Ramanisblog

Tag: Jawaharlal Nehru

  • Jawaharlal Nehru Was Born In A Brothel?

     

    Jawaharlal Nehru was born in a brothel,Motilal Nehru ran one.

     

    Nehru’s memorial is not where he was born , because it was a brothel.

     

    Jawaharlal Nehru had two step bothers.

    nehru had an affair with Edwina Mountbatten
    Nehru with Edwina Mount batten

     

    “MOTILAL had also two bastard sons out of Muslim women by name SHEIKABDULLA &SYUD HUSSAIN ”

     

    These are some of the information doing the rounds in the Internet.

     

    But what is curious is that none of the Nehru Family have deigned it important enough to contradict this any where  or any forum.

     

    The same attitude by Sonia gandhi, Rahul Gandhi on the various charges, which seem to be credible and backed by document,

    KGB paid Money to Sonia, Rahul.

     

    Sonia’s Father was a Nazi,

     

    Rahul was arrested in US by The FBI and was released by the intervention of Vajpayee.

     

    Bofors, 2G,ISRO,CWG …….

     

    Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi lied about their Educational Qualifications

     

    Is it because they think they are beyond the Morality of India?

     

    Or an arrogance of power and wealth?

     

    A denial would be welcome as this would rest these kinds of Information.

     

    ”

    NEHRU, BORN IN A BROTHEL?

Date: 4/25/2001
Comment
Brothel thrives were Nehru was born 
By Sharad Gupta, Lucknow, India 

Foreword 
The featured article below has been taken from the Daily Indian Express of New Delhi of August 29, 1997. It was written by Sharad Gupta of Lucknow. A copy was received from a friend in New Delhi only a short while ago. The Sword of Truth online magazine had presented several articles in the recent past on the Nehrus in its columns. They were based on material gleaned piecemeal from various sources and then put together. We would request our readers to specially go through the two articles named herewith: (1) A Tale of Two Lals, and (2) The Story of Gangadhar, Father of Motilal. They can be obtained in our Archives Section. 
There are other Nehru-related articles too in the Archives columns which shed more light on the Nehrus and their shameless brood. For the first time, the Sword of Truth had publicly stated that Jawaharlal had died of syphilis. This was vehemently opposed by the reigning MHMs (Mentally Handicapped Morons) but the truth did come out soon enough, as is always the case with truth everywhere. It was clear that most medical students studying in Delhi at the time, were fully informed of the real cause of Nehru's death while the wider Hindu public remained (or were left to remain) unaware of the fact. Also, fully aware of this shameful fact, at the time, were all foreign embassies and news reporters of New Delhi. Such suppression of important news from compatriots, has always been a way with the Nehrus, constantly motivated to keep the country ignorant. Ignorance is weakness and self-inflicted ignorance is suicide, what learned people say. The idea was always to keep the public in the dark and so there was not a single voice raised against the compulsory nephew/niece-ship of the entire populace to the sick Prime Minister! Some morons had even tried to blame Sikh-owned road-side 'Dhabas' saying that Jawahar had contracted the disease from a glass of water that he had taken in a 'dhaba' on a hot summer day. But then, no one believed this cock and bull story. After all, syphilis is syphilis; and it usually affects people frequenting unhealthy company and not 'dhabas'. 
We send our heartfelt thanks to the Delhi friend for the copy of the original article by Sharad Gupta, reproduced verbatim in the following pages. 
(The verbatim reproduction of the Article from the Indian Express of Aug. 29, 1997, Delhi)

    Citation.

    Jawahalal Nehru, Illicit Son

     

    Nehru was born in a brothel

     

    From Bharata to India,The Rape of Chrysee by By M. K. Agarwal

     

     

     

     

    Related articles
    Enhanced by Zemanta

  • Illuminati Engineered India’s Independence!

     

    There is explosive information that India‘s Freedom from the British was engineered by The Illuminati, the shadow Group that runs the world affairs.

     

    That the Illuminati is real is true, there is no doubt.

