Ramanisblog

Tag: Jesus

  • Evidence Jesus Christ Did Not Exist

    I posted articles on how the Bible was complied by Constantine through a Conclave of Cardinals to hold on to his empire.

    I had also written, albeit, in the passing that Jesus Christ did not exist.

    That we still do not know his real name even to-day.

    Here let us see how the story of Jesus was built.

    Compare this with Lord Rama and Krishna, the Hindu Gods, whose dates and existence has been proved beyond doubt.

    This article is dedicated to the Secular Historians, who call Indian history as revealed in the Puranas and Ithihasas to be fantasies and not supported by facts.

    Jesus Image.jpg.
    Jesus Christ.

    “Most antiquities scholars think that the New Testament gospels are “mythologized history.” In other words, they think that around the start of the first century a controversial Jewish rabbi named Yeshua ben Yosef gathered a following and his life and teachings provided the seed that grew into Christianity.

    At the same time, these scholars acknowledge that many Bible stories like the virgin birth, miracles, resurrection, and women at the tomb borrow and rework mythic themes that were common in the Ancient Near East, much the way that screenwriters base new movies on old familiar tropes or plot elements. In this view, a “historical Jesus” became mythologized.

    For over 200 years, a wide-ranging array of theologians and historians—most of them Christian—analyzed ancient texts, both those that made it into the Bible and those that didn’t, in attempts to excavate the man behind the myth. Several current or recent bestsellers take this approach, distilling the scholarship for a popular audience. Familiar titles include Zealot by Reza Aslan and How Jesus Became God by Bart Ehrman…
    No first century secular evidence whatsoever exists to support the actuality of Yeshua ben Yosef. 
    The earliest New Testament writers seem ignorant of the details of Jesus’ life, which become more crystalized in later texts. Paul seems unaware of any virgin birth, for example. No wise men, no star in the east, no miracles. Historians have long puzzled over the “Silence of Paul” on the most basic biographical facts and teachings of Jesus. Paul fails to cite Jesus’ authority precisely when it would make his case. What’s more, he never calls the twelve apostles Jesus’ disciples; in fact, he never says Jesus HAD disciples –or a ministry, or did miracles, or gave teachings.
    3.Even the New Testament stories don’t claim to be first-hand accounts. We now know that the four gospels were assigned the names of the apostles Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, not written by them.
    4.The gospels, our only accounts of a historical Jesus, contradict each other.
    5.Modern scholars who claim to have uncovered the real historical Jesus depict wildly different persons. They include a cynic philosopher, charismatic Hasid, liberal Pharisee, conservative rabbi, Zealot revolutionary, non-violent pacifist to borrow from a much longer list assembled by Price. In his words (pp. 15-16), “The historical Jesus (if there was one) might well have been a messianic king, or a progressive Pharisee, or a Galilean shaman, or a magus, or a Hellenistic sage. But he cannot very well have been all of them at the same time.” John Dominic Crossan of the Jesus Seminar grumbles that “the stunning diversity is an academic embarrassment….”

    How the sorty of Jesus Christ was fabricated follows.

    Citation.

    https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2014/12/25/five-reasons-to-suspect-that-jesus-never-existed-valerie-tarico/

     

    Related articles

  • Christmas Date Origin Brutal Murder of Innocents Saturnalia

    As I have pointed out in a few articles that the Bible was compiled ,some three hundred years after the  death of Jesus Christ, by Emperor Constantine   to keep his Kingdom intact.

     

    The Old and New Testaments do not give a date for Christ’s Birth.

    Christmas.jpg
    Christmas, a Pagan Custom

     

    ”

    The New Testament gives no date or year for Jesus’ birth.  The earliest gospel – St. Mark’s, written about 65 CE – begins with the baptism of an adult Jesus.  This suggests that the earliest Christians lacked interest in or knowledge of Jesus’ birthdate.

