Tag: Svayam Bhagavan

  • Lord Ram Sita Drunkards Debauch Amebedkar Insults Reply

    Lord Ram Sita Drunkards Debauch Amebedkar Insults Reply

    One of the Holy Cows of India, Dr.Ambedkar, others being Gandhi,Nehru,Annadurai of Tamil Nadu and MGR, is not to be commented upon by any one for they are perfect and what they utter is the Ultimate Truth, whatever non sense it might be.

    Ambedkar, a man who ,according to his followers has written the Constitution of India(the other members of the Draft committee were fools),studied with the financial help of a Brahmin, who married a Brahmin woman,became a Buddhist stating that Buddhism has no divisions.

    Those who say that Buddhism has many schools of thought and practices are idiots.

    Ramayan Sites Sri Lanka
    Ramayana Sites, Sri Lanka

    He had written that Cow was slaughtered,eaten and was sanctioned by the Vedas.

    Hinduism practices Caste system which was inhuman.

    Please read my posts where I have replied to his half-baked, ill-informed, mischievous and misleading researches(?)

    He had no spared the Ramayana , Mahabharata, Rama  and Krishna.

    His observations on Rama are highly insulting to Hindus and they are totally in correct.

    What he states about Rama has no references though he seems to quote .

    If one checks the source of his references one can see through this game.

    Normal tendency of the people, if some one says he is quoting an ancient text, is to take it for granted as True.

    Ambedkar says Ramayana is a fraud and a mere story and yet at the same time goes about denying the Ramayana.

    If the Ramayana is a Story, why take the trouble of denying it?

    If the Ramayana is a mere story of Valmiki’s fertile imagination(why do you accept Valmiki as real, you could have denied him as well), then the facts,

    The date of Ramayana has been authenticated through Archeology,History by internal and external evidence,

    The route traveled by Rama in search of Sita  exist even today with the landmarks as described by Valmiki,

    The Planets configuration described by Valmiki during Rama’s Birth, Marriage, Ramayana War all check out .

    Apart from the places mentioned in India on the incidents of Ramayana, these places, like the Asokavadi, Pond where Sita took bath in Sri Lanka, the place where she was imprisoned by Ravana, Ravana’s Airstrip, his Pushpaka Vimana’s Axle, and the ruins of his palace are found in Sri Lanka.

    The city founded by Lava, son of Rama ,Lahore is now in Pakistan.

    Ramayana is found in the far-east,in their languages.

    Yes all this is non sense and only Ambedkar is intelligent and others are fools.

    Ambedkar’s facts (?) of Ramayana are wrong.

    Now read what Ambedkar has on say on Rama.

    Valmiki also gives a detailed description of how Rama spent his life in the Zenana. This Zenana was housed in a park called Ashoka Vana. There Rama, used to take his meal. The food according to Valmiki consisted of all kinds of delicious viands. They included flesh and fruits and liquor. Rama was not a teetotaller. He drank liquor copiously and Valmiki records that Rama saw to it that Sita joined with him in his drinking bouts*[f81] . From the description of the Zenana of Rama as given by Valmiki it was by no means a mean thing. There were Apsaras, Uraga and Kinnari accomplished in dancing and singing. There were other beautiful women brought from different parts. Rama sat in the midst of these women drinking and dancing.

    They pleased Rama and Rama garlanded them. Valmiki calls Rama as a ‘Prince among women’s men ‘. This was not a day’s affair. It was a regular course of his life.

    As has already been said Rama never attended to public business. He never observed the ancient rule of Indian kings of hearing the wrongs of his subjects and attempting to redress them.”

    I do not from know where Ambedkar has this source.

    I have replied here the most obnoxious statement of Ambedkar.

    Other comments by him are mild when compared to this.

    This post is to highlight the misinformation by self-styled Rationalists for self-aggrandizement with no real grasp of what they speak about.

    This is caution to Hindus not to be misled by seemingly authentic quoted by people who have been built up as Great in India.

    Please read my posts on.

    Dating tools of Ramayana, Mahabharata,

    Date of Ramayana.

    Route taken by Rama.

    Ravana’s Palace,Pushpaka Vimana Axle.

    Sita’s Pond.Sita’s Cell.

    Ahokavana,Asokavatika.

    The date of Ramayana Battle.

    Ambedkar on Untouchability, Vedas,Cow slaughter,Reservation muddle and more.

    These posts are filed under Hinduism.

