“AlienMother ship caught on google earth Sky mode, smaller space crafts possibly docked inside and another flying towards the Mother ship. Check it out yourself before the image update!!
Their rebuttal seems to lack credibility as they are unable to explain exactly what this is excepting to state that this phenomena is quite common and their explanation seems to be labored and they seem to be unsure of their ground.
On an earlier occasion when a video was doing the rounds showing what appeared to be UFOs being parked near Mercury,NASA came with the same kind of laboured explanations.
Please read my blog filed under Astrophysics/Videos.
If what NASA says true why did they not let it be known before this incident?
They have fired a Scientist who has been with them for 16 years because he theorised that the Universe , because of its complexity, must have a an Intelligence behind it!
”
Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory has landed robotic explorers on the surface of Mars, sent probes to outer planets and operates a worldwide network of antennas that communicates with interplanetary spacecraft.
Its latest mission is defending itself in a workplace lawsuit filed by a former computer specialist who claims he was demoted – and then let go – for promoting his views on intelligent design, the belief that a higher power must have had a hand in creation because life is too complex to have developed through evolution alone”
Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory has landed robotic explorers on the surface of Mars, sent probes to outer planets and operates a worldwide network of antennas that communicates with interplanetary spacecraft.
Its latest mission is defending itself in a workplace lawsuit filed by a former computer specialist who claims he was demoted – and then let go – for promoting his views on intelligent design, the belief that a higher power must have had a hand in creation because life is too complex to have developed through evolution alone.
Now , on to FOX news Story on NASA’s denial of the purported object drwing Power from the Sun.
“Telescope images captured of the sun on Monday, March 12, show what appears to be a planet-size shadowy object tethered to the sun by a dark filament. In the image sequence, a burst of brightly lit material can be seen erupting from the sun’s surface surrounding the dark object, after which the orb detaches from the sun and shoots out into space.
The footage, a composite of images captured by the Solar Dynamics Observatory and processed by scientists at NASA’sGoddard Space Flight Center, has quickly garnered attention on YouTube, where viewers are suggesting it shows a UFO spacecraft refueling by sucking up solar plasma, or at the very least, the birth of a new planet.
UFO or Solar Flare?
However, according to NASA scientists, the feature is actually a little-understood, but frequently observed, type of solar activity called a “prominence,” and the way it is situated beneath another solar feature gives it its otherworldy appearance. [See video]
i got a mail that, A few years ago US sent a satellite which kept revolving round our globe whenever it crossed right above the spot of Thirunallaar ( East Coast Divine place of Tamil Nadu) it staggers, moves forward very slowly for a while ! NASA observed it and was puzzled! It is also said that during the SANI- PEYARCHCHI , a most sacred festival of the place, say once in 30 months , a very dense UV rays falls from the Space on the place ( it seems there is always a greater flow of UV rays compared to the quota received by any other part of our earth at that place ; and during the said festival the density gets more!) No explanations from the Scientists.Is this true?
Tuguska has been the focal point of many speculations.
Eric von Daniken in His Book’ Return to The Stars‘ deals with this issue from the angle of extra-terrestrial invasion.
What caused the impact and why has been puzzling.
Still there is no answer.
How the Tunguska object may have appeared.
Here is the full story.
One hundred and three years ago today, on the night of 30 June and 1 July, one of the most extraordinary events in modern history occurred.
The first reports of a strange glow in the sky came from across Europe. Shortly after midnight on 1 July 1908, Londoners were intrigued to see a pink phosphorescent night sky over the capital. People who had retired awoke confused as the strange pink glow shone into their bedrooms. The same ruddy luminescence was reported over Belgium. The skies over Germany were curiously said to be bright green, while the heavens over Scotland were of an incredible intense whiteness which tricked the wildlife into believing it was dawn. Birdsong started and cocks crowed – at two o’clock in the morning. The skies over Moscow were so bright, photographs were taken of the streets without using a magnesium flash. A captain on a ship on the River Volga said he could see vessels on the river two miles away by the uncanny astral light. One golf game in England almost went on until four in the morning under the nocturnal glow, and in the following weekThe Times of London was inundated with letters from readers from all over the United Kingdom to report the curious ‘false dawn’. A woman in Huntingdon wrote that she had been able to read a book in her bedroom solely by the peculiar rosy light. There were hundreds of letters from people reporting identical lighting conditions that went on for weeks… (Tom Slemen)
Aftermath of the Tunguska explosion
None of the people witnessing this strange phenomenon had any idea that, in the central Siberian plateau, just after 7:15 a.m. local time, the planet had been hit by a cometary impactor that exploded – as most such impactors do – in the atmosphere just above the Earth’s surface.
The star known as (deep breath) SDSS J102915+172927, in the constellation Leo, isn’t much to look at. It’s a bit smaller than the Sun and a bit hotter — but then, the same could be said for millions of other stars in the Milky Way. If not for a detailed census of the universe carried out over the past decade or so by the automated Sloan Digital Sky Survey (thus the SDSS in the star’s name), astronomers would probably never have noticed it….
When a team of European astronomers found the star in the Sloan’s massive database, however, they realized that the pattern of lines, and thus the mix of elements, was very different from the Sun’s. And when they used the powerful Very Large Telescope in Chile to take a closer look, they discovered just how unusual SDSS J102915+172927 is. For one thing, it’s almost certainly one of the oldest stars in the cosmos. The Sun has been around for about 4� billion years, but this star has been glowing for about 13 billion. Ancient stars are inevitably worth studying because they provide a glimpse into a time when the universe was young and still forming, and this, one, says Elisabetta Caffau, of the Center for Astronomy at the University of Heidelberg and the Paris Observatory, lead author of a study in the latest Nature, “was formed very shortly after the Big Bang,”
More to the point, however, is the startling fact that, according to conventional star-formation theory, the object people are now calling “Caffau’s star” shouldn’t exist at all. It’s very deficient in two elements — carbon and iron — that many theorists believe are critical components for normal stars to form in the first place. It’s also deficient in lithium, which is not essential for a star to take shape but ought to be present all the same. Wonders Hans-Gunter Ludwig, also at Heidelberg and Paris, and Caffau’s co-author: “Where has it [the lithium] gone?
To understand the mystery, you need just a little star science. The Big Bang created the first elements in the universe: lots of hydrogen, some helium and the tiniest soupcon of lithium. The very earliest stars — very massive, very hot and very fast-burning — were made of just these ingredients, nothing more. At the cores of these hot giants, nuclear reactions forged those three primordial elements into heavier ones, including carbon, oxygen, iron and more. When the giants exploded as supernovas, they spread the heavier elements out into the universe, where they were recycled into the second generation of stars — still mostly hydrogen and helium and a bit of lithium, but with a smattering of the new elements as well. Caffau’s should presumably be part of this second generation.
You must be logged in to post a comment.