Tag: India History

  • Secular Civil Rights Fraud Teesta Book Issue

    Secular Civil Rights Fraud Teesta Book Issue

    It is quite easy in India to abuse India. India seems to be a country which has a special species, Secularists, who has a single life consuming motivation.. That of Denigrating the rich culture of India. These people would like to be known and respected as Liberals by those who ruled us and by the great Defender of Human Dignity and Tolerance, The US. The record of UK as a main culprit who escaped the stigma of War Crimes and Peace Time Crimes which it had carried out during it’s Colonial Era. As to what US is please watch The Butler Movie in Netflix. The movie hass moved from Netflix. You can watch it (Paid/Rent) on YouTube or Google movies.

    You shall know the real face of US. It has no standing to talk about Human Rights.

    It is mainly for recognition from these people and of course for Juda’s Silver in the form of Grants , our home grown Liberals behave the way as they do.

    Teesta

    Under attack for the manner in which the government treated students of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) for allegedly indulging in “anti-national” activities, Irani quoted from the handbook, claiming it created differences between students on religious lines.

    School principal Father Bernard Fernandes confirmed the school had stopped using the textbook around 2004. “These books were used by some of our schools on an experimental basis for a year,” said Fernandes. “But they were discontinued after a year. Today, none of our teachers use these books.”

    The school authorities were surprised how Irani got a copy of the book. “Our teachers don’t use the book anymore, so we do not know how the HRD got a copy of it, claiming it was from our school,” said an official from the school. https://www.hindustantimes.com/mumbai/stopped-using-controversial-textbook-a-decade-ago-school/story-iJaporNJRo9LpokJUWYs0H_amp.html

    Speaking to The Indian Express, Father Bernard Fernandes, principal of the school, said:These were no textbooks but handbooks. These books were used by some of our schools on an experimental basis for a year and were meant for teachers...But they were discontinued immediately after a year they were introduced. Today, none of our teachers use these handbooks.

    The handbook talked about Shivaji being born as a shudra who rose to power and fame because he represented the underprivileged classes and spoke against injustice. https://www.thequint.com/news/hot-news/don-bosco-refutes-iranis-claim-history-handbook-banned-in-2001

    Teesta Setalvad’s former aide Rais Khan Pathan has filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court alleging manipulation of evidence, which were in the form of statements of witnesses, by her in five sensitive post-Godhra riot cases.

    In April 2009, the Times of India ran a story claiming that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) set up by the Supreme Court of India to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riot cases had submitted before the Court that Teesta Setalvad had cooked up cases of violence to spice up the incidents. The SIT which is headed by former CBI director, R K Raghavan has said that false witnesses were tutored to give evidence about imaginary incidents by Teesta Setalvad and other NGOs. The SIT charged her of “cooking up macabre tales of killings”.

    The court was told that 22 witnesses, who had submitted identical affidavits before various courts relating to riot incidents, were questioned by SIT and it was found that the witnesses had not actually witnessed the incidents and they were tutored and the affidavits were handed over to them by Setalvad. The report which was brought to the notice of the bench consisting of Justices Arijit Pasayat, P Sathasivam and Aftab Alam, noted that the much publicised case of a pregnant Muslim woman Kausar Bano being gangraped by a mob and foetus being removed with sharp weapons, was also fabricated, and false.However, Kausar Bano’s husband states alleges the doctors falsified the post-mortem despite his wife’s uterus having been removed from her body. The court that was trying the issue found beyond reasonable doubt that Babu Bajarangi killed Kausar Bano and her nine-month-old foetus by stabbing her in the stomach with a sword, but did not find sufficient evidence to prove that he removed the foetus from the uterus… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teesta_Setalvad

    Sample book by Teesta Setalvad https://www.amazon.in/dp/9382381708/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_imm_ZGC6ES3S3JH0HDRA1M89

  • Worlds First Republic Malla Kingdom India 700 BC

    History of India might seem to be disorganised ,but a careful and patient study will show that the history of India is an integrated one and Kingdoms were interrelated.

    Mostly through marriages.

    The difficulty in identifying the early history lies in the fact that the identification of these intricate relationships.

