Tag: Physics

  • Natarja Statue In God Particle Lab LHC CERN

    When you go into Higher Physics, you would often wonder if they are talking about Physics or Indian Philosophy.

     

    The Fundamental Particle of Physics till recently has been Atoms.

     

    Now there are Sub-atomic particles.

     

    There is the movement of the constituents of he Atoms, Electrons.

     

    They move around the Nucleus.

     

    Movement involves a set rhythm.

     

    This slideshow requires JavaScript.

    This is called Laya in Indian Thought, both in Yoga, Tantra Sasta and can be found in the explanation of the Mahavakyas of the Upanishads.

     

    Laya is the Rhythmic motion.

     

    This represents the uniformity of Nature, both in the realm of the Known physical laws applicable to the known Universe and the Unknown.

     

    for those who may not be aware now scientists accept the theory that there may be Universes or bodies or both which may not conform to our known

    Laws of Physics, but they do exist.

     

    This motion, which or who set it?

     

    An inert object can not move, unless impelled by an external force or the potential force within it.

     

    Under what conditions does this potential source becomes Kinetic or the moving force?

     

    Again, movement creates Energy.

     

    Where does it go?

     

    This is the question that is attempted to be answered at CERN, Geneva where LHC(Large Hadron Colider), apart from trying ti find the God particle.

     

    Please read more on this and Multi verses in  my posts  filed under Astrophysics.

     

    This laya, or Rhythmic Motion is the attribute of Lord Shiva in his Thandavam.

     

    Laya and Sabda , Sound are the primordial forces of the Universe.

     

    I will be posting on these subjects along with Particle theory, Light waves Theory and Scalar Field.

     

    And on the Geometry of Shiv Linga and its relevance in unlocking the fundamental Energy fields.

     

    Probably accepting the thoughts behind Shiva, CERN in Geneva has Lord Nataraja’s idol in the Hall of the Laboratory and there is no other Religious images there.

     

    In 2004, a 2m statue of the dancing Shiva was unveiled at CERN, the European Center for Research in Particle Physics in Geneva. The statue, symbolizing Shiva’s cosmic dance of creation and destruction, was given to CERN by the Indian government to celebrate the research center’s long association with India. A special plaque next to the Shiva statue explains the significance of the metaphor of Shiva’s cosmic dance with quotations from Fritjof Capra: ”

     

    A special plaque next to the Shiva statue at CERN explains the significance of the metaphor of Shiva’s cosmic dance with several quotations from The Tao of Physics. Here is the text of the plaque:

    Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, seeing beyond the unsurpassed rhythm, beauty, power and grace of the Nataraja, once wrote of it “It is the clearest image of the activity of God which any art or religion can boast of.”

    More recently, Fritjof Capra explained that “Modern physics has shown that the rhythm of creation and destruction is not only manifest in the turn of the seasons and in the birth and death of all living creatures, but is also the very essence of inorganic matter,” and that “For the modern physicists, then, Shiva’s dance is the dance of subatomic matter.”

    It is indeed as Capra concluded: “Hundreds of years ago, Indian artists created visual images of dancing Shivas in a beautiful series of bronzes. In our time, physicists have used the most advanced technology to portray the patterns of the cosmic dance. The metaphor of the cosmic dance thus unifies ancient mythology, religious art and modern physics.”

    Citations.

    http://www.fritjofcapra.net/shiva.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nataraja

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Speed Of Light =Gravity=Infinity = 0 = Science?

    The Speed( I am using this term to enable every one to understand this) is 299,792,458 metres per second,

     

    This is equal to the Speed of Gravity.

     

    Speed of Light is equal to Speed of Gravity(+ or – 1%)

     

    The Speed of Light, according to Newton is Infinite.

     

    That is you can not comprehend because there are innumerable Digits,’ it is limitless.

     

    Zero can not be comprehended because there is nothing to comprehend.( some say “A positive or negative number when divided by zero is a fraction with the zero as denominator”

     

    So in terms of Comprehending Infinity is as comprehensible as Zero is.

     

    Therefore Infinity is equal to Zero.

     

    Speed of Light is Infinite.

     

    Therefore, Speed of Light is equal to Zero.

     

    I am aware of the Logical Fallacy of undistributed Middle is present in my argument.

     

    So do the Scientist theories!

     

    We take Science because it is convenient.

     

    We do not question it.

     

    Then why not God?

     

    * Follow Theory of Relativity, it is more fun .

     

    Symbol of Infinity
    Infinity symbol

     

    Newtonian Gravity.

