Ramanisblog

Tag: Vikrama Saka

  • Vikramaditya Date 105 BC Evidence

    At times,when I study the History of India, as narrated by western authors and our home grown secularists I get the impression that Indian history is meticulously crafted, unadulterated fiction, with no regard to facts found in Indian texts.

    They are prepared to accept the History of India by James Mill as the gospel, which states that Indians were rooted in superstition and that India had no civilisation worth mentioning.

    The same book claims that the earth is six thousand years old!

    The gentleman wrote Indian history without ever stepping in the soil of India nor did he refer any texts,either Indian or Foreign classical authors.

    What a scholarship!

    And if one were to believe such authors, text books in Indian schools, one would believe that real Indian history began with the Invasion of India by Alexander.

    I have,with proof, written that it is non sense and traced Indian history from Mahabharatha period to Nanda Dynasty.

    Such misinformation has caused enormous harm to Indian history and culture.

    History of India is denied and dates of great kings and dynasties are assigned later dates, if not denying them outright.

    This is not limited to kings.

    Great personalities too suffered this fate.

    Buddha, Kalidasa, Rajput Kings, Tamil kings, to mention a few.

    So are the ancient literature in Sanskrit and Tamil.

    In this article, let us examine the Emperor Vikramaditya,after whom one of the three calendars of India are named.

    Many mistake the son of Samudra Gupta of Maurys Dynasty,Chandra Gupta.

    He assumed the name of Vikramaditya, who lived around 105 BC and established his Empire in India, Far East and Middle East.

    He conquered Arabia and established Shiva Linga in Mecca.

    Emperor Vikramaditya.image
    Emperor Vikramaditya

    Evidence of Vikramaditya’s date.

    ‘A Shaka ruler invaded north-western India and oppressed the Hindus. According to one source, he was a Shudra from the Almanṣūra city; according to another, he was a non-Hindu who came from the west. In 78 CE, the Hindu king Vikramaditya defeated him and killed him in the Karur region, located between Multan and the castle of Loni. The astronomers and other people started using this date as the beginning of a new era.’

    -Al Birauni.
    Since there was a difference of over 130 years between the Vikramaditya era and the Shaka era, Al-Biruni concluded that their founders were two kings with the same name. The Vikramaditya era named after the first, and the Shaka era was associated with the defeat of the Shaka ruler by the second Vikramaditya‘

    Reference and citation.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikramaditya

    “purne thrimsachchate varsheKalau prapte bhayamkareSakanamcha Vinasardham AryaDharma vivruddhaye Jatassivajnaya sopi kailasatGuhyakalayat.”

    – Bhavishya Maha Purana (3-1-7-14,15 verses)

    “Vikramaditya namanam pita Krutwa mumodahaSa balopi mahaprajanah pithruMathru priyamkarah”(3-1-7-16)
    “pancha Varshe vayah prapte Tapasordhe vanam gatahDwadasabdam prayathnenaVikramena krutam tapah” (Bhavishya 3-1-7-17)
    “Paschadambavatim divyamPurim yatah sriyanvitahDivyam simhasanam ramyamDwathrimsan murthi samyutam” (Bhavishya 3-1-7-18)

    At the completion of 3000 years after the advent of the terrible Kaliyuga, (ie.101 BCE.) a person descended from the abode of Guhyakas in Kailasa, at the command of Lord Siva, for the purpose of destroying the Sakas and uplifting Arya-Dharma. He was born to the Great King Gandharvasena. The father named him ‘Vikramaditya’ and felt very much rejoiced...
    Paramara KingsAmong the Paramara kings, the first one reigned between 2710 – 2716 Kali Yuga (392 – 386 BCE)Salivahana established his own Saka in 78 CE, which is followed even today in most parts of India and years in panchang (vedic almanac) known as Saka Samvat or Shaka Samvat.

    Paramara dynasty continued to rule Ujjain, which ended in 1305 CE, whose last king was Mahakaladeva.

    Reference and citation.

    https://www.booksfact.com/history/emperor-vikramaditya-ujjain-actual-dates.html

    Will be providing more evidence on Vikramaditya date from Tamil literature and foreign authors.

    Will be posting on History of Rajputs.

    Also on Bhoja.

  • Midnight to Midnight Day Calendar From Hindu Day?

    How did people measure a year and specifically how did the fix the time for a day?

    World has been following three systems for calendar.

