Tag: Columbia University

  • Some Mysteries of The Human Body (Unsolved)

    Some Mysteries of The Human body are quite intriguing.

     

    We do not know much about them.

     

    Yet we feel we have all the answers and subject our body to Medicine/Surgery.

     

    Please read the ones on Appendix and The Brain.

    Story:

    If you shaved a chimpanzee and took a photo of its body from the neck to the waist, “at first glance you wouldn’t really notice that it isn’t human,” said Kevin Hunt, director of the Human Origins and Primate Evolution Lab at Indiana University. The two species’ musculature is extremely similar, but somehow, pound-for-pound, chimps are between two and three times stronger than humans, Hunt told us. It’s unclear why we’re so much wimpier than our closest hominid relatives; perhaps our muscles’ attachment points subtly differ, or our muscle fibers could be less dense.

    /original/ape-human-02.jpg
    Man and Chimp.

    Either way, the result is slightly humiliating. Once, in an African forest, Hunt watched an 85-pound female chimp snap branches off an aptly named ironwood tree with her fingertips. It took Hunt two hands and all the strength he could muster to snap an equally thick branch. [Chimps vs. Humans: How Are We Different?

    Nine out of 10 people are right-handed. More mysterious than the dearth of southpaws is the fact that humans have dominant hands in the first place. Why just one hand with top-notch motor skills, instead of a double dose of dexterity? One theory holds that handedness results from having more intricate wiring on the side of the brain involved in speech (which also requires fine motor skills). Because the speech center usually sits in the left brain hemisphere — the side wired to the right side of the body — the right hand ends up dominant in most people. However, this theory gets a big blow from the fact that not all right-handed people control speech in the left hemisphere, while half oflefties do. Perplexing.

    Like all other female apes, women’s breasts fill with milk when they have newborn babies to feed. But female humans alone have bloated bosoms at all other times, too. Scientists can’t agree on what — or who — our “permanently enlarged breasts” are for. Most evolutionary biologists think breasts serve the purpose of attracting men, who get fooled into thinking a busty woman will make a great baby feeder (even though her breasts actually contain fat, not milk).

    breastfeeding.jpg
    Breastfeeding.

    Anthropologists, meanwhile, tend to think breasts evolved for women and babies, not men, noting that in many cultures, men don’t find big breasts remotely sexy. Florence Williams, author of “Breasts” (W.W. Norton, 2012), thinks women developed permanently enlarged bosoms to meet the greater energy needs of big-brained human babies. Hormones in breasts promote fat storage, and this stored fat gets released into milk during breast-feeding. In short, “breast fat goes toward forming the baby’s brain,” Williams told Life’s Little Mysteries. But the theory has yet to gain universal acceptance.

    Theories abound when it comes to pubes. Some say these coarse, curly tendrils are sexual ornaments — a visual signal of sexual maturity and a reservoir of smelly pheromones. Others think bushes keep our oh-so-precious nether regions cozy. Still others assert that they serve as padding, preventing chafing during sex. Whatever the reason, many modern people want this stuff gone.

    A couple of handfuls of your body aren’t actually your body. For every one of your cells, 10 microbes live inside you, and these hangers-on collectively compose a few pounds (1 to 3 percent) of your total weight. Some of this in-house fauna cleans our skin while some helps us digest food, but the bulk of these microbes contribute to our bodily functions in ways unknown. Healthy people even harbor low levels of harmful viruses, which appear to do something besides sicken us.

    “We’re just learning that the consequence of antibiotics is that when you get rid of the good bacteria in our guts, we can develop autoimmune diseases [such as allergies]. We’re not as advanced in our understanding of viruses. What do viruses do for us?” Vincent Racaniello, professor of microbiology and immunology at Columbia University, told Life’s Little Mysteries. Clearly, we’ve signed up for a whole bunch of symbiotic relationships, and have no idea what we’re getting out of the deal.

    The poor old human appendix gets lumped in with the likes of wisdom teeth, ear-wiggling muscles and our other useless evolutionary holdovers.

     

    /original/appendix.png
    The Appendix.

    The worm-shaped organ’s inconsequentiality seems proven by the fact that it can be removed with no obvious drawbacks. But biologists have recently begun to question the long-held assumption of appendix pointlessness. Some suggest it may help train the immune system during fetal development. Other research indicates the organ serves as a “safe house” for the bacteria that aid in digestion, holding a secret stash of microbes that repopulate the rest of the digestive tract after gut-evacuating bouts of diarrhea. The word “appendix” means afterthought. But maybe, just maybe, it isn’t one.

    How do the 100 trillion neural connections in our brains work together to create the feeling of being alive? Many great thinkers consider consciousness to be the biggest mystery not just of the human body, but the biggest one, period. As the neuroscientist V.S. Ramachandran put it, “[A]ny single brain, including yours, is made up of atoms that were forged in the hearts of countless, far-flung starsbillions of years ago. These particles drifted for eons and light-years until gravity and chance brought them together here, now. These atoms now form a conglomerate — your brain — that can not only ponder the very stars that gave it birth but can also think about its own ability to think and wonder about its own ability to wonder. With the arrival of humans, it has been said, the universe has suddenly become conscious of itself. This, truly, is the greatest mystery of all.”

    http://www.lifeslittlemysteries.com/2712-biggest-mysteries-human-body.html

     

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Facebook, Divorce,Alcohol Abuse,Escort Service,Syphilis

    The Internet is abuzz  with Statistics showing that Facebook is responsible for 20% of Divorce according to Lawyers.

    facebook
    facebook (Photo credit: sitmonkeysupreme)

    Worst of all is the fact that “”There are now FB widows and ‘spending time on Facebook’ is replacing ‘spending time online watching porn’ as grounds for cruelty,” said Deshmukh.

    There are also reports that Facebook increases Alcohol abuse.
    Neela Gokhale, a divorce advocate, recounts that in Pune, a woman found her husband “obsessed with FB and ‘adding’ women friends. She has filed for divorce”. Facebook posts and pictures are being used as evidence in courts”

    People want to pour out their emotions in Face Book , least understanding that the information they post may be used by professional Pimps ,lurking under the guise of Escort Service or offering to console them(men by women ,women by men).

    One leads to another and ends up in illicit relationship.
    You find a column(is it how it is called(?)  where boys and girls state that they are in ‘Relationship?

    In some cases it lets people know that they are in Love and use this to let the parents  know of their Love through this medium or by those who can inform the parents,having seen the Status.

    The ideal step,in the case of a Genuine Love, is to inform parents directly.

    People do not know realize that it hurts a parent know of their children’s relationship through others, especially when they happen to be the last to be informed.

    But in illicit relationships, the price one may have to pay ranges from Divorce to Death,Murder.

    Many a future have been ruined by posting indiscriminatingly in Facebook .

    No use in blaming the Social Media.

    Post Garbage,get Garbage.

    Please read my blog .Avoid posting these information On line

    When Facebook gets involved, relationships can quickly fall apart – as Hosni Mubarak and Muammar Gaddafi have discovered. But dictatorships are not the only ties being dissolved by social networkingsites: now Facebook is increasingly being blamed for undermining American marriages.

    Even though the rate of divorce in the US has remained largely stable in recent years, American divorce lawyers and academics have joined Middle East analysts in picking out Facebook as a leading cause of relationship trouble, with American lawyers now demanding to see their clients’ Facebook pages as a matter of course before the start of proceedings.

    “We’re coming across it more and more. One spouse connects online with someone they knew from school. The person is emotionally available and they start communicating through Facebook,” said Dr Steven Kimmons, a clinical psychologist and marriage counsellor at Loyola University Medical Centre near Chicago.

    Yet while the US media has been quick to trumpet any evidence of Facebook as the country’s leading marriage-wrecker, the truth is “It’s complicated,” as the site’s relationship status would have it.

    2010 survey by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) found that four out of five lawyers reported an increasing number of divorce cases citing evidence derived from social networking sites in the past five years, with Facebook being the market leader.

    Two-thirds of the lawyers surveyed said that Facebook was the “primary source” of evidence in divorce proceedings, while MySpace with 15% and Twitter with 5% lagged far behind.

    Those statistics included not just evidence of infidelity but other legal battles, such as child custody cases in which parents deny using illicit drugs but boast of smoking marijuana on their Facebook pages.

    Photographs harvested from social networking sites – including those posted by friends or colleagues on their own pages – are a particularly rich source of damning evidence, according to divorce lawyers.

    “This sort of evidence has gone from nothing to a large percentage of my cases coming in,” Linda Lea Vicken, a member of the divorce lawyers’ group from South Dakota, told the Associated Press.

    Marlene Eskind Moses, president of the AAML, said the openness and sharing of social networking sites left their users’ public and private lives more exposed.

    “If you publicly post any contradictions to previously made statements and promises, an estranged spouse will certainly be one of the first people to notice and make use of that evidence,” said Moses.

    Statistics for January from online analysts Nielsen showed 135 million people in the US visiting Facebook during the month – nearly 70% of the country’s internet users. On average, users spent more than seven hours a month visiting the site, far longer than the less than half an hour spent on visits to Amazon or the average of two hours and 15 minutes on Google, America’s most popular web destination.”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/08/facebook-us-divorces

    It found those who used such sites daily were five times more likely to smoke tobacco as those who did not, three times as likely to drink alcohol and twice as likely to use marijuana.

    The poll of 12 to 17-year-olds Americans, conducted by Columbia University, found 70 per cent of those interviewed said they used social networking sites on a typical day, while 30 per cent did not.

    One of the main reasons for going on such sits, besides actually communicating with friends, is to keep tabs on peers by looking at their photographs.

    But the study found that pictures of teenagers “drunk, passed out, or using drugs on Facebook and other sites” were “rampant”.

    However, parents seemed unaware that browsing such sites could increase their child’s likelihood of abusing drink or drugs, with almost nine in 10 believing it did not have an effect on them.”

    Case have increased fourfold in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside, the areas of Britain where Facebook is most popular.

    Professor Peter Kelly, director of public health in Teesside, claimed staff had found a link between social networking sites and the spread of the bacteria, especially among young women.

    He said: “Syphilis is a devastating disease. Anyone who has unprotected sex with casual partners is at high risk.

    “There has been a fourfold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected with more young women being affected.

    “I don’t get the names of people affected, just figures, and I saw that several of the people had met sexual partners through these sites.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7508945/Facebook-linked-to-rise-in-syphilis.html

    “Some marriages may get saved, but Facebook, which a recent survey in UK blamed for nearly a third of all divorces, is leading to a rise in face-offs in family courts across India too. “Facebook is fast becoming a reason why many marriages are faltering,” said celebrity divorce lawyer Mrinalini Deshmukh.

    As divorce petitions get peppered with the mention of Facebook and printouts of web pages, the reason is not merely because couples spend more hours individually on the site, Deshmukh said. “Spending more time, especially at night before bedtime, with friends on Facebook or merely playing games on the site is no doubt eating into couples’ together-time or intimacy. More pertinently, if someone wants to have an affair or flirt, then FB is an easy place to do it. People also use the ‘friend finder’ to re-unite with school or college friends and some really unite. One couple opted for mutual consent divorce when her husband found his former love on FB,” the lawyer explained.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/social-media/Facebook-face-offs-pepper-divorce-cases-across-India/articleshow/13748175.cms

  • Dinosaurs May Have Evolved Elsewhere in Universe”

    One tends to agree with Erich von Daniken‘s view of the Universe and the Earth as put forth in his Book Chariot of The Gods.

    His premise is that the earth was visited by Extra terrestrial who keep visiting the Earth.

    They have modified our Genes to evolve as they would like us to evolve.

    He quotes extensively from World Mythologies and History to support his claims.

    In fact he compares the description of the devastation  caused by the Brahmastra with that of the after effects of Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    They read eerily similar.

    Book is worth reading to get a different perspective of  theEarth’s evolution.

    Dinosaur Image
    Dinosaur

    http://www.newmanlib.ibri.org/NewmanPpt/Chariots.pdf

    For Free Down Load.

    http://torrentz.eu/04e7d25a26408e24e767f4e8a0ce6a8db21e3e65

    New scientific research raises the possibility that advanced versions of T. rex and other dinosaurs — monstrous creatures with the intelligence and cunning of humans — may be the life forms that evolved on other planets in the universe. “We would be better off not meeting them,” concludes the study, led by Ronald Breslow, University Professor in the Departments of Chemistry and Biology at Columbia University.

    The study focuses on the century-old mystery of why the building blocks of terrestrial amino acids (which make up proteins), sugars, and the genetic materials DNA and RNA exist mainly in one orientation or shape.
    There are two possible orientations, left and right, which mirror each other in the same way as hands. This is known as “chirality.” In order for life to arise, proteins, for instance, must contain only one chiral form of amino acids, left or right. With the exception of a few bacteria, amino acids in all life on Earth have the left-handed orientation. Most sugars have a right-handed orientation. How did that so-called homochirality, the predominance of one chiral form, happen?

    Breslow describes evidence supporting the idea that the unusual amino acids carried to a lifeless Earth by meteorites about 4 billion years ago set the pattern for normal amino acids with the L-geometry, the kind in terrestial proteins, and how those could lead to D-sugars of the kind in DNA

    http://digg.com/newsbar/topnews/intelligent_advanced_versions_of_earth_s_dinosaurs_may_have_evolved_elsewhere_in_universe