Tag: New york Times.

  • ‘New York Times Killed Me’ NYT Reporter.

    Image representing New York Times as depicted ...
    Image via CrunchBase

    Visiting a troubled area is fraught with danger, especially when you are in pursuit of  hot stories.

    Chasing a Pulitzer or Booker that would bring in cheers and laurels is fine , but at what cost?

    If the Reporter had any sense he should have declined to travel and if refused should have quit.

    You can not have the cake and eat it too.

    Misplaced bravado and accusation!

    ‘Ed Shadid, the cousin of dead New York Times foreign correspondent Anthony Shadid, caused a stir over the weekend when he claimed in a speech that Anthony pre-emptively blamed the Times for his death in Syria, telling his wife: “If anything happens to me, I want the world to know that the New York Times killed me.” In an interview with Gawker, the surviving Shadid confirms the account and says the Times knew a trip to Syria was too dangerous, but sent him anyway.

     

    In his speech at the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee‘s convention on Saturday, which was initially reported on Twitter and later by Politico, Shadid said that his cousin didn’t want to go on the reporting trip to war-torn Syria that led to his death, reportedly from an asthma attack, in February. On the night before he left for Syria, Ed said, Anthony was “screaming and slamming on the phone in discussions with his editors.” In his last telephone call with his wife, Ed says, Anthony gave his “haunting last directive that if anything happens to me I want the world to know the New York Times killed me.”

    Update: Anthony Shadid’s widow Nada Bakri (herself a Times staffer) has issued a statement via Twitter.

    I do not approve of and will not be a part of any public discussion of Anthony’s passing. It does nothing but sadden Anthony’s children to have to endure repeated public discussion of the circumstances of their father’s death.

    In an interview, Ed Shadid—an Oklahoma City physician and city councilman—told Gawker that his cousin didn’t want to go to Syria in February, didn’t feel like he had the support of his editors, and had been previously warned off a Syria trip by a Times security consultant.

    “Did he want to go at that time?” Shadid said. “Did he feel like he had the logistical support necessary? The answer is no.” According to Ed, a Times security consultant reviewed a plan to infiltrate Anthony and his photographer Tyler Hicks across the border between Turkey and Syria in December 2011, but rejected it as too dangerous. “There was a security advisor who said, in no uncertain terms, ‘You are forbidden to enter Syria,’” Ed says. “So Anthony wrote an email to Tyler Hicks and says, ‘Hey man, it’s off. We’re not allowed to go.’” But roughly six weeks later, Ed says, Anthony’s editors reversed course and asked him to go anyway.

    “The situation was worse on the ground than it had been in December,” Ed says. “The only thing that had changed was that CNN had gained access to [the rebel stronghold] Idlid. My understanding is that CNN gaining access bothered his editors.”

    The night before Anthony left his home in Beirut for Turkey to begin the journey into Syria, Ed says, he was overheard on the phone with his editors “screaming at them and saying, ‘This is horseshit,’ and slamming down the phone.” He doesn’t know the specifics of what the arguments were about, but claims that Anthony felt he wasn’t supported by the Times. He asked for camping equipment to bring along on the journey through the mountainous border, Ed says, but his editors said no. When the 43-year-old reporter complained about the physical demands of the journey, Ed says, Times foreign editor Joseph Kahn responded, “It sounds like you’re going to get a lot of exercise on this assignment.”

    In a statement, the Times said that it “respectfully disagrees with Ed Shadid’s version of the facts” and that the paper “does not pressure reporters to go into combat zones. Anthony was an experienced, motivated correspondent. He decided whether, how and when to enter Syria, and was told by his editors, including on the day of the trip, that he should not make the trip if he felt it was not advisable for any reason.” Asked repeatedly whether a security consultant had rejected the Syria trip in December, Times spokesperson Eileen Murphy declined to comment.

    Whether or not Anthony—a lifelong smoker—wanted to go to Syria, his cousin says, he was in no shape to be there. “When I saw Anthony in December, he wheezing,” he says. “But the New York Times had never asked him to take a physical. If you are going to send someone across mountainous terrain with gun smugglers who could—and did—abandon the journalists, shouldn’t you have a sense of whether they were physically capable? I don’t think a physician would have signed off on him travelling this arduous terrain in the cold.”