    1.Solar,based on the movement of the Sun,called the Suryamanasa in Hinduism.

    2.Lunar,based on the movement of the Moon, Chaandra Manasa.

    In India both are used.

    3.There is also the practice of using both together Luni Solar system.

    This is practiced by the Chinese.

    How is the beginning of a day calculated?

    Today,the world follows midnight to midnight as one day.

    The origin of this is lost .

    Historically, there seems to have been four norms to decide one day.

    ‘

    • day, the time based on the earth’s rotation. In the Chinese calendar, a day starts from the midnight; in the Hindu calendars, a day starts from sunrise; and in the Hebrew calendar, a day starts from sunset.’ (Wiki)
    • In Hinduism,day starts in the morning,beginning around 3.45 to 4 am called Brahma Muhurtha.
    • An interesting point is that the British were following Hindu Vikrama calendar till the middlecages befor resorting to Gregorian Calendar.


    The curious fact is that England, Wales and Scotland were following the Vikrama Samvatsara till 1752 when they changed it.

    ‘

    Yet another proof of India having once ruled England is the fact that until 1752 A.D. the English New Year began on March 25.

    That is the exact time of the year when the Indian New Year begins.

    In 1752 by an act of Parliament England arbitrarily changed over to January 1 as the New Year Day.

    As March 25 marks the beginning of the Indian Vikram Samvat it is plausible that England was part of Vikramaditya’s Indian empire.

    Please read my article Vikramaditya Date and His World Kingdom

     https://ramanisblog.in/2016/12/27/england-followed-hindu-vikrama-saka-calendar-before-1752/

    Considering the fact that Hinduism spread throughout the world in ancient times and the ancestors of world civilizations trace their origins to Bharatvarsha,it is probable that the world followed Hindu concept  of day beginning in the morning during ancien times.

    As the empire of Bharatvarsha functioned from the present India( read Vikramadityas World Empire),the world seems to have followed the Indian day concept,that is beginning in the morning.

    That is taking 5.30 am as the Sun rises in India,12 midnight has been taken as the beginning of a new day.

    One must remember that Britain was ruling the world,colonising the countries.

     

     

    ‘There are four main views of when a day begins and ends. These are 1) midnight-to-midnight 2) evening-to-evening 3) dawn-to-dawn and 4) dawn-to-sunset.

    Midnight is the popular transitional point that separates one day from another, and is used in civil time throughout the world. However as this practice does not appear to have a Biblical basis, we will only consider the evening-to-evening, dawn-to-dawn and dawn-to-sunset as the possible Biblical start and end of each day…

    In Judaism.

    ‘

    Jewish Calendar Date

    When G‑d created time, He first created night and then day. Therefore, a Jewish calendar date begins with the night beforehand. While a day in the secular calendar begins and ends at midnight, a Jewish day goes from nightfall to nightfall. Shabbat begins on Friday night, and a yahrtzeit lamp is kindled the evening before the yahrtzeit (anniversary of a person’s passing), before nightfall. If the 10th of Iyar falls on a Wednesday, and a child is born Wednesday night after dark, the child’s birthday is the 11th of Iyar.

    On those dates wherein certain activities are restricted — such as working on Shabbat or major holidays — the restrictions go into effect the night beforehand.

    [Most fast days begin at dawn (“alot hashachar“), and as such are an exception to this rule. Yom Kippur and Tisha b’Av, however, do begin at nightfall of the previous night.]

    Though the day and its restrictions begin the night beforehand, many obligations associated with specific calendar dates — such as hearing the shofar on Rosh Hashanah, taking the Four Species on Sukkot, or hearing the daytime reading of the Megillah on Purim — must be performed during daylight hours only.‘

    Source.http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/526873/jewish/The-Jewish-Day.htm

    In Islam.

    ‘In Islam, the night precedes the day.

    The new hijri date begins with the setting of sun. Hence for e.g. once the sun sets after the 11th day in Ramadhaan, the 12th has already begun.

    So, if today is Thursday 3:15 pm then Maghrib begins at 5:00 pm then know from the moment Maghrib time begins on that day, Friday begins.

    The Islamic cycle of a day begins with the setting, not the rising of the sun. In countries such as Saudi Arabia, where the Islamic calendar alone is norm, when someone is speaking about going out on Friday night, he means the night that comes before the “day” of Friday.

    Source.https://abdurrahman.org/2009/09/09/the-islamic-date-hijri-date-starts-after-maghrib/

    According to The Bible,

    ‘Sam 19:11 Saul also sent messengers to David’s house to watch him and to kill him in the morning. And Michal, David’s wife, told him, saying, “If you do not save your life tonight, tomorrow you will be killed.”

    Michal made a distinction between “tonight” and “tomorrow”. ‘Tonight’ was not the same as ‘tomorrow’. ‘Tomorrow’ was to come after ‘tonight’, and when it came in the morning, Saul sent to kill David as He had planned. The day did not begin at evening, but in the morning.

    Jonah 4:7 But as morning dawned the next day [Elohim] prepared a worm, and it so damaged the plant that it withered.

    When did the worm appear? Answer: as morning dawned the next day.

    Mark 16:2 Very early in the morning, on the first day of the week, they came to the tomb when the sun had risen.

    Luke 24:1 Now on the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they, and certain other women with them, came to the tomb bringing the spices which they had prepared.

    Matt 28:1 Now after the Sabbath, as the first day of the week began to dawn, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb.

    Combining all three accounts, it is clear that the women went to the tomb early in the morning, at dawn on the first day of the week. The evangels did not say at evening on the previous day. However having the mindset (without proof) that Sabbath ends at sunset, some persons try to twist what is clearly a dawn visit into an evening visit so as to make this account fit in with their erroneous theory that Sabbath ends at sunset.’

    Source. http://www.knowbibletruth.com/whendoesthesabbathdaybeginandend.html )

    ‘position set forth in this study is that the Scripture teaches the terminus a quo (i.e. the start) of a new day to be at morning rather than at evening. The following evidence from Scripture is brought forth in order to demonstrate that a new day begins at morning.

    1. When expressions like “tomorrow”, “that night”, “the next day”, or “the same day” are used in Scripture, the context in certain texts indicates that the night is a continuation of “the same day” that preceded it (and not the beginning of a new day). Whereas the following morning is distinguished from the previous night by being designated as “tomorrow” or as “the next day.”

     

    a. Genesis 19:33-35

    All the incestuous events of Gen. 19:33 occur on “that night.” However, the recounting of the events of the previous night actually occurred “on the morrow” (Gen. 19:34). Also note that the dialogue between the daughters of Lot “on the morrow” (Gen. 19:34) occurred before nightfall (“that night also“, Gen. 19:35), and yet what occurred the night before (Gen. 19:33) and what occurred the day after (before nightfall) are reckoned as two different days (“the morrow“, Gen. 19:34). This chain of events can only be reckoned as two separate days if the following morning begins a new day. If the previous evening begins a new day (as the evening view affirms), then one could not refer to the following morning and afternoon (before night) as “the morrow.” For the previous night, the next morning, and the next afternoon (before night) would all be the same day and not two separate days.

    b. Exodus 16:23-25

    This passage is significant for it refers to the Sabbath. In preparing for the Sabbath, God commanded Israel to gather twice as much manna on the morning of the sixth day because they were not to gather manna at all on the seventh day (Ex. 16:22, 26). On the sixth day, Moses declared, “Tomorrow is the rest of the holy sabbath unto the LORD” (Ex. 16:23). When is “tomorrow“? That same evening or the following morning? The text makes it clear that they were to bake and to boil all that they needed for food on that same day (the sixth day), and the manna they did not need for that day would be preserved from spoiling until the next morning (unlike other days, cf. Ex. 16:19-20). Moses states what is to be done with the manna that did not spoil on the morning of the seventh day: “Eat that today, for today is a sabbath unto the LORD; today ye shall not find it in the field” (Ex. 16:25). The text does not indicate that leftover manna bred worms or became spoiled immediately before sunset on the sixth day (which would be the beginning of a new day according to the evening view), but rather that all leftover manna became spoiled before morning. Why? Because morning was the beginning of a new day. It is also significant to note that the text does not associate the start of the Sabbath with the evening, but rather Moses declared, “Tomorrow is the rest of the holy sabbath” (Ex. 16:23). The “tomorrow” when the Sabbath began was the following morning (Ex. 16:23). On the morning of the seventh day Moses stated, “Today is a sabbath unto the LORD” (16:25). There is no indication that the Sabbath began the night before. Is there even one example in Scripture where “tomorrow” refers to the evening that immediately follows the morning and afternoon that precedes it? I have not yet found such a passage.

    Source.http://www.reformedpresbytery.org/books/sabbath/sabbath.htm