The reasons cited seem to overlook the simple important reason, that Porn is titillating. I do not see how sex education will make you not to watch porn as also a ‘Conservative Society’ Does it mean that porn watching will be…
If oral submissions are not to be made Public, why should the Court make them?
Are the statements made off the cuff remark,s not to be taken seriously?
The Court has also advised Tamil Nadu not to breach the water level and rejected Kerals's prayer to reduce the water level.
How is this possible?
Only one instruction can be complied with.
Precisely this is what the issue is all about.
Why make inane observations with out offering a solution?
Knowing the seriousness of the issue, the Court should have advised the Central Government to deploy CISF instead of sending a notice to it.
In fact the Court should have taken the issue suo moto.
Kerala should not object to present water level;Tamil Nadu should not stick to its stand of the present agreed level of storage.
If the State can not ask the other one not to incite passions, is it a gag order?
If the Court asks the State the same, it is not a Gag Order!
No orders for deployment of CISF.
The issue is not ' substantive'!
What sort of Order is this?
You must be logged in to post a comment.