Tag: New york Times.

  • US Government Gypped 20Million $ by Computer Programmer.

    Seal of the Central Intelligence Agency of the...
    Image via Wikipedia

    Seems easy to con a paranoid Government.

    ‘More Audacious the lie , more people will believe’-Goebbels.

    WASHINGTON — For eight years, government officials turned to Dennis Montgomery, a California computer programmer, for eye-popping technology that he said could catch terrorists. Now, federal officials want nothing to do with him and are going to extraordinary lengths to ensure that his dealings with Washington stay secret.

    The Justice Department, which in the last few months has gotten protective orders from two federal judges keeping details of the technology out of court, says it is guarding state secrets that would threaten national security if disclosed. But others involved in the case say that what the government is trying to avoid is public embarrassment over evidence that Mr. Montgomery bamboozled federal officials.

    A onetime biomedical technician with a penchant for gambling, Mr. Montgomery is at the center of a tale that features terrorism scares, secret White House briefings, backing from prominent Republicans, backdoor deal-making and fantastic-sounding computer technology.

    Interviews with more than two dozen current and former officials and business associates and a review of documents show that Mr. Montgomery and his associates received more than $20 million in government contracts by claiming that software he had developed could help stop Al Qaeda’s next attack on the United States. But the technology appears to have been a hoax, and a series of government agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency and the Air Force, repeatedly missed the warning signs, the records and interviews show.

    Mr. Montgomery’s former lawyer, Michael Flynn — who now describes Mr. Montgomery as a “con man” — says he believes that the administration has been shutting off scrutiny of Mr. Montgomery’s business for fear of revealing that the government has been duped.

    “The Justice Department is trying to cover this up,” Mr. Flynn said. “If this unravels, all of the evidence, all of the phony terror alerts and all the embarrassment comes up publicly, too. The government knew this technology was bogus, but these guys got paid millions for it.”

    Justice Department officials declined to discuss the government’s dealings with Mr. Montgomery, 57, who is in bankruptcy and living outside Palm Springs, Calif. Mr. Montgomery is about to go on trial in Las Vegas on unrelated charges of trying to pass $1.8 million in bad checks at casinos, but he has not been charged with wrongdoing in the federal contracts, nor has the government tried to get back any of the money it paid. He and his current lawyer declined to comment.

    The software he patented — which he claimed, among other things, could find terrorist plots hidden in broadcasts of the Arab network Al Jazeera; identify terrorists from Predator drone videos; and detect noise from hostile submarines — prompted an international false alarm that led President George W. Bush to order airliners to turn around over the Atlantic Ocean in 2003.

    The software led to dead ends in connection with a 2006 terrorism plot in Britain. And they were used by counterterrorism officials to respond to a bogus Somali terrorism plot on the day of President Obama’s inauguration, according to previously undisclosed documents.

    ‘It Wasn’t Real’

    “Dennis would always say, ‘My technology is real, and it’s worth a fortune,’ ” recounted Steve Crisman, a filmmaker who oversaw business operations for Mr. Montgomery and a partner until a few years ago. “In the end, I’m convinced it wasn’t real.”

    Government officials, with billions of dollars in new counterterrorism financing after Sept. 11, eagerly embraced the promise of new tools against militants.

    C.I.A. officials, though, came to believe that Mr. Montgomery’s technology was fake in 2003, but their conclusions apparently were not relayed to the military’s Special Operations Command, which had contracted with his firm. In 2006, F.B.I. investigators were told by co-workers of Mr. Montgomery that he had repeatedly doctored test results at presentations for government officials. But Mr. Montgomery still landed more business.

    In 2009, the Air Force approved a $3 million deal for his technology, even though a contracting officer acknowledged that other agencies were skeptical about the software, according to e-mails obtained by The New York Times.

    Hints of fraud by Mr. Montgomery, previously raised by Bloomberg Markets and Playboy, provide a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of government contracting. A Pentagon study in January found that it had paid $285 billion in three years to more than 120 contractors accused of fraud or wrongdoing.

    “We’ve seen so many folks with a really great idea, who truly believe their technology is a breakthrough, but it turns out not to be,” said Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr. of the Air Force, who retired last year as the commander of the military’s Northern Command. Mr. Montgomery described himself a few years ago in a sworn court statement as a patriotic scientist who gave the government his software “to stop terrorist attacks and save American lives.” His alliance with the government, at least, would prove a boon to a small company, eTreppidTechnologies, that he helped found in 1998.

    He and his partner — a Nevada investor, Warren Trepp, who had been a top trader for the junk-bond king Michael Milken — hoped to colorize movies by using a technology Mr. Montgomery claimed he had invented that identified patterns and isolated images. Hollywood had little interest, but in 2002, the company found other customers.

