Tag: Iraq

  • Terrorist Organisations Groups A List

    Under Freedom Of Information Act, US following Information has been declassified.

    Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) are foreign organizations that are designated by the Secretary of State in accordance with section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended. FTO designations play a critical role in our fight against terrorism and are an effective means of curtailing support for terrorist activities and pressuring groups to get out of the terrorism business.

    Terrorist Organisations.
    Terrorist Organisations.

    Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations

    Date Designated

    Name

    10/8/1997

    Abu Nidal Organization (ANO)

    10/8/1997

    Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG)

    10/8/1997

    Aum Shinrikyo (AUM)

    10/8/1997

    Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA)

    10/8/1997

    Gama’a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group) (IG)

    10/8/1997

    HAMAS

    10/8/1997

    Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM)

    10/8/1997

    Hizballah

    10/8/1997

    Kahane Chai (Kach)

    10/8/1997

    Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) (Kongra-Gel)

    10/8/1997

    Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)

    10/8/1997

    National Liberation Army (ELN)

    10/8/1997

    Palestine Liberation Front (PLF)

    10/8/1997

    Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ)

    10/8/1997

    Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLF)

    10/8/1997

    PFLP-General Command (PFLP-GC)

    10/8/1997

    Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)

    10/8/1997

    Revolutionary Organization 17 November (17N)

    10/8/1997

    Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party/Front (DHKP/C)

    10/8/1997

    Shining Path (SL)

    10/8/1999

    al-Qa’ida (AQ)

    9/25/2000

    Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)

    5/16/2001

    Real Irish Republican Army (RIRA)

    9/10/2001

    United Self Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)

    12/26/2001

    Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM)

    12/26/2001

    Lashkar-e Tayyiba (LeT)

    3/27/2002

    Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade (AAMB)

    3/27/2002

    Asbat al-Ansar (AAA)

    3/27/2002

    al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)

    8/9/2002

    Communist Party of the Philippines/New People’s Army (CPP/NPA)

    10/23/2002

    Jemaah Islamiya (JI)

    1/30/2003

    Lashkar i Jhangvi (LJ)

    3/22/2004

    Ansar al-Islam (AAI)

    7/13/2004

    Continuity Irish Republican Army (CIRA)

    12/17/2004

    Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)

    12/17/2004

    al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI)

    6/17/2005

    Islamic Jihad Union (IJU)

    10/11/2005

    Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group (GICM)

    3/5/2008

    Harakat ul-Jihad-i-Islami/Bangladesh (HUJI-B)

    3/18/2008

    al-Shabaab

    5/18/2009

    Revolutionary Struggle (RS)

    7/2/2009

    Kata’ib Hizballah (KH)

    1/19/2010

    al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)

    8/6/2010

    Harakat ul-Jihad-i-Islami (HUJI)

    9/1/2010

    Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP)

    11/4/2010

    Jundallah

    5/23/2011

    Army of Islam (AOI)

    9/19/2011

    Indian Mujahedeen (IM)

    3/13/2012

    Jemaah Anshorut Tauhid (JAT)

    5/30/2012

    Abdallah Azzam Brigades (AAB)

    9/19/2012

    Haqqani Network (HQN)

    Delisted Foreign Terrorist Organizations

    Date Removed

    Name

    Date Orginally Designated

    10/8/1999

    Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine -Hawatmeh Faction

    10/8/1997

    10/8/1999

    Khmer Rouge

    10/8/1997

    10/8/1999

    Manuel Modriguez Patriotic Front Dissidents

    10/8/1997

    10/8/2001

    Japanese Red Army

    10/8/1997

    10/8/2001

    Tupac Amaru Revolution Movement

    10/8/1997

    5/18/2009

    Revolutionary Nuclei

    10/8/1997

    10/15/2010

    Armed Islamic Group (GIA)

    10/8/1997

    9/28/2012

    Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK)

    10/8/1997

    Identification
    The Bureau of Counterterrorism in the State Department (S/CT) continually monitors the activities of terrorist groups active around the world to identify potential targets for designation. When reviewing potential targets, S/CT looks not only at the actual terrorist attacks that a group has carried out, but also at whether the group has engaged in planning and preparations for possible future acts of terrorism or retains the capability and intent to carry out such acts.

    Designation
    Once a target is identified, S/CT prepares a detailed “administrative record,” which is a compilation of information, typically including both classified and open sources information, demonstrating that the statutory criteria for designation have been satisfied. If the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, decides to make the designation, Congress is notified of the Secretary’s intent to designate the organization and given seven days to review the designation, as the INA requires. Upon the expiration of the seven-day waiting period and in the absence of Congressional action to block the designation, notice of the designation is published in the Federal Register, at which point the designation takes effect. By law an organization designated as an FTO may seek judicial review of the designation in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit not later than 30 days after the designation is published in the Federal Register.

    Until recently the INA provided that FTOs must be redesignated every 2 years or the designation would lapse. Under the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA), however, the redesignation requirement was replaced by certain review and revocation procedures. IRTPA provides that an FTO may file a petition for revocation 2 years after its designation date (or in the case of redesignated FTOs, its most recent redesignation date) or 2 years after the determination date on its most recent petition for revocation. In order to provide a basis for revocation, the petitioning FTO must provide evidence that the circumstances forming the basis for the designation are sufficiently different as to warrant revocation. If no such review has been conducted during a 5 year period with respect to a designation, then the Secretary of State is required to review the designation to determine whether revocation would be appropriate. In addition, the Secretary of State may at any time revoke a designation upon a finding that the circumstances forming the basis for the designation have changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation, or that the national security of the United States warrants a revocation. The same procedural requirements apply to revocations made by the Secretary of State as apply to designations. A designation may be revoked by an Act of Congress, or set aside by a Court order.

    Legal Criteria for Designation under Section 219 of the INA as amended

    1. It must be a foreign organization.
    2. The organization must engage in terrorist activity, as defined in section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)),* or terrorism, as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. § 2656f(d)(2)),** or retain the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism.
    3. The organization’s terrorist activity or terrorism must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security (national defense, foreign relations, or the economic interests) of the United States.

    Legal Ramifications of Designation

    1. It is unlawful for a person in the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to knowingly provide “material support or resources” to a designated FTO. (The term “material support or resources” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2339A(b)(1) as ” any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities, financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safehouses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel (1 or more individuals who maybe or include oneself), and transportation, except medicine or religious materials.” 18 U.S.C. § 2339A(b)(2) provides that for these purposes “the term ‘training’ means instruction or teaching designed to impart a specific skill, as opposed to general knowledge.” 18 U.S.C. § 2339A(b)(3) further provides that for these purposes the term ‘expert advice or assistance’ means advice or assistance derived from scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge.’’
    2. Representatives and members of a designated FTO, if they are aliens, are inadmissible to and, in certain circumstances, removable from the United States (see 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182 (a)(3)(B)(i)(IV)-(V), 1227 (a)(1)(A)).
    3. Any U.S. financial institution that becomes aware that it has possession of or control over funds in which a designated FTO or its agent has an interest must retain possession of or control over the funds and report the funds to the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

    Other Effects of Designation

    1. Supports our efforts to curb terrorism financing and to encourage other nations to do the same.
    2. Stigmatizes and isolates designated terrorist organizations internationally.
    3. Deters donations or contributions to and economic transactions with named organizations.
    4. Heightens public awareness and knowledge of terrorist organizations.
    5. Signals to other governments our concern about named organizations.

    Revocations of Foreign Terrorist Organizations

    The Immigration and Nationality Act sets out three possible basis for revoking a Foreign Terrorist Organization designation:

    1. The Secretary of State must revoke a designation if the Secretary finds that the circumstances that were the basis of the designation have changed in such a manner as to warrant a revocation;
    2. The Secretary of State must revoke a designation if the Secretary finds that the national security of the United States warrants a revocation;
    3. The Secretary of State may revoke a designation at any time.

    Any revocation shall take effect on the date specified in the revocation or upon publication in the Federal Register if no effective date is specified. The revocation of a designation shall not affect any action or proceeding based on conduct committed prior to the effective date of such revocation.

    Source:

    http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • What is a Terrorist ,Dad, Thought Provoking .

    iraq
    iraq (Photo credit: The U.S. Army)

    I received this forward from  Zehera Kassam,Awareness.

    I checked the source and am reproducing the article by David Campbell.

    Are we Right?

    Story:

    Surely even a child can understand the difference between good and evil.

    Dad … what’s a terrorist?

    Well, according to the Oxford dictionary a terrorist is “a person who uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims”. Which means that terrorists are very bad men and women who frighten ordinary people like us, and sometimes even kill them.

    Why do they kill them?

    Because they hate them or their country. It’s hard to explain … it’s just the way things are. For many different reasons a lot of people in our world are full of hate.

    Like the ones in Iraq who are capturing people and saying that they’ll kill them if all the soldiers don’t leave?

    Exactly! That’s an evil thing called “blackmail”. Those innocent people are hostages, and the terrorists are saying that if governments don’t do what they want the hostages will be killed.

    So was it blackmail when we said we’d attack Iraq and kill innocent people unless they told us where all their weapons were?

    AdvertisementAdvertisement

    No! Well … yes, I suppose. In a way. But that was an “ultimatum” … call it “good blackmail.

    Good blackmail? What’s that?

    That’s when it’s done for good reasons. Those weapons were very dangerous and could have hurt a lot of people all over the world. It was very important to find them and destroy them.

    But Dad … there weren’t any weapons.

    True. We know that now. But we didn’t at the time. We thought there were.

    So was killing all those innocent people in Iraq a mistake?

    No. It was a tragedy, but we also saved a lot of lives. You see, we had to stop a very cruel man called Saddam Hussein from killing a great many ordinary Iraqi people. Saddam Hussein stayed in power by giving orders that meant thousands of people died or were horribly injured. Mothers and fathers. Even children.

    Like that boy I saw on TV? The one who had his arms blown off by a bomb?

    Yes … just like him.

    But we did that. Does that mean our leaders are terrorists?

    Good heavens, no! Whatever gave you that idea? That was just an accident. Unfortunately, innocent people get hurt in a war. You can’t expect anything else when you drop bombs on cities. Nobody wants it to happen … it’s just the way things are.

    So in a war only soldiers are supposed to get killed?

    Well, soldiers are trained to fight for their country. It’s their job, and they’re very brave. They know that war is dangerous and that they might be killed. As soon as they put on a uniform they become a target.

    What uniforms do terrorists wear?

    That’s just the problem … they don’t! We can’t tell them apart from the civilians. We don’t know who we’re fighting. And that’s why so many innocent people are getting killed … the terrorists don’t follow the rules of war.

    War has rules?

    Oh, yes. Soldiers must wear uniforms. And you can’t just suddenly attack someone unless they do something to you first. Then you can defend yourself.

    So that’s why we attacked Iraq? Because Iraq attacked us first and we were just defending ourselves?

    Not exactly. Iraq didn’t attack us … but it might have. We decided to get in first. Just in case Iraq used those weapons we were talking about.

    The ones they didn’t have? So we broke the rules of war?

    Technically speaking, yes. But …

    So if we broke the rules first, why isn’t it OK for those people in Iraq who aren’t wearing uniforms to break the rules?

    Well, that’s different. We were doing the right thing when we broke the rules.

    But Dad … how do we know we were doing the right thing?

    Our leaders … Bush and Blair and Howard … they told us it was the right thing. And if they don’t know, who does? They say that something had to be done to make Iraq a better place.

    Is it a better place?

    I suppose so, but I don’t know for sure. Innocent people are still being killed and these kidnappings are terrible things. I feel very sorry for the families of those poor hostages, but we simply can’t give in to terrorists. We must stand firm.

    Would you say that if I was captured by terrorists?

    Uh … yes … no … I mean, it’s very difficult …

    So you’d let me be killed? Don’t you love me?

    Of course! I love you very much. It’s just that it’s a very complicated issue and I don’t know what I’d do …

    Well, if somebody attacked us and bombed our house and killed you and Mum and Jamie I know what I’d do.

    What?

    I’d find out who did it and kill them. Any way I could. I’d hate them for ever and ever. And then I’d get in a plane and bomb their cities.

    But … but … you’d kill a lot of innocent people.

    I know. But it’s war, Dad. And that’s just the way things are. Remember?

    http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/22/1082616260498.html

     

  • Contractor Over charges US For Torturing Iraqi Citizens!

    KBR: Kickbacks, Bribes, Ripoffs & War Racketee...
    KBR: Kickbacks, Bribes, Ripoffs & War Racketeering (g1a2d0043c1) (Photo credit: watchingfrogsboil)

    That is US!

    Defender of Democracy,Free world,Free Speech.

    Schizophrenic.

    WASHINGTON—Pentagon officials expressed outrage when an independent audit revealed Tuesday that defense contractor KBR Inc. had charged them up to five times more than market price for the service of torturing Iraqi citizens. “At a time when our government is facing budget cuts across the board, it is reprehensible that someone would charge $150,000 to grab an innocent civilian off the street, fly him to a prison in an undisclosed location, and deprive him of sleep while forcing him to maintain an excruciatingly painful stress position for 40 hours,” said Douglas B. Wilson, assistant secretary of defense for public affairs, adding that the service should have cost “$40,000, tops.” “Sure, they got this particular individual to talk, but is that any reason to tack on $250 dollars per nipple-clamp used to electrocute him?” The Defense Department later confirmed it looked forward to continuing its work with KBR on projects throughout the region.

    http://www.theonion.com/articles/report-military-contractor-overcharged-pentagon-fo,26613/

  • US Fells Qadhafi, another step in Controlling world Oil?

    Now Qadhafi is dead ,the US has another source to feed its voracious appetite for OIL.

    Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are the lackeys of the US.

    US has successfully contributed to the dismantling of the USSR which has opened up the central Asian Countries Reserve for the US.

    On the deliberate ploy of WMD, Iraq has been dealt with.

    Hosni Mubarak is gone. Now Qadhafi.

    Yemen is to follow.

    All these countries have jumped from dictatorships to US hegemony.

    In all these countries,the alternate to the fallen dictators is Anarchy.

    US has been very clever in  destabilizing Dictators with a token support to dissidents(it also ensures that the opponents to the regime are not united) ,which would ensure that there is no viable alternative ,thus keeping the Country unstable.

    This would facilitate US interests in Oil and the likes of Halliburton and the Oil Giants will have a field day.

    The world is paying for the Oil Greed of the US.

    See the related articles, you will know what  US has done and how CIA has played both sides at the same time.

    The CIA and other Western intelligence agencies worked closely with the ousted regime of Muammar Qaddafi, sharing tips and cooperating in handing over terror suspects for interrogation to a regime known to use torture, according to a trove of security documents discovered after the fall of Tripoli.

    The revelations provide new details on the West’s efforts to turn Libya’s mercurial leader from foe to ally and provide an embarrassing example of the U.S. administration’s collaboration with authoritarian regimes in the war on terror.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/03/cia-worked-closely-with-libyan-intelligence-tripoli-files-show/#ixzz1c04IRrQD

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/03/cia-worked-closely-with-libyan-intelligence-tripoli-files-show/

    Related:

    WASHINGTON, March 22 (UPI) — One of the primary reasons for the U.S. military intervention in Libya is because of the dependence on foreign oil, a Democratic lawmaker charged.

    A U.S. fighter jet crashed in Libya while on a mission that was part of an international effort to put pressure on Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi. The U.N. Security Council last week passed a resolution that allowed for military intervention in Libya to protect the civilian population.

    U.S. Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., the former chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, told MSNBC, however, that a primary reason for intervention was oil.

    “We’re in Libya because of oil,” he said. “And I think both Japan and the nuclear technology and Libya and this dependence that we have upon imported oil have both once again highlighted the need for the United States to have a renewable energy agenda going forward.”

     http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Energy-Resources/2011/03/22/Libyan-war-about-oil-US-lawmaker-says/UPI-48361300801026/#ixzz1c03URInD

    Dictators in Arab countries like Libya and Egypt may have deserved to be ousted by their people. But the role of the West in hastening the demise of the regimes in such countries, especially in the case of Libya its ruler, has been prompted by its greed to control natural wealth

    After seven-odd assassination attempts over the last four decades, it was on October 20, 2011, that one of the most successful Libyan leaders, Muammar Gaddafi kissed the most brutal and disgraceful death. Libyan fighters snapped him out of his ‘hole’ and shot him to death. His body, half naked, completely wounded, with shambled hairs and bloodied, was then delivered as prized possession to Misrata (a city near Sirte) where it was put on public display as a token of victory for the rebels. And with it came an end of the era, which Gaddafi had built over 40 years. And with his end, the US again proved its double standards to the world.

    http://www.dailypioneer.com/pioneer-news/oped/15998-lust-for-oil-drives-us-ambition.html