If the oldest literature of Sanskrit were to mention Tamil , Tamil must ant-date Sanskrit.
Curiously enough, as I said earlier there is no mention of Tamil Kings or Literature in detail.
My question is that which History is Correct?
By Tamil's admission and quotes of Vedic Life, Sanskrit and Vedas must have preceded the Tamils.
Yet Sanskrit quotes Tamil/Tamils?
Which history is correct?
Are both of them correct/
She adds that Indra is the Chief God in the Rig Veda.
Better her Professorship is revoked.
The argument is that the worship of the Sun was there in Egypt and elsewhere is the proof tha the Aryans came from these places to India.
Further the migration to India began , as can be evidenced from the fact that the Rivers mentioned in the Rig Veda are all from the extreme north, which Includes the Saraswati River, it is observed.
Saraswati river in the extreme north!
Please read geography and look at the location of Saraswati.
The Logic is if the Rivers are in the North then the migration will come from that Direction.
One forgets that there is another direction,South from where people can migrate!
Those who have read the Puranas and the Ithihasas like the Ramayana and the Mahabharata would know the extent of the land mass that was called the 'Bharata Varsha', the name Hindu is from the Arabic al-Hind, from the River Sind.
Bharat Varsha extended upto and beyond Kabul.
Gandhari of the Mahabharata was from Kandahar, which formed a part of Bharat Varsha.
There are the description of Yavanas, the Romans and the Mayas
Please read my posts on these subjects filed under Hinduism.
You must be logged in to post a comment.