     

    Therefore the theory assumes the speed of gravity to be infinite. This assumption was adequate to account for all phenomena with the observational accuracy of that time. It was not until the 19th century that an anomaly in astronomical observations which could not be reconciled with the Newtonian gravitational model of instantaneous action was noted.

     

    Relativity Gravity.

    General relativity predicts that gravitational radiation should exist and propagate as a wave at lightspeed: a slowly evolving and weak gravitational field will produce, according to general relativity, effects like those of Newtonian gravitation.

     

    Infinity.

    Infinity (symbol: ) is an abstract concept describing something without any limit and is relevant in a number of fields, predominantly mathematics and physics. The English word infinity derives from Latin infinitas, meaning “the state of being without finish”, and which can be translated as “unboundedness”, itself calqued from the Greek word apeiros, meaning “endless”

     

    The Indian mathematical text Surya Prajnapti (c. 3rd–4th century BCE) classifies all numbers into three sets: enumerable, innumerable, and infinite. Each of these was further subdivided into three orders:

    • Enumerable: lowest, intermediate, and highest
    • Innumerable: nearly innumerable, truly innumerable, and innumerably innumerable
    • Infinite: nearly infinite, truly infinite, infinitely infinite

    In the Indian work on the theory of sets, two basic types of infinite numbers are distinguished. On both physical and ontological grounds, a distinction was made between asaṃkhyāta (“countless, innumerable”) and ananta (“endless, unlimited”), between rigidly bounded and loosely bounded infinities.

     


    Minecraft can be a great tool for visualizing complicated subjects, such as the speed of light (aka “c”). Using a straight track and simple math, we can see how the universe might be limiting speeds for very fast things, such as light.

    The “doors” metaphor is admittedly, imperfect. While they do limit speed outside of “acceleration”, they falsely imply that there is something “in space” that slows things down, which does not appear to be the case at the moment. The actual mechanisms that limit objects to light speed will be the topic for a future video. (Hint: It has to do with time!)

     

    Zero.

     

    The rules governing the use of zero appeared for the first time in Brahmagupta‘s book Brahmasputha Siddhanta (The Opening of the Universe),[25] written in 628 AD. Here Brahmagupta considers not only zero, but negative numbers, and the algebraic rules for the elementary operations of arithmetic with such numbers. In some instances, his rules differ from the modern standard. Here are the rules of Brahmagupta:[25]

    • The sum of zero and a negative number is negative.
    • The sum of zero and a positive number is positive.
    • The sum of zero and zero is zero.
    • The sum of a positive and a negative is their difference; or, if their absolute values are equal, zero.
    • A positive or negative number when divided by zero is a fraction with the zero as denominator.
    • Zero divided by a negative or positive number is either zero or is expressed as a fraction with zero as numerator and the finite quantity as denominator.
    • Zero divided by zero is zero.

    In saying zero divided by zero is zero, Brahmagupta differs from the modern position. Mathematicians normally do not assign a value to this, whereas computers and calculators sometimes assign NaN, which means “not a number.” Moreover, non-zero positive or negative numbers when divided by zero are either assigned no value, or a value of unsigned infinity, positive infinity, or negative infinity.

     

    Read my Posts on Time, Astrophysics.Science.

     

    Citations.

    Zero Wiki

    Infinity Wiki

     

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Hinduism And Mathematics, Calculations,Measures

    It is known that India is the Civilization that gave the world Zero and Infinity.

    According to Indian Philosophy(most Indian Philosophers were Mathematicians like in the West, Descartes,Leibniz,), The Concept of Knowledge is Negative.

    That is the absence of ignorance is Knowledge, unlike the Western Thought where Knowledge is a Positive concept.

    Infinity is a Positive concept and Finity is a negative concept, the other side of Infinity is Finity.

    Darkness is a Positive concept and the absence of darkness is Light.

    Knowledge is not something one acquires from outside but from within by removing Ignorance.

    Everything in Science is determined by Philosophy first and later it is passed onto Science.

    Let’s peep into some aspects.

    Measurement Units in Ancient India

    The highest prefix used for raising 10 to a power in today’s maths is ‘D’ for 10 to a power of 30 (from Greek Deca). While the largest numbers the ancient Greeks and the Romans used were 10 to the power of 6, whereas Hindus used numbers as big as 10 to the power of 53 with specific names as early as 5000 B.C. during the Vedic period.

    1= Ekam =1, 10 was Dashakam, 100 was Shatam (10to the power of 2), 1000 was Sahasram(10 power of 3), 10000 was Dashasahasram (10 power of 4), 100000 was Lakshaha (10 power of 5), 1000000 was Dashalakshaha (10 power of 6), 10000000 was Kotihi (10 power of 7)……Vibhutangamaa (10 power of 51), Tallaakshanam (10 power of 53).