     

    Please check my posts on this.

     

    India becomes Independent
    India Gains Independence.Image source.http://bhuwanchand.wordpress.com

     

    And there is admissible evidence that it was responsible for many a world changes.

     

    What is astounding is the information that the Illuminati wanted India to attain Freedom from the British.

     

    This is to create an India as a Proxy for The Soviets.

     

    In this Project Freemasonry was involved.

     

    And this information goes on.

     

    I am providing excerpts and you may read in detail at the Link .

     

    At times Truth might be stranger than fiction.

    Not that I am endorsing the information.

    I have my doubts on this information as well as the source.

    At the same time, I do have my doubts about the reasons and the  process of granting Independence to India from The British.

    There are, in my view gaps in the granting of Indian Independence voluntarily by the British.

    So also the process the Illuminati has adopted to get India its Independence.

    With the resources Illuminati had/has, it could have achieved this objective more easily than what is divulged here.

    I am posting this to make people aware that there seems to be a scheme  of things political, which we normally assume to be natural

    Quote

    “For this purpose, Indian Freemasonry worked overtime to groom local Indian Mason operatives.

    According to this official Masonic website, “Swami Vivekananda (initiated in 1884 under the name of Bro. Narendra Nath Dutt in Lodge Anchor & Hope, Calcutta). Motilal Nehru – Lodge Harmony, Kanpur (Father of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and grand father of Indhira Gandhi), C. Rajagopalachary (Governor General of India), Sir C P Ramaswamy Iyer (Divan of Travancore), Dr. P V Cheriy (Governor of Maharashtra), and Fakruddin Ali Ahmed (President of India).” –

     

    According to this official Masonic website, “Swami Vivekananda (initiated in 1884 under the name of Bro. Narendra Nath Dutt in Lodge Anchor & Hope, Calcutta). Motilal Nehru – Lodge Harmony, Kanpur (Father of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and grand father of Indhira Gandhi), C. Rajagopalachary (Governor General of India), Sir C P Ramaswamy Iyer (Divan of Travancore), Dr. P V Cheriy (Governor of Maharashtra), and Fakruddin Ali Ahmed (President of India).”

    Since this Illuminati project of delivering an “independent India” to the Soviet sphere of influence required top priority, Illuminati operative Helena Blavatsky founded The Theosophical Society in India. The purpose was two-fold. First, Blavatsky would dig up the swastika and Aryan theory for the Nazis who were created to attack Russia, which would result in the entire Eastern Europe and Germany being transferred to Communists…..

     

    Since this Illuminati project of delivering an “independent India” to the Soviet sphere of influence required top priority, Illuminati operative Helena Blavatsky founded The Theosophical Society in India. The purpose was two-fold. First, Blavatsky would dig up the swastika and Aryan theory for the Nazis who were created to attack Russia, which would result in the entire Eastern Europe and Germany being transferred to Communists.

    Secondly, The Theosophical Society would coordinate the Indian Independence movement through the Indian National Congress. Even back then, rumors began circulating about Blavatsky and the “Russians”.

    A key theosophist activist was Mrs. Annie Besant who despite acting against the British, managed to mysteriously escape being punished by them. If one analyzes the Indian independence movement, we notice the British building a crescendo of antagonizing the Indian National Congress and then caving in to their demands….whereas transfer of power to the INC was predetermined.

    Realizing that Indian National Congress leaders were phoney in every respect, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, a British educated lawyer managed to get a mandate for an all Muslim Pakistan without shedding a drop of blood or going to jail.

    The last Governor General of India, Lord Mountbatten was associated with the Rothschilds. He realized the threat Pakistan would pose to Soviet-proxy India. He assured that independent India got more than its share of landmass, including islands in the Indian Ocean, many border districts initially marked for Pakistan (which resulted in the Muslims being massacred), and 95% Muslim Kashmir which should have gone to Pakistan.

    The moment India was liberated coincides with a little known private ceremony known as “Hour of the British Empire” which is held in London -”

    Unquote.