    With the help of Representative Jim Gibbons, a Republican who would become Nevada’s governor and was a longtime friend of Mr. Trepp’s, the company won the attention of intelligence officials in Washington. It did so with a remarkable claim: Mr. Montgomery had found coded messages hidden in broadcasts by Al Jazeera, and his technology could decipher them to identify specific threats.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/us/politics/20data.html?_r=2

  • New York Times Moves Contents.

    Logo of The New York Times.
    Image via Wikipedia

     

    Make Good Business sense and saves readers time.

    Following is another way of looking at this.

    Ultimately we shall be paying for reading on-line.

    Funnily this move could boost the print media.

    NEW YORK—In an effort to highlight content of interest to the subscribers it values most,The New York Times announced Monday it would move all articles you could not possibly give a shit about unless you make more than $200,000 into one handy section. “From now on, people looking for helpful hints on renovating a $4 million Manhattan townhouse won’t have to waste time sifting through articles on the crisis of public education,” Times executive editor Bill Keller said of the new section, which will be printed in smudge-proof ink so it doesn’t soil the soft, pink hands of its readers. “They can flip straight to TimesElite for the latest on society weddings, Tuscan getaways, and the rising cost of boat winterization.” Keller added that if the experiment proved successful, the Times might create a similar section for moms in Brooklyn.

    http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-york-times-moves-all-content-you-wont-give-a-s,19188/

    Time has decided to dive headfirst into an issue that has bedeviled many a news organization before it: how to cure online readers of their addiction to free content.

    But Time’s approach is more a process of weaning readers than forcing them to quit cold turkey. Starting this week, it replaced most of the content that appeared in its current issue with abridged articles and summaries online. The move is meant to drive readers to newsstands and Time’s iPad applications, where the magazine costs $4.99.

    Richard Stengel, the managing editor, says Time plans to experiment and will continuously adjust what it decides to keep off its Web site.

    “I think we’ll see what works and doesn’t work,” Mr. Stengel said in an interview by phone. “We’ll adapt and change. We’re in the hunt like everyone else to figure this out.”

    By pulling its print content off its Web site, Time is taking a step that other American newsweeklies have so far avoided. Whether the move is enough to push more readers into paying for Time content is unclear.

    The magazine will continue to make its columnists and vast archives available online. And once an issue is two weeks old, its content will be posted on the site and available to the public.

    Time expects its decision to have little effect on its readership online. About 90 percent of the traffic on Time.com involves content that appears only online, the company said.

    Another Time Inc. property, People, has left articles from its magazine off its Web site for some time. People’s online editors often try to entice readers by displaying an image of the magazine cover along with an excerpt from the cover article. A small teaser informs readers that if they want more they should go to the newsstand and buy an issue.

    Time’s online approach was similar, though it included lengthy excerpts from the week’s magazine articles with the disclaimer: “The following is an abridged version of an article that appears in the July 12, 2010, print and iPad editions of Time.” Eventually the magazine plans to offer an online subscription that will provide readers with access to all Time content.

    Edward K. Moran, a media analyst with Deloitte, says Time’s approach is one he expects other media outlets to adopt in the coming months.

    “Quite frankly I’m surprised it’s taken this long,” Mr. Moran said. “Everybody wants to jump in the pool, but no one wants to be the first one.”

    Mr. Stengel said the decision was an effort to draw a brighter line between what the magazine provided free and what it charged consumers to read.

    “We kind of wanted to draw a line in the sand,” he said. “We want to remain a vigorous and important part of the conversation. There are some things that are necessary to be part of that. But we will experiment.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/08/business/media/08time.html

     

     

  • Illuminati 2012- The World doesn’t want you to read.

    ”]Cover of "Angels & Demons [Blu-ray]"

     

    Please be aware that this book is written in a writing style that some have not seen before: Direct and to the Point. If you are more concerned about grammar and prose rather than the story, please move on- as this book may not be for you. However, if you are more interested in revealing the truth hidden in the works of a great story, then in this book may lie your answers…

    What if everything you have been taught to trust and believe is a lie? What if there is a secret government within our own that has been in place for centuries? What if that organization is using its unimaginable wealth, immense power, and the fervent worship of their god to bring about the end of times?

    Illuminati – 2012 will take you into the very depths of human corruption and wickedness while it enlightens you to the true meaning of good versus evil and the power of faith that is in all of us. The main character, Ethan Swan is enormously seductive; a young man who is thrust into a surreal world of darkness, lies, and a horrifying truth. “The only question you will be asking yourself upon reading this book, is if this is simply just a work of fiction…or is it something more?” ‘The Truth Awaits For Those Who Seek It…’

    lluminati 2012 is a conspiracy tale that is a mix of Science Fction, Thriller, Horror, Mystery, and Suspense. If you have read Angels & Demons by Dan Brown or seen The Da Vinci Code with Tom Hanks (Robert Langdon), then you may get an idea of how these secret cults have survived through generations in the shadows. Most people do not believe they exist & think that the people who do believe in them are mad.

    We live in a world of closed-mindedness, we eat, sleep, and work all the while believing in what we are told by the News & the Media to be true. Our ‘true heroes’ are in Movies like Twilight, Harry Potter, X-men, or Star Trek or in celebrities: George Clooney, Paris Hilton, & Heath Ledger. We are a people consumed by Entertainment & Social Networking Sites: Myspace, Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Hulu; we are Bloggers and Watchers and Consumers. We are trusting with Government & Politics. We are a Nation that lives in a well-built Fantasy.

    Most of us do not want to see or know that such a darkness exists in our ‘Personal Societies’ we have built around us; our ‘Safe Cocoons’ we have enveloped ourselves in, but they are here, they exist, and they are watching.

    About The Author:

    Nishan Kumaraperu was born in April of 1974. He grew up in England and the United States. He currently resides in Appleton Wisconsin with his wife, their five children, and two dogs. He has always been a storyteller. All throughout grade school, he would dabble in short stories of fantasy, sci-fi, and action adventure. During these years, he and a friend would each write half a story and exchange them to finish what the other had started. They would then share the final story amongst themselves and critique each other to the best of their knowledge. Kumaraperu’s life was based on learning everything he was interested in. He gained valuable knowledge in multiple fields: Behavioral Counseling, Real Estate, Property Management, Technology, Finance, and even Cooking. He co-wrote his first screenplay with a friend using Final Draft. Since then, he has written his own screenplay and this Novel. For the past many years, he is the President and CEO of a computer corporation (CNREnterprises / Elite I.T.) in Appleton Wisconsin. He has written multiple articles for magazines and online journals, including being an Expert Author on Ezinearticles.com. Writing has always played an important part of his life since he was young and will always continue to be so.

    More on this book here: www.morningson.info

    Related:

    summary: There are 13 bloodlines in the world to worship Satan and not hesitate to remove you from their agenda to get everything done. They seek a new world order where people will venerate these bloodlines and will do what they have ordered. They do not on the front page of the New York Times or Quote to stand, no, they want to remain in the background all their plans. They apply the rule of thumb: “the end justifies the means’. The Freemasons (as they are called) argue for a new world that they NWO, or the new international order. As said, their ultimate goal is world domination. How they want to address? 10 years ago, someone stepped out of the Illuminati, and before he was killed, he told a few things. He confessed that they were achieving that goal by 2012 (idd, the “end of the world”) the “North American Union, the USA So, will throw open its borders with Canada and Mexico, and then create a new currency, the Amero. This will cause the entire economy collapse, and then the Illuminati take over, after all the important people killed. If that is all done, we dance to their pipes. It is not the end of the world, but the end of the world as we know it.
    These “people” have the following character as a logo or trademark:

    Read more: http://socyberty.com/issues/rondom-info-illuminati/#ixzz1DntgN2FI

     

  • US! Is this fair?

    Picture of Julian Assange during a talk at 26C3
    Image via Wikipedia
    Ultra-rugged soldier systems fielded in Iraq & Afghanistan. www.drs-ts.com
    Washington, Dec 15 (DPA) US Air Force personnel who try to view leaked WikiLeaks diplomatic cables or stories about them are finding the websites blocked by management, The Wall Street Journal reported. 

    Citing people familiar with the matter, the Journal reported late Tuesday that

    Air Force users who try to view the websites of the New York Times, Britain’s Guardian, Spain’s El Pais, France’s Le Monde or German magazine Der Spiegel get a page saying ‘ACCESS DENIED. Internet Usage is Logged & Monitored’.

    The five media organisations were given access to secret US diplomatic documents by the whistleblower organization WikiLeaks before they were posted on the internet. The leaks have generated weeks of news coverage and provoked an international legal wrangle over WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

    The Air Force confirmed the blocking action, telling the Journal it had blocked more than 25 websites. The action was intended to keep classified material off unclassified computer systems, a spokeswoman for the Air Force said.

    The Journal reported that the Army, Navy and Marines said they were not blocking such websites.

    Air Force users who try to view the websites of the New York Times, Britain’s Guardian, Spain’s El Pais, France’s Le Monde or German magazine Der Spiegel instead get a page that says, “ACCESS DENIED. Internet Usage is Logged & Monitored,” according to a screen shot reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. The notice warns that anyone who accesses unauthorized sites from military computers could be punished.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/14/air-force-wikileaks_n_796799.html

    Try to arrest Assange for his real Crime?

    You can’t do it legally.

    May be true that he has compromised international diplomacy.

    But this is not the way to go about it.

    Entire world knows what all this is all about.

    You are harming yourself more by these juvenile actions.

    There is a saying in Tamil( a language of India)

    ‘Hide the comb and stop the marriage’