While there is an element of reality in Movies., most of them are fantasies. subjective.
People fulfill their wishes which they know can not be fulfilled, like running around a girl as in the Movies,fighting ten people single-handedly, shooting down people,effortlessly,handling even a Machine Gun with one hand or crying aloud in grief film style.
The same is true of Porn Films.
There is an element of reality and more of Fantasy and unfulfilled and un-realizable fantasies.
At best Porn can only arouse and increase your expectations and if you are normal you will enjoy real Sex with the impressions of Porn watching.
If abnormal you will attempt to pursue it in real Life and come to grief.
Porn provides a safety outlet for repressed, perverse desires and helps society.
Please read my post on this.
Porn Sex and Real Sex.
Story:
It seems like common sense that sex in porn doesn’t mirror what men and women do in their own, non-commercialized bedrooms. But this point gets really driven home in “Porn Sex vs Real Sex: The Differences Explained With Food,” a video which shatters the illusion the porn is anything like real sex by going back to basics: fruit metaphors.
Inspired by the video, HuffPost Live spoke to women working in the porn industry, and asked them to share what they believe the difference between porn sex and real sex is.
Jincey Lumpkin, Esq., Chief Sexy Officer of Juicy Pink Box, noted that porn involves, “posturing for the camera,” “flattering” angles and “cutting together of the scenes” — all of which, if reenacted by normal people, can “take away sometimes from the pleasure and enjoyment aspect” of their sexual experiences.
Nina Hartley, an adult film actress, agreed, emphasizing the performative aspect of porn. She told HuffPost Live host Caitlyn Becker:
Pornography is a paid, professional performance by actors. It is a fantasy, it is not meant to be a rulebook and guidebook or a how to as a general rule. And it goes to show how poor our sex education is in this country that people are reduced to looking at an entertainment medium for information about the body.
Both the “Porn Sex vs. Real Sex” video, and HuffPost Live’s conversations with Lumpkin and Hartley, contribute to a greater dialogue about porn as a sometimes unrealistic fantasy. The more we discuss these subjects, the more women and men alike will hopefully realize that they don’t have to force themselves to emulate what they see in porn films. Fantasy is great, but the reality of sex based on one’s own desires — and separate from the pressure to look or act a certain way — can be even better.
2 c If you are living so amiably with the Hindus in Tamil Nadu, and if they are going to change by watching this Movie, well..this is some special relationship of Religious Amity!
2 d) We are not getting houses.
True partly.
This has nothing to do with Mr.Kamal Hassan or Mr.Kamal Hassan.
This is because of the terrorists’ attacks and the apprehension that some would be tenants might belong that Minority of Muslims who are rabid fanatics.
2 e ) Our concurrence is needed to produce a Film.
What can one comment on a statement as silly as this!
2 f) Since when Muslims have started taking Brides from the other Communities?
If they mean within their Communities, that only means that they suspect the Bride groom might be a terrorist.
Some good counters.
Director R.K.Selva Mani.
If these groups rallied against Pakistan when it cut the heads of Indian Soldiers in the Border, as they do now, Hindus would have loved Muslims more.
KRG,Director,Distributor.
‘ We do not call you Minority,You call yourself thus.
If as a Minority you say you are hurt please understand we still love you l despite what has happened throughout the world, it is because our patience’
I am no Fan of Mr.Kamal Hassan either.
I like his Histrionic abilities, not his pseudo humility , Pseudo Intellectualism and his habit of swiping at Hindus , especially Brahmins.
”
Various Muslim organisations demanded a ban on the screening of actor-producer Kamal Haasan’s ‘Vishwaroopam‘, saying “it will affect social harmony” in Chennai.
M H Jawahirullah, MLA and President, Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam, said representatives of various Muslim organisations met the City Police Commissioner S George demanding that the screening of the movie be banned.
“The screening of the movie will affect social harmony in the state. We plan to meet the Home Secretary, besides moving the Censor Board,” he said.
Jawahirullah replied in the affirmative when asked if they planned to move the court if required.
Muslim organisations had earlier demanded that the film be screened to them prior to its release, expressing concern over the depiction of the community in the movie.
He said Haasan had organised a special screening of the movie for them following their demand.
The thespian had already courted controversy after taking a U-turn on his decision to release the movie on Direct-to-Home (DTH) platform with theatre owners red-flagging his decision.”
ஆனால் இதன் பின்னனியில் என்ன நடக்கிறது என விசாரிக்கும் போது கமல் பெரிய சிக்கலில் மாட்டியிருப்பதாய் தகவல்கள் வருகிறது.