    Citation.

    http://www.henrymakow.com/myth_indian_independence.html

     

    Since this Illuminati project of delivering an “independent India” to the Soviet sphere of influence required top priority, Illuminati operative Helena Blavatsky founded The Theosophical Society in India. The purpose was two-fold. First, Blavatsky would dig up the swastika and Aryan theory for the Nazis who were created to attack Russia, which would result in the entire Eastern Europe and Germany being transferred to Communists.Secondly, The Theosophical Society would coordinate the Indian Independence movement through the Indian National Congress. Even back then, rumors began circulating about Blavatsky and the “Russians”.A key theosophist activist was Mrs. Annie Besant who despite acting against the British, managed to mysteriously escape being punished by them. If one analyzes the Indian independence movement, we notice the British building a crescendo of antagonizing the Indian National Congress and then caving in to their demands….whereas transfer of power to the INC was predetermined.Realizing that Indian National Congress leaders were phoney in every respect, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, a British educated lawyer managed to get a mandate for an all Muslim Pakistan without shedding a drop of blood or going to jail.

    The last Governor General of India, Lord Mountbatten was associated with the Rothschilds. He realized the threat Pakistan would pose to Soviet-proxy India. He assured that independent India got more than its share of landmass, including islands in the Indian Ocean, many border districts initially marked for Pakistan (which resulted in the Muslims being massacred), and 95% Muslim Kashmir which should have gone to Pakistan.

    The moment India was liberated coincides with a little known private ceremony known as “Hour of the British Empire” which is held in London – See more at: http://www.henrymakow.com/myth_indian_independence.html#sthash.T700r1M6.dpuf

     

     

    .

    Communists. #sthash.T700r1M6.dpuf
    be a proxy for the Soviets.
    be a proxy for the Soviets.
    Related articles
    Enhanced by Zemanta

  • Nehru Family Tree Muslims

    Now there is a lot of talk of Article 370 of The Indian Constitution, applicable to Jammu and Kashmir.

    This has become loud after Narendra Modi declared that he will rethink on the Article 370 for Kashmir if he becomes the PM.

    I remember having asked my Father, (who is no more) as to why this provision was applied to Jammu and Kashmir and why Sheikh Abdullah was not imprisoned in a tough Jail instead of a resort for his anti India utterances.

    He replied that Sheikh Abdullah was Nehru‘s half-brother!

    I recalled this when I read a news item that the Congress has decided(meaning Sonia Gandhi has decided) to move a fresh Bill to legalize Gays.

    The paper declared that this was in keeping with the progressive outlook of the Nehru clan.

    Without going into the merits of granting Gays Rights( my readers know what my views are on this), I wanted to check on the Nehru family‘s myth of Brahmins from Kashmir and that despite being orthodox Brahmins the Nehru’s have been progressive( does not mean that Brahmins are not progressive)

    This is what I came up with.

    The Family of Nehru.
    Nehru Family Tree

    “The Nehru family starts with the Mughal man named Ghiyasuddin Ghazi. He was the City Kotwal i.e. police officer of Delhi prior to the uprising of 1857, under the Mughal rule. After capturing Delhi in 1857, in the year of the mutiny, the British were slaughtering all Mughals everywhere. The British made a thorough search and killed every Mughal so that there were no future claimant to the throne of Delhi. So, the man Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (the word means kafir-killer) adopted a Hindu name Gangadhar Nehru and thus saved his life by the subterfuge. Ghiyasuddin Ghazi apparently used to reside on the bank of a canal (or Nehr) near the Red Fort. Thus, he adopted the name ‘Nehru’ as the family name. The 13th volume of the “Encyclopedia of Indian War of Independence” (ISBN:81-261-3745-9) by M.K. Singh states it elaborately. The Government of India have been hiding this fact…

    JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU:—Jawahar Lal’s father was Moti Lal and Moti Lal’s father was Gangadhar Nehru. His wife was kamala Kaul, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. M. O. Mathai in his book– “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age”– which opens secret of Jahawarlal Nehru relationship with a Beneras girl. His relationship with several teens , Nehru was a playboy type , drinking wine, smoking with Edwina Mountabattien & others secretly. (Link:–http://www.sikhsundesh.net/nehru_dynasty.htm )..

