Tag: Viswamitra

  • Who Saw Rama As Vishnu In Physical Form, Ramayana

    Who saw Lord Rama as Vishnu Himself in Human Form?

    There are references in The Ramayana of people recognizing Rama as Vishnu.

    Hanuman, Shiva and Rama.Image.jpg
    Hanuman, Shiva and Rama.

    Viswamitra makes the first mention of this when he tells Dasaratha, while taking Rama with him that Dasaratha did not realize who Rama was, implying he knew Rama was Vishnu , but he did not express it openly.

    The next instance is when Parashurama’s Astra fails, He addresses Rama as an Incarnation of Vishnu.

    Then Ravana realizes Rama was none other than Vishnu, the Pranava Swaroopa, when Ravana’s Sakthi Ayudha fails.

    Later Vibhishana knew Rama was Vishnu.

    But it is Hanuman who sees Rama as Vishnu by looking at Rama the first instance, as Vishnu .

    That too in Vishnu in His Physical form.

    Valmiki talks of this.

    aayataaH cha suvR^ittaaH cha baahavaH parighopamaaH || 4-3-14
    sarva bhuuShaNa bhuuShaarhaaH kim artham na vibhuuShitaaH |

    14b, 15a. aayataaH su vR^ittaaH baahavaH= lengthy, spherical, too, are arms; parighaH upamaH= clubs, in similarity; sarva bhuuSaNa bhuuSa arhaaH= for all kinds of, ornaments, decor-worthy; kim artham= for what, reason; na vibhuuSitaaH= not decorated.

    “Also lengthy are your hands, and spherical are your shoulders similar to clubs… they are worthy for decoration with every kind of ornament, for what reason they are undecorated… [4-3-14b, 15a]

    Here in the verse plural number is used for hands, aayataaH, baahavaH, parighaaH, whereas so far, dual number, dvivachana is used to describe any two. The ancient commentators take this as many hands, more than two, as opposite to other dual numbered wording. For this it is said that since Lakshmana is a right hand to Rama, Hanuma sees a three-handed god in Rama. But Hanuma is talking to both Rama and Lakshmana; there shall be two deities with two hands each. The accepted phenomenon is that, Hanuma as a true devotee has seen the fourhanded Vishnu in Rama. This is according to Govindaraja. Next, the arms of Rama are of protective nature to the friendly ones. aayaataaH, lengthily ones – they can be stretched to any extent, and on the other hand, anything can depend on them, as in yopaam aayatanam veda… and this su vrittaaH, round like the serpent’s hoods, or body builder’s clubs, is to tell that no one can near them. Thus, the spherical universe can depend on the spherical shoulders of Rama. Thus Hanuma is reminding Rama of his wild-boar incarnation where the whole world is lifted on his snout from waters. The word parighaH, is to say that those spherical shoulders can remove difficulties of those who adore them. The parighaH in simple terms means, clubs, bludgeon, or ancient dumbbell unlike the present day dumbbells of gym, but the word is deciphered to be pari gha fully, removing, or fully, falling to one’s lot. That is, here these shoulders are mighty to eliminate Vali and these hands if shook by Sugreeva in friendship, Sugreeva’s miseries will be removed completely..

    In Sanskrit there are different  words for  addressing a Single person(Eka Vachana), two (Dwivachana) and more than two(Bahu Vachana)

    Citation.

    http://www.valmikiramayan.net/kishkindha/sarga3/kishkindha_3_prose.htm

  • Dravidians And Aryans Were amid Each Other Proof.

    Dravidians And Aryans Were amid Each Other Proof.

    One finds it very curious about the  relationship of the people of India living in the northern part of India, North of  the Vindhya Ranges, where the

    Vedic civilization flourished and the Southern part, South of the Vindhyas.

    There are some assumed facts.

    1.Vedic civilization was a closed one and Dravidians had no inkling of it.

    2.The Vedic people considered the Dravidians as Barbarians and uncultured.

    They were called as Dasyu meaning Slaves.

    3.That the Vedic life was introduced by the sons of Viswamitra through their descendant, Apasthamba( I was holding this view and  you can see my

    posts on this and my view was based on the scholarly view of PT.Srinivasa Ayyangar in his Book History of the Tamils.

    The Vedic people banished  criminals and the sinners to Dravida Desa.

    4.The Dravidas were invaded by people from the north and the Dravidians , subjugated and the Dravidians became cultured.

    Lets us see how right these assumptions are.


    1.Vedic civilization was a closed one and Dravidianas had no inkling of it.

    Far from it.

    To begin with the Bharata varsha extended beyond the Vindhyas,Asia, included Lemuria,Far east,Africas, Americas and the Europe, including the

    Scandinavian Countriies.

    The customs that have survived in these areas, the artifacts and temples, system of worship point to Vedic Presence.

    The worship of Fire, Burning the corpses,Worship of the Sun, Use of Spices native to India, Temples like Angkor,worship of ancestors , especially in

    Read some of my posts on these under Hinduism.

    The designation as the Chief  God of each geographical Division unique to Tamils-Varuna for Neythal Seashore,Korkai, Durga for Palai, Desert, Mayon,

    Vishnu for Mullai, Forests.