    Citation.

    http://fateh.sikhnet.com//sikhnet/discussion.nsf/ca32680024ff68b487256a08007e86d8/daf9fa36ea63a5ea87256afc0072869c!OpenDocument

    Through this booklet Ambedkar questions the authenticity of so called Lord Rama and Krishna being worshiped as God by Hindus. He highlights numerous erroneous activities of Rama and Krishna that shakes people’s conscience to accept them as Lord. He quotes Valmiki Ramayana in which Ram’s cunning acts of killing Bali, Ravana and Shambook has been exposed. In all of these killings Ram has not shown honesty on any account. He exposes Ram’s and Krishna’s lust for women. Krishna has as many as 16108 wives and Ram too was never loyal to Sita and spends all his time in his harem among women. Ambedkar very categorically illustrates Krishna’s decisions during Mhabharata war and each one was guided by special mystical power and no real power of strength. And hence most of the men killed by Arjun was with the help Krishna or otherwise he could not have done it.

    http://ff1.dalitresourcecentre.com/activities/the-riddles-of-rama-and-krishna/

  • Krishna Casteless Cowherd Coward Of Unsound Mind

    After the conclusion of the Raja Suya aga, The Panadavas had to perform the Agra Pooja, the First respect to be paid .

    Among those present Lord Krishna was The One who deserved this Honor.

    The Cosmic form Krishna.Image.jpg
    Lord Krishna Viswaroopa

    Excepting one.

    That was Sishupala.

    Lord Krishna st there , smiling at His insults.

    This is described in an interesting manner in Villi Bharatham,Tamil.

    Bhima, who was sitting near Krishna, asks him,

    ” He (Sishupala) keeps on insulting You.

    You are keeping quiet, smiling.

    I can not.

    I shall go and finish him off.

    Krishna replied,

    ‘Wait, I have promised his mother, my aunt, that I shall bear with his 100 insults.”

    Bhima,

    ‘What  if he stops at 99’

    Krishna,

    ‘It is his fate that he completes 100 insults and that I should kill him’

    Sishupala completes his 100 insults and Krishna kills him

    I am reproducing a sample of Insults.

    Read the original in Vyasa Bharata and Magha’s Sishupala vadha.

    If one reads the original, one would  that this is a Tribute to Krihsna, called Nindha Stuhthi.

    Sisupala remained in his seat, but when he became angry at Krsna’s being honored, Sisupala stood up suddenly, and, raising his hand, began to speak very strongly and fearlessly against Lord Krsna. He spoke in such a way that Lord Krsna could hear him very distinctly.

    “Ladies and gentlemen, I can appreciate now the statement of the Vedasthat, after all, time is the predominating factor.

    In spite of all endeavors to the contrary, the time element executes its own plan without opposition.

    For example, one may try his best to live, but when the time for death comes, no one can check it.

    I see here that although there are many stalwart personalities present in this assembly, the influence of time is so strong that they have been misled by the statement of a boy who has foolishly spoken about Krsna.

    There are many learned sages and elderly persons present, but still they have accepted the statement of a foolish boy.

    This means that by the influence of time, even the intelligence of such honored persons as are present in this meeting can be misdirected.

    I fully agree with the respectable persons present here that they are competent enough to select the personality who can be first worshiped, but I cannot agree with the statement of a boy like Sahadeva, who has spoken so highly about Krsna and has recommended that Krsna is fit to accept the first worship in the sacrifice.

    I can see that in this meeting there are many personalities who have undergone great austerities, who are highly learned, and who have performed many penances.

    By their knowledge and direction, they can deliver many persons who are suffering from the pangs of material existence.

    There are great rsis here whose knowledge has no bounds, as well as many self-realized persons and brahmanasalso, and therefore I think that any one of them could have been selected for the first worship because they are worshipable even by the great demigods, kings and emperors.

    I cannot understand how you could have selected this cowherd boy, Krsna, and have left aside all these other great personalities. I think Krsna to be no better than a crow–how can He be fit to accept the first worship in this great sacrifice?

    “We cannot even ascertain as yet to which caste this Krsna belongs or what His actual occupational duty is.

    ” Actually, Krsna does not belong to any caste, nor does He have to perform any occupational duty. It is stated in the Vedas that the Supreme Lord has nothing to do as His prescribed duty. Whatever has to be done on His behalf is executed by His different energies.

    Sisupala continued: “Krsna does not belong to a high family.

    He is so independent that no one knows His principles of religious life.

    It appears that He is outside the jurisdiction of all religious principles.

    He always acts independently, not caring for the Vedic injunctions and regulative principles.

    Therefore He is devoid of all good qualities.” Sisupala indirectly praised Krsna by saying that He is not within the jurisdiction of Vedic injunctions.

    This is true because He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. That He has no qualities means that Krsna has no material qualities, and because He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, He acts independently, not caring for conventions or social or religious principles.

    Sisupala continued: “Under these circumstances, how can He be fit to accept the first worship in the sacrifice?

    Krsna is so foolish that He has left Mathura, which is inhabited by highly elevated persons following the Vedic culture, and He has taken shelter in the ocean, where there is not even talk of the Vedas.

    Instead of living openly, He has constructed a fort within the water and is living in an atmosphere where there is no discussion of Vedic knowledge. And whenever He comes out of the fort, He simply harasses the citizens like a dacoit, thief or rogue.

    Citation.

    http://krsnabook.com/ch74.html

    Image.

    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KW1AefGJNyQ/mqdefault.jpg