    Once we identify this ,the task becomes easier.

    While I was trying to fix the date of King Vikramaditya,I stumbled upon the History of Samudra Gupta,father of Chandra Gupta II,who is popularly known as Vikramaditya.

    But,as it is the wont,western historians dismiss most of the facts associated with Vikramaditya Chandra Gupta as legends.

    Facts seem to indicate otherwise.

    Vikramaditya’s grandfather,Chandra Gupta I married a princess from Lichavi Kingdom .

    (Samudra Gupta was the son of Chandra Gupta I).

    Malla reference may be found in Lichaavis.

    This Kingdom coexisted with the most ancient Kingdoms of India,that is the Mahajanapadas,the Sixteen Kingdoms of India,which is mentioned in the Vedas.

    The astonishing fact is that it was a Republic.

    The roots of Lichavis may be traced back to Nepal,Varanasi.

    These places are venerated in Buddhist texts.

    The date of Malla Kingdom is between 700 to 300 BC!

    The Gupta emperor Chandragupta I married a Licchavi princess Kumaradevi and the legend Licchavayah is found along with a figure of goddess Lakshmi on the reverse of the Chandragupta I-Kumaradevi type gold coins of Samudragupta. In the Allahabad Pillarinscription of Samudragupta, he is described as the Licchavidauhitra (the grandson of the Licchavis from his mother’s side). These probably suggest Licchavi occupation of Magadha immediately before the rise of the imperial Guptas, although there is no direct evidence to prove it

    Kautilya in his Arthaśāstra (ch. XI), describes the Licchavis as a tribal confederation (gaṇa sangha), whose leader uses the title of rājā(rājaśabdopajīvinah). A Buddhist text, the Mahāparinibbāna Suttanta refers them as Kshatriyas and one of the claimants of the relics of Buddha. They have claimed Kshatriya status themselves. According to the Dīgha Nikāya, the Licchavis were of the Vasiṣṭhagotra.Buhler assumes that, in the Manusmriti (X.22), the Licchavis are placed in the category of the Vratya Kshatriyas.

    Buddhaghośa in his Paramatthajotikā, traced the origin of the Licchavis to Benaras. The date of the establishment of the Licchavi domination over the area consisting of present-day north Bihar and Terai region of Nepal is not known. By the time of Mahavira and Gautama Buddha this clan was already well settled in the area around their capital Vaiśālī. Buddhist tradition has preserved the names of a number of eminent Licchavis, which include prince Abhyaya, Oṭṭhaddha(Mahāli), generals, Sīha and Ajita, Dummukha and Sunakkhata. The Kalpasūtra of Bhadravāhu refers to the nine Licchavi gaṇarājas (chieftains) who along with the nine Malla gaṇarājas and the eighteen KāśīKośalagaṇarājas formed a league against Magadha. The leader of this alliance was Chetaka, whose sister Trishala was the mother of Mahavir)

    Source.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Licchavi_(clan)

    Malla was an ancient Indian republic (Gaṇa sangha) that constituted one of the sixteen Mahajanapadas (great kingdoms) of ancient India. The republic is notable for being the chosen death place of Mahavira and Gautama Buddha.

    Malla was one of the solasa (16) mahajanapadas of mentioned in the Anguttara Nikaya. It was named after the ruling clan of the same name. The Mahabharata (VI.9.34) mentions the territory as the Mallarashtra (Malla state). The Malla mahajanapada was situated north of Magadha. It was a small mahajanapada. The mahajanapada was divided into two main parts and the river Kakuttha (present day Kuku) was probably the dividing line. The capital of these two parts were Kusavati(modern Kasia near Gorakhpur) and Pava, modern Fazilnagar, 12 miles from Kasia.

    Source.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malla_(Ancient_India)

  • Tamil Sangam Brick Roman Trade Center Near Chennai Found

    Dating of Indian History by the West has been a  sort of joke.

    Unsuspecting Indians believed it and they still do!

    The Rig Veda is dated around 5000 years ago, while the date of Ramayana has been proved to be 5114BC!

    The same misinformation on Mahabharata and the excavations at Dwaraka place it around 30,000 Years ago!

