Hidden Pages Of Indian Independence.

Nehru and Mountbatten .image

History is what the Historians choose to write.

I have come across information on The History of The Independence.

This is backed up by good references and sources,

Read On.

“British were in trouble in 1946. Indians in the Armed forces were no longer trust worthy. The mutiny, that no one in our generation has ever heard of, did to the British colonization, what no other action could have done in the long struggle of 250 years.

Said Sir Stafford Cripps, intervening in the debate on the motion to grant Indian Indepence in the British House of Commons in 1947 (‘The Freedom Struggle and the Dravidian Movement’ by P.Ramamurti, Orient Longman, 1987)

…The Indian Army in India is not obeying the British officers. We have recruited our workers for the war; they have been demobilised after the war. They are required to repair the factories damaged by Hitler’s bombers. Moreover, they want to join their kith and kin after five and a half years of separation. Their kith and kin also want to join them. In these conditions if we have to rule India for a long time, we have to keep a permanent British army for a long time in a vast country of four hundred millions. We have no such army….”

In August 1945, Subhash Bose had reportedly died, while he collaborated with the Japanese and Hitler to fight the British. After the Second World War was over, three of the top officers of the Indian National Army (INA) – General Shah Nawaz Khan (Muslim), Colonel Prem Sehgal (Hindu) and Colonel Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon (Sikh) were put on trial at the Red Fort in Delhi. Their crime: “waging war against the King Emperor”

While Nehru was busy “defending” the three; he (Nehru), Gandhi, Mohd. Ali Jinnah, and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad had come to a secret pact that if Subhash Bose was to enter India (as many knew he hadn’t died in 1945), he would be handed over and charged.

Unprecedentedly, these trials were very public. Due to the sympathy toward Netaji and the INA in general, there was an instant and large outpouring of passion and patriotism in Indians. These stories were being shared via wireless sets and through media in general on the ships, where the sailors who were being given bad treatment (lack of proper service facilties), got inspired to go out and join together in a strike and rebel against the government.

The mutiny started on 18 February 1946 and by next evening a Naval Central Strike Committee was formed where Leading Signalman M.S Khan and Petty Officer Telegraphist Madan Singh were unanimously elected President and Vice-President respectively.

The spread of the Naval mutiny, which started in Bombay was complete – Karachi, Calcutta, Cochin and Vizag. 78 ships, 20 shore establishments and 20,000 sailors had been involved in the strike.

Seeing this Naval strike, the Bombay-ites did a one day general strike. Even the Royal Indian Air Force and local police forces joined in the other cities. The NCOs in the British Indian army openly ignored and defied the orders of the British superiors. In Madras and Pune, the Indian Army revolted in the British Garrisons.

Riots broke out all over the country. The mutineers were hoisting 3 flags – Indian National COngress, Muslim League and CPI. British people in cars were made to get off and shout “Jai Hind” by the mutineers. The Indian Tricolor was hoisted on many ships and establishments, by just the second day.

Such was the crisis that destroyers were gotten and stationed at the Gateway of India in Bombay to deal with the mutineers. Navies of Australia and Canada were also summoned.

The third day into this – the Royal Air Force flew an entire squadron of Bombers over Bombay Harbor to show support. Meanwhile the sailors had taken over HMIS Bahadur, Chamak and Himalaya and from the Royal Naval Anti-Aircraft School .

It was by that time that the decision to confront the Navy ratings was taken by the British and the sailors aboard the destroyer Hindustan were challenged. The sailors lost many lives and could not fight back much and in the process the ship Hindustan was destroyed.

Betrayal by Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah and Azad

Despite the extensive public support and support from all the wings of the Armed forces – Army, Navy, Air force, and even police – apart from unanimous coming together of people across religious groups at a time when the religious situation had been made really bad due to Partition debate and passion, ALL the National Leaders not only did NOT support the Navy Mutineers and their supporters but instead condemned them.

They were leaderless, surely, but they had achieved what NO OTHER generation and group of Indians had achieved in 250 years – turn the Indian Armed forces personnel against their Masters. Subhash Bose had imagined this kind of situation. Little did he know that from the failure of his own Army, would arise a rebellion and a will to fight amongst the rank and file of Indian soldiers hitherto fighting dutifully for the British, often against their own countrymen, to strike back.

The Mainstream politicians – from Jinnah to Gandhi, to Nehru to Maulana Azad – ALL let these final Freedom fighters down. They just abandoned them and except for preaching they did nothing to help them.

In midst of one of most unprecedented religious tension in the sub-continent, this rebellion and its genesis was a Godsend to reinforce religious and class harmony, which was forged instantly WITHOUT any machination. Yet, it was squandered…. probably deliberately by all those who promised us peace and harmony.

These people – the so-called Mainstream politicians spearheaded by Gandhi were interested in only their hold of their masses.. to see themselves being upstaged by a bunch of young upstarts with romantic patriotism in their eyes was unnerving. (James L. Raj; Making and unmaking of British India. Abacus. 1997. p598) Show of fake “constitutional process” and “principles” was a good way to brush them aside despite all they had been able to do.

Real Reason for Independence

So what were the three things which convinced the British that India could not be governed by force anymore?

Subhash BoseIndian National Army and the Royal Navy Uprising..

When Justice P.B. Chakrabarty, the Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court once asked the British PM Lord Clement Atlee – responsible for conceding India’s Independence, the all important question –

“what was the extent of Gandhi’s influence upon the British decision to quit India”

His response, with a smirk: “m-i-n-i-m-a-l!“

So, then why did they have to leave if the Quit India movement of 1942 had subsided and nothing major happened in the mainstream politics – then why did the British have to leave so suddenly in 1947??

Clement Atlee’s response:

Erosion of loyalty to the British Crown among the Indian army and navy personnel as a result of the military activities of Netaji

Such was the Congress party scared of the truth coming out that as late as 1965, a Marxist theater actor and writer Utpal Dutt was arrested for writing a passionate play on the VERY event that ensured India its Independence – the Royal Navy Uprising!





* The last link has   doesn’t work.Publication closed.

7 responses to “Hidden Pages Of Indian Independence.”

  1. touching information; however, can we call that the congress leaders “betrayed” Mr. Netaji. were they not @ difference of opinion and ideologies. Mr. Netaji is a martyr.


  2. Kudos for posting the truth of Independence.Nehru always tried to suppress the truth.He is the single most crucial factor for all major problems of independent India.Pakistan was created due to his close intimate relations with Edvina Mountbatten.(See Philip Zeigler’s Mountbatten).Kashmir issue is also due to his adamency over retaining Kashmir under his foreign ministry instead of Home Ministry as was the case with all other native princely states.China’s border issue is also due to his blunder of surrendering Tibet to China instead of maintaining Tibet as a buffer state between China and India.Assam problem is also due to him. Insurgency and hostilities in the North East is also due to his patronisation of Church there and continuation of inner line permit system which was abolished by Indira Gandhi.Economic backwardness was also due to “license, quota, permit raj” perpetuated by him.He always tried to suppress the truth about Subhash Chandra Bose. Ironically, when Justice Mukherjee sought permission from the UPA-1 govt to officially approach the government of Russia to provide the files pertaining to Netaji the UPA-1 govt refused to permit.


  3. Thank you for putting Nehru and Gandhi in proper perspective. No wonder poor India had a false start with a set of false leaders. I squirm every time I am told Gandhi was the father of the nation. Now another set of lies are being deified in the name of Ambedkar. Are we all doomed to be Worshiping False Gods then?


    • Mr.Umashankar,
      I am happy that the younger generation has kept up the quest for Truth and seems to verify facts before accepting them.
      The Holy Cows of India, Gandhi,Nehru,Ambedkar need to be put under the microscope.
      However this is not to belittle their contribution to India.
      You may read my blogs on these people especially on Ambedkar.
      The way the Cult of Ambedkar is promoted one would imagine, he,all alone . wrote the Constitutions Of India.
      People forget or conveniently omit to check facts.
      Even mild statement of facts on Ambedkat invites aspersions on your caste,race,religion and even your lineage.
      Yes. we are worshiping false Gods.


      • No doubt we have been worshipping false Gods ever since independence.The newspaper cutting that u have reproduced here must have been seen by innumerable other readers of that time.There are plenty of other evidence also which provided a true glimpse of the events of that time.But why people ignored all these.I think the media of the country has not discharged its role in right earnest.Moreover, keeping a large section of the country illiterate has also helped.Continuation with the wrong and motivated history books promoted by the colonial rulers to justify their rule have been purpetuated even to date.All experts today believe that the theory of Aryan invasion was a concoction, and Aryan-Dravid divide was also a figment of imagination but the same was continued with renewed zeal because the rulers who ruled the country after the Britishers also continued with the policy of divide and rule.Now the younger generation has to awake and seek and promote the truth.


      • The younger generation is more critical and they do not accept myths,which is a welcome sign.
        See the comment of Mr.Umashankar on the same post.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: