Tag: God

  • Jesus Did not rise from the Dead,The Bible is not Eternal.

    One should  differentiate  Parables from Facts.

    True, there might have been  Jesus.(even the name  means ‘son of God, not Jesus’s original name).

    One has to understand the social and political conditions at the time of Jesus.

    People were revolting against Roman Empire and the society had become corrupt  and was oppressive.

    There was a crisis of values.

    Jesus was a social thinker .

    He was also a rebel against the Romans.

    He  preached human values.

    Constantine, to buttress his hold on the Empire, embraced Christianity , called for a meeting of  people to organize the information on Jesus( nearly three hundred years  after Jesus’s death),had an Anthology compiled and called it The Bible; laid down Rules for the election of Popes through a Conclave of Cardinals.

    He wanted to ensure his hold on the population.

    Hence he organized the Office of the Pope for he knew that people can be controlled under faith and made  the Papacy to do his bidding.

    However, The Bible, whatever be the intentions, is one of the greatest pieces on Ethics .

    It is not important who said, but what is said.

    To research into Christianity is welcome and at the same time it should be ensured that the moral values of The Bible(excepting Religious Conversion) are not demeaned.

    Please read my blogs filed under Christianity.

    Crossan says Jesus was an exploited “peasant with an attitude” who didn’t perform many miracles, physically rise from the dead or die as punishment for humanity’s sins.

    Jesus was extraordinary because of how he lived, not died, says Crossan, one of the world’s top scholars on the “historical Jesus,” a field in which academics use historical evidence to reconstruct Jesus in his first-century setting.

    “I cannot imagine a more miraculous life than nonviolent resistance to violence,” Crossan says. “I cannot imagine a bigger miracle than a man standing in front of a tank in Tiananmen Square.”

    …..Crossan believes the public should be exposed to even the most divisive debates that scholars have had about Jesus and the Bible. He co-founded the Jesus Seminar, a controversial group of scholars who hold public forums that cast doubt on the authenticity of many sayings and deeds attributed to Jesus.

    John Dominic Crossan

    …The 77-year-old Crossan has built on the seminar’s mission by writing a series of best-selling books on Jesus and the Apostle Paul. With his silver Prince Valiant haircut and his pronounced Irish accent, he’s also appeared on documentaries such as PBS’s “From Jesus to Christ: The First Christians” and A&E’s “Mysteries of the Bible.”

    Crucifixion meant that imperial power had won,” Crossan says. “Resurrection meant that divine justice had won. God is on the side of the crucified one. Rome‘s’ values are a dead issue to me.”

    How about the stories of Jesus’ miracles, like raising the dead or stilling the storm?

    John Dominic Crossan wanted to be a missionary priest as an Irish schoolboy.

    Most were parables, too, Crossan says. But there were some exceptions.

    “I’m completely convinced that Jesus was a major healer,” he says. “I don’t think anybody would talk about Jesus if all he did was talk.”

    People like to talk about Scripture, but Christians should also know history to understand Jesus, Crossan says.

    In Jesus’ time, Rome was forcing many Jewish families into destitution, with high taxes and land seizures. Some Jews advocated violent rebellion, but others opted for non-violent resistance.

    Jesus called for nonviolent resistance to Rome and just distribution of land and food. He was crucified because he threatened Roman stability — not as a sacrifice to God for humanity’s sins, Crossan says.

    If you believe in a God that uses violence to “save” humanity, you’ll start believing that violence is permissible in certain circumstances, such as suicide bombing or invading other countries to spread democracy, Crossan says.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2011/LIVING/02/27/Jesus.scholar/index.html

  • Should we follow religious practices?

    Content of Faith is more important than form.
    Question of practicing and non practicing is more of analysis of of our Faith than actual Faith we have.
    Faith is tested belief and as such it does not need reassurance of the same.
    Religion as such is meant to enhance the spiritual level of the individual.
    When prescribed practices are set in a regular form, human nature rebels and one develops a guilty feeling when they do not conform to what has been prescribed.This is not necessary.
    As you have remarked if you have a comfortable feeling with yourself, you are on course.Unalloyed reactions for what we have done or nor done indicates whether we are right or not.Only when we tinker with rationalization we have problems.
    All these conflicts arise when you have a standard ,prescribed format of procedures for realizing God.
    But if these barriers are removed, it is easy to live the life than practice what we believe in.
    Hinduism does not have standard text books to follow.
    You can either follow or not.
    You deny existence of God, you may not practice , yet you are a Hindu.
    In fact the name Hindu denotes geographical identity
    You are given the freedom to pursue your course of action.

    Story:

    Some religions do some very smart things and state things in logical ways.  For example I like a phrase the Catholics use, they are either practicing or non-practicing.  As a young girl, my friend’s mom told me she was a “non-practicing Catholic”.  I had no idea what that meant.  I knew Maria in the Sound of Music was a Catholic, so non-practicing Catholic must be someone who didn’t act like Maria.  Someone who wasn’t good and probably didn’t go to church or spin on a mountain singing about the hills being alive to a big 100+ musician orchestra.

    http://sherrymeneley.com/2010/10/15/practicing%C2%A0and%C2%A0non-practicing/#comment-2459

    AfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChineseCroatianCzechDanishDetect languageDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian Creole ALPHAHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddishAfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChineseCroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian Creole ALPHAHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddish

    Detect language » Hungarian
  • Prostitutes of God?-Devadasis.




    The Devadasi system is not meant for prostitution.
    In Hinduism God is easily accessible and one can worship Him/Her in any form or have relation ship with him in any capacity,Supreme Being,Teacher,friend ,Lover,Guide ,mother,father or in any way the human mind can conceive, depending individual’s comfort level for communion with the Supreme Being.
    The Devadasi system was evolved taking into consideration this fact and women who wish to serve God by dedicating themselves to the service God, shunning all worldly desires, including marriage and the society took care of their needs.
    Unfortunately this system got corrupted by people who do not know/understand the background of the system and it has become an out let for prostitution.
    The Devadasis are  dedicated to any God , not to Goddesses, (as mentioned  in the article)
    It is easy for people to misunderstand Hinduism if they do not study deeply  Hinduism .This applies in equal measure to people who call themselves Hindus as well as those who do are not familiar with Hinduism.
    Let me record my appreciation of the author for her objective reporting.
    For details of Hinduism and Hindu customs please follow the link.

    The Devadasi system is not meant for prostitution.In Hinduism God is easily accessible and one can worship Him/Her in any form or have relation ship with him in any capacity,Supreme Being,Teacher,friend ,Lover,Guide ,mother,father or in any way the human mind can conceive, depending individual’s comfort level for communion with the Supreme Being.The Devadasi system was evolved taking into consideration this fact and women who wish to serve God by dedicating themselves to the service God, shunning all worldly desires, including marriage and the society took care of their needs.Unfortunately this system got corrupted by people who do not know/understand the background of the system and it has become an out let for prostitution.The Devadasis are  dedicated to any God , not to Goddesses, (as mentioned  in the article)It is easy for people to misunderstand Hinduism if they do not study deeply  Hinduism .This applies in equal measure to people who call themselves Hindus as well as those who do are not familiar with Hinduism.Let me record my appreciation of the author for her objective reporting.For details of Hinduism and Hindu customs please follow the link.

    http://books.google.co.in/books?id=4zMY2qURR-8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=custom+and+manners+of+Hindus&hl=en&ei=S-2WTPLlBI6ycd3diKQF&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=custom%20and%20manners%20of%20Hindus&f=false

    Also read my Blogs under Hinduism/Indian Philosophy.

    Story.

    On my very first day there I stumbled into a meeting of Devadasi prostitutes. I was told that they were temple prostitutes, but didn’t have any understanding of what that meant. It sounded absolutely barmy!

    I began to research it and in February 2008 was invited to northern Karnatakar, which is the centre of the tradition in India. I interviewed a few of the women and wrote an article about it for Vice magazine. But visiting them stayed with me, and I wanted to find out more.

    When you approach a Devadasi girl for interview the response varies hugely. There’s a huge spectrum of women. A really wealthy brothel madam in Mumbai would be quite proud to talk about what she does. But in very poor rural communities, like in Karnatakar, they’re much more difficult to talk to. These young women are ostracised and exploited and they’re ashamed of what they do. They wish they could get married, but they can’t and are in this dreadful prison.

    The only thing that has changed since the Devadasi practise was made illegal in 1988 is that the ceremonies have been driven underground. It’s still very common in some parts of India. A Westerner wouldn’t know to look at the girls that they are Devadasi, but Indians know on sight who they are and what they do. Really it comes down to caste.