    Contrary to a report from one Twitter correspondent who heard Ed’s speech, Shadid’s family is not pursuing legal action against the Times, even though he says he has “audiotapes and email evidence” to back up his claims. All he wants, he says, is to start a conversation about steps that the Times and other papers can take to better protect the safety of its correspondents. “How much would it cost to do an annual physical exam?” he says. “Or mandate basic medical training? These are not expensive, complicated things.” (According to Ed, Anthony’s companion Hicks improperly performed CPR on the stricken reporter.)

    Ed had previously spoken at several memorial events for his cousin, each time raising questions about whether the Times and other papers can do more to ensure the safety of their correspondents.

    “While the specifics of this case are important,” Ed says, “the bigger issue is what commonsense reforms can we put in place to protect journalists, at all newspapers.”

    He’s also concerned that the official narrative of Anthony’s death—he died of an asthma attack exarcebated by the presence of horses—doesn’t wash. The emphasis on asthma comes from Hicks, who wrote that Anthony sustained increasingly severe allergic reactions to the horses they travelled with. But according to Ed, Anthony took has young daughter to horseriding lessons once a week without any adverse reactions. “They put out a story that Anthony Shadid died from asthma—according to who? Dr. Tyler Hicks?” Ed says Hicks’ account of Anthony’s final moments—he “stopped and leaned against a large boulder [and] collapsed onto the ground…already unconscious and [not] breathing”—is much more consistent with a heart attack than an asthma attack. He also says an autopsy was performed on Anthony’s body in Turkey, and wonders why he hasn’t seen the results. “We don’t have them,” he says.’

    http://gawker.com/5921090/dead-new-york-times-reporter-anthony-shadid-allegedly-told-his-wife-the-times-killed-me?utm_source=Gawker+Newsletter&utm_campaign=f9477e6a06-UA-142218-2&utm_medium=email

     

     

  • Osama Death-Pakistan Arrests CIA Informants.Denies AsUsual.

    If any confirmation is needed that the Pakistani Authorities knew of Osama bin laden staying in Pakistan, this is it.

    Pakistan must have been keeping tabs on the CIA operatives.

    Otherwise how would they know that they have passed on the information?

    Again, even if Pakistan did not know of Osama staying in Pakistan before following  the CIA personnel, Pakistan should have known where Osama was staying by following these people.

    What action would Pakistan take against the personnel who had information of Osama bin laden?

    Or is it still in the denial mode?

    The arrest of the CIA informants is like arresting the State’s evidence and letting the Guilty go scot-free!

    Pakistan’s intelligence service has arrested the owner of a safe house rented to the CIA to observe Osama bin Laden’s compound before the U.S. raid that killed the al-Qaida leader, as well as a “handful” of other Pakistanis, a U.S. official said late Tuesday.

    The Times, in an article posted on its website late Tuesday, said detained informants included a Pakistani army major who officials said copied the license plates of cars visiting bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan in the weeks before the raid.

    The fate of the CIA informants who were arrested was unclear, but American officials told the newspaper that CIA Director Leon Panetta raised the issue when he visited Islamabad last week to meet with Pakistani military and intelligence officers…

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/15/pakistan-arrests-cia-informants-bin-laden-raid_n_877193.html

    Pakistan government has denied reports that its intelligence service has arrested five informants of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) over the raid at Osama bin Laden’s hide out in AbbotabadPakistan

    However, a spokesman of Pakistan’s Inter Services Pubilc Relations (ISPR) has strongly refuted the news report.

    “There is no army officer detained and the story is false and totally baseless,” the statement from ISPR said.

    Another Wound in Strained Relations

    Nevertheless, the latest developments add salt to the already strained relationship between U.S. and Pakistan after the Osama raid.

    http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/163192/20110615/osama-bin-laden-central-intelligence-agency-al-qaeda-cia-pakistan-isi-osama-raid-operation-geronimo-.htm

     

  • Twitter Finds’up to 30 Dismembered Bodies’

    A Twitter tweet
    Image via Wikipedia

    Any News will have an Event preceding it.

    Unless the source is checked .only misinformation remains.

