You can search by name detailed reports on the prisoners in Guantanamo facility where suspects of 9/11 attacks are interred.
Down loadable PDF Format.
You can search by name detailed reports on the prisoners in Guantanamo facility where suspects of 9/11 attacks are interred.
Down loadable PDF Format.
Bigger the Company, less the tax it pays.
They are effectively assisted by Accountants ,who under the guise of tax planning ,cheat the Government of Taxes.
Sting is the Government approves them and enroll them by training them/approving the Institutes that train them in their discipline.
They are called Financial Consultants,Chartered Accountants(chartered to evade tax?)
If the Accountants were to be honest, there would be no tax frauds.
General Electric is America’s biggest firm, but it’s not paying a dime in US taxes this year—instead, it has claimed a $3.2 billion tax benefit, the New York Times reports. Though it made a $14.2 billion profit in 2010, $5.1 billion of which was made here, GE’s aggressive accounting strategies and lobbying have, year after year, cut its tax burden on US profits. The reported figure is 7.4%, a third of what most American multinational firms pay—and thanks to offshore shelters, it’s even less in reality.
The company’s huge tax department, which includes former IRS members and writers of the tax code, has been called the best tax law firm in the world. GE has lobbied to change tax law in order, for example, to get credits for its wind turbine projects. The company is unapologetic: “We are committed to complying with tax rules and paying all legally obliged taxes,” says a spokeswoman. “At the same time, we have a responsibility to our shareholders to legally minimize our costs.”
Related.
General Electric paid no taxes in 2010. Or at least that was the major takeaway from a recent bomb-dropping exposé in the New York Times. At a time of obsessions with federal fiscal austerity, this was a big story, and everyone was talking about it last week.
I’ll admit to having a visceral negative reaction, in part because GE is an important company that most people have high expectations for. So I wanted a bit of distance before composing some thoughts. I thought it would also be interesting to see GE’s reaction and response before jumping to conclusions. But even after mulling it, I feel like the whole affair is not good for anyone — the country, the business world, or even GE itself.
Ok, so the facts are these. GE made $14 billion in profits in 2010, $5 billion in the U.S. Its tax bill in the U.S. will benegative $3.5 billion (as in getting money back). Is this legal? Of course it is. But the question on everyone’s lips is whether a company can be a solid, contributing member of society and pay no taxes.
http://blogs.hbr.org/winston/2011/04/corporate-citizenship-should-i.html

The Author’s denial seems feeble.
He does not categorically deny that he has implied.
He is very careful in declaring that ‘he did not use the word Bisexual any where’.
That’s all.
There are ways of insinuating with out explicitly stating.
Best is to ignore the remarks.
Decency demands that the Author states categorically that he does not say or imply that Gandhi was homosexual.
Or he should provide Documentation /proof.
Another Catherine Mayo’s book on India?
Gandhi said of the Author’s(book mentioned above ”sewage inspectors report”
But again they have to earn few pieces of Silver.
Gandhi does not need certification from semi pornographers.
Pity them!
The author of a new book on the life of Mahatma Gandhi angrily dismissed claims that he alleged Gandhi left his wife for a gay lover or was a racist despite upholding the cause of the downtrodden all his life.
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/book-alludes-to-gandhi-as-racist-bisexual/147365-40-100.html
Jad Adams, who wrote a book last year that itself caused a storm for examining how Gandhi bathed with nubile young women and often shared a bed with one or more of his female followers, rejected any suggestion that Gandhi was gay.
“If Gandhi committed acts of homosexuality, there would be ample evidence, either justifying them or expressing shame,” he said, adding Gandhi used the word “love” often in letters and speech.
Adams said that he believed Kallenbach was homosexual and strongly attracted to Gandhi, but that the future independence leader, who had four children with his wife Kasturba, did not reciprocate.
‘Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi And His Struggle With India’ is written by a former New York Times executive editor Joseph Lelyveld, who makes shocking claims about Gandhi and his conflicting personal ideologies on racism, political faddism and sexual perversion.
The international daily ‘Wall Street Journal‘ on Monday published a review of the contentious book, quoting passages that pointed at the duality in Gandhi’s life in his profession of love for mankind as a concept while actually despising people as individuals
The author’s reaction followed outrage in Indian media and followers of the man whom many consider as the architect of a successful civil disobedience campaign against the British Raj.
Lelyveld said his book had been misinterpreted by the press.
He said the word “bisexual” appears nowhere in the book and the word “racist” is used once to describe comments by Gandhi during his stay in South Africa.”
The British Daily Mail reported “Gandhi ‘left his wife to live with a male lover’ new book claims”, while the Daily Telegraph said he had “held racist views against South African blacks.”
Gandhi’s great-grandson Tushar Gandhi was quoted by the ‘Mail Today‘ daily as saying “these western writers have a morbid fascination for Gandhi’s sexuality. It only helps them sell their books. It is always open season with Gandhi.”
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/book-alludes-to-gandhi-as-racist-bisexual/147365-40-100.html
Related:
This week: Joseph Lelyveld revisits Gandhi’s years in South Africa; The Times’s John Schwartz on a new biography of Will Rogers; Julie Bosman has notes from the field; and Jennifer Schuessler has best-seller news. Sam Tanenhaus is the host. (Podcast Archive)
Jad Adams, who wrote a book last year that itself caused a storm for examining how Gandhi bathed with nubile young women and often shared a bed with one or more of his female followers, rejected any suggestion that Gandhi was gay.
