If CBI were not to name any group or individual, you would again dub it a traud?
If enquiries by police are to be questioned because its findings are not to your liking,then please tell the Government that you want such and such individual/organisation is to be punished.
You would save a lot of time and money for the Government.
Yes, Christianity does not proselytize right from St.Thomas.
It does not encourage people to convert.
It does social service to tribes urging them to remain in Hinduism./Islam.
Funds do not flow to Churches from abroad.
( read my blog on Missionaries fund to India).
Indian Media is not controlled by Christian organizations( read my blog Media-who owns it in India?)
US does not encourage conversions.( read my blog US pressured Egypt on conversionsWikiLeaks)
Pope does not set target for conversions nor calls a decade as a Decade of Harvest( Asia).
Story:
Nearly a week after the Justice Somasekhara Commission of Inquiry submitted its report on attacks on churches in Karnataka, representatives of the Christian community demanded the state government reject the report and hand over the inquiry to the CBI.
“We, the entire Christian community, unanimously reject this commission’s report totally since it has failed to address its terms of reference and caused injustice to the community,” Rev Bernard Moras, Archbishop of Bangalore, and president, Karnataka Region Catholic Bishop’s Council, told reporters here on Saturday.
Pointing out that it was only during the past three years that the state had seen a high number of attacks on churches and its personnel, the archbishop said the final report absolves persons and organizations responsible for the attacks as mentioned in its interim report. “Though the commission found some attacks to be deliberate, well-planned, communal, with fundamentalism brewing since several years, it failed to identify people or groups behind them,” he added.
Condemning the report’s recommendation that Christian places of worship be brought under some legislation to check conversion, Rev. Moras said: “It creates an impression that churches are anti-social institutions. Despite being a mere 2.1% of the population, Christians were accused of mass conversion”
Rubbishing reports about New Life, a Christian denomination reportedly publishing derogatory literature about other religions, Moras said: “If some individual is involved in it, why don’t you identify him instead of generalising?”
Objecting to the commission’s finding on foreign funds, the bishop of Church of South India Rev. Vasanth Kumar said: “All funds coming from foreign countries are closely monitored by the Union home ministry.
Related:
The second part of Washington’s “battle cry” is from a Christian convert from Islam he heard on the radio expressing this sentiment: “America must use its military to go to every Muslim nation in the world and convert them to Christianity; it is the only way to end the Muslim jihad against the West, against Christianity and against civilization.”
Washington also wants to combine “Coulter’s battle cry together with the Newtonian principle that to every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction” and send the U.S. military on “an international comprehensive Christian conversion campaign.” “A conversion policy will obviate the need for perpetual nation building,” he says.
But Washington does Coulter one better: “My one revision of Coulter is not that we should invade their countries: ‘We must invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.’” He wants the U.S. military to “join Christ’s battle cry” and honor the Marine Corps hymn.
Washington’s comments are so ludicrous and so contrary to sound Christian doctrine that every armchair Christian warrior, Christian Coalition moralist, Religious Right warvangelical, Reich-wing Christian nationalist, theocon Values Voter, Red-State Christian fascist, and God and country Christian bumpkin that I have ever criticized for supporting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan should be ashamed and embarrassed at his comments.
Washington’s mention of America’s conflict with the Barbary Pirates over two hundred years ago – as if it has anything to do with the current “war on terror” – is ludicrous. But because other apologists for the “war on terror” have also brought it up, I will address that subject in a future article.
It’s not often that I am rendered speechless. I have but seven brief comments to make.
One, how can WorldNetDaily continue to publish Washington?
Two, the attacks of 9/11 were political acts that were not undertaken because of our freedoms, way of life, culture, or religion. The reason why any Muslims hate us or are trying to kill us is because of our wretched foreign policy and occupation of their countries.
Three, the aberrant Christianity advocated by Washington will turn away multitudes of unbelievers from real Christianity.
Four, the U.S. military is not God’s army. The Lord never sanctioned any crusade of Christians against any religion. The God of the Bible never called, commanded, or encouraged any Christian to kill, make apologies for the killing of, or excuse the killing of any adherent to a false religion.
Five, what kind of genuine conversion to Christianity can be obtained at the point of a gun?
Six, what Washington proposes – forced conversion – is something Muslims have been criticized for. How can he advocate that U.S. soldiers – many of whom are not even Christians – “convert” our “enemies” to Christianity?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance227.html
Leave a Reply