    Yesterday,I came across a news item that the Supreme Court of India had asked the CBI to find where the 2G Scam money has gone before seeking opposing the bail application of Kanimozhi!

    I was about to blog on this when I came across the news that the Court had only mentioned in passing as to where the money has gone.

    It is not only non-existent stories but selective, and quoting out of context that has to be checked.

    If there are any incorrect information in my blog,please inform me.

    Story:

    On last Thursday’s visit, cops did come upon the smell of rotten meat (from a broken freezer), and blood on the door (from Bankson’s daughter’s boyfriend, who cut his wrist). They showed up after receiving a tip from a psychic (now under investigation). By that time however, even International news agencies were covering the non-existent story with growing detail including headlines such as, “Dozens of bodies’ found in mass Texas grave,” that were tweeted and retweeted hundreds of time. …

    “The way the events unfolded, probably around 3:30 or 3:45 p.m., we received a call from the Liberty County Sheriff’s Department (Public Information Officer) Rex Evans, so it did not start with a tweet with us,” Collura told Garfield. “So I can set the record straight.” Curiously, PIO Evans didn’t mention the cops got their tip from a psychic.

    For his part, PIO Evans didn’t seem interested in placing blame … or accepting it. He pretty much just spread it around, letting us all off the hook, or hanging us on it. “I believe not only mainstream media but social media played an integral part in,” the non-news frenzy. Adding that you can’t really pin it on anyone in particular, PIO Evans offered this timely observation: “In social media, nobody stops to verify anything.” Be it Facebook, emails or Twitter, “you can disseminate any information you want. Problem is, people don’t stop and think what they are releasing or putting out there could actually be harmful for someone else.”…

    “I thought ‘Medium’ was canceled,” cracked the Los Angeles Times Scott Collins on Twitter Tuesday night as news outlets rushed to retract their breathless headlines about a (non-existent) stack of two dozen dismembered bodies. Just about every media outlet sent a breaking alert out on Twitter, fromThe New York Times, to Breaking News, to the Associated Press. And plenty “confirmed” the story. ABC tweeted, ” ‘Dozens of bodies’ found in mass Texas grave.” Seth Mnookin tweeted the sentiment of many this morning: “Hope “breaking news! dozens of headless bodies on Texas ranch!” was fun for @nytimes, et al, while it lasted.”

    The supposed story of bodies, including those of children, rotting in an unattended farmhouse on the outskirts of metropolitan Houston came from a psychic who provided a tip to police. A psychic who is now under investigation. Most outlets got their headlines updated pretty quickly, and by today they’re leading with the fake-out. But Telegraph bloggerBrendan O’Neill caught a Reuters alert, now apparently deleted from the news agency’s site, that confirmed “Texas Authorities Find up to 30 Bodies.” The headline still shows up in a Google search.

    http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/13/6849978-how-twitter-found-up-to-30-dismembered-bodies-

    http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/06/psychics-tip-touches-off-mass-murder-media-frenzy/38618/

  • US Executive Has No Powers to Run the Country?

    Richard Milhous Nixon, 37th President of the U...
    Image via Wikipedia

     

    Democracy is about selection of the best,as it seems, the best available that stand for election and giving them time to represent the people.

    The Chief executive runs the country on behalf of the people and as such represents the will of the people at the time of election,not for every action he performs as the Chief executive, for such a process is not possible.

    Or you need to run Referendum for every action,even here there will be dissenters) which will lead to nothing but anarchy.

    The compromise in democracy is that you trust one and give him time to act whether it is in the interests of the country or not.

    If he does not run the country in the interests of the country,you replace him, period.

    Not that democracy is the best form of governance, but the best available on date.

    Story:

    In the 1960s, Ellsberg was a high-level Pentagon official, a former Marine commander who believed the American government was always on the right side. But while working for the administration of Lyndon Johnson, Ellsberg had access to a top-secret document that revealed senior American leaders, including several presidents, knew that the Vietnam War was an unwinnable, tragic quagmire.