“If Gandhi committed acts of homosexuality, there would be ample evidence, either justifying them or expressing shame,” he said, adding Gandhi used the word “love” often in letters and speech.
Adams said that he believed Kallenbach was homosexual and strongly attracted to Gandhi, but that the future independence leader, who had four children with his wife Kasturba, did not reciprocate.

Dear New York Times Reader,
Today marks a significant transition for The New York Times as we introduce digital subscriptions. It’s an important step that we hope you will see as an investment in The Times, one that will strengthen our ability to provide high-quality journalism to readers around the world and on any platform. The change will primarily affect those who are heavy consumers of the content on our Web site and on mobile applications.
This change comes in two stages. Today, we are rolling out digital subscriptions to our readers in Canada, which will enable us to fine-tune the customer experience before our global launch. On March 28, we will begin offering digital subscriptions in the U.S. and the rest of the world.
If you are a home delivery subscriber of The New York Times, you will continue to have full and free access to our news, information, opinion and the rest of our rich offerings on your computer, smartphone and tablet. International Herald Tribune subscribers will also receive free access to NYTimes.com.
If you are not a home delivery subscriber, you will have free access up to a defined reading limit. If you exceed that limit, you will be asked to become a digital subscriber.
This is how it will work, and what it means for you:
For more information, go to nytimes.com/digitalfaq.
Thank you for reading The New York Times, in all its forms
Would US have let off a spy caught in the act(CIA) ?
Seems that US administration thinks that the world did not know of CIA/Cons Ops . and only by gagging the Press it can suppress this information.
Probably Obama might have been the last one to know that Raymond Davis works for CIA.
Normally CIA would have washed its hands off the spy.
Why such concern?
Raymond might have been in possession of some serious and embarrassing information,
Sad that New York Times wilted under pressure.
Did NYT think the ‘suggestion’ by authorities was in the national interest and involved National Security?
So much for Free Press!
The New York Times had agreed to temporarily withhold information about Mr. Davis’s ties to the agency at the request of the Obama administration, which argued that disclosure of his specific job would put his life at risk. Several foreign news organizations have disclosed some aspects of Mr. Davis’s work with the C.I.A.
On Monday, American officials lifted their request to withhold publication. George Little, a C.I.A. spokesman, declined to comment specifically on the Davis matter, but said in a statement: “Our security personnel around the world act in a support role providing security for American officials. They do not conduct foreign intelligence collection or covert operations.”
Since the United States is not at war in Pakistan, the American military is largely restricted from operating in the country. So the Central Intelligence Agency has taken on an expanded role, operating armed drones that kill militants inside the country and running covert operations, sometimes without the knowledge of the Pakistanis.
WASHINGTON — The American arrested in Pakistan after shooting two men at a crowded traffic stop was part of a covert, C.I.A.-led team collecting intelligence and conducting surveillance on militant groups deep inside the country, according to American government officials.
Working from a safe house in the eastern city of Lahore, the detained American contractor, Raymond A. Davis, a retired Special Forces soldier, carried out scouting and other reconnaissance missions as a security officer for the Central Intelligence Agency case officers and technical experts doing the operations, the officials said.
Mr. Davis’s arrest and detention last month, which came after what American officials have described as a botched robbery attempt, have inadvertently pulled back the curtain on a web of covert American operations inside Pakistan, part of a secret war run by the C.I.A.
The episode has exacerbated already frayed relations between the American intelligence agency and its Pakistani counterpart, created a political dilemma for the weak, pro-American Pakistani government, and further threatened the stability of the country, which has the world’s fastest growing nuclear arsenal.
Without describing Mr. Davis’s mission or intelligence affiliation, President Obama last week made a public plea for his release. Meanwhile, there have been a flurry of private phone calls to Pakistan from Leon E. Panetta, the C.I.A. director, and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all intended to persuade the Pakistanis to release the secret operative.
Mr. Davis has worked for years as a C.I.A. contractor, including time at Blackwater Worldwide, the private security firm (now called Xe) that Pakistanis have long viewed as symbolizing a culture of American gun-slinging overseas.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/22/world/asia/22pakistan.html
Related:
It’s one thing for a newspaper to withhold information because they believe its disclosure would endanger lives. But here, the U.S. Government has spent weeks making public statements that were misleading in the extreme — Obama’s calling Davis “our diplomat in Pakistan” — while the NYT deliberately concealed facts undermining those government claims because government officials told them to do so. That’s called being an active enabler of government propaganda. While working for the CIA doesn’t preclude holding “diplomatic immunity,” it’s certainly relevant to the dispute between the two countries and the picture being painted by Obama officials. Moreover, since there is no declared war in Pakistan, this incident — as the NYT puts it today — “inadvertently pulled back the curtain on a web of covert American operations inside Pakistan, part of a secret war run by the C.I.A. ” That alone makes Davis’ work not just newsworthy, but crucial.
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/02/21/nyt/index.html
You must be logged in to post a comment.