    The participation of Northern kings in Southern princesses’ Swayamvara and of the South in the North.

    In Damayanti Swayamvara Tamil kings were present.

    In Lord Rama’s marriage tamil kings names are mentioned as being present tin the Swayamvar of Sita.

    Tamil Chera King Udiyan Cheralathan  fed both he Kaurva and Pandavas armies during the Mahabharata War.

    Tamil kings participated in the Mahabharata war, some on the side of the Pandavas some on the side of Kauravas

    Pandya King fought along the Pandavas,his daughter was married to Arjuna when hwas on a Pilgrimage to South.

    So this argument that the Tamil and the Vedic  people were mutually exclusive is erroneous and mischievous.

    2.The Vedic people considered the Dravidians as Barbarians and uncultured.

    They were called as Dasyu meaning Slaves.

    Again sheer nonsense.

    The Puarans quote Tamil Kings as cultured, wealthy and highly industrious.

    The Vedic people bought Ivory and pearl from the South.

    The History of Tamil is as old as Sanskrit and beyond tracing.

    Please refer my posts on these.

    Now to the term Dasyu.

    Rigveda 1.33.4

    O, All Powerful Warrior! You possess a variety of powers and roam alone. Do use your powerful weapon to destroy wealthy Dasyu (criminals) and Sanakah (those who steal from others). May they reach their deaths through your weapon. These Sanakah are devoid of noble acts.

    The adjective used for Dasyus are “Ayajva” meaning those who do not perform noble acts or noble resolutions. Obviously such people would be criminals. Thus the king is advised to destroy such criminals to safeguard his people.

    Sayana defines Dasyu as thief. Dasyu origins from root ‘Dasa’ which means “Upakshaya” or that which leads to destruction. Hence Dasyu refers to those people who are destructive or criminals. It does not refer to any caste or race.

    Rigveda 1.33.5

    Those Dasyu (criminals) who are themselves devoid of noble resolutions and clash with noble people, flee away due to your protection. O brave warrior, you have destroyed the Avrata (unscrupulous) from everywhere.

    In this mantra, two adjectives are used for Dasyu – Ayajva (those who do not perform noble acts and noble resolutions) and Avrata (indisciplined and unscrupulous).

    Very clearly, Dasyu refers to criminals and they are accorded the same treatment in Vedas as they deserve in any civilized society.”

    So this misinformation falls flat.

    3.That the Vedic life was introduced by the sons of Viswamitra through their descendant, Apasthamba( I was holding this view and  you can see my

    posts on this and my view was based on the scholarly view of PT.Srinivasa Ayyangar in his Book History of the Tamils.

    The Vedic people banished  criminals and the sinners to Dravida Desa.

    In the light of explanation in 1 and 2 this is no more valid.

    However it is a fact that criminals were sent to Dravida desa ,Viswamitra banished his sons and and Apasthamba compiled the Apasthamba Sutra being

    practiced even to day in the South.

    4.The Dravidas were invaded by people from the north and the Dravidians , subjugated and the Dravidians became cultured.

    Aryan invasion theory is deliberate misinformation and proved to be a Myth.

    Read my post on this.

    As,

    Indus valley inscriptions do indicate the so called Dravidian insignia and the artifacts found in the South in places likes like Aikkamedu contain Vedic

    Symbols,

    The cultural unity in customs and practices between the north and the South,

    Many Rishis are common both to North and South, Agasthay, Bhargava, Parashuama, Viswamitra, Vasishta,Ygnyavalkya,

    The ancient languages both Tamil and Sanskrit quote each other, and as

    , nothing definite is known about the ancient domain of the Dravidian parent speech. It is, however, a well-established and well-supported hypothesis that Dravidian speakers must have been widespread throughout India, including the northwest region. Origins of Dravidian people are informed by various theories proposed by linguists, anthropologists, geneticist and historians. According to geneticist Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza in the book The History and Geography of Human Genes, the Dravidians were preceded in the subcontinent by an Austro-Asiatic people, and were followed by Indo-European-speaking migrants sometime later.

                                  Most linguists believe that Dravidian-speaking people were spread throughout the Indian subcontinent before a series of Indo-Aryan migrations. In this view, the early Indus Valley civilization (Harappa and Mohenjo Daro) is often identified as having been Dravidian.Cultural and linguistic similarities have been cited by researchers such as Finnish Indologist Asko Parpola as being strong evidence for a proto-Dravidian origin of the ancient Indus Valley civilization.

                                 Some scholars like J. Bloch and M. Witzel believe that the Indo-Aryan moved into an already Dravidian speaking area after the oldest parts of the Rig Veda were already composed. The Brahui population of Baluchistan has been taken by some as the linguistic equivalent of a relict population, perhaps indicating that Dravidian languages were formerly much more widespread and were supplanted by the incoming Indo-Aryan languages.(wiki)

    My conclusion is that the people of the North and the South were one under Bharatavarsha lived together, married between them , fought against each

    other.

    When they were against each other they considered the other as  undesirable and once he issues are sorted out they became one  together.

    Otherwise lot of things in Sanatana Dharama, Temples, Archaeology become meaningless and self contradictory.

    Citation with thanks.

    http://agniveer.com/vedas-dasyu-hinduism/

    Image credit.

    Vedic India North.

    http://www.miraed.net/parallelhistory/era_display_get.php?fname=India%20Vedic%20Period

  • Tamil Culture Part Of Sanatana Dharma

    I had a comment for my post on Skanda, not Muruga, ‘Is not Tamil  Culture a part of Sanatana Dharma?’

     

    A tricky question indeed.

     

    My reply was it is both a part and not a part of Sanatana Dharama.

     

    Map of Tamils area during Vedic period.Image.Jpg.
    Map of Tamils area during Vedic period.

     

    People who were living North of Vindhyas  were not seemingly unaware of the existence of the Great Culture that was thriving in the Dravida, meaning South, part of India , The South of Vindhya ranges.

     

    Viswamitra, banished his 52 sons to Dravida for having disobeyed and questioned him to the Dravidian  Region.

     

    They found a superior culture, if not on par with the Vedic culture to be thriving there.

     

    They found that , of all the civilizations known then , The Tamils were the only Culture, who were so evolved that they ascribed  five landmasses in their territory, ascribed Gods, birds.Animals, Palnts, Lifestyle to each of these Divisions, this was explained in Agathiyam , Thokappiyam , the ancient Grammatical works of the Tamil language, dated some five thousands years!

     

    Curious fact is that these Tamil texts quote Vedas and they , in turn, quote, the Tamils!

     

    Please read my post, Million year Old Tamil quotes Vedas and They quote Tamil.’

     

    The great Tamil Chera King Nedunchearalaathan was the man who fed both the armies of the Mahabharata War, Kauravas and Pandavas.

     

    He had been addressed as P’erunchotru Udiyan’ one who fed many number of Stomachs-Nedunchotru Uthiyan Neduncheralaathan was how he was called.

     

    He donated 100 veli( one veli= 100 acres) of land to Brahmins on the condition that he should see the Homa Smoke in the morning from this area every morning!

     

    ( source.History of Tamils By PT.Srinivasa Iengar)

     

    There are references to Arjuna marrying a Princess from Madurai on his pilgrimage.

     

    Now coming back to Viswamitra’s sons.

     

    The sons of Viswamitra mingled with the Tamils and followed the Tamil Customs.

     

    Their descendant , Apasthamaba, combined the best of Tamil practices and the Sanatana Dharma ad compiled the Apashamba Sutra, which is practiced by the Brahmins even to-day(Apasthamba Sutra)

     

    One notable custom is the inclusion of Mangaya Dharana, Thali in a Marriage, which is not found in Vedic Marriages.

     

    In Santana Dharma, marriage is complete with the performance of Panigrahana and Sapthapati.

     

    And the wearing of ‘Metti’, wring worn around the toe of the leg of Man was practiced  among the Tamils, to indicate that he was married.(women were decribed as not looking at Men in the Face!)

     

    This custom was changed to Women by Apasthamba.

     

    Read the following information to complicate the issue.

     

    Evidence indicates that Apsthamba compiled  the practices of the Tamils  and the Sanatana Dharma was unaware of the Tamils Culture.

     

    Yet Archaeological and other Puranic references indicate that there was  interaction between the two great cultures.

     

    It seems that there were two different cultures existing side by side at the same time.

     

    Or is it that both were One and that History is lost in India , as usual with us.

     

    I tend to agree with the last view.

     

    The archaeologist K.�V. Raman also notes�:

    Some form of Mother-Goddess worship was prevalent in the Megalithic period … as suggested by the discovery of a small copper image of a Goddess in the urn-burials of Adichchanallur. More recently, in Megalithic burials the headstone, shaped like the seated Mother, has been located at two places in Tamil Nadu.[17]

    Megalithic culture attached great importance to the cult of the dead and ancestors, which parallels that in Vedic culture. It is also likely that certain gods later absorbed into the Hindu pantheon, such as Aiyanar (or Sastha), Murugan (the later Kartik), Korravai (Durga), Naga deities, etc., were originally tribal gods of that period. Though probably of later date, certain megalithic sites in the Nilgiris were actually dolmen shrines, some of them holding Ganesh-like images, others lingams.[ 18] Megalithic practices evocative of later Hinduism are thus summarized by the British archaeologists Bridget and Raymond Allchin�:

    The orientation of port-holes and entrances on the cist graves is frequently towards the south. … This demands comparison with later Indian tradition where south is the quarter of Yama. Among the grave goods, iron is almost universal, and the occasional iron spears and tridents (trisulas) suggest an association with the god Siva. The discovery in one grave of a trident with a wrought-iron buffalo fixed to the shaft is likewise suggestive, for the buffalo is also associated with Yama, and the buffalo demon was slain by the goddess Durga, consort of Siva, with a trident. … The picture which we obtain from this evidence, slight as it is, is suggestive of some form of worship of Siva.[ 19]

    About the third century BC, cities and towns appear owing to yet little understood factors�; exchanges with the Mauryan and Roman empires seem to have played an important catalytic role, as also the advent of iron. From the very beginning, Buddhist, Jain and Hindu[*] streaks are all clear.

    Among the earliest evidences, a stratigraphic dig by I.�K. Sarma within the garbagriha of the Parasuramesvara temple at Gudimallam,[*] brought to light the foundation of a remarkable Shivalingam of the Mauryan period (possibly third century BC)�: it was fixed within two circular pithas at the centre of a square vastu-mandala. �The deity on the frontal face of the tall linga reveals himself as a proto-puranic Agni-Rudra�[20] standing on a kneeling devayana. If this early date, which Sarma established on stratigraphic grounds and from pottery sherds, is correct, this fearsome image could well be the earliest such representation in the South.

    Then we find �terracotta figures like Mother Goddess, Naga-linga etc., from Tirukkampuliyur�; a seated Ganesa from Alagarai�; Vriskshadevata and Mother Goddess from Kaveripakkam and Kanchipuram, in almost certainly a pre-Pallava sequence.�[21] Cult of a Mother goddess is also noticed in the early levels at Uraiyur,[22] and at Kaveripattinam, Kanchipuram and Arikamedu.[ 23] Excavations at Kaveripattinam have brought to light many Buddhist artefacts, but also, though of later date, a few figurines of Yakshas, of Garuda and Ganesh.[24] Evidence of the Yaksha cult also comes from pottery inscriptions at Arikamedu.[25]

    The same site also yielded one square copper coin of the early Cholas, depicting on the obverse an elephant, a ritual umbrella, the Srivatsa symbol, and the front portion of a horse.[ 26] This is in fact an important theme which recurs on many coins of the Sangam age[27] recovered mostly from river beds near Karur, Madurai etc. Besides the Srivatsa (also found among artefacts at Kanchipuram[28]), many coins depict a swastika, a trishul, a conch, a shadarachakra, a damaru, a crescent moon, and a sun with four, eight or twelve rays. Quite a few coins clearly show a yagnakunda. That is mostly the case with the Pandyas� coins, some of which also portray ayubastambha to which a horse is tied as part of the ashvamedha sacrifice. As the numismatist R.�Krishnamurthy puts it, �The importance of Pandya coins of Vedic sacrifice series lies in the fact that these coins corroborate what we know from Sangam literature about the performance of Vedic sacrifices by a Pandya king of this age.�[29]

    Finally, it is remarkable how a single coin often depicts symbols normally associated with Lord Vishnu (the conch, the srivatsa, the chakra) together with symbols normally associated with Lord Shiva (the trishul, the crescent moon, the damaru).[30] Clearly, the two �sects��a very clumsy word�got along well enough. Interestingly, other symbols depicted on these coins, such as the three- or six-arched hill, the tree-in-railing, and the ritual stand in front of a horse, are frequently found in Mauryan iconography.[31]

    All in all, the material evidence, though still meagre, makes it clear that Hindu concepts and cults were already integrated in the society of the early historic period of Tamil Nadu side by side with Buddhist and Jain elements. More excavations, for which there is great scope, are certain to confirm this, especially if they concentrate on ancient places of worship, as at Gudimallam. Let us now see the picture we get from Sangam literature.

    Vedic & Puranic Culture�Literary Evidence
    It is unfortunate that the most ancient Sangam compositions are probably lost for ever�; we only know of them through brief quotations in later works. An early text, the Tamil grammar Tolkappiyam, dated by most scholars to the first or second century AD,[*] is �said to have been modelled on the Sanskrit grammar of the Aindra school.�[32] Its content, says N. Raghunathan, shows that �the great literature of Sanskrit and the work of its grammarians and rhetoricians were well known and provided stimulus to creative writers in Tamil…. The Tolkappiyam adopts the entire Rasa theory as worked out in the Natya Sastra of Bharata.�[33] It also refers to rituals and customs coming from the �Aryans,� a word which in Sangam literature simply means North Indians of Vedic culture�; for instance, the Tolkappiyam �states definitely that marriage as a sacrament attended with ritual was established in the Tamil country by the Aryas,�[ 34] and it uses the same eight forms of marriage found in the Dharmashastras. Moreover, it mentions the caste system or �fourfold jathis� in the form of �Brahmins, Kings, Vaishyas and Vellalas,�[35] and calls Vedic mantras �the exalted expression of great sages.�[36]

    The Tolkappiyam also formulates the captivating division of the Tamil land into five regions (tinai�), each associated with one particular aspect of love, one poetical expression, and also one deity�: thus the hills (kuri�ji�) with union and with Cheyon (Murugan)�; the desert (palai�) with separation and Korravai (Durga)�; the forests (mullai�) with awaiting and Mayon (Vishnu-Krishna)�; the seashore (neytal�) with wailing and Varuna�; and the cultivated lands (marutam) with quarrel and Ventan (Indra). Thus from the beginning we have a fusion of non-Vedic deities (Murugan or Korravai), Vedic gods (Indra, Varuna) and later Puranic deities such as Vishnu (Mal or Tirumal). Such a synthesis is quite typical of the Hindu temperament and cannot be the result of an overnight or superficial influence�; it is also as remote as possible from the separateness we are told is at the root of so-called �Dravidian culture.�

    Expectedly, this fusion grows by leaps and bounds in classical Sangam poetry whose composers were Brahmins, princes, merchants, farmers, including a number of women. The �Eight Anthologies� of poetry (orettuttokai�) abound in references to many gods�: Shiva, Uma, Murugan, Vishnu, Lakshmi (named Tiru, which corresponds to Sri) and several other Saktis.[37] The Paripadal, one of those anthologies, consists almost entirely of devotional poetry to Vishnu. One poem[38] begins with a homage to him and Lakshmi, and goes on to praise Garuda, Shiva on his �majestic bull,� the four-faced Brahma, the twelve Adityas, the Ashwins, the Rudras, the Saptarishis, Indra with his �dreaded thunderbolt,� the devas and asuras, etc., and makes glowing references to the Vedas and Vedic scholars.[39] So does the Purananuru,[40] another of the eight anthologies, which in addition sees Lord Shiva as the source of the four Vedas (166) and describes Lord Vishnu as �blue-hued� (174) and �Garuda-bannered� (56).[41] Similarly, a poem (360) of a third anthology, the Akananuru, declares that Shiva and Vishnu are the greatest of gods[42]

    Not only deities or scriptures, landmarks sacred in the North, such as the Himalayas or Ganga, also become objects of great veneration in Tamil poetry. North Indian cities are referred to, such as Ujjain, or Mathura after which Madurai was named. Court poets proudly claim that the Chera kings conquered North Indian kingdoms and carved their emblem onto the Himalayas. They clearly saw the subcontinent as one entity�; thus the Purananuru says they ruled over �the whole land / With regions of hills, mountains, / Forests and inhabited lands / Having the Southern Kumari / And the great Northern Mount / And the Eastern and Western seas / As their borders….�[43]

    The Kural (second to seventh century AD), authored by the celebrated Tiruvalluvar, is often described as an �atheistic� text, a hasty misconception. True, Valluvar�s 1,330 pithy aphorisms mostly deal with ethics (aram), polity (porul) and love (inbam), following the traditional Sanskritic pattern of the four objects of human life�: dharma, artha, kama, and moksha�the last implied rather than explicit. Still, the very first decade is an invocation to Bhagavan�: �The ocean of births can be crossed by those who clasp God�s feet, and none else�[44] (10)�; the same idea recurs later, for instance in this profound thought�: �Cling to the One who clings to nothing�; and so clinging, cease to cling� (350). The Kural also refers to Indra (25), to Vishnu�s avatar of Vamana (610), and to Lakshmi (e.g. 167), asserting that she will shower her grace only on those who follow the path of dharma (179, 920). There is nothing very atheistic in all this, and in reality the values of the Kural are perfectly in tune with those found in several shastras or in the Gita.[45]

    Let us briefly turn to the famous Tamil epic Shilappadikaram (second to sixth century ad), which relates the beautiful and tragic story of Kannagi and Kovalan�; it opens with invocations to Chandra, Surya, and Indra, all of them Vedic Gods, and frequently praises Agni, Varuna, Shiva, Subrahmanya, Vishnu-Krishna, Uma, Kali, Yama and so forth. There are mentions of the four Vedas and of �Vedic sacrifices being faultlessly performed.� �In more than one place,� writes V. Ramachandra Dikshitar, the first translator of the epic into English, �there are references to Vedic Brahmans, their fire rites, and their chanting of the Vedic hymns. The Brahman received much respect from the king and was often given gifts of wealth and cattle.�[46] When Kovalan and Kannagi are married, they �walk around the holy fire,� a typically Vedic rite still at the centre of the Hindu wedding. Welcomed by a tribe of fierce hunters on their way to Madurai, they witness a striking apparition of Durga, who is addressed equally as Lakshmi and Sarasvati�the three Shaktis of the Hindu trinity. There are numerous references to legends from the Mahabharata, the Ramayana, and the Puranas. After worshipping at two temples, one of Vishnu and the other of Shiva, the Chera king Shenguttuvan goes to the Himalayas in search of a stone for Kannagi�s idol, and bathes it in the Ganges�in fact, the waters of Ganga and those of Cauvery were said to be equally sacred. Similar examples could be given from the Manimekhalai�: even though it is a predominantly Buddhist work, it also mentions many Vedic and Puranic gods, and attributes the submergence of Puhar to the neglect of a festival to Indra.

    Vedic Dharma

     

     

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Bala AdiBala Mantras Viswamitra To Lord Ram

    Sage Viswamitra taught two important Mantras to Lord Rama to overcome Fatigue and sleep while fighting.

    I am reproducing the Mantras.

    The mantra is not a a text written or assembled by some people to propagate a religion to sustain an Empire,

    It was revealed to Humanity to the deserved.

    For the deserving this will be from a Guru who will initiate this.

    As practiced with out a Guru, Yama Niyama and Sandhyavandana, it will be remain a text.

    Not meant for self style rationalists and egotistic academicians.

    I have provided from three different sources for authenticity , easy readability and download,

    balaatibalayoh viraat purusha rishih |

    gaayatrii devataa | gaayatrii chandah |
    akaara okaaramakaaraa biijaadyaah |
     kshudhaadi nirasane viniyogah|
    klaamityaadi shadanga nyaasah |
    klaam angushtaabhyaam namah |
    kliim tarjaniibhyaam namah | kluum madhyamaabhaamnamah |
    klaim anaamikaabhyaam namah | klom kanishtikaabhaam namah |
    klah karatalakaraprishtaabhyaam namah ||klaam hridayaaya namah |
    kliim shirase svaahaa | kluum shikhaayaivashat | klaim kavacaaya hum |
    klom netratrayaayavaushat | klah astraaya phat | bhuurbhuvassuvaromiti digbandhah |
    amrita karatalaardrau sarva sanjiivanaadhyaa
    avaghaharana sudkshau veda saare mayuukhe|
    pranavamaya vikaarau bhaaskaraakaara dehau
    satatamanubhave’ham tau balaatiibaleshau ||

     om hriim bale mahaadevi hriim mahaabale
    kliim catur vidha purushartha siddhi prade tatsavitur
     varadaatmike hriim varenyam bhargo devasya varadaatmike |
    atibale sarva dayaamuurte bale sarva kshud bhrama upanaashini
    dhiimahi dhiyoyonarjaate pracuryaa pracodayaatmike pranava shiraskaatmike |
    hum phat svaahaa ||
    evam vidvaan krita krityo bhavati |
    saavitryaa eva salokataam jayati ||
    iityupanishat ||

    om aapyaayantu mamaangaani vaakpraanashcakshuh

    shrotramatho balamindriyaanicasarvani |
    sarvam brahmaupanishadam |
    maaham brahma niraakuryaam maa maa brahma niraakarot |
    aniraakaranamastu aniraakaranam me’stuh tadaatmani
    nirate ye upanishatsu dharmaaste mayi santu te mayi santu ||
    om shaanti shaanti shaantih |
     Deatiled with Body Gestures, Anganyasa ans Karanyasa.
    BalaAtibalaMantraWithMeaning:
    SudhakarV.RaoMD.
    Thisisthemeaningofthemantrasingeneralterms.IthastobelearntfromaqualifiedGuruandpracticedwithappropriatemeaningfulgesturescalled(Karanyaasa-handgesturesandanganyaasa-bodygestures).
    BalaAtibalayoH,
    “ForthemantrasBalaandAtibala,
    ViratPurusharishiH
    ThesageisViratPurusha(LordNarayana)
    Gayatridevataa,
    ThepresidingDeityisGayatri.
    Gayatrichandah
    Themeter(chandas)isGayatri
    AkaaraUkaaraMakaarabijaadyah

    TheBija(seed)is“A”;theshakti(power)is“U”andthekilaka(thekeytothepower)is“M”.(A,U,Marethethreeletterswhichformthe“OM”-thatis
    Kshudhaadi nirasanay viniyogah
    The mantra is used to vanquish hunger, thirst, fatigue etc.
    Klaamityaadi shaDanga nyaasah; Klaam angushTaabhyaan namaH; kleemtarjaneebhyaan namaH; kloom madhyamaabhyaan namaH; klaimanaamikaabhyaan namaH; klaum kanishTakaabhyaan namaH; klaah karatalakara prushTaabhyaan namaH;Klaam hridayaaya namaH; kleem shirase svaahaa; kloom shikhaayai vashaT; klaimkavachaaya Hum; klaum netra trayaaya vaushaT; klaaH, astraaya phaT; Bhoorbhoovassuvaromiti digbandhaH
    .(These are body gestures and hand gestures to invoke the Gods of the mantra. Thegestures are called Anga nyaasa and karanyaasa. (Anga means parts of the body and karameans hand. Nyasa is the gestures.) The 6 gestures are made uttering the seed letterscalled Bijaksharas. They are Klaam, Kleem, Kloom, klaim, klaum and klah.
    They should be learnt from the Guru.)
    Ater this, meditation is done with the following thoughts:
    Amrita karatalaardrau sarva sanjeevanaadhyaa avagha haraNa sudkshau Vedasaare mayookhay, praNava maya vikaarau, Bhaaskaraakaara dehau, satatamanubhaveham, tau balaatibaleshau

     http://www.scribd.com/doc/121296201/Bala-Atibala-mantra-in-english-with-meaning

     

    With Original Reference.

    Vishvamitra addressed Rama in a harmonious voice calling, ‘oh, Rama’, on the southern riverbank of Sarayu. ( Valmiki Ramayana, Book 1, Chapter 22, Verses 10b, 11a)

    गृहाण वत्स सलिलम् मा भूत् कालस्य पर्ययः || १-२२-११
    मंत्र ग्रामम् गृहाण त्वम् बलाम् अतिबलाम् तथा |

    grihaana vatsa salilam maa bhuut kaalasya paryayah || 1-22-11
    mamtra graamam grihaana tvam balaam atibalaam tathaa |

    “Take water, my boy, and like that you receive a group of hymns, bala and ati bala from me, and let no time lapse. (1-22-11b, 12a)

    “On receiving these hymns neither tiredness nor fever, nor disfiguring of personality can effect you, nor the demons can charge you either you are sleeping or unvigilant. (1-11-12b, 13a)

    “As it is none whosoever on earth can equal you in dexterity, Rama, and by reciting these hymns none can equal you in the three worlds. (1-22-13b, 14a)

    “My dear Raghava, if bala atibala hymns are practised, oh, impeccable one, none can equal you in the world by your handsomeness, calibre, erudition, by your discernment, and even in replying or rebutting you. (1-22-14b, 15)

    “On receiving these two teachings there will be none similar to you, for bala and atibala are the mothers of all knowledge. (1-22-16)

    “Oh, best one among men, Raghava, if you go on reciting bala and atiblala hymns, my dear Rama, there will be no hunger or thirst to you. (1-22-17)

    “And if these twin teachings are practised an inestimable renown will also accrue, oh, Raghu’s legatee, these two hymns that possess brilliance are the daughters of Forefather Brahma, and oh, Rama of Kakutstha, I intend to impart these hymns to you, oh virtuous one, as you are the most eligible one, hence take the teachings that are kept safe from the world. (1-22-18, 19a)

    “Though all of these numerous qualities are undoubtedly available with you, that too in abundance, yet these hymns if ascetically nurtured will yield various results.” Thus spoke Sage Vishvamitra to Rama. (1-22-19b, 20a)

    (ii) Bala Atibala Teaching:

    Sage Vishvamitra is the Seer for Gayatri hymn. He is the same Sage to impart bala atibala hymns to Rama and Lakshmana. This hymn is yet another aspect of Gayatri, and there is no hymn superior than Gayatri, na gaayatriyaah paramam japam.

    (One will get maximum benefit if the teaching from Guru).

    Balaatibala Mantropanishad:

    balaatibalayoh viraat purusha rishih | gaayatrii devataa | gaayatrii chandah | akaara okaaramakaaraa biijaadyaah | kshudhaadi nirasane viniyogah |klaamityaadi shadanga nyaasah |klaam angushtaabhyaam namah | kliim tarjaniibhyaam namah | kluum madhyamaabhaamnamah | klaim anaamikaabhyaam namah | klom kanishtikaabhaam namah | klah karatalakaraprishtaabhyaam namah ||klaam hridayaaya namah | kliim shirase svaahaa | kluum shikhaayaivashat | klaim kavacaaya hum | klom netratrayaayavaushat | klah astraaya phat | bhuurbhuvassuvaromiti digbandhah |

    Dhyaanam:

    amrita karatalaardrau sarva sanjiivanaadhyaa avaghaharana sudkshau veda saare mayuukhe |
    pranavamaya vikaarau bhaaskaraakaara dehau satatamanubhave’ham tau balaatiibaleshau ||

    om hriim bale mahaadevi hriim mahaabale kliim catur vidha purushartha siddhi prade tatsavitur varadaatmike hriim varenyam bhargo devasya varadaatmike | atibale sarva dayaamuurte bale sarva kshud bhrama upanaashini dhiimahi dhiyoyonarjaate pracuryaa pracodayaatmike pranava shiraskaatmike | hum phat svaahaa || evam vidvaan krita krityo bhavati | saavitryaa eva salokataam jayati || iityupanishat ||

    Shaanti paatha:

    om aapyaayantu mamaangaani vaakpraanashcakshuh shrotramatho balamindriyaanicasarvani | sarvam brahmaupanishadam | maaham brahma niraakuryaam maa maa brahma niraakarot | aniraakaranamastu aniraakaranam me’stuh tadaatmani nirate ye upanishatsu dharmaaste mayi santu te mayi santu || om shaantishshaantishshaantih |

    http://in.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110529202558AAlvnc0

  • Caste Origin Genome Study Misleading Mischievous

    Indian tradition states that the intermingling of people from the North and South, separated by the Vindhya Mountains , started taking place during the time when Sage Viswamitra lived.

    Sage Viswamitra banished his 56 children to the ‘Dravida‘ ,meaning South of Vindhya Mountains, as they disobeyed him.

    They moved to the South, found a culturally rich civilization , married integrated the Veda and Dravidian Customs and formed the Agamas.

    Sage Apasthamba  compiled the Vedas for those living south of the Vindhyas , comprising the best of both the Cultures and gave the Apasthamba Sutra,.

    This is practiced in the South even today.

    Recent studies date this period around 4000 years earlier from now.

    This roughly corresponds to the beginning of Kali Yuga of Indian calendar.

    ( According to the Surya Siddhanta, Kali Yuga began at midnight (00:00) on 18 February 3102 BCE in the proleptic Julian calendar, or 14 January 3102 BC)

    But the system of caste has been in existence much before the intermingling of people between the South and the North, in the North and South,

    Though the names are different , there were marriages between different groups in the south or the Dravida area as well.

    People were classified on the basis of the basis of their geographical location in the South.

    The Tamil Literature assigns names ,

    Kuringi, Hilly Terrain.

    Mullai.Forest areas.

    Marutham, Arable land mass.

    Neydal, Area around the Sea and

    Palai, the Desrt area.

    The characteristics and specific issues are elaborated in the Tholkappiyam Agathiyam, the ancient works in Tamil.

    Each area had its own God’s,Profession and social Mores.

    Cowherds lived in Mullai,farmers in Marutham, Hunters in Kurinji,Fishermen in Neyadal and Kallars in Palai.

    There were injunctions against marrying from different geographical group.

    So the Caste system is not because of the mingling from the North.

    The Study at best conveys the fact that people from the North started mingling with each other , that’s all.

    This does not mean that Caste has been imported to South from the North.

    This confusion or deliberate misinformation is because of the Myth of Aryan Invasion of the South.

    Please read my posts on Aryan Invasion Myths and On Viswamitra.

    The name Viswamitra appears in all the Four Yugas, or the Time Scale of the Hindus,

    it is difficult to assign a time for him.

    And Viswamitra  is a  Nom de plume, meaning ‘friend of the Universe ‘.

    The name of the Viswamitra as it appears in the Ramayana, which took place in the Treta Yuga, is Kausika.

    And the Viswamitra of Dwapara Yuga can not be same as the Yugas are separated by thousands of Years.

    Unless people were living for very long period of time, which, in my opinion, is possible.

    More important is the concept of Time in Hinduism.

    Migration of Humans.English: Hypothesized map of human migration based on mitochondrial DNA. Español: Mapamundi de las principales migraciones humanas prehistóricas. Zonas de predominio de los macrohaplogrupos de ADN mitocondrial. Antigüedad de las rutas migratorias. Italiano: Mappa delle antiche migrazioni ricavate dall'analisi del DNA mitocondriale. Français : Carte de la migration humaine selon des études ADN mitochondrial.
    Human Migration.

    Read my post on Time.

    There is another anomaly in the study.

    It says the intermingling of the North and South stopped about 2000 years ago.

    Are there not marriages today between the people of the north and the South?

    Some more doubts on Viswamitra,

    “I had some confusion about Sage Vishwamitra. We hear
    about Sage Vishwamitra in many places:

    [1] Much before the Lord Rama came down to the earth.
    (Vishwamitra was the one who build the heaven for the
    ancestor of Lord Rama, Satyavrata, later called as
    Trishanku).

    [2] Then Vishwamitra went into penance with an enimity
    with Sage Vasista. Thats when Gayathri mantra was
    given to us.

    [3] During the penance Menaka comes down and from them
    is born the Bharatha dynasty king – Dushyant. So does
    that mean while Lord Rama’s dynasty (SuryaVamsa) were
    ruling in Treta Yuga, the seed for the Bharatha’s
    dynasty (ChandraVamsa) was sown and set to begin in
    Dwapara Yuga? in which Yugas did the Chandra Vamsa and
    Surya Vamsa dynasties gain importance?…

    I cannot provide you with a religious/spiritual answer, but as far as chronology
    is concerned – here is my answer:

    If you please refer to my ‘Royal Chronology of India’ at
    (http://www.newdharma.org/India_Chron.zip) you’ll see the name Vishvamitra come
    up many times (as you will also see with Vasishtha) because these are not one
    person. They represent an incredible lineage of Rsis going back thousands of
    years. These priests have been mentioned in our scriptures by their family
    names (“last names”) and on a few occassions their first names are also
    mentioned.

    Analysis of mtDNA Suggests a Proto-Asian Origin of Indians

    MtDNA HVR1 genetic distances between caste populations and Africans, Asians, and Europeans are significantly different from zero (p < 0.001) and reveal that, regardless of rank, each caste group is most closely related to Asians and is most dissimilar from Africans (Table ​(Table1).1). The genetic distances from major continental populations (e.g., Europeans) differ among the three caste groups, and the comparison reveals an intriguing pattern. As one moves from lower to upper castes, the distance from Asians becomes progressively larger. The distance between Europeans and lower castes is larger than the distance between Europeans and upper castes, but the distance between Europeans and middle castes is smaller than the upper caste-European distance. These trends are the same whether the Kshatriya and Vysya are included in the upper castes, the middle castes, or excluded from the analysis. This may be owing, in part, to the small sample size (n = 10) of each of these castes. Among the upper castes the genetic distance between Brahmins and Europeans (0.10) is smaller than that between either the Kshatriya and Europeans (0.12) or the Vysya and Europeans (0.16). Assuming that contemporary Europeans reflect West Eurasian affinities, these data indicate that the amount of West Eurasian admixture with Indian populations may have been proportionate to caste rank.”

    “India’s caste system, says a new genetic study, began about 2,000 years ago. The study adds that people from different genetic populations — from the North and the South — began to mix with each other about 4,200 years ago but that the mixing stopped about 2,000 years ago.

    The study was carried out by Harvard Medical School and the CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB) in Hyderabad. David Reich, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School, said that the caste system in India has been around for a long time, but that it had certainly not begun right at the very beginning.

    Source:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC311057/

    http://www.indiadivine.org/audarya/sri-vaishnava-forum/183337-q-confusion-about-sage-vishwamitra.html

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Study-reveals-origin-of-Indias-caste-system/articleshow/21754499.cms