    Also Nehru had love affair with Sarojini Naidu’s daughter Padmaja Naidu, whom Nehru got appointed as the Governor of Bengal. It is revealed that he used to keep her portrait in his bed room, which Indira would often remove. It caused some tension between father and daughter.

    Also Nehru had an affair with a sanyasin from Benares named Shraddha Mata  in 1949, in a convent in Bangalore. A son was born and he was kept at a Christian Missionary Boarding School. His date of birth is estimated to be 30th May, 1949.

    In 1929 Nehru father Motilal made a report , after that Muslims in India demanded new country.Then Jinnah who was in Congress Party was forced to join Muslim League.Nehru was so eager to take position of Prime Minister,created differences with Jinnah.Nehru even didn`t thought of poor people who died in civil war between Hindus Vs Muslims.

    (Link: http://nehrufamily.wordpress.com/)

    Related Articles

  • Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Suppressed History of India

    I&B have uploaded excellent Videos of Inspiring Speeches,Music and rare documentaries of the Independence Struggle in YouTube .

    Some:

    Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel’s Speech delivered on 12th February 1949

    Sardar Vallabahbhai Patel, the Iron Man of India is in fact the Architect of Modern India.

    Like Rajaji(C.Rajagopalachari0 was a Statesman, who did not bother popularity.

    He did what was Right was for the Country and obviously not popular as he did not play to the Gallery.

    He was a Man who called Nehru wrong when Nehru was wrong when none was prepared to point it out scared of the charisma of Nehru.

    ‘

    My dear Jawaharlal,

    Ever since my return from Ahmedabad and after the cabinet meeting the same day which I had to attend at practically fifteen minutes’ notice and for which I regret I was not able to read all the papers, I have been anxiously thinking over the problem of Tibet and I thought I should share with you what is passing through my mind.

    I have carefully gone through the correspondence between the External Affairs Ministry and our Ambassador in Peking and through him the Chinese Government. I have tried to peruse this correspondence as favourably to our Ambassador and the Chinese Government as possible, but I regret to say that neither of them comes out well as a result of this study. The Chinese Government has tried to delude us by professions of peaceful intention. My own feeling is that at a crucial period they managed to instill into our Ambassador a false sense of confidence in their so-called desire to settle the Tibetan problem by peaceful means. There can be no doubt that during the period covered by this correspondence the Chinese must have been concentrating for an onslaught on Tibet. The final action of the Chinese, in my judgement, is little short of perfidy. The tragedy of it is that the Tibetans put faith in us; they chose to be guided by us; and we have been unable to get them out of the meshes of Chinese diplomacy or Chinese malevolence. From the latest position, it appears that we shall not be able to rescue the Dalai Lama. Our Ambassador has been at great pains to find an explanation or justification for Chinese policy and actions. As the External Affairs Ministry remarked in one of their telegrams, there was a lack of firmness and unnecessary apology in one or two representations that he made to the Chinese Government on our behalf. It is impossible to imagine any sensible person believing in the so-called threat to China from Anglo-American machinations in Tibet. Therefore, if the Chinese put faith in this, they must have distrusted us so completely as to have taken us as tools or stooges of Anglo-American diplomacy or strategy. This feeling, if genuinely entertained by the Chinese in spite of your direct approaches to them, indicates that even though we regard ourselves as the friends of China, the Chinese do not regard us as their friends. With the Communist mentality of “whoever is not with them being against them”, this is a significant pointer, of which we have to take due note. During the last several months, outside the Russian camp, we have practically been alone in championing the cause of Chinese entry into UN and in securing from the Americans assurances on the question of Formosa. We have done everything we could to assuage Chinese feelings, to allay its apprehensions and to defend its legitimate claims in our discussions and correspondence with America and Britain and in the UN. Inspite of this, China is not convinced about our disinterestedness; it continues to regard us with suspicion and the whole psychology is one, at least outwardly, of scepticism perhaps mixed with a little hostility. I doubt if we can go any further than we have done already to convince China of our good intentions, friendliness and goodwill. In Peking we have an Ambassador who is eminently suitable for putting across the friendly point of view. Even he seems to have failed to convert the Chinese. Their last telegram to us is an act of gross discourtesy not only in the summary way it disposes of our protest against the entry of Chinese forces into Tibet but also in the wild insinuation that our attitude is determined by foreign influences. It looks as though it is not a friend speaking in that language but a potential enemy.”

    Nehru paid for his folly when China invaded India in 1962 and Nehru died a disillusioned Man.

    Liberation Of Hyderabad from The Nizam.(Daily pioneer)-How Vindictive was Nehru?

    Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the then Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister of India, whose 137th birth anniversary is on October 31, was insulted, humiliated and disgraced by the then Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, during a Cabinet meeting. “You are a complete communalist and I’ll never be a party to your suggestions and proposals,” Nehru shouted at Patel during a crucial Cabinet meeting to discuss the liberation of Hyderabad by the Army from the tyranny of the Razakkars, the then Nizam’s private army.

    Sardar Patel
    Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
    “A shocked Sardar Patel collected his papers from the table and slowly walked out of the Cabinet room. That was the last time Patel attended a Cabinet meeting. He also stopped speaking to Nehru since then,” writes MKK Nair, a 1947 batch IAS officer, in his memoirs “With No Ill Feeling to Anybody”. Nair had close ties with both Sardar and VP Menon, his Man Friday.
    Though Nair has not written the exact date of the above mentioned Cabinet meeting, it could have happened during the weeks prior to the liberation of Hyderabad by the Indian Army. Operation Polo, the mission to liberate Hyderabad from the Nizam, began on September 13, 1948 and culminated on September 18. While Sardar Patel wanted direct military action to liberate Hyderabad from the rape and mayhem perpetrated by the 2,00,000 Razakars, Nehru preferred the United  Nations route.
    Nair writes that Nehru’s personal hatred for Sardar Patel came out in the open on December 15, 1950, the day the Sardar breathed his last in Bombay (now Mumbai). “Immediately after he got the news about Sardar Patel’s death, Nehru sent two notes to the Ministry of States. The notes reached VP Menon, the then Secretary to the Ministry. In one of the notes, Nehru had asked Menon to send the official Cadillac car used by Sardar Patel to the former’s office. The second note was shocking. Nehru wanted government secretaries desirous of attending Sardar Patel’s last rites to do so at their own personal expenses.

    Foresight in accepting Partition

    But the greatest of his foresights was shown by the way he dealt with the crisis created by Muslim League after it entered the Interim Government on 25th October 1946. He was the first to realize that the League had created a vertical divide in the entire governmental machinery on a communal basis, up from a Member (Minister) down to the lowest peon. There was a virtual inter-Departmental (the term Ministry was used only after Independence) war on the Raisina Hill. The League was making a determined attempt to demonstrate that Hindus and Muslims could not work together, to strengthen the notion that partition of the country was unavoidable. In fact, the League had already, in a way, created several Pakistans on Indian soil, if one looked at the working of the Departments of Finance, Industry, Health, Posts & Air, which were under League Members; Liaqat Ali, the Finance Member, presented the Finance Bill (Central Budget) of 1947 to the Central Assembly without showing it in advance to Nehru, who was the leader of the Interim Government.

