The Book by John Robison presents a compelling case on Illuminati‘s hold over world affairs.
The Book written 1798 presents the proofs of a conspiracy against all the religions and governments of Europe carried on in the secret meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies.
John Robison (1739–1805) was a Scottish physicist and mathematician. He was a professor of philosophy at the University of Edinburgh. A member of the Edinburgh Philosophical Society when it received its royal warrant, he was appointed as the first General Secretary to the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Robison invented the siren and also worked with James Watt on an early steam car. Following the French Revolution, Robison became disenchanted with elements of the Enlightenment. He authored Proofs of a Conspiracy in 1797—a polemic accusing Freemasonry of being infiltrated by Weishaupt’s Order of the Illuminati.
Watchers of History may know that Revolutions like the French Revolution of 1789,1848 were followed by Revolutions throughout Europe as if on cue which made a Historian remark ‘when France catches cold ,whole of Europe sneezes’
The present unrest in Africa and Middle east seem to be synchronized very well.
To what end,we do not know.
I feel that extraneous forces are at work, which seem to be beyond the Governments.
Not that I am a subscriber to Conspiracy theories.
Raja will wish he were in France, with the proviso that the Law amended to include kick-backs.
Story:
French lawmakers will not face automatic jail sentences if they lie about their wealth or income to the country’s Commission for Financial Transparency in Politics, but a bid to exempt them from other penalties has been shot down
French MPs will not face prison if they lie about their personal wealth or income, the country’s lower house of parliament decided late Monday night.
They will, however, face a fine of 30,000 euros and be declared ineligible to stand for office in a move that amounted to a defeat for Christian Jacob, head of the ruling UMP party in France’s National Assembly.
The penalties, included in a bill to be voted on next month, are nevertheless harsh new measures for lawmakers who misrepresent their wealth and income to the Commission for Financial Transparency in Politics (CTFVP).
Jacob, to the consternation opposition socialists, had called for a two-year prison term, the fine and the ineligibility clause to be removed from the text of the bill.
He argued that it was “unnecessary for the CTFVP to become a judicial authority in its own right, with powers of investigation.”
But at the end of a marathon session at the National Assembly in Paris, MPs voted 54 against 33 to keep the fine and the ineligibility clause, but to drop the prison term.
Despite this defeat for Jacob, the house’s left-wing opposition was incensed that the threat of jail for lying MPs had been left out.
“If you steal a scooter you get three years’ jail,” said Jean-Yves Le Bouillonnec, a member of parliament for the Socialist Party. “It is totally unacceptable that a man who gets voted into office should be allowed to lie blatantly about his wealth or income without incurring a prison term.”
Well.people may not like it, but some of her views on immigration,gays,lesbians and ecology can not be brushed aside.
Whether she knows something about running the country?-how many of the current crop knows that anyway
Story:
The (very) ex-sex symbol is considering an offer to run for the French presidency for a French Ecology party, but before you all rush to wish her success or give her your vote, do you know exactly what her political views are? If you don’t, you should.
The fact is that Bardot has been convicted on multiple occasions over the years for anti-gay and racist statements, and her views on Muslims, immigration in general, gays and lesbians are such that apart from those who share her points of view, she is considered these days in France to be a sad sick joke or a crank, or both. She was convicted in 1998 by a French court for provoking racial hatred against Muslims, and called on President Jacques Chirac to “stop crawling around in front of these Asiatics” concerning animal rights. Several human rights and anti-racist groups have taken her to court for alleged racism and she was heavily fined in 2004 for the fourth time for incitation to racial hatred, this time over content contained in her book ‘And God Created Woman.”
France. Decision to balance between reckless traveling by people to known areas of vulnerability and people who have to be present ,say like the Press.
While reimbursement by the former is warranted, for the latter it is not applicable in a Democracy.
But who shall decide?
If the govt. wants to tweak the Press, this is a good option not to miss.
By and large an unwarranted step.
If the Govt. decides that it is due to reckless traveling despite repeated appeals, it can always choose the option of not rescuing them
Story:
France has introduced a law obliging citizens who are taken hostage in countries declared to be dangerous to pay back some or all of the cost of their release operations. Confusion reigns as to which hostages would be exempted.
The new law, called The State Exterior Action Act imposes “The reimbursement of all or part of the costs incurred by release operations [..upon all French citizens who..] enter dangerous zones in the absence of legitimate reasons after having received warnings on the risks involved” according to online French news site Rue89. It was introduced in order to “Instill a sense of responsibility in French nationals.” http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/294679#tab=comments&sc=0&local=
You must be logged in to post a comment.