China , Free for expressing one’s thoughts! as serious a fact as Pakistan is a Democracy and Terrorist Free Nation.
De link Google/internet issue from ‘Relations Issue”
yea,
forget Human Rights,Tiananmen, North Korea/Pakistan issues,Dumping substandard products on the international market,protectionism-Yes, what is there to relate to in China?
China may continue to say is in the Right, but two plus is four not withstanding China’s cocooned world.
Time is not far for Chinese people shall rise and expose the ruling Oligarchy.
-China rejected Friday a call by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton for the lifting of restrictions on the Internet in the communist country, denouncing her criticism as false and damaging to bilateral ties.
A state-run newspaper labeled the appeal from Washington as “information imperialism.”
Clinton’s speech Thursday elevated the issue of Internet freedom in the U.S. human rights agenda as never before. She urged China to investigate cyber intrusions that recently prompted search engine Google to threaten to pull out of the country.
“Regarding comments that contradict facts and harm China-U.S. relations, we are firmly opposed,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu said in a statement posted Friday on the ministry’s Web site.
“We urge the U.S. side to respect facts and stop using the so-called freedom of the Internet to make unjustified accusations against China,” the statement said.
In her speech in Washington, Clinton cited China as among a number of countries where there has been “a spike in threats to the free flow of information” over the past year. She also named Tunisia, Uzbekistan, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Vietnam.
Ma defended China’s policies promoting the Web, saying the nation boasted more than 380 million users, 3.6 million Web sites, and 180 million blogs.
“The Chinese Internet is open and China is the country witnessing the most active development of the Internet,” Ma said, adding that China regulated the Web according to law and in keeping with its “national conditions and cultural traditions.”
Internet control is considered a crucial matter of state security in China, and Beijing is not expected to offer any concessions to the U.S. Beijing promotes Internet use for commerce, but heavily censors content it deems pornographic, anti-social or politically subversive.
Chinese cyber police troll the Web for sensitive content, and many foreign news and social media sites, including Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, are permanently blocked. Following ethnic rioting in Xinjiang last summer, authorities cut off public Web access entirely to the western region, portions of which they have only recently begun restoring.
Clinton’s speech came on the heels of a Jan. 12 threat from Google to pull out of China unless the government relented on rules requiring the censorship of content the Communist Party considers subversive. The ultimatum came after Google said it had uncovered a computer attack that tried to plunder its software coding and the e-mail accounts of human rights activists protesting Chinese policies.
Eric Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, said Thursday that the company hoped to find a way to maintain a presence in China but intended to stop censoring search results within “a reasonably short time.”
U.S. State Department officials have said they intend to lodge a formal complaint with Chinese officials soon over the Google matter. Clinton not only urged China to investigate the cyber intrusions but openly publish its findings.
China has sought to downplay the Google dispute and Ma repeated China’s standard line that its laws ban hacking and that it was a leading target for cyber crime.
On Thursday, Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei was quoted by the official Xinhua News Agency as saying the Google case “should not be linked with relations between the two governments and countries; otherwise, it’s an over-interpretation.”
Clinton’s speech was also denounced by an official newspaper Friday as part of a U.S. campaign to impose its values and denigrate other cultures, labeling it “information imperialism.”
China must defend itself from information from the West that comes “loaded with aggressive rhetoric against those countries that do not follow their lead,” said the English-language Global Times, published by the Communist Party’s official People’s Daily as part of a government-sponsored campaign to develop international media and influence opinion about China overseas.
“Unlike advanced Western countries, Chinese society is still vulnerable to the effect of multifarious information flowing in, especially when it is for creating disorder,” the newspaper said. It offered no examples.
As part of Washington’s promotion of Internet freedoms, U.S. diplomats in China have reached out to bloggers as a method of skirting Beijing’s Internet controls, sometimes called the “Great Firewall of China.”
On Friday, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing and consulates in Shanghai and Guangzhou were hosting Internet-streamed discussions with members of the blogging community to “share insights and answer questions about Clinton’s speech,” the embassy said.
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
http://news.aol.com/article/china-clinton-internet-speech-harms-ties/534082
Category: Media
-
China: Clinton Internet speech harms ties with US
-
New York Times website to charge
The New York Times has announced that it is to charge for full access to its website from 2011, the latest newspaper to move in that direction.
It said it will introduce a metered system, allowing readers free access to a limited number of articles, before charging for additional content.
A similar online payment model has been introduced by the UK’s Financial Times.
Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation has also said it plans to start charging for access to its online newspapers.
News Corporation’s titles include the Sun and Times in the UK, as well as the New York Post in the US.
Risk to advertising
The New York Times has yet to say how many stories will be available free and what it will charge to read more.
It previously charged for access to its website back in 1996, but abandoned it after failing to build up sufficient subscription numbers.
Media analysts say this is the fundamental problem for newspapers thinking of charging for their online content – and that advertising revenues could fall as a result.
The New York Times is already struggling to make a profit.
Its parent group, the New York Times Company, made a loss of $35.6m (£22m) between July and September of last year.
This came as advertising revenue across its newspaper portfolio fell 30% from a year earlier.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8470894.stm -
Take on China!
Long over due action directed at Beijing.Beijing feels , because of its market, it could do any thing on any front, be it Humanitarian issues,be it aiding Pakistan,aiding North Korea.True it has markets.It needs the services and technologies too.Companies might worth remember India too has a large market and most importantly a Free Society and a growing Economic power house.
The Google setback for Beijing comes at a time of growing disillusionment with China, to which recent developments add weight:–Beijing’s conduct at the Copenhagen climate summit exposed the limits of China’s alignment with developing countries. Further, it was criticized for its relatively low level of engagement among the world powers, sending a signal that the more powerful China becomes, the less inclined Beijing is to consensus building.
–Blame for the financial crisis and recession of the past couple of years can be laid at the door of the U.S. and EU, but China has a key role to play in addressing the imbalances that helped fuel the problem. Yet policy, for example, on the exchange rate is entirely inward-looking.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/18/china-google-policy-business-oxford-analytica.html?partner=alerts -
Billboard porn film stops traffic
MOSCOW (Reuters) – An enormous television screen showing a pornographic film caused a midnight traffic jam in central Moscow Thursday as stunned motorists slammed on the brakes to gawk at the writhing naked bodies.
The owner of the advertising screen, which sits atop a main road about two km (1.2 miles) south of the Kremlin, told the state-run RIA news agency that hackers had broken into the screen’s computer system and turned on the porn.
“They were either acting out of hooliganism or were from a rival company,” Viktor Laptev, commercial director of advertising firm Panno.ru, told RIA.
A short clip showing cars slowing to a halt to look at the screen sprung up on youtube.com and internet sites Friday across Russia, a country which banned nudity on television before the Soviet Union fell in 1991.
Authorities said they are investigating, RIA added
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60E3ZN20100115 -
On Media Coverage , Haiti-BBC.
Journalists are doing their jobs.By and large they are responsible for the enormous amount of Good will and sympathy pouring in for the people of Haiti, even to people who do not know where Haiti is.At the same time reporters must not be over carried while reporting- I saw a tweet from Nuala that ‘A nation Has to take care of itself’-though well intentioned , it hurts people at the time of grief.In fact i have replied the tweet.That the Nation is not managing is for every one to see.Comments can wait.
Intensive coverage and intrusive coverage and indifferent coverage are three aspects.The line demarcating intensive and intrusive coverage is thin and it has to come by experience.BBC team as I see it is doing a great job, barring a few off the cuff remarks, like judgmental reporting on looting .
Let me take this opportunity of a TV cameraman in an Indian TV channel shooting pictures merrily grinning as a police officer lay dying, crying for water. This is inhuman coverage.This inhuman reporting must be avoided.
Story:
There’s been a lot of you commenting on the role of the media in Haiti.This blogger for example questions the need for spaces on UN flights to go to journalists and wonders if it’s right to have “play-by-play” type reporting when someone is being dug out from the rubble.
He also wonders if people from media crews should put down their cameras and …well, help.
It’s a difficult area on how much journalists should help and of course they can’t help but interact : i saw the BBC’s Matt Frei during one of his pieces having to explain to desperate people at the airport that he had no work for them.
I must admit i’ve been uncomfortable watching people being dug out of the rubble only to have a reporter crouching next to their stretcher delivering a “look-I’m-here-too” piece to camera.
And it’s hard to explain that aid isn’t getting through, while journalists clearly are.
And a blogger here is concerned about negative stereotyping of Haitians (“when will the looting start ?”) and compares coverage to the aftermath of Katrina where – she says – white people taking from stores were described as “survivors” and black people “looters”.
Some too are also concerned that the media isn’t giving enough context about Haiti’s background, and history.
And to be fair, as you’ve seen , WHYS has been criticised by you broadcasting the sound of people in distress and for ignoring other stories (the latter is a lot easier to defend than the former).
http://worldhaveyoursay.wordpress.com/2010/01/18/media-watch/#comment-195468
You must be logged in to post a comment.