Aarushi Murder New Evidence Confusion To Mislead.

The Aarushi murder case is now in the final stages, with the prosecutor, having just finished his concluding remarks,

As I have been following the case regularly, indicating the criminality of the parents in hiding the crime, suppressing crime evidence, having the Police personnel transferred, asking the Doctors who were doing the post mortem to doctor the report and as a last resort have made use of Media by paid write-up in defense of them.

Now it transpires that the parents were not asleep in their room when their thirteen year old daughter was raped and  brutally murdered, but were busy browsing the Internet.

Not content with this, they seem to be doing what ever is possible by the moneyed to sow seeds of doubt in the testimonies of the witnesses by a TV  Channel proprietor coming out now saying that there was a footage of a song Playlist which confirmed that there were seven people in the Home of the Talwars while the murder was being committed.

And the CBI did not use this evidence.

The intention seems to sow suspicion in the minds of the Judges to exonerate the parents from the hideous crime on the basis of ‘Benefit of Doubt’

But what they seem to have forgotten is the fact that the CBI closed the Case earlier.

That Rajesh Talwar did not identify the Body of Hemraj.

Talwar had the door removed and painted it.

Had the Police personnel transferred.

The CBI refuted the allegation that they suppressed the TV Channel evidence by explaining that the information that the suspects(seven people) were listening in to the programme was revealed to them during the Narco Analysis and that the Analysis was discredited.

Sounds correct.

What could then have happened on the day of Murder?

What is the motive?

Possible scenarios.

1.Aarushi and Hemraj had illicit liaison , Tawars found it and in a fit of anger and murdered them both.

2.Mrs. Talwar had illicit relations with Hemraj, found in the act by Aarushi who informed her father and in the scuffle Hemraj was murdered and somehow Aarushi got in the way , got murdered .

3.Rajesh Talwar’s relation with Aarushi was not paternal ,found out by Mrs. Talwar, in the melee Mrs.Talwar murdered him with the help of Hemraj while Hemraj and Aarushi were the unintended victims,Aaarushi by and Hemraj by Talwar.

4.The girl was used for immoral purposes and was gang raped and murdered with the parent ‘s connivance.

All the these theories are preposterous.

However, as Sherlock Holmes would out it, ‘when you eliminate all the possibilities,what remains is possible though it ma appear to be improbable.

My earlier post on this, Excerpt.

The Aarushi double murder case has been bewildering  from the beginning.

I have been posting on the developments as they unfolded.

I have in the last post mentioned that Rajesh Talwar’s DNA had to be checked and matched with the DNA found on Aarushi’s pillow.

This does not have come t pass.

The CBI though wanted to close due to insufficient evidence in the first attempt’ later charge sheeted the Talwars as the accused.

Now Tehelka comes with a piece questioning the decision of the CBI Court, Magistrate Court and the Supreme Court on the ground that thirteen witnesses, asked to be examined by the Talwars were not allowed to be examined.

The article also says that two explosive discoveries on the Narco tests on Krishna were found and states that it would deal with them later in the story.

But no further information on this is provided.

The main arguments that the Talwars are not guilty , apart from a syrupy wailing prose are

1.That “So: two parents with no former history of dysfunctionality or rage are accused of butchering their only child.”

So if you can be punished only if you have a history of Dysfunctionality or Rage?

2.That they have not been allowed to cross-examine 13 witnesses, when after the case is over in the first instance and in the second after a thorough examination of witnesses, some 39 of them.

If one keeps on asking for witnesses as an afterthought after the case is over , or even closed. when will a trial end?.

3.Insinuation by a Journalist ,As Avirook Sen, a journalist who has been attending the trial regularly, writing sharp reports for the Mumbai Mirror, says, “According to me, the CBI never intended to go for a trial. But when a trial was ordered, they just had to extemporise the evidence along the way. Now, with each passing day in court, they are getting more and more invested in their own story.’

4.Why there are no answers for some questions I have raised?On Feb 10,2011.

“Why don’t you answer the following questions?

Why do you communicate with your daughter through  email when she is in the next room?

How was the evidence dressed up?

Why Aarushi’s cuts bore the precision of a Surgeon?

Why was the doctor asked not to report rape?

If your conscience is clean you would not be talking like this, rather you would be cooperating with the authorities as a father would.

Well, a Father would.(http://ramanisblog.in/2011/02/10/indiaa-banana-republic-aarushis-father/)

Some more question I raised on 7 January 2012,

http://ramanisblog.in/2013/08/31/aarushi-murder-tehelka-in-defence-of-talwars/

”

On October 15, the CBI had told the court that dentists Rajesh and Nupur Talwar dressed up the crime scene and tried to influence a doctor who conducted the autopsy of the teenager.

two used their home computer’s Internet all through the night of the murder, indicating that they were not asleep as claimed by them.

Aarushi, 14, was found murdered at her parents’ Noida residence on May 16, 2008. The body of their domestic help Hemraj was found the next day on the terrace of the house.

The CBI claimed that the suspicion was on the Talwars as they disturbed the crime scene and destroyed evidence on Aarushi’s body.

Blood stains on the railing of staircases, lock and on the steps were found partially mopped, the CBI had said, adding that this indicated the involvement of the dentist couple in the double murder.

The Talwars also tried to influence the doctor who performed the post-mortem on Aarushi, the CBI had said. ”

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/1904796/report-aarushi-murder-case-cbi-says-rajesh-and-nupur-talwar-guilty-of-killing-daughter-and-servant

http://ramanisblog.in/2012/08/09/dna-on-aarushi-talwars-pillow-covermatch-rajesh-talwars/

http://www.tehelka.com/framed-the-aarushi-hemraj-murder-case-an-investigation/

http://mrwhatis.net/aarushis-story.html

Related Articles

• Aarushi Talwar murder: Defence witness fails to turn up (dnaindia.com)
• Final arguments in Aarushi-Hemraj murder case begins (ndtv.com)