    Caste is a massively complicated issue still in India. My understanding of it is that originally when the Devadasi tradition first came about, the women dedicated were from high caste families, even royalty. They held a very special place in the Indian culture: were incredible dancers, poets, artisans. They had specific religious roles to play within the temple performing various sacred religious rites. They were almost like nuns and it had nothing to do with sex. It was more like being a priestess.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/prostitutes-of-god-2082290.html

    AfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChineseCroatianCzechDanishDetect languageDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian Creole ALPHAHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddishAfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChineseCroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian Creole ALPHAHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddish

    Detect language » Hungarian
  • Something out of Nothing?God is not required?

    Stephen hawking , in his forthcoming book the Grand Design makes interesting observations.While he , in his earlier book,Brief history of Time seemed to take  a philosophical position, which is unwarranted, as scientists normally  concern themselves to their discipline instead of trying to explain things from their discipline,in his latest book he has taken the position that God is not necessary for the creation of Universe.

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2010-09-03-hawking02_ST_N.htm?csp=34news&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+usatoday-NewsTopStories+%28News+-+Top+Stories%29

    The absurdity of this argument lies in the fact that he has taken or rather seems to take the concept of God according to Christianity.

    Creation , according to  The Bible, is to have begun at a fixed point of Time.

    This is not logically tenable.

    Can he define ‘Some thing’ and ‘Nothing’?

    Every effect has a cause, every Effect has more than one Cause ;a Cause may be a result of another Cause and an Effect may be a  Cause for another Effect.

    In the first case, we credit an Event/Effect with a specific Cause relatively for this case for this cause  may be a result of another cause.

    In the second case the reverse is true.Causes are classified into Immediate Cause, Concomitant Cause.Material Cause,Efficient Cause etc.No single entity is responsible for any Effect .Similar is the case with Effects.

    law of causality in nothing but a tool of mind to find a pattern for our convenience of understanding and classification.Things happenirrrespective of the fact whether we recognise them , classify them or not.

    Things/Events happen-Period.

    Unified Theory is as good as Chaos Theory.Both are equally true , depending on our perception.

    As Immanuel Kant has observed Space and Time are the two spectacles through which we perceive.Take away the these twin concepts(in fact they are one), you can perceive or conceptualize nothing.

    Therefore the causality is a myth.

    Again Law of causality depends on two factors,Law of uniformity of nature and Law of Causation.

    We know, or rather we think we know that the the law of of Uniformity of Nature will be there tomorrow as in Sun appearing to morrow.At best we may say it has happened till date and MAY be so to morrow.That is all.

    We have already seen that law of Causality is a myth and only a convenient tool as science is .

    Therefore the argument for First cause is not tenable(God).

    Then how do we explain the Universe and Mind?

    As said earlier things happen, happened ,and shall happen.

    We are in the flow ,as Henri Bergson called it,elan vital-Stream of Consciousness.

    We can not pin point a point of Time when this originated

    Please refer my Blog on Time-a non linear theory for details.

    Hence hawking is right in so far as the concept of God as Christianity sees it.

    Not philosophically correct.

    Spinoza explains the Reality( God) thus.

    “Substance is that which exists independently of any thing else and which does not need the concept  of any thing in order to be conceived”

    Hinduism states that reality is without Cause,it is the First cause.It has no attribute.It is immanent.beyond human intellect.It is indescribable,It can not be known.it can only be experienced.It can not be defined but can be described by negating-not this, not this.

    Hinduism states that things were, are and shall be.(The Bhagavad Gita).

    Universe evolved both matter and Mind by the Sparsa( loosely trnslated means touching,grazing) of inanimate matter Prakriti or nature( not Nature) or qualities and dynamic or Flowing Energy Purusha.

    They graze due to lila or playfully(loose translation) with out any specific purpose or purposeless may be a purpose.

    Out these are formed the seeming first cause, mahat and 24 principles are evolved for the Creation.It does not Time reference.

    “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing,” the excerpt says. “Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to … set the Universe going.”-Hawking in his latest Book.

    Exactly.This what Hinduism is about.

    The dichotomy between western and oriental thought is due to the basic difference in the basic concept of Knowledge.

    In the west knowledge is to be gained.A positive concept.-philosophically speaking.

    In the east it is the removal of ignorance.

    West follows the dictum’Ex Nihilo nihil Fit'( out of nothing comes).

    East”This is full,That is Full; having taken Full out of Full, Full remains Full”

    Hawking is right on the denial of God as conceptualized by Christianity ;wrong from the indian and philosophical standpoint.