Rana has been found guilty any way.
That his terror links to Lashkar-e-Taiba has been proved,but not for Mumbai attacks?
That L e T is also responsible for the terrorist attack is known to US and it has notified L e T as a Terrorist out fit is of no consequence?
In a mass murder , proof of one murder is enough?
Is that the logic?
I feel that the Juries verdict might have been influenced by The White House,which, though expressing disappointment about Rana not being found guilty for Mumbai attacks,will be greatly relieved because of the nature of US’s relations with Pakistan and the fall out that will follow if Rana has been indicted for 26/11 attack as well.
That the Jury can not be pressurized is for the kids.
Story:
A federal jury on Thursday found a Chicago businessman guilty of supporting plans to attack a Danish newspaper that published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, but acquitted him of the more serious charge of helping to plot the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India…
A federal jury on Thursday found a Chicago businessman guilty of supporting plans to attack a Danish newspaper that published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, but acquitted him of the more serious charge of helping to plot the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India. …
Mr. Headley’s testimony made headlines around the world when he accused not just Mr. Rana but also Pakistani intelligence officers of helping to support the Mumbai attacks. The accusations threatened to exacerbate tensions among the United States, Pakistan and India, especially after American Special Forces discovered Osama bin Laden hiding out in a Pakistani military town.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/10/world/asia/10headley.html?scp=1&sq=Rana%20sentenced&st=cse