Tag: Ramayana

  • Human Migration World History India

    I have often wondered about terms like Domicile and migration.

    Human migration.png
    Human migration.png

     

    If we understand History and follow it, we shall know that no one can claim to be a domicile of any place!

     

    The movement of Humans from prehistoric times is so complex and changing, it is impossible to say who was in one place first.

     

    Whenever we read History of Human migration we find that when people move from one place,it is stated that they mixed with the people in that place.

     

    How did these people come to be there?

     

    And from where?

     

    If migration takes place it has to be from one place to another.

     

    The place from where they moved from, how did they arrive there at the first place?

     

    European History says that Asia served as a sort of reservoir for Humans to migrate from.

     

    How did they come to be there at all?

     

    European history says, in migration, people came in waves from Asian, through the Urals and Russia, through the landmass of mideast .

     

    The group that came through Russia settled down and mingled with people over there.

     

    The other group .

     

    The first wave settled in Spain Pyrenees, North of Africa, in England,Scotland and Wales,and in Gaul.

     

    The second wave settled in Bulgaria, Hungary

     

    The third wave Huns, settled finally in Germany, after raiding all the ethnic groups settled before them.

     

    Then there were the Vikings who raided the Gauls, Anglo-Saxon.

     

    However all the information here are theories.

     

    There is yet another theory that states that people migrated from Africa.

     

    Curious is that while the west acknowledges that The Vedas are the first Literature of Mankind and were in existence at least from 5000 BC

    no body bothers to check the refernces found in the Vedas , Puranas, and Ithihasas on people, culture and places.

     

    There is another Language and civilisation found in India which is as old as the Vedas .

     

    Tamil.

     

    Tamil literature is at least 500o years old.

     

    Puranas quote Tamils, Tamil Kings.

     

    Ramayana and Mahabharata do the same.

     

    References are found in Sanskrit Literature, Tamil Literature  ,Vedas Puranas ,Ramayana and Mahabharata about people and places which are now Europe, US,Africa, Russia,

     

    Middle east, Iran, Southeast Asia, Polynesia .

     

    These references are not used, I presume, it hurts the pride of these scholars to accept India as a the cradle of Human Civilisation.

     

    So overwhelming are the artifacts and archeological finds, they have to grudgingly accept Indus Valley civilisation!

     

    They are yet to accept the Sarasvati Valley Civilisation.

     

    The Tamil civilisation is totally ignored as also the influence of this culture in Huan Migration in world History.

     

    I have also noticed a curious fact,

     

    Hindu,Indian Religious, Cultural artifacts and archeological finds are found all over the world.

     

    I have quite a few posts on this under Hinduism.

     

    But not a single artifact or archeological find has been found in India relating to History or culture or Religion of the other civilisations in the world which predate Vedic period or Tamil culture.

     

    I shall be examining the concept of Human migration from Dravida to rest of the world, including the Sarasvati Valley civilization.

     

    This will be with help of Vedas, Puranas,Ramayana, Mahabharata, Tamil and Sanskrit Literature.

     

     

     

     

  • Ramayana In The Rig Veda

    In terms of Time Ramayana took place after the Vedas.

     

    Lord Rama.jpg.
    Lord Rama.

     

    However there is a view that The Ramayana was during the close of the final portions of the Vedas.

     

    Krita Yuga,also called the Satya Yuga, which preceded the Treta Yuga when Ramayana took place.

     

    It was considered to be perfect Yuga where people were Righteous to the core.

     

    People had a Life span of 100,000 years.

     

    There is no Avatar as there was no necessity.

     

    But the question remains as to who were these people in this Yuga and where does Daksha fit in.

     

    Now on to the Rig Veda and the Ramayana.

     

    It will be an internal contradiction to have Ramayana quoted in the Rig Veda as Ramayana was later to Vedas.

     

    Even if we accept the view that the Ramayana happened during the closing years of the Vedas, then what about yajur Veda which was practised in the Ramayana.

     

    This can be resolved only if all the Vedas were grasped at the same time..

     

    However there is reference  to Ramayana and Rama in the Rig Veda.

     

    There is a Rama Rahasya Upanishad in the Vedas.

     

    Please read my post on this.

     

    There is also a verse in the Rig Veda on the name Rama.

     

    “14 This to Duḥśīma Pṛthavāna have I sung, to Vena, Rama, to the nobles, and the King.
    They yoked five hundred, and their love of us was famed upon their way.
    15 Besides, they showed us seven-and-seventy horses here.
    Tānva at once displayed his gift, Pārthya at once displayed his gift; and straightway Māyava showed his.” XCIII Visvedevas.

