Tag War crime

The release of the War Crime Documentary on Sri Lanka,No Fire Zone' has not evoked any comments from the sri Lanka Government for quite some time.

I have posted in a Blog of mine at that time,may be Fifteen days ago that Sri Lanka had not commented yet.

But now The Government official declares that the there is a concerted attempt by the International Community to defame Sri Lanka.

There is also a Link in the Wiki that the earlier film Killing fields of Sri Lanka is doctored.

The Analyst says that the blood is not real, is faked and manipulated.

Now my points are.

1.If the Killing Fields of Sri Lanka are false.then why no claim was made disproving it then?

The first part is what is expected, but where is the effort to disprove the Video?

2.Now look at he analysis of the Video, No Fire Zone.
Why no rebuttal?

3.What does the International Community gain by taking on a small Nation as Sri Lanka?

4.Sri Lanka declared, at the time of the killing of Prbhakaran that the "LTTE's back was boken and it was finished'

After the release of this No Fire Zone; LTTE has become active and is able to control World Opinion?

If it were to be so, it should have made Rajapakshe atand on Trail for War Crimes in the International Court by now!..
The professor identified what he thinks is the first of the shots to be fired at the boy: “There is a speckling (on the skin) from propellant tattooing, indicating that the distance of the muzzle of the weapon to this boy’s chest was two to three feet or less. He could have reached out with his hand and touched the gun that killed him.”

The professor said the angle of the shots suggested that after that bullet was fired, the boy fell backwards and was then shot four more times. Unlike the men around him, there was no indication that the boy had been blindfolded or bound, so it was possible that the boy may have been made to watch the execution of his guards before the gun was turned on him.

The new photographs released today give us a chilling insight into what happened before that. They appear to demonstrate that the situation was calm and orderly. Balachandran was given a snack and some water. There was time to take photographs while he was held in the bunker and again afterwards. The forensic analysis report on the photographs concludes that there is “no evidence to indicate fabrication, manipulation or the use of effects to create the images” and concludes that the photographs “appear to be an accurate representation of the events depicted.”

From the separate video sequence recorded later (which has also been authenticated by both digital video analysis), it is clear that there were several military personnel in the area.