    “How can the country be governed in such a divided way, now and in future?” Patel is reported to have wondered. Nehru was angry with the League, but it was Patel whose prescience helped him and the country to realize the inevitability of the Partition. It was neither defeatism nor a hurry to capture power, as has been imputed to both of them in subsequent years. It was nothing short of foresight and wisdom which Poet Tulsi Das had advocated in the 16th century in this famous verse: “Budh ardh tajain, lukh sarvasa jata” (the wise give up half when they see the whole is going).(dadinani.com)(PC Modi)

    ‘

    Patel was intensely loyal to Gandhi and both he and Nehru looked to him to arbitrate disputes. However, Nehru and Patel sparred over national issues. When Nehru asserted control over Kashmir policy, Patel objected to Nehru’s sidelining his home ministry’s officials.[63] Nehru was offended by Patel’s decision-making regarding the states’ integration, having neither consulted him nor the cabinet. Patel asked Gandhi to relieve him of his obligation to serve, knowing that he lacked Nehru’s youth and popularity. He believed that an open political battle would hurt India. After much personal deliberation and contrary to Patel’s prediction, Gandhi on 30 January 1948 told Patel not to leave the government. A free India, according to Gandhi, needed both Patel and Nehru. Patel was the last man to privately talk with Gandhi, who was assassinated just minutes after Patel’s departure.[64] At Gandhi’s wake, Nehru and Patel embraced each other and addressed the nation together. Patel gave solace to many associates and friends and immediately moved to forestall any possible violence.[65] Within two months of Gandhi’s death, Patel suffered a major heart attack; the timely action of his daughter, his secretary and nurse saved Patel’s life. Speaking later, Patel attributed the attack to the “grief bottled up” due to Gandhi’s death.[66]

    Criticism arose from the media and other politicians that Patel’s home ministry had failed to protect Gandhi. Emotionally exhausted, Patel tendered a letter of resignation, offering to leave the government. Patel’s secretary persuaded him to withhold the letter, seeing it as fodder for Patel’s political enemies and political conflict in India.[67] However, Nehru sent Patel a letter dismissing any question of personal differences and his desire for Patel’s ouster. He reminded Patel of their 30-year partnership in the freedom struggle and asserted that after Gandhi’s death, it was especially wrong for them to quarrel. Nehru, Rajagopalachari and other Congressmen publicly defended Patel. Moved, Patel publicly endorsed Nehru’s leadership and refuted any suggestion of discord. Patel publicly dispelled any notion that he sought to be prime minister.[67] Though the two committed themselves to joint leadership and non-interference in Congress party affairs, they would criticise each other in matters of policy, clashing on the issues of Hyderabad’s integration and UN mediation in Kashmir. Nehru declined Patel’s counsel on sending assistance to Tibet after its 1950 invasion by the People’s Republic of China and ejecting the Portuguese from Goa by military force.[68]

    When Nehru pressured Dr. Rajendra Prasad to decline a nomination to become the first President of India in 1950 in favour of Rajagopalachari, he thus angered the party, which felt Nehru was attempting to impose his will. Nehru sought Patel’s help in winning the party over, but Patel declined and Prasad was duly elected. Nehru opposed the 1950 Congress presidential candidatePurushottam Das Tandon, a conservative Hindu leader, endorsing Jivatram Kripalani instead and threatening to resign if Tandon was elected. Patel rejected Nehru’s views and endorsed Tandon in Gujarat, where Kripalani received not one vote despite hailing from that state himself.[69] Patel believed Nehru had to understand that his will was not law with the Congress, but he personally discouraged Nehru from resigning after the latter felt that the party had no confidence in him.[70](Wiki)

    http://www.friendsoftibet.org/main/sardar.html

    Enhanced by Zemanta

  • Swamy On Sonia, Rahul 1600 Crore Graft ,Text Video

    Dr.Swamy has leveled serious allegations against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi on illegal donations , land deals, violating Company Laws and owning property worth Rs. 1600 crore.

    Subramanian Swamy_jpg.
    Subramanian Swamy.

    Rahul Gandhi has threatened to sue Dr.Swamy.

     

    Hope he does.

     

    Please read my blog KGB paid money to Rahul Gandhi.