    Vena is the ancestor of Rama.

    In the absence of Dasaratha reference, some dispute the name Rama as the Rama of Ramayana.

     

    There is an interesting  note found in the Bala Kanda of Ramayana.

     

    Valmiki wrote that he wrote the Ramayana to expound The Vedas.

     

    “kushiilavau tu dharmaGYau raajaputrau yashasvinau |
    bhraatarau svarasampannau dadarsha aashramavaasinau ||
    sa tu medhaavinau dR^ishhTvaa vedeShu pariniShThitau |
    vedopabR^ihmaNaarthaaya taavagraahayata prabhuh ||
    kaavyaM raamaayaNaM kR^itsnaM siitaayaashcharitaM mahat.h|
    paulastya vadhamityeva chakaara charitavrataH||

    (vAlmIki-rAmAyaNabAlakANDa 1.4.5-7)

    The princes, the brothers, Kusha and Lava, were knowledgeable about Dharma and were glorious. Their voices were melodious and they lived in the hermitage of (vAlmIki). He (vAlmIki), established in good deeds, observed those two extremely intelligent (princes), skilled in the Vedas, and for the sake of expounding the Vedas, he composed and made them study the poem sampUrNa-rAmAyaNa (the entire rAmAyaNa) (containing) the great story of sItA and the slaying of rAvaNa.

    These verses from the vAlmIki-rAmAyaNa clearly show that the sage vAlmIki composed the rAmAyaNa to expound the meaning of the Vedas.

    Since rAmAyaNa is based on the Vedas, there must be mantras in the Vedas that correspond to the immortal story of rAma. It is with this objective that nIlakaNTha, the great commentator on the mahAbhArata, has presented, with his own wonderful commentary, the mantra-rAmAyaNa. The mantra-rAmAyaNa is a compilation of Riks from the R^ig Veda that narrate the story of rAma or the rAmAyaNa.”…

     

    For this reason, vAlmIki bases the twenty-four thousand verses of the rAmAyaNa on the twenty-four akshhara’s (syllables) of the gAyatrI mantra (of the Vedas).

    nIlakaNTha quotes from the agastya-saMhitA to further support the fact that the rAmAyaNa story is drawn from the Vedas:

    vedavedaye pare puMsi jAte dasharathAtmaje |
    vedaH prAchetasAdAsIt.h sAxAdrAmAyaNAtmanA |
    tasmAdrAmAyaNaM devi veda eva na saMshayaH ||…

     

    http://www.advaita-vedanta.org/articles/rig_vedic_ramayana/rig_vedic_ramayana-1.htm

  • Where Is The Reference To The Bible

    India and Hinsuim is pilloried for its tardiness in maintaing its History.

     

    There  are no historical references, no continuity in Indian History nor any official crdible History.

     

    This is the view among most of the Indians, that most of Indian History is a fable.

     

    The west is not far from holding this view.

     

    Is this a Fact?

     

    Let us look at some facts.

     

    1.References of Hindu Epics and The Veda are found in the literature that existed in the corresponding period where/when they came  into existence.

     

    I have not used the term written as the Vedas, it is believed were not written and they were transmitted orally over Five Thousand Years.

     

     

    The Mahabharata refers to the Ramayana.

     

     

    The Puranas refer to both Ramayana and the Bible, not to speak of the Vedas.

     

    All the literary works in India refer to the Vedas, Ramayana and the Mahabharata.

     

    These are works belonging to the years before Christ.

     

    2.Post Christ Era.

     

    All the works in India refer to all of these at least in the two languages I know, Sanskrit and Tamil, of these Tamil is at least 500 year old.

     

    Tamil works of the Sangam period which are t least 500 years older than the Bible quotes the Hindu Epics and the Vedas.

     

    Old Testament.jpg
    Old Testament.

     

    One of the major tools in determing the existence of a Literay work or event is the cross refernce in the  Text, refernce to it by works of the same period

    and its refernce to it at least in the earliest succeeding work.

     

    Hinduism fulfills these tests.

     

    What about the Bible?

     

    Bible is taken so seriously that people have fixed even time scale on Christ!

     

    Has the Bible been referred to in the works of the same period or in the period immediately succeeding it?

     

    I do not seem to find it anywhere.

     

    Excepting Bible refrences in the non Cannonical texts of the Bible.

     

    All the cannonical texts are taken as  a part of the Bible.

     

    This is like Ramayana proving Ramyana in itself!-by taliking about it in The Ramayana.

     

    And the Hebrew Bible called Hebrew Bible, also known as the Tanakh by Jews, is the earliest refernce to The Bible.