முன்னதாக பல்வேறு எதிர்புபகளையும் மீறி கமல் DTHல் ரிலீஸ் என்ற போது, ஆந்திரா/வட இந்தியாவில் ஒரு பெரிய மல்டிபிளக்ஸ் நிறுவனத்தலைவர் DTH வேண்டாம் ஆனால் நான் 400 திரையரங்களில் ரிலீஸ் செய்வதாக கூறியதாகவும் அதற்கு கமல் மறுத்துவிட்டதால் எந்த தியேட்டரிலும் ரிலீஸ் செய்யமுடியாது என சேலஞ்ச் செய்ததாகவும் கமலே கூறினார். அந்த வகையில் வட இந்தியாவில் போதுமான தியேட்டர்கள் கிடைக்காமல் வெறும் DTH ரிலீஸ் என்ற நேற்று தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டது. ஆந்திராவிலும் ஏற்கனவே தெலுங்கின் பெரிய நட்சத்திர படங்கள் ரிலீஸால் போதிய திரையரங்குகள் இல்லாமல் 2 வாரம் கழித்து விஸ்வரூபம் ரிலீஸ் என்ற சூழ்நிலையில் இருந்தது.
ஆக தமிழ்நாட்டில் மட்டுமே தியேட்டர் ரிலீஸ் என்ற நிலையில், எத்தனை திரையரங்குகளில் என்பது கேள்விக்குறியாய் இருந்தது. ஆரம்பத்தில் கமல் 400 திரையரங்குகளில் வரும் என்றார்.. பின்னர் சில நாட்கள் முன்பு குறைந்தது 300 தியேட்டர்களாவது ரிலீஸ் செய்யும் என்றார். நேற்று முன்தினம் கமிஷ்னர் அலுவலகத்தில் புகார் குடுக்கவரும்போது 200 தியேட்டர்களாக இருக்கலாம் என்ற தகவல் கசிந்தது. ஆனால் உண்மையில் 30 முதல் 40 திரையரங்குகளே ரிலீஸ் செய்ய முன்வந்தாக தெரிகிறது.
..DTH நிலை என்ன என விசாரித்தால் அதுவும் அதிர்ச்சியாகவே இருந்திருக்கிறது.
முன்னதாக சென்ற வாரத்தில் கிட்டத்தட்ட 30 லட்சம் பேர் முன்பதிவு செய்திருப்பதாக திடீரென ஒரு செய்தி வெளியானது. நாமும் அதை வெளியிட்டிருந்தோம். சினிமா ஆட்களுடன் நெருங்கிய தொடர்பில் இருக்கும், முன்பு விநியோகஸ்தராக இருந்த, ஒரு பிரபல நபர் தனது பேஸ்புக்கில் விலாவரியாய் எழுதியிருந்ததை அடிப்படையாய் வைத்து வந்த அந்த செய்தி ஆதாரமற்றதாய் போய்விட்டது. அந்த நபரிடமே அதைப்பற்றி விசாரித்தபோது அது ஆந்தையார் ரிப்போர்டரிடமிருந்து வந்த தகவல் எனவும்,இந்த DTH பற்றி தான் பல வருடமாய் கவனித்து தகவல்களை சேகரித்து வைத்துள்ளதாகவும், 10 கோடி DTH இணைப்புகள் இருப்பதால் 30 லட்சம் இணைப்புகள் நடப்பது எளிது என்றும், கமலின் பேஸ்புக் பேஜில் அதை பகிர்ந்துள்ளேன் அதை அவர் மறுக்கவில்லை எனவே.. தனது கணக்கு தப்பாது என்றார். அவர் சொன்னதைப் பார்க்கும் போது வாய்ப்பு இருக்குமோ எனத் தோன்றியது. ஆனால் உண்மை வேறுமாதிரியாய் இருந்திருக்கிறது.
Choah, il informe le caméra. Choah Ан nyong. Anja. Dans l’anglais: bon, bon, salut, et s’asseoir.
Il y a six ans, cette bande vidéo diffuse par la personnel laissé perplexe du toujours débarque zoo, a frappé l’inbox de Joyce pôle – communication enquêteur de éléphant de ElephantVoices. Le métrage était le regard premier que scientifiques auraient de Koshik, le coréen -parle un éléphant.
C’est impressionnante, polonais, une préservation faire confiance un bénéficiaire pour la société nationale géographique écrità la période. ( Nouvelle géographique national est une pièce de la guilde. )
Je ne voir tout chance il est truqué, et il est assurément une voix de personne qui est imitée. Elle a donné l’agrafe à collègues. On a exigé réviser cela Ce avait-il pu peut-être être littéral?
Vite -promeut six ans, et confirmation finalement est arrivée dans un rapport sans pareil venu en tête par une des Collègues Deuxième de Barre-ex, Angela Stoeg er de la Université de Vienna,. Koshik Stoeg Il dit, est selon le données pour un littéral.
Contactent cette fin, Stoeg er et sa équipe avaient dû vérifier que sounds de Koshik S étaient mots at all d’abord. Suis entraîneurs, il a eu un vocabulaires de six-mots, dont un nyong (salut), dans elle également (un No) Аня (s’asseoir) according to l’éléphant, et choah (Good)
Nous pensons que les animaux ne parler et et nous sommes les espèces only qui penser et parler, thi se détacher lentement dans notre self-importance.
Quand même ne être connexe à cette poste, je voudrais saisir ce, Венера est (nous l’avons compris comme singes) soulignée été une fiction d’imagination et cela dans la Ramayana des Épopées hindoues Polissons parler, let alone sont intelligents.