     

    http://ramanisblog.in/2011/02/16/kgb-paid-money-to-sonia-rahul-rajiv-gandhi/

     

    Read my other blogs on Sonia Gandhi ,Rajiv Gandhi deals  filed under Corruption.

    1. Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi had floated a Section 25 private company called Young Indian, and acquired the public limited company, the Associated Journals Ltd., which is the owner of National Herald and Quami Awaz Newspapers, and all high value real estate property in Delhi and other places in Uttar Pradesh of the said company. The deal is a sham, bogus, and a violation of several laws. It is a fraud committed in order to grab the Herald Housein Delhi, that is located in a hub and which is valued at about Rs.1600 crores. 

       

    2. The first dubious fact of the AJ Company RoC details is that Jawahar Lal Nehru, Indira, Feroze Gandhi, GD Birlaand other like noted deceased person, are shown as current shareholders! In fact 80 per cent of the original shareholders are no more alive So too many of the defunct firms, including several companies having dubious addresses in Kolkata, are shown as shareholders of the Associated Journals Ltd. 

       

    3. The second dubious fact is the acquisition of the associated Journals Ltld. Judging by documents filed with RoC it is wholly illegal. On February 26, 2011, the Board of AJ Pvt. Ltd. passed a Resolution approving that All India Congress Committee9AICC) had loans to the Company unsecured and for zero interest rate to extinguish the liability of the company of more than Rs.90 crores. It is illegal for a political party to give loans to any company. The Resolution also resolved that in lieu of this deal with AICC, the Board decided to allot all AJ’s nine crore shares, of Rs.10 each to Young Indian, the private company of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, where both together more than three fourths of the total shares and fully control the said Young Indian Company. 

       

    4. The third dubious fact is that Young Indian filed statements with the RoC disclosing that the shareholders meeting was held in Sonia Gandhi’s Government allotted 10, Janpath. This is violation of the law since the 10, Janpath, New Delhi Government accommodation cannot be used for commercial purposes and business. 

       

    5. The fourth dubious fact is that the Rs.90 crore liability of The associated Journals was owned by Young Indian for a mere Rs.50 lakhs! 

       

    6. Thus the deal was to grab the Rs.1600 crore worth Herald House and other properties of the National Herald/Quami Awaz in Delhi and in different part of UP for a commitment to pay Rs.50 lakh to AICC for the Rs.90 crores advanced as unsecured zero interest loan. 

       

    7. Therefore, I urge immediate institution of a SFIO/CBI probe into this dubious stinking deal between Young Indian and The Associated Journals as also the illegality of the AICC in giving a loan to a private company in reckless cronyism since the AICC President is Ms. Sonia Gandhi and General Secretary Rahul Gandhi who are also owners of Young Indian, the beneficiary. More curiously, the associated Journals Ltd.’s Chairman Shri Motilal Vore is also the Treasurer of the AICC! 

       

    8. In his election affidavit on assets and liabilities, Mr. Rahul Gandhi had failed to inform that he owned 38 per cent share of a company he had formed named Young Indian with his mother, Ms.Sonia Gandhi, who also owned 38 per cent of the shares.

    Ack: OneIndia News.

    Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy today targeted Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi raising questions over acquisition of a company that published the now-defunct National Herald newspaper to which Congress gave a loan of over Rs 90 crore – Swamy made a fleeting mention of Rs 1,600 cr figure too in his diatribe.

    Addressing a press conference here, he said Sonia and Rahul had floated a Section 25 company called ‘Young Indian’ each with a share holding of 38 per cent, which acquired Associated Journals, founded by late Jawaharlal Nehru, that published the National Herald and Quami Awaz.

    Swamy said Associated Journals obtained an unsecured loan of over Rs 90 crore from AICC which he claimed was illegal under Income Tax Act because a political party cannot give loans for commercial purposes.

    http://www.indianexpress.com/news/rs-1600-cr-graft-subramanian-swamy-says-sonia-gandhi-kneedeep-in-graft-sam-pitroda-rahul-to-sue/1025310/

     

     

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta