I have been already labelled as antiDarwin and an ignoramus in comments in Times of India , when people could not reply my queries.
Let me add further by posting a Photo Essay on the animals hitherto unknown.
Monkey(?) UKThis creature was found by Russian soldiers on Sakhalin shoreline. Sakhalin area is situated near to Japan, it’s the most eastern part of Russia, almost 5000 miles to East from Moscow (Russia is huge). People don’t know who is it. According to the bones and teeth – it is not a fish. According to its skeleton – it’s not a crocodile or alligator. It has a skin with hair or fur. It has been said that it was taken by Russian special services for in-depth studies, and we are lucky that people who encountered it first made those photos before it was brought away.
Giant sea stars or starfish that measure 24 inches (60 centimeters) across are held by Sadie Mills, left, and Niki Davey of New Zealand’s National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research on February 15, 2008.
The 19-inch-long (50-centimeter-long) creature might be a tunicate, or sea squirt, say scientists who found it during a large-scale survey of Antarctic life in early 2008.What’s This? SHARE Digg StumbleUpon Reddit RELATED STORIES PHOTOS: ”Glass Tulips,” Huge Worms Found in Antarctica (February 20, 2008) Antarctic Marine Census Trip Begins (January 29, 2008) PHOTOS: Weird New Animals From Antarctica’s Deep Seas (May 16, 2007) An Antarctic octopus found at 3,280 feet (1,000 meters) in southern Antarctica’s Ross Sea was one of about 18 octopus species recorded during a survey conducted in early 2008.
A mysterious beast can be seen clearly the head, legs, teeth and tail. Not only enough scales wrote CNN. Now scientists have a long work on the study. via HubpagesA Rare White Turtle which was found on the riverbank of the Yellow River in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
The Surinam Toad (Pipa pipa) lives in the Forests and marshes of South America. It has no tongue or teeth
Sir,
I changed it because the readers and my son, 32, have been saying that my earlier design was very bad.
I have noted your point and see what I can do to make it easy for you.
Sir, I am 62
I read a book called ‘The unexplained’ some 5 years ago. It contained this pic of the big foot
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=mysterious+bigfoot+cited&um=1&sa=N&hl=en&biw=1366&bih=667&tbm=isch&tbnid=RjpJEjZW-onC9M:&imgrefurl=http://mysterious-sightings.com/cryptozoology-photo-gallery/bigfoot-patterson-gimlin&docid=vzgWbJgjeRhJbM&imgurl=http://mysterious-sightings.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/bigfoot.jpg&w=400&h=483&ei=HHxtUYazGszirAfnu4GQAg&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=1021&page=1&tbnh=169&tbnw=148&start=0&ndsp=19&ved=1t:429,r:8,s:0&tx=628&ty=437
Hello You have changed the design /-colour backgrounds now-days. People like me in 60s are not able to read. With regards Ramalingam K S
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Ramani’s blog
Sir,
I changed it because the readers and my son, 32, have been saying that my earlier design was very bad.
I have noted your point and see what I can do to make it easy for you.
Sir, I am 62