    Officially titled “United States-Viet Nam Relations, 1945-1967: A Study Prepared by the Department of Defense,”–the Pentagon Papers, as they became known–also showed that the government had lied to Congress and the public about the progress of the war. In 1969, he photocopied the 7,000-page study and gave it to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In, 1971, Ellsberg leaked all 7,000 pages to The Washington Post, and 18 other newspapers, including The New York Times, which published them.

    Not long after, he surrendered to authorities and confessed to being the leaker. Ellsberg was charged as a spy. His trial, on twelve felony counts posing a possible sentence of 115 years, was dismissed on grounds of governmental misconduct against him. In April 1973, the court learned that Nixon had ordered his so-called “Plumbers Unit” to break into the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist to steal documents they hoped might make the whistle-blower appear crazy. In May, more evidence of government illegal wiretapping was revealed. The charges against Ellsberg were dropped. This led to the convictions of several White House aides and figured in the impeachment proceedings against President Nixon. (*More bio below)……

    The federal government has now declassified the Pentagon Papers. The Nixon Presidential Library & Museum will release the documents on June 13, forty years to the day that leaked portions of the report were published on the front page of  The New York Times.

    Also, the PBS series POV  is streaming “The Most Dangerous Man inAmerica: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers,” on June 13 and 14.

    In this interview, Ellsberg says, “Richard Nixon, if he were alive today, would feel vindicated that all the crimes he committed against me–which forced his resignation facing impeachment–are now legal. ” (Thanks to the Patriot Act and other laws passed in recent years.) And he says all presidents since Nixon have violated the constitution, most recently President Obama, with the bombing of Libya.

    Until now, the public has been able to read only the small portions of the report that you leaked. What do you think the impact of releasing all 7,000 pages might be?

    The “declassification” of the Pentagon Papers–exactly forty years late–is basically a non-event.  The notion that “only small portions” of the report were released forty years ago is pure hype by the Nixon Library.  Nearly all of the study–except for the negotiations volumes, which were mostly declassified over twenty years ago– became available in 1971,  between the redacted (censored)  Government Printing Office edition and the Senator Gravel edition put out by Beacon Press….

    On June 23, 1971, in an interview with CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite, you said,  “I think the lesson is that the people of this country can’t afford to let the President run the country by himself, even foreign affairs, without the help of Congress, without the help of the public. I think we cannot let the officials of the Executive Branch determine for us what it is that the public needs to know about how well and how they are discharging their functions.” How concerned are you that elected officials haven’t learned those lessons?

    I still stand by my cited conclusions, both for 1971 and for every single year since, including this one.  But I never expected elected officials in the Executive branch (of which there are exactly two in each administration) or their myriad subordinates to “learn those lessons” or to accept them as warnings.

    Leaders in the Executive branch–in every country– know what they’re doing, and why they’re doing it, and they always want to stay in office and keep on running things with as little interference from Congress, the public and the courts as possible: which means, with as much secrecy as they can manage.  So I’m not exactly concerned that they’re still at it (which is why I’m still at what I do), since that is so predictable, in every government, tyrannical or “democratic.”…

    However, as has been pointed out repeatedly by Glenn Greenwald,  ( CLICK HERE) and  Bruce Ackerman , David Swanson and others, no president has so blatantly violated the constitutional division of war powers as  President Obama in his ongoing attack on Libya, without a nod even to the statutory War Powers Act, that post-Pentagon Papers effort by Congress to recapture something of the role assigned exclusively to it by the Constitution…

    These days, when you find yourself thinking about Richard Nixon, what comes to mind?

    Richard Nixon, if he were alive today, might take bittersweet satisfaction to know that he was not the last smart president to prolong unjustifiably a senseless, unwinnable war, at great cost in human life.  (And his aide Henry Kissinger was not the last American official to win an undeserved Nobel Peace Prize.)

    He would probably also feel vindicated (and envious) that ALL the crimes he committed against me–which forced his resignation facing impeachment–are now legal.

    That includes burglarizing my former psychoanalyst’s office (for material to blackmail me into silence), warrantless wiretapping, using the CIA against an American citizen in the US, and authorizing a White House hit squad to “incapacitate me totally” (on the steps of the Capitol on May 3, 1971). All the above were to prevent me from exposing guilty secrets of his own administration that went beyond the Pentagon Papers.    But under George W. Bush and Barack Obama,with the PATRIOT Act, the FISA Amendment Act, and (for the hit squad) President Obama’s executive orders. they have all become legal….

    http://inthearena.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/07/daniel-ellsberg-all-the-crimes-richard-nixon-committed-against-me-are-now-legal/

  • U.A.E .Builds Secret Army Of Colombian Mercenaries By US.

    Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, has a new project.

    Is the force meant to counter  terrorist attacks?

    Looks as though it is meant to protect the Sheikhs from their people and Army,which they do not seem to trust.

    Resorting to Mercenaries organised by a Foreign power will definitely give an edge to terrorist outfits like the Al Qaeda.

    The Rulers are inviting trouble, considering especially the volatile situation in Yemen,Somalia,Egypt ,Libya and elsewhere in the Muslim Countries.

    They must remember they will be detested by their people and their country will be taken for granted by US, like Pakistan.

    As for US, the operation could not have been undertaken with out Governmental sanction.

    US heading for another quagmire?

    Copy of Mercenary Contract

    Copy of Mercenary Contract

    Click the Above link to see the Mercenary Contract.

    ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — Late one night last November, a plane carrying dozens of Colombian men touched down in this glittering seaside capital. Whisked through customs by an Emirati intelligence officer, the group boarded an unmarked bus and drove roughly 20 miles to a windswept military complex in the desert sand….

    The Colombians had entered the United Arab Emirates posing as construction workers. In fact, they were soldiers for a secret American-led mercenary army being built by Erik Prince, the billionaire founder ofBlackwater Worldwide, with $529 million from the oil-soaked sheikdom.

    Mr. Prince, who resettled here last year after his security business faced mounting legal problems in the United States, was hired by the crown prince of Abu Dhabi to put together an 800-member battalion of foreign troops for the U.A.E., according to former employees on the project, American officials and corporate documents obtained by The New York Times.

    The force is intended to conduct special operations missions inside and outside the country, defend oil pipelines and skyscrapers from terrorist attacks and put down internal revolts, the documents show. Such troops could be deployed if the Emirates faced unrest in their crowded labor camps or were challenged by pro-democracy protests like those sweeping the Arab world this year.

    The U.A.E.’s rulers, viewing their own military as inadequate, also hope that the troops could blunt the regional aggression of Iran, the country’s biggest foe, the former employees said. The training camp, located on a sprawling Emirati base called Zayed Military City, is hidden behind concrete walls laced with barbed wire. Photographs show rows of identical yellow temporary buildings, used for barracks and mess halls, and a motor pool, which houses Humvees and fuel trucks. The Colombians, along with South African and other foreign troops, are trained by retired American soldiers and veterans of the German and British special operations units and the French Foreign Legion, according to the former employees and American officials.

    In outsourcing critical parts of their defense to mercenaries — the soldiers of choice for medieval kings, Italian Renaissance dukes and African dictators — the Emiratis have begun a new era in the boom in wartime contracting that began after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. And by relying on a force largely created by Americans, they have introduced a volatile element in an already combustible region where the United States is widely viewed with suspicion.

    The United Arab Emirates — an autocracy with the sheen of a progressive, modern state — are closely allied with the United States, and American officials indicated that the battalion program had some support in Washington.

    “The gulf countries, and the U.A.E. in particular, don’t have a lot of military experience. It would make sense if they looked outside their borders for help,” said one Obama administration official who knew of the operation. “They might want to show that they are not to be messed with.”

    Still, it is not clear whether the project has the United States’ official blessing. Legal experts and government officials said some of those involved with the battalion might be breaking federal laws that prohibit American citizens from training foreign troops if they did not secure a license from the State Department.

    Mark C. Toner, a spokesman for the department, would not confirm whether Mr. Prince’s company had obtained such a license, but he said the department was investigating to see if the training effort was in violation of American laws. Mr. Toner pointed out that Blackwater (which renamed itself Xe Services ) paid $42 million in fines last year for training foreign troops in Jordan and other countries over the years.

    The U.A.E.’s ambassador to Washington, Yousef al-Otaiba, declined to comment for this article. A spokesman for Mr. Prince also did not comment.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/15/world/middleeast/15prince.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha2