possibly Asia (China); Africa (eastern and southern)
    When Lived: About 700,000 to 200,000 years ago

    This early human had a very large browridge, and a larger braincase and flatter face than older early human species. It was the first early human species to live in colder climates; their ­­­short, wide bodies were likely and to conserving heat. It lived at the time of the oldest definite control of fire and use of wooden spears, and it was the first early human species to routinely hunt large animals. This early human also broke new ground; it was the first species to build shelters, creating simple dwellings out of wood and rock.

    Year of Discovery: 1908
    History of Discovery:

    In 1908 near Heidelberg, Germany, a workman found the of H. heidelbergensis in the Rösch sandpit just north of the village of Mauer. This was nearly complete except for the missing premolars and first two left molars; it is heavily built and lacks a chin. German scientist Otto Schoentensack was the first to describe the specimen and proposed the name Homo heidelbergensis.

    Before the naming of this species, scientists referred to early human fossils showing traits similar to both Homo erectus and modern humans as ‘archaic’ Homo sapiens.

    Height: Males: average 5 ft 9 in (175 cm); Females: average 5 ft 2 in (157 cm)
    Weight: Males: average 136 lbs (62 kg); Females: average 112 lbs (51 kg)

    We don’t know everything about early humans—but we keep learning more! Paleoanthropologists are constantly in the field, excavating new areas with groundbreaking technology, and continually filling in some of the gaps about our understanding of human evolution.

    Below are some of the still unanswered questions about Homo heidelbergensis that may be answered with future discoveries:

    .Smithsonian

    1. Did this early human indeed range in time from 1.3 million to 200,000 years ago, and in geography from Africa to Europe to Asia? Or are there more than one species represented among the fossils that some scientists call H. heidelbergensis (including H. antecessor, H. cepranensis, and H. rhodesiensis)?
    2. Many scientists think this species was ancestral tor n, but which species wancDidbehaviorceTheir model begins about 250,000 years ago, when Homo heidelbergensis arrived in India toting crude stone tools. Digs in central India in the 1980s turned up skeletal remains of the species, and other sites revealed almond-shaped hand axes chipped from stone.

    Meanwhile in Africa modern humans arose about 190,000 years ago, most archaeologists believe. These humans too developed stone tools

    .

    Scattered evidence, such as red ochre—perhaps used as body paint—suggests early African humans also dabbled in the creative arts.

    The new theory posits that as much as 70,000 years ago, a group of these modern humans migrated east, arriving in India with technology comparable to that developed by Homo heidelbergensis.

    “The tools were not so different,” Petraglia says. “The technology that the moderns had wasn’t of a great advantage over what [Homo heidelbergensis] were using.”

    But modern humans outcompeted the natives, slowly but inexorably driving them to extinction, Petraglia says. “It’s just like the story in Western Europe, where [modern humans] drove Neandertals to extinction,” he says.

    The modern humans who colonized India may also have been responsible for the disappearance of the so-called Hobbits, whose fossilized bones were discovered recently on the Indonesian island of Flores.

    But Athreya of Texas A&M argues that the evidence for such a “replacement event” in India remains weak.

    “You have to explain the reasons for the replacement, [such as] technical superiority,” she said.

    Reference and Citation.

    https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1114_051114_india_2.html

  • Hanuman Vanaras Not Monkeys New Extinct Human Species Denivosan Cave Siberia

    Hanuman Vanaras Not Monkeys New Extinct Human Species Denivosan Cave Siberia

    Hanuman and Vanaras mentioned in Indian Epics and Puranas are not Monkeys as is commonly understood.

    Valmiki in Ramayana repeatedly mentions as Vanara,Nara in Sanskrit means Human being.

    Taking into account the incomplete knowledge of our planet and ancient civilizations and new facts emerging about the origin of Humans and the age of Earth and birth of Civilizations,I had written earlier that Hanuman and Vanaras were the Neanderthals of India.

    But, as I have been maintaining my posts, there is this obsession to follow the History(?) of Europe through European sources, when these sources quote Asian/Indian resources for their first migration !

    HanumanThe earliest Epic of Humanankind, The Ramayana gives a clear description of the type of Species.

    Valimki states that when Rama decided to attack Ravana He gave a call through Sugreeva.

    The Vanaras came from all the places from Madhya Pradesh,South India, and from the place ‘where the Sun always shines or always sets”

    The last one is Polar regions.’

    Hanuman Vanaras Neanderthals of India.

    Now I have come across information that there was another species of Humans.

    Denisovans.
    Denisovans resemble Vanaras,more than the Neanderthals.

    Am awaiting more information on Denisovans and more finds on Humans.

    Lord Hanuman, one of the Immortals of Hinduism, is reported to have been seen in Sri Lanka in 2014.

    It is also reported that he visits Lanka regularly a sub tribe of Veddah in lankan Jungle

    Hanuman visits Lanka.

    In the light of above information,The Species might still be around.

    This information goes to prove that Vanaras were not Monkeys.

    Valmiki’s descriptions of the Flora and fauna of ancient India has been found true.

    And my theory that the Bharatha Marsha was near the Arctic in ancient days and the Rig Veda was composed in the Arctic is reinforced.

    And the Dravidas were a part of Sanatana Sharma.

    The Denisovans spread from Siberia to Southeast Asia,Melanesia and Polynesia.

    Denisovans.

    Denison cave.image
    Denisovan Cave,Siberia.Image credit.Wiki.

    The Denisovan or Denisova hominin ( /dɪˈnsəvə/ di-NEE-sə-və) is an extinct species or subspecies of human in the genus Homo. Pending its status as either species or subspecies it currently carries the temporary names Homo sp. Altai, or Homo sapiens ssp. Denisova.In March 2010, scientists announced the discovery of a finger bone fragment of a juvenile female who lived about 41,000 years ago, found in the remote Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains in Siberia, a cave that has also been inhabited by Neanderthals and modern humans.The mitochondrial DNA(mtDNA) of the finger bone showed it to be genetically distinct from Neanderthals and modern humans. The nuclear genome from this specimen suggested that Denisovans shared a common origin with Neanderthals, that they ranged from Siberia to Southeast Asia, and that they lived among and interbred with the ancestors of some modern humans, with about 3% to 5% of the DNA of Melanesians and Aboriginal Australians deriving from Denisovans.

    Denisovan Cave.image
    Entrance to the Denisova cave in southern Siberia, Russia. Image courtesy of Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

     

     

    A 2013 comparison with the genome of another Neanderthal from the Denisova cave revealed local interbreeding with local Neanderthal DNA representing 17% of the Denisovan genome, and evidence of interbreeding with an as yet unidentified ancient human lineage.Analysis of DNA from two teeth found in layers different from the finger bone revealed an unexpected degree of mtDNA divergence among Denisovans. Two teeth belonging to different members of the Denisova cave population have been reported in November 2015, a tooth fossil containing DNA was reported to have been found and studied.

    …..

    The mtDNA from the finger bone differs from that of modern humans by 385 bases (nucleotides) in the mtDNA strand out of approximately 16,500, whereas the difference between modern humans and Neanderthals is around 202 bases. In contrast, the difference between chimpanzees and modern humans is approximately 1,462 mtDNA base pairs.This suggested a divergence time around one million years ago. The mtDNA from a tooth bore a high similarity to that of the finger bone, indicating that they belonged to the same population. From a second tooth, an mtDNA sequence was recovered that showed an unexpectedly large number of genetic differences compared to that found in the other tooth and the finger, suggesting a high degree of mtDNA diversity. These two individuals from the same cave showed more diversity than seen among sampled Neanderthals from all of Eurasia, and were as different as modern-day humans from different continents.

    Reference and citation.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denisovan

  • A Sperm Driven Machine. Man

    Human Sperm.
    Human Sperm.

    All of us are fundamentally animals and are driven by Nature to propagate the Species.

    In short we are a Sperm Driven Machine, looking at from the Biological perspective.

    Of course we are not simply this.

    But what are the Facts?

    The sticky concoction called semen holds more than just sperm(those DNA-carrying swimmers that make a mad dash for the nearest egg). In fact, semen is a combination of sperm and fluids produced by accessory glands surrounding the penis. Its non-sperm ingredients include a mix of fructose, molecules made from fatty acids called prostaglandins, and proteins that nourish sperm and help them swim, according to the National Institutes of Health.

    Additional fluids from the prostate and bulbourethral glands are slightly alkaline, or basic, reducing the acidity of any urine residue in the urethra, neutralizing the acidic environment of the vagina, and lubricating the tip of the penis for intercourse.

    And turns out, what a man eats affects the quality of this semen, with a study published in 2012 in the journal Human Reproduction finding that guys who consumed more of the fat often found in fish (called omega-3s) had better-formed sperm than those who ate less of the fishy fat.

    And while semen carries those critical egg fertilizers, some women are allergic to it, reacting to it with genital itching, burning and swelling. In severe cases, women may experience hives or swelling elsewhere on the body, and even difficulty breathing. A study described in 2011 at the annual meeting of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology in Philadelphia suggested a possible cure: frequent sex. –

     http://www.livescience.com/22415-facts-male-body.html#sthash.qdTqmD6T.dpuf

     

  • Grandparents Choose Grandchildren’s Sex

    Mammals Choose Grandchildren's Sex
    Ilnar Salakhiev/AP – For a lioness, the safest bet would be to have a girl cub, according to a new study that says mammals have the ability to select the gender of their offspring for the benefit of their species. With sons, a lioness could end up with zero grandcubs or hit the genetic jackpot.

    The bond between the Grandparent and Grand children is unique.

    While certain naughty behaviour from sons and daughters were frowned upon, are overlooked in the case of Grandparents.

    It is well-known that Grandchildren bond better with their Grand parents.

    They have more liberty with their grandparents,share their intimate details with them, which the would not share with even their parents.

    I have seen that Grandchildren ,in general, share physiological emotional and mental characteristics f Grand parents.

    Tamil language calls he Grandchildren as ‘peran’, ‘The one who establishes Grandparents’ name.(பேரன்)

    Now it transpires that Mammals choose the Sex of their grand children, a Study reveals!

    Story:

    Mammals appear to have the ability to select the gender of their offspring for the benefit of their species, according to a new study that followed three generations of more than 2,300 animals from the San Diego Zoo.

    It is not a conscious choice, but in some way, a female’s biology has the capability to assess her health, the quality of her mate, and her environment to determine which sex to go with, according to study author and Stanford evolutionary biologist Joseph P. Garner.

    For a lioness, for example, the safest bet would be to have a girl. Even if her daughter isn’t the strongest or highest-ranking female, she will most likely have at least the average number of cubs.

    Sons, on the other hand, are a high-risk but potentially high-reward bet. Most male lions don’t reproduce because they are beat out by the few alpha males that father the vast majority of cubs. With sons, she could end up with zero grandcubs, or hit the genetic jackpot.”

    There are also indications in the study as to why the initial Human Society was Matrilinear , the preference for female offspring instead of male.

    Source:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/mammals-pick-offsprings-sex-to-maximize-number-of-grandchildren-study-shows/2013/07/10/553b1a5a-e969-11e2-8f22-de4bd2a2bd39_story.html

  • Multiverse,Other Worlds Part 1

    Multiverse or Meta Universe is a novel and Daring concept

    Parallel Unverses
    Multiverse

    .

    This Concept was formulated because of the improbability of the events/inadequate explanation of the recent findings of Science, which can not be explained by our present physical Laws.

    1. Biological Evolution  is found to be reversed in certain Species.

    “They sequenced five nuclear genes from each species, then applied statistical analyses to construct a tree of relationships called a phylogeny. And that’s when they saw it: deeply nested inside a large group of parasites were our everyday, non-parasitic, allergy-causing dust mites.”While this isn’t the first time that Dollo’s Law has been questioned, it’s the first strong evidence that parasitism might not be the evolutionary “blind alley” we tend to describe it as. The more scientists use genetics to study the evolutionary relationships between organisms, the more they find that Dollo’s Law is less law-like than once thought, broadening our understanding of evolution as a whole and challenging our assumptions about how it works. Which is, really, the brilliance and beauty of science — like life on this Earth, our understanding of the universe is constantly adapting and evolving.(ramanan50.wordpress.com)

    Either our understanding of Evolution is wrong, or there is some Laws which we can not understand.

    Cloning.

    In Cloning, the Oocytes produces a Primordial germ cell (PGC) which undergoes mitosis to form an oogonium. During oogenesis the oogonium becomes a primary oocyte.

    Now how and under what Laws, the Oocytes produce the PGC is not known.

    2.Geometry.

    How is it we are unable to conceive more shapes than  Squares, Rectangles,Circles, and variations of these and no other shapes?

    3.Brain.

    We do not understand many of the activities of the Brain at all.

    For instance, the Olfactory Bulb, in the rostral (forward) part of the brain, is responsible for the detection of Odors.

    There are two fundamental questions.

    a) How and  why does the Olfactory Bulb picks up only a particular Odor to the exclusion of all the Odors present in the same Object?

    Explanations are there as to the Function , not the cause.

    b)In ‘Seizure’ Syndrome’ it picks up Odors not present/

    Why and How?

    Does this imply that these Odors are present out there and were waiting to be picked up selectively?

    The same applies all the Functions of Perception.

    Put it simply, Things are out there and we register only certain things.

    In that case , if the Things were to exist independent of Our Perceiving them, how do things exist when we do not Perceive them and if so by what laws are they governed?

    3.Space and Time.

    Till date we do not have a satisfactory definition of Space and Time.

    Source:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloning