‘The Hindu’s Pro-Lanka Bias? N.Ram Fumbles.

The Hindu‘s coverage of the news relating to  Tamil Genocide warrants this conclusion.

The Hindu which was known for integrity and unbiased reporting is no more.

English: Dmitry Medvedev and Mahinda Rajapaksa...
Image via Wikipedia

‘Activists of Delhi Tamil Students’ Union, Democratic Students Union, Students for Resistance and other common students raised slogans against N. Ram accusing him of being a ‘media fascist’ and ‘a stooge of Rajapaksa’ at a public meeting in JNU after his reply to a question on The Hindu’s role in whitewashing the Sri Lankan state genocide of the Eezham Tamils, wherein he had extensively blamed the LTTE. The meeting on ‘Paid news and media ethics’ was organized at JNU on Wednesday by the Student’s Federation of India, which is the students wing of the CPI(M). The fact that N.Ram and The Hindu have unethically manipulated news to cover up the war crimes of Colombo makes them complicit in the genocide committed on the Eezham Tamils, a Tamil Nadu research scholar in JNU told TamilNet.

Mr. Ram was talking about journalist coverage in India elections and during the US’ wars and on the theme of media ethics, referring greatly to Noam Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent, a classic on understanding how news is manipulated and on editorial bias.

An activist of the DTSU raised a question on why Ram, who had talked about journalists being attacked in Palestine and Iraq, had nothing to say about media freedom and assault on journalists in Sri Lanka, including murder of Sinhala journalist Lasantha Wikramatunga.

When he has been silent about this, used his newspaper to support the genocidal war on the Eezham Tamils, called a visit to the IDP camps in Vavuniya an uplifting experience when they were reality in concentration camps, how could he talk about the ethics of journalism, the activist further asked.

As a reply, N. Ram had said that those who criticize the GoSL do not criticize the LTTE [an argument highlighted by Mahinda Rajapaksa too nowadays]. After criticizing the ‘ruthlessness’ of the LTTE in his reply, he added a line that had the GoSL committed excesses, he would criticize that too…..

When an activist of the DSU observed that his bias was obvious in his reply itself, where he had criticized the LTTE for ten minutes, but had only one line to say about the GoSL, and whether this was his idea of media ethics, Ram fumbled for a response. At this, students in the audience remarked loudly that ‘this is why they gave you Sri Lanka Ratna’ and shouted ‘shame’.

http://www.tamilnewsnetwork.com/2012/03/15/ram-journalism-faces-criticism-in-jnu-for-pro-sri-lanka-bias-endorsing-genocide/

Comments

One response to “‘The Hindu’s Pro-Lanka Bias? N.Ram Fumbles.”

  1. shankarboregowda Avatar
    shankarboregowda

    I FULLY SUPPORT SRI LANKA.DO ANY ONE HAS GUTS TO QUESTION ME.AT FIRST LET LTTE SUPPORTERS COME OUT WITH LOGIC WHO KILLED RAJIV GANDHI.MORE OVER WHO IS BEHIND THE ASSASSINATION.DO ANY ONE GOT GUTS FOR OPEN DEBATE ON SRI LANKA.PRABHAKARAN KILLED THOUSANDS OF SRI LANKAN CITIZENS.WHAT YOU WERE DOING.DON’T YOU HAVE EYES AND EARS AND MOUTH TO TALK.TODAY YOU STUPID BASTARDS MAKING ALL ALLEGATIONS ON SRI LANKA.WHEN PRABHAKARAN WAS KILLING MERCILESSLY WHAT YOU WERE DOING WHERE THE HELL YOU PEOPLE DOING.UNITED STATES PLAYING DIRTY POLITICS.BECAUSE SRI LANKA TOOK ASSISTANCE FROM CHINA TO SMASH THE TERRORISTS LIKE PRABHAKARAN.

Leave a Reply

More posts

Discover more from Ramanisblog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading