Ramanisblog

Tag: Koran

  • Shiva Linga In Kaaba Opens At Pradosha Video Pakistani Web Site

    I have written a few articles on  Shiva Linga in Mecca OM is 786,

    Muslims Worship Shiv Lingam At Mecca Masjid Al Haraam Says Islamic Site,

    Prophets Uncle wrote Siva Sthuthi, A Prayer On Lord Shiva,

    Sapthapathi of the Marriage ceremony of the Hindus and Navagrahas in Arabia,

    Aravasthan is Arabia and some more articles.

    shivlingamuzzien
    Inside Kaaba(left) and Shiva Abhishekam(Right)

    The Prophet, after signing a treaty with tribes the Medina Treaty, stormed Mecca and destroyed 360 Idols housed there.

    There is Kaaba Stone which is believed to have been of Abrahamic times.

    People are not permitted to take videos or  photographs of the inside of the room.

    The room seems to contain an Idol, the worship of which is prohibited in Islam.

    Now let us see what a a surreptitiously taken video and an article  in a web site run by Pakistani Defense Think Tank say.

    Video is below.

    One can see an Idol resembling Shiv Linga there.

    And watch the Video, and look at the clock for the time of opening the Room.

    5.20 to 5.45!

    Shivas Pradosha Time!

     

     

     

     

    The article from Pakistan Defense Thin Tank Site.

    ‘Arabia is an abbreviation. The original word even today
    is Arbasthan. It originates in Arvasthan. As observed earlier
    Sanskrit “V” changes into “B”. Arva in Sanskrit means a horse.
    Arvasthan signifies a land of horses, and as we all know Arabia
    is famous for its horses.

    slide7

    In the 6th and 7th centuries A.D. a wave of effecting a
    complete break with the past spread over West Asia. All links
    with the past were broken, images smashed, scriptures des-
    troyed, education discontinued and the entire West Asian
    region took a plunge in abyssmal ignorance which lasted for
    centuries thereafter and perhaps persists to a certain extent
    even today because if in the whole world modern scientific and
    educational developments find stubborn and entrenched resis-
    tance anywhere it is in the West Asian countries. It is said
    that the late Saudi Arabia ruler could not permit a radio
    broadcasting station opened in his own capital because of
    oposition from his Maulavis. He then resorted to a stratagem.
    Once while he had his council of Maulavis in attendance he had
    a radio set switched on to a program of Koranic recitation
    broadcast from a small transmitting station set up earlier
    without much ado. The Maulavis were delighted, so goes the
    report, to hear the word of Allah coming to them as if from
    nowhere. The king told them that what objections could they
    have to a mechanism which broadcast the word of Allah. The
    Maulavis agreed and the small radio broadcasting project was
    at last ratified.

    According to Encyclopaedia Britannica and Encyclø-
    paedia Islamia the Arabs are ignorant of their own history of
    the pre-Muslim era. By a strange euphemism they call it a
    period of ignorance and darkness. Probably no other country
    in the world has deliberately written off a 2,500 year period of
    their own history by systematically stamping out and snapping
    all links with the past. They have wiped the memories of pre-
    Muslim era off their minds. So while they chose to remain
    ignorant of their past ironically enough it is they who dub the
    pre-Muslim era as a period of ignorance.

    Fortunately we can still trace the history of that pre-
    Islamic Arabia. It is a well known adage that there is no such
    thing as foolproof destruction of all evidence. The pre-Islamic
    history of Arabia is the story of Indian Kshatriyas over that
    land, with the people following the Vedic way of life.

    In our attempt to reconstruct the story of pre-Islamic
    Arabia we begin with the name of the country itself. As
    explained earlier the name is fully Sanskrit. Its central
    pilgrim centre, Mecca is also a Sanskrit name. Makha in
    Sanskrit signifies a sacrificial fire. Since Vedic fire worship
    was prevalent all over West Asia in pre-Islamic days Makha
    signifies the place which had an important shrine of fire
    worship.

    Coinciding with the annual pilgrimage of huge bazaar
    used to spring up in Makha i.e. Mecca since times immemorial.
    The annual pilgrimage of Muslims to Mecca is not at all an
    innovation but a continuation of the ancient pilgrimage. This
    fact is mentioned in encyclopedias.

    VIKRAMADITYA

    Evidence is now available that the whole of Arabia was
    part of the great Indian King Vikramaditya’s vast empire. The
    extent of Vikramaditya’s empire is one of the main reasons for
    his world wide fame. Incidentally this also explains many
    intriguing features about Arabia. It could be that
    Vikramaditya himself had this peninsula named Arvasthan if
    he was the first Indian monarch to capture it and bring it
    under his sway

    Citation and references source.

    http://defence.pk/threads/exclusive-was-pre-islamic-arabia-hindu-nation-un-told-arabian-tales.265608/

  • Muslims Worship Shiv Lingam At Mecca Masjid Al Haraam Says Islamic Site

    I have written articles on the Fact that,

    Kaaba was a  Shiva Temple,

    786 is Flipped OM,

    Vikramadhitya’s inscription is found in Kaaba,

    Prophet Mohammed’s Uncle wrote a Siva Stuthi,

    Sapthapathi in Islam,

    Ancient Tamils literary practices were followed in Arabia,

    Kaaba is from The Tamil deity, Kabaaleswarar,Shiva,

    and more posts on this subject.

    Usually vociferous  Islam Apologists and our own secularists are  generally mum on these issues.

    However there are some comments which need more evidence.

    Most of the evidence I have provided are from Islamic sources.

    Now there is one more evidence from a Muslim source, that too from a strict Islamic one at that.

    The site is named as ‘

    Ahlal Quran Wal Tawheed

     

    meaning or is it a Byline? ‘

    “Indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is the straight path’

    The site denounces the act of worshiping the Idol of Shiva by the Muslims in Kaaba as prohibited in Islam and exhorts Muslims to desist from this.

    shringar of shiv ling
    Shiva Linga at  Masjid Al Haraam
    images1
    Kaaba where Muslims worship.
    rudraksha-shiv-ling
    Rudraksha Shiva Linga

    Quote from the site.

    ‘The Polytheist Hindu’s of India worship something called Shiva Lingham, which literally translates to Shiva’s Penis. Here are some images of this Penis:

    Polytheist Muslims also worship their own type of Penis five times a day. Those who live in the ancient city of Mecca visit the old temple grounds to face and worship this Penis. To polytheist Muslims temple ground is known has Masjid Al Haraam but historically it was where Arab polytheists gathered anully to worship their gods. Those who live far from the Lingham worship it by facing the direction of Lingham. The Arabian shape of Lingham is a cube building popularly known as Kabah. Here is a image of the greatest enemy of Tawheed and most worshiped idol on earth:

     

    Polytheist Muslims worship this greatest enemy of Tawheed and not Allah the Great even though Allah the Great has informed mankind to not to worship anyone other then Him:

    “O mankind! Worship your Lord (Allah), Who created you and those who were before you so that you may become Al-Muttaqun.” (2:21)

    “Indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is the straight path.” (3:51)

    These polytheist Muslims do not worship Allah the Great purely. Instead they pollute their worship of Allah the Great with idol worship. They in reality hate purifying their worship for Allah and about such people Allah the Great as said:

    “And your Lord says, “Call upon Me; I will respond to you.” Indeed, those who disdain My worship will enter hell [rendered] contemptible.“ (40:60)

    The polytheist Muslims commit major Shirk by worshiping idols. Allah the Great states in a verse of Koran that  He does not forgive Shirk:

    “Indeed, Allah does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whom He wills. And he who associates others with Allah has certainly fabricated a tremendous sin.” (4:48)

    “Indeed, Allah does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whom He wills. And he who associates others with Allah has certainly gone far astray.” (4:116)

    Those who associate partners with Allah the Great the paradise has forbidden for them and they will enter hellfire:

    “They have certainly disbelieved who say, ” Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary” while the Messiah has said, “O Children of Israel, worship Allah , my Lord and your Lord.” Indeed, he who associates others with Allah – Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers.” (5:72)

    If you are a Unitarian Muslim then know that a Muwahid does not worship anyone other then Allah. Please spread the message of Quran and Tawheed. Prevent from polytheisitic Muslims from distorting the true teaching of Quran and Tawheed. Tell your relatives and friends about the Tawheed and about the greatest enemy of Tawheed – the Kabah Penis Idol.

    Quote, Images  and Reference.

    https://ahlaltawheed.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/5/

     

    Denial with authentic sources welcome.

  • Prophet Mohammad Did Not Exist ? Quran

    Those who , as a right, question, the Vedas,, the existence of Lord Rama, Lord Krishna, never bother to question about Prophet Mohammad‘s existence.

    The Koran.
    Holy Quran.

    This is probably is the fear of the Sword.

    In my native Madurai District,Tamil Nadu there is a saying that the Muslims of India have become one by choosing the easiest option.

    The options are,

    a) have your penis cut(circumcised)

    b)Have your head cut.

    Jokes apart the Muslims are or were a revered lot in Tamil Nadu.

    They are called Rowther, a term to indicate  Muslims.

    It is both a term of endearment and respect.

    Saint Arunagirinathar calls Lord Muruga ,Rovuthane’ in his Thiruppugazh.

    My father was a teacher and he had a Muslim student, named Habib.

    Habib became an Inspector of Schools and he used to visit the school where my father worked.

    He would come to our Home direct, though he would stay n guest House, ask my mother to prepare food and request her to send in ragi Dosa for hi, for the night.

    And, in those days we never used Ragi, my mother would prepare it for him .

    Habib when he enters the class where my father was teaching, which he should evaluate, would first prostrate at my father’s feet in the open class and shall go about inspecting the class!

    How one wishes that amity remains to-day.

    Sorry about the digression.

    I started writing on the proof for the existence of Mohammad but wandered along.

    Unlike the Ramayana, Mahabharata there are no( to my knowledge) Astrophysical events associated with or indicated in the life history of the Prophet to validate.

    And there are no contemporary external evidence.

    Like The Bible, the Koran was compiled quite some time after the death of the Prophet.

    Now some one has come out with a Book on this aspect of Prophet Mohammad’s existence.

    “A recent book by Robert Spencer has the title, Did Muhammad Exist? The book1 is well-researched and deals with many historical issues. He describes the “canonical” story, that is, the common story told by Muslims, of Muhammad and then deals with the problems of supporting the story. The conclusion is that there is little to support the Muslim claims concerning the existence of Muhammad historically…

    First, we must examine the Qur’an, the sacred book of Muslims. There is little information about Muhammad in the Qur’an. The word “Muhammad” appears 4 times in the Qur’an. In three of the cases it could merely refer to a title, “the praised one,” or “chosen one.” Other names like Abraham appear 79 times, Moses 136 times, Pharaoh 74 times. The title “messenger of Allah” appears 300 times. Surah 33:40 is certainly a reference to a person, but it tells nothing about the life of Muhammad. Surah 48:29 also names Muhammad as a messenger of Allah.

    Spencer concludes that “we can glean nothing from these passages about Muhammad’s biography. Nor is it even certain, on the basis of the Qur’anic text alone, that these passages refer to Muhammad, or did so originally.” (p.19)

    Second, there are the hadiths, traditions, that are voluminous in quantity, often contradictory in nature, and most of them fabrications due to the lack of information about Muhammad. The hadiths arose much later after Muhammad supposedly died in 632.

    Third, there is the Sira, an Arabic term for the traditional biographies of Muhammad. “The earliest biography of Muhammad was written by Ibn Ishaq (d.773), who wrote in the latter part of the eighth century, at least 125 years after the death of his protagonist, in a setting in which legendary material about Muhammad was proliferating. And Ibn Ishaq’s biography does not even exist as such; it comes down to us only in the quite lengthy fragments reproduced by an even later chronicler, Ibn Hisham, who wrote in the first quarter of the ninth century, and by other historians who reproduced and thereby preserved additional sections. Other biographical material about Muhammad dates from even later.” (p.19)

    One of the earliest non-Muslim sources to possibly mention the prophet of Islam is a document known as the Doctrina Jacobi which was written by a Christian between 634 and 640. The document mentions the Saracens coming with an army and the prophet leading them. The writer was stopped by an old man well versed in Scripture and he inquired, “what can you tell me about the prophet who has appeared with the Saracens? He replied, groaning deeply: ‘He is false, for the prophets do not come armed with a sword.’ (p.21) This unnamed prophet mentioned in the Doctrina was travelling with his army. Muhammad had died already. Moreover the full document speaks with reference to the anointed one, the Christ who was to come.”

    “… there is not a single account of any kind dating from around the time the Doctrina Jacobi was written that affirms the canonical Islamic story of Muhammad and Islam’s origins.” (p.22)

    The conquest of Jerusalem in 637 is mentioned by Sophronius, the patriarch of Jerusalem, who turned the city over to Umar, the conquering leader, but nothing is said about a holy book, or Muhammad, only that they were Saracens who were “godless.”

    The first reference to the term Muslim comes in 690 by a Coptic Christian bishop, John of Nikiou. He wrote: “And now many of the Egyptians who had been false Christians denied the holy orthodox faith and lifegiving baptism, and embraced the religion of the Muslims, the enemies of God, and accepted the detestable doctrine of the beast, that is, Muhammad, and they erred together with those idolaters, and took arms in their hands and fought against the Christians.”

    “There is, however, reason to believe that this text as it stands is not as John of Nikiou wrote it. It survives only in an Ethiopic translation from the Arabic, dating from 1602. The Arabic itself was a translation from the original Greek or some other language. There is no other record of the terms Muslim and Islam being used either by the Arabians or by the conquered people in the 690’s, outside of the inscription on the Dome of the Rock, which itself has numerous questionable features…” (p.36)

    After pursuing various issues Spencer sums up what we know about the traditional account of Muhammad’s life and the early days of Islam.

    • No record of Muhammad’s reported death in 632 appears until more than a century after that date.
    • A Christian account apparently dating from the mid-630s speaks of an Arab prophet “armed with a sword” who seems to be still alive.
    • The early accounts written by the people the Arabs conquered never mention Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an. They call the conquerors “Ishmaelites,” “Saracens,” “Muhajirun,” and “Hagarians” but never “Muslims.”
    • The Arab conquerors, in their coins and inscriptions, don’t mention Islam or the Qur’an for the first six decades of their conquests. Mentions of “Muhammad” are non-specific and on at least two occasions are accompanied by a cross. The word can be used not only as a proper name but also as an honorific.
    • The Qur’an, even by the canonical Muslim account, was not distributed in its present form until the 650’s. Contradicting that standard account is the fact that neither the Arabian nor the Christians and Jews in the region mention the Qur’an until the early eighth century.
    • During the reign of the caliph Muawiya (661-680), the Arabs constructed at least one public building whose inscription was headed by a cross.
    • We begin hearing about Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, and about Islam itself in the 690’s, during the reign of the caliph Abd al-Malik. Coins and inscriptions reflecting Islamic beliefs begin to appear at this time also.
    • Around the same time, Arabic became the predominant written language of the Arabian Empire, supplanting Syriac and Greek.
    • Abd al-Malik claimed, in a passing remark in one hadith, to have collected the Qur’an, contradicting Islamic tradition that the collection was the work of the caliph Uthman forty years earlier.
    • Multiple hadiths report that Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, governor of Iraq during the reign of Abd al-Malik, edited the Qur’an and distributed his new edition to the various Arab-controlled provinces— again, something Uthman is supposed to have done decades earlier.
    • Even some Islamic traditions maintain that certain common Islamic practices, such as the recitation of the Qur’an during mosque prayers, date from orders of Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, not to the earlier period of Islamic history.
    • In the middle of the eighth century, the Abbasid dynastic supplanted the Umayyad line of Abd al-Malik. The Abbasids charged the Umayyads with impiety on a large scale. In the Abbasid period, biographical material about Mohammed began to proliferate. The first complete biography of the prophet of Islam finally appeared during this era—at least 125 years after the traditional date of his death.

  • Why Islam Is Violent, A Christian View.

    I chanced upon an article which was interesting and I am sharing it here.

    It states that,

    ‘

    Yet when we consider that, historically, geographically, and, most importantly, theologically, Islam is remarkably continuous with both Judaism and Christianity, we should see that this is a question that must be raised.  After all, Jews, Christians, and Muslims are of one mind in affirming the divine origins of the Hebrew Scriptures, monotheism, the personal nature of God, God’s justice and compassion, the creation of the world, the orderliness and goodness of the world, and the irreducible individuality of the human person.

    Christianity Violence on the Non believers
    Violence in Christianity

    Despite these fundamental similarities, it is the followers of Islam alone that have never stopped slaughtering in the name of their God.  Why?..

     

    ‘As some critics have plausibly argued, monotheism, being a sort of one size-fits-all concept, expresses a moral universalism that, like all such universalisms, can and has bred arrogance and intolerance in those who endorse it.  Judaism and Christianity, however, have tempered this vision.  Islam, though, has not.  In fact, it is precisely in the Muslim’s objections to Judaism and Christianity that this becomes most clear.

    From the Muslim’s perspective, neither Judaism nor Christianity is truly monotheistic.  Judaism has always revolved around the historically andculturally-specific experiences of a particular people—i.e. “the Chosen People,” the Jews.  And Christianity, with its doctrines of the Blessed Trinity (God is Three Persons in One) and the Incarnation (God entered the flux of history by becoming a man in Christ), compromises monotheism even further.’

    Judaism  Christianity and Islam share common geographical location and legends.

    Christianity  Non-Violent?

    Spanish Inquisitions, Bloody Mary,Crusades are some examples of Tolerance.

    Then came and it still exists, carrots, in the form of Money,free Education, Vatican Budget for conversion.

    Christianity  has ‘mellowed’ because it has found a  better tool for conversion, persuasion, and the use of Money, both to individuals and Government.

    Islam has not learnt it or refuses to learn this from Christianity.

    Pot calling the kettle black?

    As to Monotheism, where is it in Christianity except in few references in The Bible, there too you would find the father being mentioned apologetically.

    Curiously the author has rolled father, Son and the Holy Spirit into One!

    Compared to it, Islam is Monotheistic , if not Monistic.

    “The Bible is a historical narrative.  It is this narrative framework that constrains the range of interpretations that the text lends.  It is the Bible’s sequential ordering of events, its meticulous attention to details, to context, that informs its message regarding the One, True God.’

    The Bible was prepared edited and published by Constantine ,period.(see my posts on this)

    ”

    The Koran has no narrative.  Rather, it is essentially a collection of divinely issued moral precepts that, devoid as they are of context, are meant to pertain to all peoples—everywhere.  In ignoring the context of its emergence and development, Islam also neglects the contexts of those upon whom it seeks to impose itself.

    This explains why Islam has not, cannot, assimilate to any institutional arrangements that allow a separation of some sort or other between the eternal and temporal spheres.  It is this that accounts for why Islam appears incapable of co-existing for long with any and all potential competitors.

    Christianity was institutionalized by Constantine and we know what the Church has done or is doing, including keeping mum during the holocaust.

    When a religion is institutionalized it ceases to be free and religion loses its moral force.

    And finally is Christianity tolerant?

    Source for discussion.

    http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/why-islam-leads-to-violence/

    Related;

    The first item is to define violence. The only violence that matters to someone outside of Islam, Christianity, or Judaism is what they do to the “other,” or political violence. Cain killing Abel is not political violence. Political violence is not killing a lamb for a meal or making an animal sacrifice. Note that regardless of whether a vegan or a PETA member considers both of these actions violent, neither constitutes violence against vegans or PETA members.