    1. The year of Jesus birth was determined by Dionysius Exiguus, a Scythian monk, “abbot of a Roman monastery.  His calculation went as follows:
    2. In the Roman, pre-Christian era, years were counted from ab urbe condita (“the founding of the City” [Rome]).  Thus 1 AUC signifies the year Rome was founded, 5 AUC signifies the 5th year of Rome’s reign, etc.
    3. Dionysius received a tradition that the Roman emperor Augustus reigned 43 years, and was followed by the emperor Tiberius.
    4. Luke 3:1,23 indicates that when Jesus turned 30 years old, it was the 15th year of Tiberius reign.
    5. If Jesus was 30 years old in Tiberius’ reign, then he lived 15 years under Augustus (placing Jesus birth in Augustus’ 28th year of reign).
    6. Augustus took power in 727 AUC.  Therefore, Dionysius put Jesus birth in 754 AUC.
    7. However, Luke 1:5 places Jesus’ birth in the days of Herod, and Herod died in 750 AUC – four years before the year in which Dionysius places Jesus birth.
    8. Joseph A. Fitzmyer – Professor Emeritus of Biblical Studies at the Catholic University of America, member of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, and former president of the Catholic Biblical Association – writing in the Catholic Church’s official commentary on the New Testament, writes about the date of Jesus’ birth, “Though the year [of Jesus birth is not reckoned with certainty, the birth did not occur in AD 1.  The Christian era, supposed to have its starting point in the year of Jesus birth, is based on a miscalculation introduced ca. 533 by Dionysius Exiguus.”
    9. The DePascha Computus, an anonymous document believed to have been written in North Africa around 243 CE, placed Jesus birth on March 28.  Clement, a bishop of Alexandria (d. ca. 215 CE), thought Jesus was born on November 18.  Based on historical records, Fitzmyer guesses that Jesus birth occurred on September 11, 3 BCE.

    1.Dates were arrived at based on legends quite some time later.

    2.The suggested dates by convoluted, unverified and unsupported legends give the dates as,

     

    March 28,

    September 11,.

     

    How come Christmas is fixed on December 25?

     

    ”

    Roman pagans first introduced the holiday of Saturnalia, a week long period of lawlessness celebrated between December 17-25.  During this period, Roman courts were closed, and Roman law dictated that no one could be punished for damaging property or injuring people during the weeklong celebration.  The festival began when Roman authorities chose “an enemy of the Roman people” to represent the “Lord of Misrule.”  Each Roman community selected a victim whom they forced to indulge in food and other physical pleasures throughout the week.  At the festival’s conclusion, December 25th, Roman authorities believed they were destroying the forces of darkness by brutally murdering this innocent man or woman.

    1. The ancient Greek writer poet and historian Lucian (in his dialogue entitled Saturnalia) describes the festival’s observance in his time.  In addition to human sacrifice, he mentions these customs: widespread intoxication; going from house to house while singing naked; rape and other sexual license; and consuming human-shaped biscuits (still produced in some English and most German bakeries during the Christmas season).
    2. In the 4th century CE, Christianity imported the Saturnalia festival hoping to take the pagan masses in with it.  Christian leaders succeeded in converting to Christianity large numbers of pagans by promising them that they could continue to celebrate the Saturnalia as Christians.
    3. The problem was that there was nothing intrinsically Christian about Saturnalia. To remedy this, these Christian leaders named Saturnalia’s concluding day, December 25th, to be Jesus’ birthday.
    4. Christians had little success, however, refining the practices of Saturnalia.  As Stephen Nissenbaum, professor history at the University of Massachussetts, Amherst, writes, “In return for ensuring massive observance of the anniversary of the Savior’s birth by assigning it to this resonant date, the Church for its part tacitly agreed to allow the holiday to be celebrated more or less the way it had always been.”  The earliest Christmas holidays were celebrated by drinking, sexual indulgence, singing naked in the streets (a precursor of modern caroling), etc.
    5. The Reverend Increase Mather of Boston observed in 1687 that “the early Christians who  first observed the Nativity on December 25 did not do so thinking that Christ was born in that Month, but because the Heathens’ Saturnalia was at that time kept in Rome, and they were willing to have those Pagan Holidays metamorphosed into Christian ones.”

    Citation.

    http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/Christmas_TheRealStory.htm

    Related articles
  • Jesus Is Iswara Prajapathi Christian Misinterpretaion

    Jesus Is Iswara Prajapathi Christian Misinterpretaion

    My Father looks like Me,

     

    This is what Christian Neo Missionaries are attempting to do by seemingly researched, though sheer  nonsense ,work about Hinduism and Christianity,in their attempt to legitimize Christianity and lure the unwary into the Christian fold.

     

    Vatican a Shiva templejpg
    Vatican a Shiva temple

     

    This follows their earlier attempts to spread the canard about Jesus having visited Kashmir, learned Yoga and his grave is in Kashmir.

     

    Please read my post on this.

     

    Now they have gone one step further,

     

    That Jesus had studied in Kashmir.

     

    He was a follower of Rudra.

     

    He,as a carpenter, built a King’s palace in India.

     

    Jesus is Shiva and Prajapathi.

     

    Jesus is Ishwara and this is mentioned in the Bhavishya Purana.

     

    Jesus is mentioned in the Rig Veda.

     

    My rebuttal.

    “The Aryan invasion of India occurred around 1500 BC.  The Aryans were polytheistic, bringing Vishnu, Brahma and the thousands of gods, with them.  Before this, India was monotheistic. Study and dating of different sections of the Rig Veda show that the early monotheistic Semito-Dravidians called God, Rudradeva. There are 75 references to Rudra in the Rig Veda, and these segments are very early, redacted from material dated around 1800 BCE.  There is also a group of hymns to him in the Yajur Veda, today called the Rudram.”

    This spreads the myth of the Aryan Invasion Theory, which stands discredited.

     

    Read my posts on this.

     

    The reference to Shiva i very limited in the Vedas and the term Rudra is am Amsa of Shiva and not Shiva.

     

    “It seems that the Aryans later  took one of Rudra’s epithets, “shiva”, meaning “auspicious”, and over time subsumed him into the polytheistic pantheon under this name as a demi-god called Shiva. A trinity of Shiva, Vishnu and Brahma was woven together by the Aryans after 1500 BCE.’

     

    Rudra is an aspect of Shiva and not the other way around

     

    ‘Nama Sivaya cha, Siva Dharaya Cha- Sri Rudram

     

    ‘The Dravidians worshipped Linga in the temples, the Linga which was the amorphous representation of Shiva. They worshipped Linga by sprinkling it with water or milk, by offering prayers, by meditating on the deity. .. They had an idea of death and judgement after death which was the basis of moral life. But to crown all these, they had a concept of the Triad – An, the Supreme Godhead; Amma, the Goddess; and Anil, the Son. These are the later day Shiva, Shakti and Sharana of the Agamas.”[i]’

     

    Linga worship is /was throughout India and not limited to the South.

     

    ”

    This suggests a religious structure compatible with the ancient Hebrew structure, and might explain why Kashmir was visited by Moses  around 1500 BCE and Jesus  in the 1st century CE.   The ancient Hebrew structure comprised God the Father, God the Mother, Shekinah, and God the Son.

    The Spirit of God appears in the Old and New Testaments as the Hebrew feminine noun, Shekinah. Shekinah is related to the Sanskrit word for God the Mother, Shakti, from which comes the Indo-European root for our English word, “she”.

    she pron.   Used to refer to the woman or girl previously mentioned or implied. See Usage Note at ”

     

    Sanskrit was earlier to English by a few thousand Years.

     

    Judaism is later to Hinduism.

     

    So who follow whom?

     

    ”

    n the book The Serpent of Paradise by Miguel Serrano and Frank MacShane, p. 79, it is stated that the Nathanamavali records that Jesus studied with the Natha Yogis from the age of 14, was initiated as one of them, and came to know Shiva as his own Father.  He went to the land of the Hebrews and willingly gave up his body at the age of 49, having mastered yoga.   He then returned to India, and founded the cult of the Lingam and the Yoni in Kashmir.

    It is important to note here  that Jesus advocated monogamy or celibacy (Matthew 19: 11, 12).  If he taught and practiced tantra, it was not a recipe for promiscuity. According to records in Kashmir, Jesus married Maryan in Pahalgam, Kashmir.  They had a son called Jehoiakim, who had a son called Raj Bhishtay, according to an inscription in the temple on Shankriyacarya Hill in Srinagar, Kashmir, dated 3154 Laukika Era, or 78 AD. (Hassnain and Levi, The Fifth Gospel, pp. 247-8)”

     

    Please read my post on Jesus in Kashmir.

     

    Aramaic inscription from Taxila

    As well as the Nathanamavali, there is further evidence that Jesus accepted Shiva as a name for the monotheistic God, while teaching that worship of  the demi-gods is false.  An inscription in Aramaic found in Taxila, Pakistan, describes the foreign carpenter who built the palace of King Gondophares (ruled 25 – 60 AD) from cedar and ivory as a “pious devotee of Rudradeva”. (Hassnain and Levi, The Fifth Gospel, p. 231)   According to records such as the Acts of Thomas, it was St Thomas who built the palace for the king.  Rudradeva was the early Semito-Dravidian name for the monotheistic God, Shiva, in the Indus Valley, before the invasion of the polytheistic Aryans in 1500 BC. In other words, it seems that the inscription is stating that St Thomas was a pious devotee of Rudradeva.