Un côté de Jane est signalé être une d’intelligence haute, sapience et une personne douée pour la communication très capable, persuasive.
Венера c n’est pas singes, ils sont l’une des missing links évolutionniste chaîne inthe entre Ap e et homme.
Alan Roberts, Director of The Film’Innocence of Muslims”
It transpires the news that Sam Bacile who was reported to have made the film did not make it and that it was made by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is incorrect and that Sam Baicle was the same man as Nakoula!
And this man brought in a Porn Film Director,Alan Roberts, a 65-year-old who is listed as director on the film’s casting calls and call sheets from the summer of 2011, back when it was innocuously called Desert Warriors..
This is the same Alan Roberts listed in IMDB as the director of a handful of softcore porn movies and other low-budget films, according to acquaintances we spoke to today.
“I am sure it was the same Alan Roberts, as I remember him speaking about this project,” said filmmaker David A. Prior, a longtime acquaintance of Roberts, in an email. Roberts is listed as a producer on two of Prior’s films, 2008’s Zombie Wars and 2007’s Lost at War.
“He did work on [Innocence of Muslims],” confirmed a man who was Roberts’ business partner in a post-production facility he ran, who asked not to be named.
The backstory behind how Roberts became director of Innocence of Muslims is still unclear, like so many things about the film. We’ve tried to reach Roberts, but his business associate told us he “turned off his phone” soon after protests broke out over the film and is laying low. But he said Roberts was “non-political” and did not have any apparent anti-Islam feelings. Roberts may have been duped by the film’s producer in much the same way as the rest of the cast and crew. They believed they were participating in a period piece about ancient Egypt and had no idea the movie would be edited and dubbed into a piece of Islamophobic propaganda..
“They redubbed it, they brought in the actors, put in new sounds, changed the names,” said the business partner. “And this was done later, before it was initially released. Of course Alan had nothing to do with it.”
An actress who worked with Roberts on Innocence of Muslims agreed that he had nothing to do with the political bent of the film.”
_Gawker.
Now one can understand the hurt sentiments of the Muslims.
With such a sleazy man directing sa sensitive subject as a Religious head, there is absolutely no question of being Creative.
Either it was made for the controversy it might create for the film to successful, or with the definite intent of hurting Islam.
As an aside I might add if one watches the Film of David Cameron ‘Apocalypto’, he will get the subtle message that the Ancient Civilizations were simply savages and that only the advent of Christianity has brought in Culture to them!
You can also get the same message in the Film ‘300’
Washington Post‘s Reporter ,after finalising a house,meets with an accident along with his wife.
The seriously injured wife dies in the Hospital.
At the Hospital, he comes across a note-book with strange doodles by his wife.
He decides to take some days off and drives away.
After a couple of hours his car is stuck and he knocks on the doors of a house.
When he comes to know where he has landed, he is bewildered for he could not have travelled that distance between the time he left and his arrival at the city.
The house owner comes with his gun ready to shoot the reporter saying that he had been knocking at the door for the past couple of Days.
The local police woman saves him.
Later he comes to know from the woman that the city has been witnessing strange things and behaviour from its residents.
She also tells him she has been having a vivid dream that she was dying by drowning , some how she remains alive and numbers are whispered in her ears.
In the meanwhile the man whom he met tells the reporter that he has been hearing voices of a disaster from his wash basin sink.
He also suffers from the same ailment which the reporter’s wife was diagnosed with before her death.
The man dies mysteriously.
The reporter hears voices on the telephone.
How these things end is the story.
The Story is reported to be based on facts.
”
On Nov. 15, 1966, two young couples from Point Pleasant, Roger and Linda Scarberry, and Steve and Mary Mallette told police they saw a large white creature whose eyes “glowed red” when the car headlights picked it up. They described it as a “flying man with ten foot wings” following their car while they were driving in an area of town known as ‘the TNT area‘, the site of a former World War II munitions plant.[5][6]
During the next few days, other people reported similar sightings. Two volunteer firemen who sighted it said it was a “large bird with red eyes”. Mason County Sheriff George Johnson commented that he believed the sightings were due to an unusually large heron he termed a “shitepoke”. Contractor Newell Partridge told Johnson that when he aimed a flashlight at a creature in a nearby field its eyes glowed “like bicycle reflectors”, and blamed buzzing noises from his television set and the disappearance of his German Shepherd dog on the creature.[7] Wildlife biologist Dr. Robert L. Smith at West Virginia University told reporters that descriptions and sightings all fit the Sandhill Crane, a large American crane almost as high as a man with a seven foot wingspan featuring circles of reddish coloring around the eyes, and that the bird may have wandered out of its migration route.
There were no Mothman reports in the immediate aftermath of the December 15, 1967 collapse of the Silver Bridge and the death of 46 people, giving rise to legends that the Mothman sightings and the bridge collapse were connected”
In reality, 46 people died in the collapse of the Silver Bridge, not 36. Also, the film’s claim at the end credits of the collapse of the Silver Bridge never being explained is incorrect; the incident was found to be caused by the failure of an eye-bar in a suspension chain.[6]
The film is devoid of melodrama and is quite engaging.
You must be logged in to post a comment.