     

    The next item is to compare the doctrines both quantitatively and qualitatively. The political violence of the Koran is called “fighting in Allah’s cause,” or jihad.

     

    We must do more than measure the jihad in the Koran. Islam has three sacred texts: Koran, Sira, and Hadith, or the Islamic Trilogy. The Sira is Mohammed‘s biography. The Hadith are his traditions — what he did and said. Sira and Hadith form the Sunna, the perfect pattern of all Islamic behavior.

     

    The Koran is the smallest of the three books, also called the Trilogy. It is only 16% of the Trilogy text[1]. This means that the Sunna is 84% of the word content of Islam’s sacred texts. This statistic alone has large implications. Most of the Islamic doctrine is about Mohammed, not Allah. The Koran says 91 different times that Mohammed’s is the perfect pattern of life. It is much more important to know Mohammed than the Koran. This is very good news. It is easy to understand a biography ab out a man. To know Islam, know Mohammed.

     

    It turns out that jihad occurs in large proportion in all three texts. Here is a chart about the results:
    It is very significant that the Sira devotes 67% of its text to jihad. Mohammed averaged an event of violence every six weeks for the last nine years of his life. Jihad was what made Mohammed successful. Here is a chart of the growth of Islam.

  • Bibles and porn, same difference?


    If you want to find fault with The Bible, you should provide an alternate which is better, not with the same (perceived) denigration.
    Which part of Bible denigrates women?-that women is a part of man or women and men are bound in matrimony unto death?
    If you can not differentiate between parables/allegories and philosophy one can only pity you.
    First read the Bible;well,it is too much to ask of you as you seem to be doing everything in the University except studying.
    A healthy and inquiring mind would have searched for a better system of Philosophy and religion,but not a sick mind obsessed with porn.
    Believers, do not give them any recognition for them or for their acts.Best to treat them with indifference.
    One more question in what respect do you want women to be respected more than what is given in the Bible?
    By allowing them to be flirts, with loose morals , drink ,smoke pot, go in for Divorce, leave children and family ?
    Woman occupies most precious position in a society, that is of a Mother.
    This has been stressed in the Bible.
    Well. You can wake up a Man who is asleep, not one who pretends to be asleep.
    <

    Story:
    A stand set up by students on the college campus of the University of San Antonio, Texas, caused quite a stir last week: a group of atheist students were giving out free porn magazines and books in exchange for…bibles.

    Their message: the way women are portrayed in Holy Scriptures is as degrading as it is in porn literature, so why not trade ‘smut for smut’? Needless to say, Christian students on campus were unimpressed by the initiative.
    "Some see me as a kind of antichrist"
    We founded our group five years ago, and every year we organise the ‘smut for smut’ campaign. This year the event got more attention than ever: after just three days, we had collected 42 bibles, two Korans and several other sacred texts, including a sort of satanist bible. We ended up running out of porn magazines to trade them against! The campaign also got a lot of media attention, including in the foreign press.

    Our goal isn’t to shock or offend people but to get them thinking: why are women portrayed in such a misogynistic way in so many religious texts? The Bible is full of excuses used by society to belittle women, it’s just as bad as porn in that sense. So, for us, inviting students to trade bibles against porn is a way of pointing out the flaws in religious texts.
    Things sometimes got tough on campus. Never violent, but Christian students took the initiative really badly. There were a couple of arguments, but also a lot of genuine, interesting debates. Some students now see me as a kind of new antichrist, which I think is kind of funny.

    This video posted on YouTube shows the members of Atheist Agenda carrying Bible for Porn signs. At 2’16, one of them reads a passage from the Bible that he considers sexist. Christian students respond by chanting "Jesus will set you free!"


    http://observers.france24.com/en/content/20100309-trade-bibles-porn-usa-san-antonio-university-atheism-christians-smut?ns_campaign=20100310_obsen&ns_mchannel=nlobsen&ns_source=sitef24_en&ns_linkname=usa-porno-bible&ns_fee=0