    4. Bhavishya Maha Purana

    In the Bhavishya Maha Purana, internally dated 115 AD, Jesus gives his name as Ishwara Putram, which translates as The Son of the Lord.   Ishwara has now become in Inda  a name of Shiva.

    5. Prajapati as Jesus-figure in Rig Veda.

    There is a prophecy about a Jesus-figure  in the Purusha Hymn, the 90th hymn of the 10th book of the Rig Veda, which  may date from around 1800 BC.  Prajapati is the name given, which translates from the Sanskrit as Lord of Created Beings[ii], and in Hinduism represents the God of gods, the God of all creation. ”

     

    Iswara in Sanskrit means personal God.

     

    There is no mention of Iswara Kumara as Christ in the Bhavishya Purana.

     

    And where it appears it refers to Kaarthikeya, Subrahmanya.

     

    Pathetic attempt to legitimize a Religion which was framed, not founded  three hundred years after the death of Jesus, whose name is not known.

     

    At best Christians can say, we follow Vedas in part, period.

     

    Citation.

    http://ishanathayoga.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/jesus-in-the-rig-veda/

    Related articles

  • “Don’t Respect Other Religions” The Bible

     

    If some one has a doubt that Christianity whether Christianity respects other Religions, here is quote and explanation from Edward D. Waller, Ph. D. in

    Catholic News.

     

    Catholicism.Image.bmp
    Catholicism.

     

    The statement and the article is directed at Protestants and those who are Non Catholics among the Christians.

     

    If this is the attitude towards their sister groups,whom the consider as their mortal enemies, what is there to sa about other Religions?

     

    ”

     

    If respecting other religions means to refrain from interfering with other people’s beliefs, then how do we reconcile Christ’s words to His apostles before ascending into Heaven? “

    And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to Me in Heaven and in earth. Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.” (Matt.28:18-20)

    Christ’s instructions were very clearly given to His apostles. They were commanded to teach ALL (not some) nations ALL things (not some things) whatsoever Christ had commanded them to teach. That is, Christ gave them the revealed truth and all His doctrines. The apostles were not told to respect those nations or beliefs that held different beliefs from Christ’s teachings. Even Christ professed Truth to the elite Rabbis who rejected not only His teachings, but Christ as Son of God. Christ was crucified on the cross because He did not compromise His teachings

     

    Is it possible to consider worthy of high regard or esteem other religious beliefs that are contradictions to the Truth found within the Roman Catholic Church? Should we respect religions that allow polygamy, deny the Divinity of Jesus Christ, deny original sin and the Immaculate Conception? Should we respect beliefs of others that allow divorce, abortion and permit homosexuality as a lifestyle?

    How can TRUE Catholics hold these beliefs in high regard or esteem and call themselves followers of Christ? As a Catholic I should respect my fellow brothers and sisters. I can hold human beings in high regard and esteem because each one of us has been created in the image and likeness of God. Jesus gave us the commandment to love God with all our heart, mind and soul and to love our neighbor as ourselves. He did not tell us to love sin or beliefs that contradict His teachings. Thus, I will not elevate with high regard or esteem any religion or belief that contradicts the teachings of Jesus Christ.

    Pope Pius XII states in the same encyclical, “…God has given to His Church a living Teaching Authority to elucidate and explain what is contained in the deposit of faith only obscurely and implicitly. This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer has given authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church.” He further states that Christ appointed the Church as “guardian and interpreter of the whole deposit of divinely revealed truth”.

    God did not send His only begotten Son into the world to establish a multiple of religions equally meriting salvation. If this were the case, there would have been no need for Christ to die on the cross, for all religions would have been equally pleasing to God. Christ came to establish His Church which contains the WHOLE deposit of divinely revealed truth which is the ONLY means to salvation. The present post-conciliar Church has silenced the doctrine of “No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church” as a means of promoting false ecumenism which attempts to establish respect for all religions.

    I can not understand how Catholics could fall for such nonsense. Are they unaware that a doctrine can never be revoked. A doctrine is a revealed truth through God that can NEVER change. God is pure Truth and can never deceive us. Only man and the serpent are capable of deceptive ploys.

    Pope Pius XII reiterates this doctrine very clearly and precisely. “Some say they are not bound by the doctrine which teaches that the Mystical Body of Christ and the Roman Catholic Church are one and the same thing. Some reduce to a meaningless formula the necessity of belonging to the true Church in order to gain eternal salvation. Others finally belittle the reasonable character of the credibility of Christian faith. These and like ERRORS, it is clear, have crept in among certain of our sons who are deceived by imprudent zeal for souls or by false science.”..

    Since the Second Vatican Council, there has been great emphasis on ecumenism or unity among all religions. We are now hearing from all levels within the Roman Catholic Church that we must RESPECT all religions. We are told that we must refrain from forcing our beliefs onto others. We are told that all religions hold some truth that may lead to salvation of souls. What we have not been told is that this notion is UTTER NONSENSE and contrary to our traditional faith.

    In the encyclical, Humani Generis, Pope Pius XII warns the faithful about false “irenics” (ecumenism). He states: “Another danger is perceived which is all the more concealed beneath the mask of virtue. There are many who, deploring disagreement among men and intellectual confusion, through an imprudent zeal for souls, are urged by a great and ardent desire to do away with the barrier that divides good and honest men; these advocate an ‘irenism’ according to which, by setting aside the questions which divide men, they aim not only at joining forces to repel the attack of atheism, but also at reconciling things opposed to one another in the field of dogma.

    “…But some through enthusiasm for an imprudent ‘irenism’ seem to consider as an obstacle to the restoration of fraternal union things founded on the laws and principles given by Christ and likewise on institutions founded by Him, or which are the defense and support of the integrity of the faith, and the removal of which would bring about the union of all, but only to their destruction.

    “In theology some want to reduce to a minimum the meaning of dogmas: and to free dogma itself from terminology long established in the Church and from philosophical concepts held by Catholic teachers … They cherish the hope that when dogma is stripped of the elements which they hold to be extrinsic to divine revelation, it will compare advantageously with the dogmatic opinions of those who are separated from the unity of the Church and that in this way they will gradually arrive at a mutual assimilation of Catholic dogma with the tenets of the dissidents.

    “Moreover they assert that when Catholic doctrine has been reduced to this condition, a way will be found to satisfy modern needs, that will permit dogma being expressed also by the concepts of modern philosophy … Some more audaciously affirm that this can and must be done, because they hold that the mysteries of faith are never expressed by truly adequate concepts but only by approximate and ever changeable notions, in which the truth is to some extent expressed, but is necessarily distorted.”

     “A person sins against faith, first, by not trying to know what God has taught; second, by refusing to believe all that God has taught; third, by neglecting to profess his belief in what God has taught.”

    (Baltimore Catechism No. 4, p. 265) False worship is a sin against the First Commandment. “And now that we have the real sacrifice it would be sinful to use only figures, (as in other religions) and it would be a false worship displeasing to God …So, too, all those who leave the true Church to practice a religion of their own have a false worship, for they worship God not as He wants, but as they wish” (Baltimore Catechism No. 4, p. 261).

    Citation.

    http://www.olrl.org/doctrine/respect.shtml

    Related articles

  • Buy Cattle,Convert Forcibly Christians New Tactics

    I have posted an article on how Christians pose as Brahmins to covert Hindus into Christianity.

     

    That was quite novel and weird I thought.

    Christian Missionaries Target Hindus.Image.jpg.
    Christian Missionaries Target Hindus.

     

    Still more to com, I never imagined.

     

    It seems that these Christian groups have joined forces with Multinational Companies in an effort to destroy local cattle first b offering Money to bu the Cattle and simultaneously cajoling and threatening farmers that it was only Jesus who was born in a Cattle shed and only he could  save the Cattle,Hindu temple priests being Frauds.

     

    The Brainwashing, terrorizing team arrives in threes and twos.

     

    The aim seems to be twofold.

     

    1.By offering money, entice people to convert.

    2.By offering to buy the local cattle,inject them with artificial insemination  drugs, ensue that the local cattle population is wiped out.

     

    What has injecting Cattle to do with Religious Conversion?

     

    In Villages,Tamil Nadu, there is the custom of dedicating cattle to Temples.

     

    Cattle are worshiped.

     

    The condition is that these cattle must be Local Cattle, not artificially inseminated.

     

    The thinking of the Christian groups seems to be that b ensuring that there are less number of local cattle, the can reduce the number of people using Cattle to worship and prevent them from going to Temples.

     

    By reducing the number of local cattle, the can prevent Youngsters from following local custom of  engaging the Cattle in a Race-this normally is done during Temple festivals

     

    And the money offered si Rs. Three Lakhs per Cattle-head.

     

    In the process the companies marketing  these products ,get business and like Monsanto, the villagers once the use these, will have to depend only on these companies.

     

    The horror is that the cattle thus bought is sent to other States to be killed and sold as beef, the major Business going the Kerala way.

