Ramanisblog

Tag: SEO

  • Site Analysis ramanan50 wordpress

    Out of curiosity I found this information about my site.

    Home page ramanan50
    Former Home Page ramanan50 wordpress

    Some time back I discussed about the Discussions about my site by the others and it was interesting,

    Though I check Alexa.com to find out my site’s performance, this present analysis is more detailed.

    And it is free.

    Have your site checked.

    I have found Google Webmaster tools to be very educative

    The Report.

    RAMANAN50.WORDPRESS.COM is rated 3.51 out of 7 SEO metrics which we consider as an Above Average rating.

    The site seems to be popular in India with a rank of #21,063 and brings in 87% of the site’s traffic which is 98.20% of the total pageviews to the site. Among the cities, Bangalore, IN tops in bringing the traffic to the site, where it is ranked #1,964 and brings in 96.00% of the total pageviews and has 26 average page views per visit.

    When analyzed on Mar 31, 2013 the site was hosted in UNITED STATES with the IP address 76.74.254.123.

    While reviewing the site, we have considered the following metrics for positive ratings:

    • Great Alexa Global Rank rating (#173,692)
    • Great Inbound Links (#455)  as per Alexa
    • Excellent Inbound Links (#4,170)  as per SEOMoz
    • Good Google PageRank (3/10)
    • Excellent SEOMoz Rank (4.24/10)
    • Excellent SEOMoz Subdomain Rank (4.06/10)
    • Excellent Google PageSpeed Score (94/100)
    • The site has social shares such as #10 Facebook shares, #7 Twitter Tweets, #1 StumbleUpon Shares
    • Good number of daily visitors (approx. #14,905)
    • The site has MyWot Reputation ratings
    • The site has MyWot Confidence ratings.
      • Poor Alexa Speed Score (2/100)-“Some other sites say my site is fast!
      • The site does not have any Delicious Shares or LinkedIn Shares or they are still building-“Sharing in Delicious I get confused there.
      • The site is not yet listed in DMoz directory. -“Confusion in submitting,, that is under which category
      • Traffic Statistics

                The statistical reports here provide various parameters based on which you can evaluate        the performance of ramanan50.wordpress.com. It has different categories each        of which has a graphical and/or numerical representation which makes it more easily        understandable. Each of these categories can be viewed for a varying period between        one week and a year.

        Site Reputation

        Wots (Web of Trust) provides rating to websites based on four major components like        trustworthiness, Vendor reliability, Privacy and Child safety. Here we provide the        MyWOT Scores of the ramanan50.wordpress.com based on the reputation and        confidence, ranging from excellent to very poor.

                                Reputation                         Confidence
                                Trustworthiness Excellent 1/5
                                Vendor Reliability Excellent 1/5
                                Privacy Excellent 1/5
                                Child Safety Excellent 1/5

            Safety ratings for ramanan50.wordpress.com

        Safety advice by McAfee‘s SiteAdvisor about ramanan50.wordpress.com website.

        Content allocation.

            Content of ramanan50.wordpress.com is categorized by major DOM content types    classified by volume of bytes and by number of occurrences.

        Traffic contribution.

        Bifurcation of traffic pertaining to ramanan50.wordpress.com from different sources        is illustrated graphically and in detail. They are represented by geographical locations,        by user and by page views.

        Content analysis.

        Content of ramanan50.wordpress.com, classified by Concepts, Keywords, Entities,        Relations and Categories allows scrutinizing the site data from different perspective.

        Source.

        http://www.siteratios.com/site/ramanan50.wordpress.com

    Enhanced by Zemanta

  • Know your Blog -Site ranking Websites-Alexa,Real Pointer.

    Image representing Alexa as depicted in CrunchBase
    Image via CrunchBase

    As one keeps on Blogging,one would like to know as to how his blog is read,number of people per Day/Month;how many pages are viewed,how much time the reader spends on the site ,what the bounce rate is and a host of other details like keywords .

    There are number of sites providing this information free of cost.

    I have found Alexa.com the easiest to understand without too many IT jargon,simple yet detailed.

    You visit the site ,enter you site url in Search and you get information on Traffic Rank(Global and Country specific, Reach,Page views,Page Views/user,Bounce Rate,Time on spent on site ans Search information relating to your site.

    You can also get information on audience profile,age,income group,educational level and keywords details.

    You would also get to know how your site looked in the past by way back machine.

    You also get to  know details on in bound links and outward links apart from the details of sites linking to your site.

    You may become a member by creating an account and the site has affiliates programme as well.

    Loading time is provided and you can  correct mistakes,adjust your blog accordingly.

    You can down load the Alexa tool bar and use it.

    The only disadvantage  I felt was that it does not provide historical data for anything ,1,00,00.

    You get  Click stream, Related Links and a host of other details relating to your site.

    There are two kinds of Bloggers,who write for their pleasure and for the Audience.

    I belong to the first category.

    But as one goes along he finds that a section of the audience like what he writes and with the help of Alexa he can zero in  on the group,key words,subjects and concentrate on those topics/tags.

    More than others it was a revelation to me as I write what ever that interests me and I have found that there are people who have the same predicament,in my case as  to what I really write consistently on and for others what they really are interested in reading.

    I find in Alexa a good friend who does not preach.

    Related articles
    Enhanced by Zemanta

  • Google revels how it Ranks websites.

    For bloggers, I have always maintained that the content must be interesting,supported by facts/links and the posts are to be educative,informative and interesting.

    The blogger should be interested and believe in what he/she writes.

    One need not bother about as to how some body ranks, unless of course you write for money.

    Google on Monday revealed 10 recent changes to its search algorithm that affect results as diverse as those that are date-specific and those that are in Hindi.

    Google makes more than 500 changes to its search algorithm each year. Most are tiny and some — including a recent one that added real-time results for a third of search queries — affect a large proportion of searches.

    But Google rarely publicizes its algorithm changes. One reason: It does not want to give hints to the Web sites that try to game the algorithm so that their links show up higher in results. Google chose to reveal these changes because they are less susceptible to gaming, Matt Cutts, a distinguished engineer at Google who works on search quality, wrote in a company blog post.

    There is also another reason that Google is shedding some light on the black box of its algorithm. It is under fire from government regulators who are investigating it for antitrust violations. One of their main concerns is how little Google reveals about how search works, even though changes in the algorithm can drastically affect Web businesses.

    One of the new changes will affect searches in languages for which there is little Web content available, including Afrikaans, Hindi and Icelandic. Google will now translate relevant Web pages written in English and show those results, too.

    http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/google-reveals-tweaks-to-its-search-algorithm/

    Related:

    Ten recent algorithm changes

    11/14/11 | 8:30:00 AM

     

    Today we’re continuing our long-standing series of blog posts to share the methodology and process behind our search ranking, evaluation and algorithmic changes. This summer we published a video that gives a glimpse into our overall process, and today we want to give you a flavor of specific algorithm changes by publishing a highlight list of many of the improvements we’ve made over the past couple weeks.

    We’ve published hundreds of blog posts about search over the years on this blog, our Official Google Blog, and even on my personal blog. But we’re always looking for ways to give you even deeper insight into the over 500 changes we make to search in a given year. In that spirit, here’s a list of ten improvements from the past couple weeks:

    • Cross-language information retrieval updates: For queries in languages where limited web content is available (Afrikaans, Malay, Slovak, Swahili, Hindi, Norwegian, Serbian, Catalan, Maltese, Macedonian, Albanian, Slovenian, Welsh, Icelandic), we will now translate relevant English web pages and display the translated titles directly below the English titles in the search results. This feature was available previously in Korean, but only at the bottom of the page. Clicking on the translated titles will take you to pages translated from English into the query language.
    • Snippets with more page content and less header/menu content: This change helps us choose more relevant text to use in snippets. As we improve our understanding of web page structure, we are now more likely to pick text from the actual page content, and less likely to use text that is part of a header or menu.
    • Better page titles in search results by de-duplicating boilerplate anchors: We look at a number of signals when generating a page’s title. One signal is the anchor text in links pointing to the page. We found that boilerplate links with duplicated anchor text are not as relevant, so we are putting less emphasis on these. The result is more relevant titles that are specific to the page’s content.
    • Length-based autocomplete predictions in Russian: This improvement reduces the number of long, sometimes arbitrary query predictions in Russian. We will not make predictions that are very long in comparison either to the partial query or to the other predictions for that partial query. This is already our practice in English.
    • Extending application rich snippets: We recently announced rich snippets for applications. This enables people who are searching for software applications to see details, like cost and user reviews, within their search results. This change extends the coverage of application rich snippets, so they will be available more often.
    • Retiring a signal in Image search: As the web evolves, we often revisit signals that we launched in the past that no longer appear to have a significant impact. In this case, we decided to retire a signal in Image Search related to images that had references from multiple documents on the web.
    • Fresher, more recent results: As we announced just over a week ago, we’ve made a significant improvement to how we rank fresh content. This change impacts roughly 35 percent of total searches (around 6-10% of search results to a noticeable degree) and better determines the appropriate level of freshness for a given query.
    • Refining official page detection: We try hard to give our users the most relevant and authoritative results. With this change, we adjusted how we attempt to determine which pages are official. This will tend to rank official websites even higher in our ranking.
    • Improvements to date-restricted queries: We changed how we handle result freshness for queries where a user has chosen a specific date range. This helps ensure that users get the results that are most relevant for the date range that they specify.
    • Prediction fix for IME queries: This change improves how Autocomplete handles IME queries (queries which contain non-Latin characters). Autocomplete was previously storing the intermediate keystrokes needed to type each character, which would sometimes result in gibberish predictions for Hebrew, Russian and Arabic.
    • http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/11/ten-recent-algorithm-changes.html

    Here’s how to play a Google a day.

    http://www.agoogleaday.com/#date=2011-11-17

    Related articles