     

    And the Tanakh is dated at  2 Century BC, that is 200 Years before Christ!

     

    4.

    “Perhaps the most obvious way that the Bible has inspired writers can be seen in the ways that works of literature actually retell stories found in the Bible. John Milton’s Paradise Lost, for example, retells the biblical fall of man in a long, epic poem, including Satan’s rebellion against God and Adam and Eve’s expulsion from Eden.

    Similarly, John Steinbeck‘s East of Eden is roughly structured around the biblical story of Cain and Abel. Another example can be seen in C.S. Lewis’s The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. Following the biblical story of God as the all-powerful savior, Lewis uses the Bible to create parts of his plot,   by especially with the return of King Aslan, which parallels Jesus’s return.

    Other writers take images in the Bible and expand on them or use them as a setting, such as Dante, who used the Bible’s description of the afterlife to create an epic 3-volume poem that explores Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven, titled the Divine Comedy.”

     

     

    And Dante’s period is  1265–1321 !, full 1200 Years after Christ.

     

    Why there is no reference to The Bible at all in the earlier works between the Bible and the Divine Comedy?

     

     

    Perhaps there was no literature!

     

    3.The Bible should have been referred to corresponding literature of the same period.

     

    I do not find any reference at all.

     

    Now which History is credible?

     

    Hinduism where Rama’s and Krishna’s dates have been proved,places mentioned have been identified, refernces to them are found every where in Indian Literature,in Japan,Cambodia, Laos,Lanka, Russia, Italy,Americas,and Africa or

     

    The Bible and the western History?

     

     

    http://education-portal.com/academy/lesson/the-bible-as-literary-influence-references-and-allusion.html#lesson

  • Svarga Mount Meru Of Hinduism Is The Arctic

    Descriptions of places in Hindu epics are generally real.

     

    Heaven Hinduism.jpg
    Heaven Hinduism. Image credit. http://www.hinduhumanrights.info/the-seven-heavens-and-the-wheel/

     

    Except of the Poetic License where the writer indulges in hyperbole.

     

    However the basic information about the Topography is correct and verifiable.

     

    Many of the sites mentioned in the Ramayana, Mahabharata,The Vedas have been found now.

     

    Ayodhya, Mathura,Pandyaa Kingdoms, not to speak of the Holy places, Rivers, Mountains and even the Species that thrive in these locations.

     

    At the same time one gets the impression that the areas mentioned are not in The Earth and are located in some other location ,Planet, under the Ocean.

     

    And we have the Lokas, the abode of Beings confusing.

     

    We have , for example, the Surya Loka, Chandra Loka.

     

    While the description of these places make one belive that these are In Heavens, one is floored by the reference to these places in Treatises relating to Astronomy that they are Stars, Planets and their movements are measured, without mentioning the Inhabitants.

     

    These are taken as reference points in studying Astronomy.

     

    Then we have the Philosophical treatises mention these places as indicative of spiritual development.

     

    Chandra is associated(Moon) withe Mind.

     

    In Spiritual development, Chandra loka means an awakening of the mind on its path towards Self realization.

     

    Surya Loka is a heightened state of spiritual development.

     

    While taking about these , the treatises do not talk of these as place of Dwelling, but as a state of Spiritual Development.

     

    There are also references in the Vishnu Purana about the Sun, Moon an`d the Pole Star(Dhruva Mandala)

     

    The distance of these places from the earth are shown and it is stated that they , Sun and Moon are destroyed during the Dissolution by Brahma(Pralaya), but Pole Satr remains!

     

    Here it becomes tougher to know whether these places are locations or indicative of spiritual development.

     

    Lets us keep this point in mind before  proceed further.

     

    Descriptions of Svarga or Heaven remain unchanged in all the Puranas and Ithihasas.

    When one reads the original texts and finds that some characters have visited these places form the earth, right from Mandhata to Arjuna, Narada keeps commuting from Heaven to earth, one gets an inkling that these places could be on the earth.

     

    Read the following study.

     

    I am inclined to have an open mind on this as this seems to be on course with the tenets of Hinduism, where Svarga or Naraka ,Heaven or Hell is more of the Mind and its manifestations, not withstanding the Garuda Purana where details of Travel to Heaven is described.

     

    These are mostly allegorical.

     

    One may refer to the ascendency to Heaven by the Pandavas, where the descriptions are of the Himalayas and proceeding further North.

     

    And we have the Meru Mountain , whose description bewilders one.

     

    Please read my post on this.

     

    Now the Heavens are Arctic….

     

    Despite the prevalent opinion that all gods were inhabitants of heaven, their larger part lived on land, in water or underground. According to Indian and Slavonic legends, gods-incomers (Adityas/Devas and Svarozhichi – Svarozhichs) lived in the land (kingdom) of Indra/Svarog –Svarga/Blue Svarga, the capital of which the majestic city of godsAmaravati was. In spite of the fact that Old Indian written information sources point (indicate) to a different location of Svarga and Amaravati -from the superior planets (Satjaloka, Maharloka, Svargaloka) to some area between Earth and the Sun,  of heaven or of the earth surface, in the Second and Third books of the “Mahabharata” (Sabhaparva and Aranyakaparva) more than convincing arguments are given in favour of that Svarga, including Meru mount (Amaravati was on the top of it), Mandara and adjacent mounts with forests,

     

    gardens, parks and orchards, was on the Earth (on land).
    Here is how the land of Indra is described in the “Aran
    yakaparva” in B.L. Smirnov’s translation from Sanscrit and author’s translation from Russian:
    «At last th
    e abode  (dwelling place) of Shakra, Amaravati, I have seen.
    … the Sun there does not bake, neither heat, nor chill do not exhaust,
    … There on trees always flowers and fruits, (always)
    Leaves turn green;
    [There] various ponds, grown with the blue
    Lotus
    es and lilies white, fragrant;
    …There winnows a fragrant breeze – vivifying, cool, pure;
    … There is possible to see many air chariots,
    Flying by in heaven…»…

     

    The “Rigveda”, “Mahabharata”, “Bhagavata purana”, «Laws of Manu» [1] and other Old Indian texts, and also the Old Iranian “(Zend-)Avesta” place Meru mount [2] and accordingly Svarga in the far North:
    «On the North side, shining, there is mighty Meru… Great Meru, the chaste (pure), good abode  (dwelling place). Here set and again [over the Meru] rise Seven divine rishis led by Vasishtha [3]» (the “Mahabharata”);
    «On Meru gods see the sun after its one-time rising over a period its path, equal to
    a half of its circulation round land». «For gods and day and night – a year [human],  again divided in two: day – the period of movement of the sun northward, night – the period of movement to the south» («Laws of Manu»).
    The “Avesta” also give characteristic features of the polar disposition of Hara mount (Meru): «That they consider by day, that is a year. … there stars, moon, the sun can be seen once a year only rising and setting, and year seems only one day».
    Judging by the fragments cited above, Svarga, “Paradise of Indra” or “Paradise of Svarog” was located near to the North pole and, perhaps,were by a part of the disappeared polar continent – Hyperborea. According to the descriptions given in the “Mahabharata”, it was a mountainous country with mounts to the sky, the main of which was  Mandara:
    «On the North side, shining, stands mighty Meru. The paradise of great god Indra placed on its top. From these mounts the great rivers … fall. At the bottom
    of Meru – « adobe of gods »,  Milk ocean is, and before the great mounts Meru sandy sea is stretched out».
    Svarga can be compared with Jambudvipa described by Shukadeva Gosvami [4] in the “Bhagavata purana” . If we clean it from poetic embellishments (such, as trees up to heaven, lakes of honey and milk) it come to the following.
    In Jambudvipa there is Sumeru mount. Sumeru is environed by four other mounts: Mandara, Merumandara, Suparshva and Kumuda. On these four mounts mango trees, pink apples trees, kadamba  trees and banyan trees grow. Besides, there are a lot of lakes with pure water. There are also gardens, the names of which are Nandana,  Chitraratha, Vaibhradzhaka and Sarvatobhadra. Sumeru is surrounded by twenty mountain chains, including Kuranga, Kurara, Kusumbha, Vaikanka and Trikuta. To the East from Sumeru Dzhathara and Devakuta mounts, to the West  from Sumeru – Pavana and Pariyatra, to the South – Kailasa and Karavira, and to the North – Trishringa and Makara. On the top of Sumeru there is Brahmapuri, residence of Lord Brahma. Round Brahmapuri are cities of tsar Indra and seven other demigods. Each of these cities is in four times less than Brahmapuri…

     

    Comparing different descriptions of continent of Svarga (Jambudvipa, Hyperborea) among themselves, somebody pays attention at once to their obvious differences. On the one hand, this country was situated near to the North pole «in the area of gloom and snow», «where stars rotate, the Moon and the Sun». On the other hand, there was never cold on it, evergreen trees and flowers grew, larger part of which could grow only in warm tropical climate.

     

    It can be related as with different time of compiling of legends, so with repeated application in the “Mahabharata”, “Ramayana”, “Bhagavata purana” and other Old Indian texts of additions and adjustments (improvements). And, most likely, that and other together.
    In my opinion,
    the fragments given above describe different time – when Svarga represented the country with warm tropical climat and gods-incomers (Adityas, Svarozhichi -Svarozhichs, etc.) lived in it, and when the country, fertile before, had turned out in the area near the North pole (or to the contrary, the North pole moved to it) and had been locked by ice (has been icebound). Judging by the having data, it had happened rather recently (about 12 thousand years ago), and the most possible reason of it was a global catastrophe accompanied by a shift of Earth’s axis. I will tell to you about it in my workLast days of the Great Northern civilization -the descendants of white gods. What has happened in the Northeastern Asia, Alaska and the shelf of Arctic ocean 12 thousand years ago? The reconstructions on a joint of geology and history

    Attention! This point of view reflects my opinion 3 years ago (relative to 2012). In fact, all was much more intricate. The glaciation of Svarga (Jambudvipa, Hyperborea) began at least 16 million years ago (according to K.Moran, Ya.Bekman, H.Brinkhus, 34 million years ago). Over the past 16 million years, the north pole position repeatedly changed, but all this time it remained in the Arctic region. At the same time the area of the northern continent reduces. The warm climate of Svarga (Jambudvipa, Hyperborea) was in the Paleocene and Eocene epoch (65,5-34 million years ago), called by me the “golden age”, and partly in the Oligocene and Early Miocene epoch (34-16 million years ago ). At this time, Earth was covered by  a water-steam envelope, and in the north it was as hot as at the equator. Read about it in the works, annotated with  “Hyperborea – the northern native land of mankind,” and on the website.’

     

    This might explain the seeming  discrepancy in some geographical descriptions in the Ramayana, especially the location of Lanka.

     

    I shall be writing on this.

     

    Citation:

     

    http://earthbeforeflood.com/home.html

  • Mahabharata 1.8 Million Words In One Verse

    Vyasa wrote the Mahabharata in 100,000 Verses, slokas.

    He has also written the same Mahabharata in different lengths.

    Krishna lifts Govardhana Giri.image
    Sri Krishna lifts Govardhana Mountain to save His people

    He Compiled the Vedas.

    Just to have an idea of ho voluminous the Mahabharata is see at  the end of the post.

    No look this epic of 1.8 Million words in just about 93 Sanskrit Letters!

    एकश्लोकीमहाभारतम्

    आदौ पाण्डववधार्तराष्ट्रजननं लाक्षागृहे दाहनं
    द्यूते श्रीहरणं वने विहरणं मत्स्यालये वर्धनम् ।
    लीलागोग्रहणं रणे वितरणं सन्धिक्रियाजृम्भणं
    भीष्मद्रोणसुयोधनादिमथनं एतन्महाभारतम् ॥

    “Adau Paandava DhaarthaRaastra Jananam LakshaaGruheDahanam

    Dhyootha SreeHaranam VaneVicharanam MatsaaLaye VarthaNam

    Govinda Priya BhaashaNaadi Phalitham SandhiKriyaaJrumbhanam

    BheeshmaDrona Suyodhanaadhi Hananam ChaitanMahaBharatham”

    (With) the birth of sons of Pandu and Drthrashtra and (failed attempt) of burning alive Pandavas) in a wax house, Wealth grabbed illegally, exile in forests (of Pandavas), retreat in the house of Matsya (Kingdom) cows stolen and rescued, in battle, Attempts for compromise (between the Pandavas and Karavas by Lord Krishna) failed, Bhishma, Drona Duryodhana and others killed, is MAHABHARATA..

    Its longest version consists of over 100,000 shloka or over 200,000 individual verse lines (each shloka is a couplet), and long prose passages. About 1.8 million words in total, the Mahabharata is roughly ten times the length of the Iliad and Odyssey combined, or about four times the length of the Ramayana. W. J. Johnson has compared the importance of the Mahabharata to world civilization to that of the Bible, the works of Shakespeare, the works of Homer, Greek drama, or the Qur’an.(www.crystal Links.com)

    Vyasa wrote two versions, one is the Bharata Charitra and another is The Mahabharata which is popular.

    4.Vyasa wrote The Mahabharata with sub-stoiries in 100, 000 slokas for Mankind,

    He also wrote it in 24, 000 slokas without the substories.

    He wrote again  in a compact form containing 150  slokas,

    This is called the Anugramanigathya and is in the First Parva.

    4.Vyasa released further editions of the Mahabharata.

    One for the Deva Loka with 300000 slokas.

    Another for Pithr Loka with 150000.

    With 1400000  for the Rakshasas and Yakshas and 100,00 for humanity,

    Citation.

    http://www.crystalinks.com/Mahabharata.html