    Tamils history had been dated around 2 to 3 BC, while excavations at Poomouhar have dated it to 20,000 years ago.

    Trade was carried between India and ancient Rome
    Tamil Nadu , India and Rome , ancient Trade Route.

    Sangam period (Tamil: சங்ககாலம், Sangakālam  Malayalam : സങ്ക കാലം) is the period in the history ofancient southern India (known as the Tamilakam) spanning from c. 3rd century BC to c. 4th century AD. It is named after the famous Sangam academies of poets and scholars centered in the city of Madurai.

    In Old Tamil language, the term Tamilakam (Tamiḻakam தமிழகம், Purananuru 168. 18) referred to the whole of the ancient Tamil-speaking area, corresponding roughly to the area known as southern India today, consisting of the territories of the present-day Indian states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, parts of Andhra Pradesh, parts ofKarnataka and northern Sri Lanka also known as Illam….

    According to Tamilian legends, there were three Sangam periods, namely Head Sangam, Middle Sangam and Last Sangam period. Historians use the term Sangam period to refer the last of these, the first two being legendary. So it is also called Last Sangam period (Tamil: கடைச்சங்க பருவம், Kaṭaissanka paruvam ), or Third Sangam period (Tamil: மூன்றாம் சங்க பருவம்,Mūnṟām sanka paruvam ?). The Sangam literature is thought to have been produced in three Sangam academies of each period. The evidence on the early history of the Tamil kingdoms consists of the epigraphs of the region, the Sangam literature, and archaeological data.

    Approximately during the period between 400 BC to AD 500, Tamilakam was ruled by the three Tamil dynasties of Pandya, Cholaand Chera, and a few independent chieftains, the Velir’

    This misinformation, despite the fact that

    The Vedic people had  flourishing trade with the Tamils,.

    Madurai Meenakshi’s father participated in the Mahabharata War,

    Udiyan Cheralathan, A Tamil King, provided food for both the Pandava and Kaurava armies during the Mahabharata war,

    Krishna and Arjuna married Pandyan Pricnesses and had children through them,

    Balarama visited Murugan temple and worshiped him in Tamil Nadu,

    A million year old advanced Tamil site was found in Chennai, Tamil Nadu,

    The Humanity’s earliest DNA has been traced to Madurai!

    And there is much more.

    Please read my articles on these subjects by googling the search term +ramanan50.

    Now evidence is available to the effect that Bricks used during the Tamil Sangam Period have been found, near Chennai!

    And this place had been a center of Roman business center!

    Ancient Romans did not restrict themselves to coastal Tamil Nadu; they set up trading centres even far inland. A team of archaeologists exploring a dry lake bed in Naduvirapattu village, some 12km from Tambaram, unearthed a few days ago some artefacts, including broken pieces of amphorae (jars used by Romans).

    The team comprised assistant professor Jinu Koshy and students S Vasanthi and K Vignesh of the department of history and archaeology of the Madras Christian College.

    The evidence at the site, archaeologists said, was a sign that the village may have been a transit staging area for the Romans before they proceeded towards Kancheepuram, a famous trading centre since the pre-historic era, to exchange their glass utensils and wine for rice, sesame oil, spices and silk.

    In fact, they said, the pieces of amphorae were clear evidence of the presence of Romans. Earlier, similar jars had been found at excavation sites in Kancheepuram, Vasavasamudram and Arikamedu near Puducherry. These sites are located near the shore or river (Kancheepuram is near the Palar river), but Naduvirapattu is far from the coast or a river.

    “The findings are interesting because the site is between two towns — Somangalam and Manimangalam — important since the pre-historic era,” said former deputy superintending archaeologist K Sridharan.

    It was a tip by a villager, engaged in sand-mining on a dry lake bed, that took the team to the site where it found artefacts of the Sangam Age (between 3rd century BCE and 4th century CE) and some from ancient Rome. Among them, the archaeologists said, were black-and-red ware, black ware, red slipped ware, double slipped ware, broken handles of vessels, hopscotch and lid knob.

    Brick from Sangam Age also found

     We also found two shreds that formed the base of a conical jar. The conical jar is an imitation of the Romans’ amphorae and is indigenously made,” said assistant professor Koshy. Also found was an old brick structure, reportedly from the Sangam Age. Each brick, it was found, was 31cm long, 20.5cm wide and 7.5cm thick.
     

    The dry lake bed is being exploited by sand miners with earth movers, the archaeologists said, adding that unless checked it could destroy rare evidence to trace the cultural history from the early historic period or Sangam Age. The site should be preserved for further research and excavation that could help throw light on the importance of the village during the Sangam Age, structural activities and trade contacts during the Age.’

    Reference and Citation.
  • Lord Rama Was A King of Sumeria King List

    Lord Rama Was A King of Sumeria King List

    The King List which chronicles a list of Kings of Sumeria is written in Sumerian Language.

     

    Ancient Sumeria, one of the oldest civilizations flourished in the southern parts of Iraq.

     

    In the Kings List, one finds the Dynasties of the Kings of Sumeria with their official locations.

     

    It includes the names of Kings of adjoining countries, then called city states

     

    The Kingship was believed to be from the Gods and was transferable from one  city to another.

     

    Sumeria was believed to have had an hegemony during its period of existence.

     

    It is curious to find the name of Lord Rama in the Sumerian King List.

     

    Not only Lord Rama but his brother Bharata also find a place in the List.

     

    The King List.jpg
    King List,Sumeria

     

    Fortunately, a study of Sumerian history provides a fairly vivid flesh-and-blood picture of Rama. The highly authentic Sumerian King-list appear such hallowed names as Bharat (Warad) Sin and Rim Sin. Sin was the Moon god Chandra and as the cuneiform symbol for ‘Rim’ can also be read as ‘Ram’, Rim Sin is the same as Rama Chandra. In the Sumerian texts Ram-Sin is said to be from Elam which links him to Indo-Iran. Rama was the longest reigning monarch of Mesopotamia who ruled for 60 years. Bharat Sin ruled for 12 years (1834-1822 BC), exactly as stated in the Dasaratha Jataka. The Jataka statement, “Years sixty times hundred, and ten thousand more, all told, / Reigned strong-armed Rama”, only means that Rama reigned for sixty years which agrees exactly with the data of Assyriologists. Ayodhya may be Agade the capital of Sargon which has not yet been identified. It is possible that Agade was near Der or the Heart near Harayu or Sarayu. Learned scholars like D. P. Mishra were aware that Rama could be from the Herat area. The noted linguist Sukumar Sen also noted that Rama is a sacred name in the Avesta where he is mentioned together with Vayu. Rama is called Rama Margaveya in some texts from which Dr. Sen concluded that he hailed from Margiana. The Cambridge Ancient History contains priceless information relevant to Indian ancient history. The Sumerian records furnish the first date of the Indus era – the war with Ravana took place in 1794 BC. The significance of the fact Ram-Sin’s reign (60 years) was the longest in Sumerian history has been lost on most writers. There are two Ram-Sins in Sumerian history.”…….

     

    My researches into the relationship from between the Dravadas (South of Bharata Varsha) and Sanatana Dharam have led me to establish that the ancestor of Lord Rama, Vaivaswatha Manu migrated from Dravida desa because of a Tsunami to Ayodhya to establish a Kingdom.

     

    * Seemingly different dates of Rama from the Date of Rama of Ramayana tells another story.

     

    Shiva and His sons Ganesha,Muruga left by the Arabian Sea and spread through the Middle East, establishing their lineage en route, Iraq, Africa, Spain,Latin America,North America, Central America before reaching the Arctic where the Rig Veda was composed.

     

    Later their descendants traveled from the Arctic through Russia to reach India again.

     

    These facts are culled from Tamil Classics Vedas, Sanskrit Literature and cross checked by Astronomical facts mentioned in these texts.

     

    More to follow on this subject.

     

    Citations.

    http://www.ranajitpal.com/rama.html

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waddell%27s_chronology

    Waddell’s Chronology.

    Amar-Sin, (“Bur-Sin II“) 2109-2089 BCE Rama or Rama-Chandra