     

    Let me list he essential features of this Operation Cattle.

     

    1.Approach a villager , as a group,,in backward village  who has only health Cattle as a means of Livelihood.

     

    2.Offer him money for the Cattle.

     

    3. Simultaneously cajole, threaten him into Converting to Christianity.

     

    This is happening in Nallampatty, Perunthurai Taluk, Erode District  Tamil Nadu.

     

    Following is the News  Story in Tamil.

     

    As usual, no media Coverage!

     

    ஈரோடு அருகில் சேலம்-கோவை மெயின் ரோட்டில் உள்ளது பெருந்துறை. பெருந்துறை சரித்திர பழமை வாய்ந்த ஊர். மதமாற்றம் என்பதை அங்கீகரிக்காத ஊர். மேட்டுபாங்கான பகுதியாதலால் இங்கு ஐம்பது வருடங்களுக்கு முன்பு வரை மானாவரி விவசாயமே. காய்ந்த காலங்களில் நாட்டு மாடு மேய்த்து, மழை காலங்களில் சோளம், வரகு, எள், போன்றவைகளை பயிர் பண்ணி, வருவோர்க்கு நாட்டு மாட்டு மோரும், சோள சோறும் இட்டு விரும்தோம்பலுக்கு பெயர் பெற்றவர்கள் இப்பகுதி மக்கள். இத்தாலூகாவின் சில பகுதிகளில் கீழ்பவானி வாய்க்கால் பாசனம் இடையில் வந்தது. கரும்பு, நெல், வாழை, மஞ்சள் என மக்கள் பயிர்களை மாற்றினர். மாட்டையும் மாற்றினர். நாட்டு மாடுகளுக்கு பதில் சீமை மாடுகளுக்குச் சென்றனர். பால் கறந்து ஊற்றி லாபமில்லாமல் பொருளாதார வீழ்ச்சி அடைந்து உடல் நலம் கெட்டு, மனநலம் கெட்டு போயினர்…

     

    பின்வாசல் வழியே ஆப்ரகாமிய பாதிரிகள் 
    லோன் கேட்ட சில வாரங்களில் இரண்டு இளம்வயது பாதிரிகள் (நன்கு டக்-இன் செய்துகொண்டு) மார்ச் மாத கடைசியில் இந்த நாட்டு மாட்டு விவசாயியை சந்தித்து கோவையிலிருந்து வந்துள்ளதாக கூறியுள்ளார்கள். TN 74 ரெஜிஸ்திரேசன் கொண்ட யூனிகாரன் பைக்கில் வந்துள்ளனர். இந்த நாட்டு மாட்டு காளைகள் மூன்றையும் மூன்று லட்சம் ரூபாய்க்கு எங்களிடம் கொடுத்து விடுங்கள்.
    உங்களுக்கு கிர், தார்ப்பார்க்கர் போன்ற வடநாட்டு மாட்டு ஊசிகளை இலவசமா தருகிறோம்; உங்கள் நாட்டு மாடுகளுக்கு இதனை இட்டு கலப்பின மாடுகளை உருவாக்குங்கள். இப்படி உருவாகும் கலப்பின மாடுகள் நன்கு பால் கறக்கும். இந்த கொங்க மாடுகள் எல்லாம் வேஸ்ட் என்று பிரச்சாரம் செய்திருக்கிறார்கள். இப்படி கூறியவுடன் அந்த விவசாயி உறுதியுடன் நாட்டு மாடுகளை வளர்ப்பதே என் லட்சியம் இவையெல்லாம் தேவையில்லாத ஒன்று என்று கூறி அவர்களை திருப்பியனுப்பியுள்ளார்.

     

    இரண்டுமணி நேர மூளை சலவை
    பின் இருபது நாட்கள் கழித்து ஏப்ரல் 17 ஆம் தேதி அந்த இரண்டு நபர்களும் மேலும் ஆறு பேருடன் வந்துள்ளார்கள். அன்று ஊரில் மாரியம்மன் பண்டிகையாதலால் வீட்டில் விவசாயியின் மனைவி மற்றும் பெரியோர்கள் யாருமில்லை. அந்த சமயத்தில் ரெஜிஸ்திரேசன் செய்யப்படாத மஹிந்திரா சைலோ காரில் ஐம்பது வயது மதிக்கத்தக்க பாதிரி ஒருவரும், முப்பது வயதில் இருவர், இருபது வயதில் மூன்று பேர் என ஒரு கும்பலாக வந்துள்ளனர். அனைவரும் நாகர்கோயில், மதுரை மற்றும் சென்னை பாஷைகளில் பேசியுள்ளனர். சுமார் இரண்டுமணி நேரம் மூளை சலவை செய்துள்ளனர். அவர்கள் கூறியவைகளாவது,

    • இந்த நாட்டு மாட்டை வைத்து நீங்கள் முன்னேற முடியாது,
    • உங்கள் காளை மாடுகளை எங்களிடம் விற்றுவிடுங்கள் மூன்று லட்சம் ரூபாய்க்கு வாங்கிக்கொள்கிறோம்.
    • கிர், தார்ப்பார்க்கர் போன்ற வடநாட்டு மாட்டு ஊசிகளை இலவசமா தருகிறோம்; உங்கள் நாட்டு மாடுகளுக்கு இதனை இட்டு கலப்பின மாடுகளை உருவாக்குங்கள்
    • அய்யர் (குலகுரு) போலி. யாகங்கள் செய்யறது ஒண்ணுக்கும் பயனில்லை. அவரை வைத்து கோ பூஜை பண்றது தப்பு,
    • ஏசுதான் மாட்டுக்கொட்டாயில் பிறந்தார். அவர்தான் நம்மை காக்க முடியும்,
    • இலவசமா போர்வெல் (ஆழ்துளை கிணறு) போட்டுத்தருகிறோம்.
    • இலவசமா உங்க வீட்டுக்கு ஜன்னல் அமைத்துத்தருகிறோம்,
    • வாரம் ஒருமுறை எங்கள் பாதர் வந்து ஜபம் செய்வார். அவர் வரும் நேரங்களில் கிடைக்கிற வருமானம் அனைத்தும் உங்களுக்குத்தான்,
    • உங்களது இடத்தில் இருபது சென்டில் எங்களுக்கு இடம் ரெஜிஸ்டர் செய்து வைக்க வேண்டும்,
    • உங்களது மாட்டு அர்க்கம், சோப்பு, ஷாம்பு போன்றவற்றை உலகம் பூரா மார்கெட்டிங் பண்ணித்தருகிறோம்,
    • உங்களுக்கு எவ்வளவு காசு வேண்டுமானாலும் தருகிறோம்.

     

    இப்படியெல்லாம், ரெண்டுமணி நேரம் அந்த விவசாயியை வீட்டு மாட்டு கொட்டகையில் வைத்து பேசியுள்ளார்கள். விவசாயி போன் பேச அனுமதிக்கவில்லை. எட்டு பேரும் சுற்றி நின்று மிரட்டல் தொனியிலேயே பேசியுள்ளார்கள். விவசாயி செய்வதறியாது அவர்கள் கூறுவதை கேட்டுகொண்டு இருந்துள்ளார். இவ்வளவு நேரம் பேசிக்கொண்டுள்ளோம் ஒரு இளநி போட்டு தாங்க என்று கேட்டுள்ளனர். உடனே, விவசாயி என்னிடம் இளநி போட தென்னை மரமில்லை என்று பதிலளித்துள்ளார். உடனே, அவர்கள் உங்களிடம் இத்தனை ஏக்கர் இருக்கிறது. இத்தனை தென்னை மரங்கள் இருக்கிறது என்று சரியாக கணக்கு வைத்துக் கூறியுள்ளனர். விவசாயி தன்னைப்பற்றி இவர்கள் இவ்வளவு தெரிந்து வைத்துள்ளனரே என்று நினைத்து அதிர்ச்சியடைந்துள்ளார். பின்னர் நாங்கள் மீண்டும் வருவோம் என்று கூறி விட்டு சென்றுள்ளனர்.

     

    பத்து நாட்கள் கழித்து பெருந்துறையிலிருந்து போன் செய்து நாங்கள் வீட்டிற்கு வருகிறோம் என்று கூறியுள்ளார்கள். விவசாயி அவர்களை வரச்சொல்லிவிட்டு முதல்முறை பேச்சுவார்த்தையின் போதே மிரட்டும் தொனியில் பேசிய அவர்களின் நடவடிக்கையை மனத்தில் கொண்டு அவர்களுடன் தனியாக பேச்சுவார்த்தையில் ஈடுபட வேண்டாம் என்ற எண்ணத்தில் ஊர்மக்களை அழைத்து வைத்திருந்தார். இதற்கிடையில் மீண்டும் அவர்கள் போன் செய்து ““ஊர்மக்களை திரட்டி வைத்துள்ளாய். நீ திருந்த மாட்டாய். நீ எங்களிடம் திரும்பி வருவாய். எங்கள் உதவி உனக்கு தேவைப்படும்” என்று கூறி போனை கட் செய்துவிட்டனர்.

     

    பாரம்பரியத்தையும், காளைகளையும் ஒழிக்க திட்டம் 
    மதமாற்றம் செய்வது கிறிஸ்தவர்களின் நோக்கமாக இருந்தாலும், கொங்க காளைகளை வாங்க மூன்று லட்சம் ரூபாய் பாதிரிகளுக்கு எங்கிருந்து வருகிறது? காளைகளை ஏன் வாங்க நினைக்கிறார்கள்? வாங்கிய மாடுகள் எங்கே போகிறது? ஏன் வடநாட்டு மாடுகளை கலப்பினமாக்க நினைக்கிறார்கள்? போன்றவை யோசிக்கவேண்டியவை. குலகுரு செய்யும் கோ பூஜையை தடுக்க நினைக்கின்றனர்.

     

    குலகுரு, பசு, காளைகள் போன்றவைகள் நாட்டில் பெருகுவதை அவர்கள் விரும்பவில்லை. மேன்மேலும், கலப்பினங்களை வலியுறுத்துவதிலேயே வந்தவர்கள் குறியாக இருந்துள்ளார்கள். நாட்டு காளைகளை ஒழித்து கிராமத்தில் நாட்டு மாடுகள் இனவிருத்தி ஆகக்கூடாது என்பது அவர்களது எண்ணம். நாட்டு மாடுகளை வளரவிடகூடாது என்று கிறிஸ்தவர்கள் குறியாக இருக்கிறார்கள். சமீபத்தில் வெளியான ஜல்லிக்கட்டு தடை கூட இதனுடன் சம்பந்தப்பட்டிருக்கலாம். ஜல்லிக்கட்டு இருப்பதாலேயே நாட்டு காளைகளை இனவிருத்தி செய்து நல்ல முரட்டு காளைகளை உருவாக்க இளைஞர்கள் முயற்சிக்கின்றனர். இதனால், பொலிக்காளைகள் நாட்டில் இருப்பதால், நாட்டு காளைகள் இனவிருத்தி ஆகிக்கொண்டே இருக்கிறது. இதனை தடுக்க வேண்டுமெனில், நாட்டு காளைகளை பூண்டோடு அழிக்க வேண்டும். இருக்கவே இருக்கிறது புளூ கிராஸ் மற்றும் விலங்கு பாதுகாப்பு அமைப்புகள். அவைகளை வைத்து சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டில் கேஸ் போடுகிறார்கள். அதற்கு நிதியுதவி கூட பெறப்பட்டிருக்கலாம். ஜல்லிக்கட்டு தடை செய்யப்படும். காளைகள் அடிமாட்டிற்கு விற்கப்படும். நாட்டு காளைகள் பூண்டோடு அழியும். இதுதான் இந்த பின்வாசல் மாபியாக்களின் திட்டம். பசுக்களும், காளைகளும் தெய்வமாக ஜல்லிக்கட்டிலும், கோயிலிலும் கும்பிடப்படும் செயல் குறைந்தால்தான் மக்கள் தங்கள் கலாச்சாரத்தை விட்டு சந்தைகலாச்சாரத்திற்கு மாறுவார்கள் என்ற நோக்கமும் உள்ளே இருக்கலாம். நமது கலாச்சாரத்தை முற்றிலும் அழிக்கவேண்டும் என்று மிக நீண்டகாலமாக கிறிஸ்தவர்கள் சதி அதை பல வழிகளிலும் நிறைவேற்றி வருகிறார்கள்.

     

    Citation.

     

    http://vsrc.in/%E0%AE%9A%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%82%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%8D/item/266-%E0%AE%A8%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%9F%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9F%E0%AF%81-%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%B3%E0%AF%88%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%B3%E0%AF%88-%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%81%E0%AE%B1%E0%AE%BF-%E0%AE%B5%E0%AF%88%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%81%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%8D-%E0%AE%AE%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%AE%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%B1%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%B1-%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%81%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%AA%E0%AE%B2%E0%AF%8D/itemid-140

     

    Image source and More on similar issues.

    http://worldhindunews.com/2014010716241/indian-christian-missionaries-plan-to-convert-hindus-opposed-by-sanatan-sanstha-members/

     

    Related articles

    http://ramanisblog.in/2013/06/12/christians-as-brahmins-new-method-of-religious-conversion/