    Time calculation,India
    Indian Measure of Time.

    Measurement in Tamil Literature.

    • 1 kuzhi(kuRRuzhi)= 6.66 millisecond-the time taken by the Pleiades stars(aRumin) to glitter once.
    • 12(base 8 ) or 10 kuzhigaL= 1 miy= 66.6666 millisecond-the time taken by the young human eyes to flap once.
    • 2 kaNNimaigaL= 1 kainodi= 0.125 second
    • 2 kainodi= 1 maatthirai= 0.25 second
    • 6(base 8 ) or 6 miygaL= 1 siRRuzhi(nodi)= 0.40 second-the time taken for a bubble (created by blowing air through a bamboo tube into a vessel 1 saaN high, full of water) to travel a distance of one saaN .
    • 2 maatthiraigaL= 1 kuru= 0.50 second
    • 2(base 8 ) or 2 nodigaL= 1 vinaadi= 0.80 second-the time for the adult human heart to beat once
    • 212 nodigaL= 2 kuru= 1 uyir= 1 second
    • 5 nodigaL= 2 uyir= 1 saNigam= 1/2 aNu= 2 seconds
    • 12(base 8 ) or 10 nodigaL= 1 aNu= 4 seconds
    • 6(base 8 ) or 6 aNukkaL= 12 saNigam= 1 thuLi= 1 naazhigai-vinaadi= 24 seconds
    • 12(base 8 ) or 10 thuLigaL= 1 kaNam= 4 minutes
    • 6(base 8 ) or 6 kaNangaL= 1 naazhigai= 24 minutes
    • 12(base 8 ) or 10 naazhigaigaL= 4 saamam= 1 siRupozhuthu= 240 minutes= 4 hours
    • 6(base 8 ) or 6 siRu-pozhuthugaL= 1 naaL(1 day)= 24 hours
    • 7 naaTkaL= 1 kizhamai(1 week)
    • 15 naaTkaL= 1 azhuvam(1 fortnight )
    • 29.5 naaTkaL= 1 thingaL(1 lunar month)
    • 2 thingaL= 1 perum-pozhuthu(1 season)
    • 6 perum-pozhuthugaL= 1 AaNdu(1 year)
    • 64 aaNdugaL= 1 vattam(1 cycle)
    • 4096(=8^4) AaNdugaL= 1 Oozhi(1 epoch)

    Area Measurement

    • 1 Marakkal vaedaipadu (seeds required for planting rice) = 8 cents
    • 12.5 Marakkal vaedaipadu = 100 cents (one acre)

    Area calculation and Measurement Chart

    • 1 hectare = 2 acre 47 cent
    • 1 hectare = 10,000 sq.m.
    • 1 acre = 0.405 hectare
    • 1 acre = 4046.82 sq.m.
    • 1 acre = 43,560 sq.ft.
    • 1 acre = 100 cent = 4840 sq.gejam
    • 1 cent = 435.6 sq.ft.
    • 1 cent = 40.5 sq.m
    • 1 ground = 222.96 sq.m. = 5.5 cent
    • 1 ground = 2400 sq.ft.
    • 1 kuli = 44 cent
    • 1 kaani = 132 cent = 3 kuli
    • 1 kaani = 1.32 acre
    • 1 kaani = 57,499 sq.ft.
    • 1 acre = 2.25 kuli
    • 1 dismil = 1.5 cent
    • 1 furlong = 660 feet = 220 kejam
    • 1 kilometre = 5 furlong
    • 1 link / chain = 0.66 foot = 7.92 inch
    • 1 kejam = 3 feet
    • 1 mile = 8 furlong
    • 1 ares = 1076 sq.ft. = 2.47 cent
    • 1 chain = 22 kejam
    • 1 furlong = 10 chain
    • 1 kejam = 0.9144 metre
    • 1 township = 36 sq.mile
    • 1 sq.mile = 640 acre.
    • For more check,
    • Source:
    • http://mysteriesexplored.wordpress.com/2011/11/04/measurement-india-world-guru-of-mathematics-part-11/
    • http://ramanisblog.in/2012/10/16/time-non-linear-theory-indian-thoughts-1/
    • You may read more filed under Time,Astrophysics in my site.
  • Gravity, Film Review,For The Discerning,

    It is very difficult to take a film based on Space sans gimmicks , laser gun wielding characters and keep the audience engaged for about 140 Minutes.

    A Film on Gravity.
    Gravity, Movie.

    If the story line is about losing oneself cutoff from Communication network from anywhere deep in Space, totally at the mercy of Technology, which can fail against the smallest idiosyncrasies of Nature,,well even imagination is bound to fail.

    Yet,Gravity does just that ‘conceptualizing beyond the Human Mind and execution beyond technology, that is Human Creativity plus technology.

    One is overwhelmed while rating the film, Rate it the Best for Photography,Special Effects. Editing, Music,Script,Dialogues Acting,Direction,or the Best film of all times in this Genre.

    A crew aboard a Mission craft are left stranded in Space because of malfunction and the escape routes are blocked by falling man-made Satellite debris, which cuts off all communications,

    How the issue is resolved forms the story.

    As I have indicated in my earlier post before viewing the film, one does know how to react when lost in Space when you get disoriented.

    What is the frame of reference?

    The fear of Death seems trivial when compared to the primordial fear of the vastness of  Space.

    The film is both psychological and scientific though not a documentary.

    The Director steers clear of commercializing the Movie and at the same has not made this a documentary.

    The result is a gripping film with a tight script and excellent acting from Sandra Bullock and George Clooney.

    The script, what can one say?

    One word ‘outstanding’, scientific, early, dry humor  breezy, all at the same time.

    Ina all a film for the discerning .

    Only yesterday I was telling my son that my favorite film on any day on Space is  Spielberg’s  Close Encounters of the Third Kind  for its original thought on communication with the extra terrestria,l despite the fact that there have been movies on the subject.

    Well, now My favorite has changed-Gravity.

    Trivia.

    Why does the earth look like Milky way Galaxy in one shot?

    Why does Gravity does not get mentioned even once in the Movie?

    The film seems to be more about Space than gravity?

    is this has been named as Gravity because the tag Gravity is more catchy?

  • Mind Not A Fluke And Is

    I read an interesting article,excerpts I am providing below.

    Mind Quantum Mechanics.
    Mind and Quantum Theory

    Indian Philosophy states that the universe, let alone mind is ‘Leela’

    Lila (Sanskrit: लीला, IAST līlā), or Leela is a concept within Hinduism literally meaning “pastime”, “sport” or “play(wiki)

    According to Religious texts, As different from Philosophical Texts, th universe is God’s Leela or pastime ,play.

    But the word ‘leela’ conveys more , that can not be expressed in English.

    It is more than a pastime, though unintended as we can perceive.

    The Sankhya Philosophy lists the two fundamental principles, Purusha and Prakriti.

    The world of Names and Forms evolved out of the ‘sprasa matra’ by their ‘touching’ each other, here again ‘sparsa is more than touching.

    As the root causes are Principles we can no bet attribute Motives, so in this sense ,Mind is either or neither intended or unintended.

    The Non Dualism of Advaita states the whole world is not real, has only transitory existence and as such is both real and unreal, depends on one’s stand point.

    So Mind is a Fluke and not a Fluke at the same time.

    The term inevitability is purely subjective and it depends , again on one’s perception.

    Story:

    According to atheist and University of Chicago biologist Jerry Coyneprobably:

    As for mind being nothing but a fluke of nature, well, that’s probably true, at least the human mind, since I don’t see our evolution as inevitable (it may have depended on mutations that are based on quantum effects).

    Coyne doesn’t elaborate on what he means by the relation of the human mind’s evolution to “quantum effects,” but bringing quantum physics into the issue of the mind’s relation to matter, my question then becomes the following: Why start with the axiomatic assumption that matter is prior to mind and must be responsible for accidentally causing human consciousness? Doesn’t quantum physics (via Schrödinger’s famous kitty), imply that matter requires mind (an observer) for a particle to move from a possible state to an actual state–that matter is in some manner inextricably bound up with the mind?

    For example, physicists Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner, both at the University of California at Santa Cruz, call the mind’s relation to matter a “quantum enigma”—indeed, the central quantum enigma—and ask rhetorically in their book of the same title, the following:

    [D]oes it not go without saying that there is a real world ‘out there,’ whether or not we look at it? (4)

    But according to Rosenblum and Kuttner, quantum physics suggests that our intuitive ‘yes’ to that question may be spectacularly wrong. Likewise, I would suggest that the intuition among materialists that human minds and purposes must be generated by determinate matter first, and thus cannot really be necessary to matter or impact the direction of otherwise determinate particles, may also be spectacularly wrong.”

    http://santitafarella.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/is-mind-a-fluke-of-nature/