There have been some questions asked on what I write on my Blog and why do I write?
The answer to the first question is obvious.
Among other topics, about 116 Categories, I write more on Hinduism, the name given to Santana Dharma by the West.
I have found that the Youngsters , the Age group between 20-35, are quite curious and want to know more about Hinduism.
And they do not want to hear the answer that things are what they are in Hinduism and one should follow it.
But if one were to explain them in simple, yet in modern scientific terms , they are interested, ask for more and they become ardent followers of Hinduism.
The percentage of Readers for Ramani’s blog from the youth brigade outstrips the elder generation by quite a few yards.
And they ask me very pertinent , intelligent question, either in the form of comments or by personal email.
I wanted to provide material for their hunger.
The information in the Religious texts, Indian Philosophy is slightly difficult to follow as the concepts are very abstract and needs a careful study to understand their implication.
And reading in English from the West distort Hinduism, in most cases because they were/are deliberately done to malign Hinduism.
I am trying to provide information to provide as a sort of signpost for people to follow.
I provide the sources where people can read and research further.
I provide information direct from the sources in Sanskrit, simplify it, present in a language an average person can understand sans jargon.
Some times some difficult concepts are presented in such a simple manner, at times the full import of Philosophical implications may not be forthcoming.
But this provides people information to check further and seek clarification.
That’s it.
Once people read from the sources, I know they will get hooked to Hinduism.
And, in my opinion, our generation has failed in transmitting the information to the next generation mainly because most of us did not know the subject or could not communicate.
This has to be rectified to prevent our Great religion being maligned and ridiculed.
The scientific knowledge our ancestors have amassed and stored…..?
Mind boggling.
As to the question why I write,
Well , I like to write, that’s all.
I do not bother about earning through my writings as God has made me contented.
I spend about 10 to 11 hours reading and writing.
The feedback I get is more than what Money can give me and even if one is benefited by my posts, my purpose is served.
To those who read my posts, please take my posts as a starting point, cross check the information and wherever possible read from the original in Sanskrit.
And point out inaccuracies in my posts.
I would like my blog to be authentic as Ramani’s blog is now rated among the first twenty authoritative blogs on Hinduism.
I would like to be authentic and I do not hesitate to correct and correct information is more important.
(I also write replies to slanders on Hinduism through my other blog Ramani Comments at https://ramanan50blogs.wordpress.com/
I have written on these subjects in this Ramani’s blogs( this blog) earlier.
Now I am writing in Ramani’s comments as a rejoinder, reply and translation of the English Blog at http://www.ramanan50.worpress.com)
The blog has crossed Ten Million Readers and has 8049 Subscribers as on August 19th,2017.
Thanks and Regards.
Following is a summary of the article by Jetpack AI.
In this article, the author explains why they write on their blog and specifically focus on Hinduism. They have noticed that young people, particularly those between the ages of 20-35, are curious about Hinduism but prefer explanations in modern scientific terms rather than accepting it blindly. The author aims to provide simplified information about Hinduism, sourced from the original Sanskrit texts, to make it more accessible to the average person. They encourage readers to cross-check the information and read from the original sources. The author also expresses the importance of preserving and transmitting knowledge from previous generations to prevent the misrepresentation and ridicule of Hinduism. The article concludes by stating that the author writes because they enjoy it and find fulfillment in the feedback and benefit it brings to others.
Sir; wish you happy day. Veda is book of ethics. This ethics are not prepare but it is search by Rushi [ at present we know as scientist. ] This ethics ; they adopt in their life; put in action. Lord Krishna adopt and put in action this ethics. he told in “Geeta ” That Brahman are super in race; so after Mahabharat yudh; in Ashvamegh yagna; Lord Krishna lift the diner dish of Brahman.
The definition of intelligence is change. Suppose I am Advocate; so I am unknown about other subject; like engineer ; commerce ; medicine . etc.though i believe that my self is the master of all subject; it reflect that believe that I have a knowledge of engineering;. medicine. commerce; i can prepare every thing . This is wrong. we believe in master of particular subject; that is for illness we will go to Doctor; not to advocate. Our Rushi were master of brain; so they research the ethics of happy life. They also research the way of God; How we can meet Him. Patanjal Yogsdutra; ; Svaroday sastra; physics [ body ] so they become master of double figar.
we read and believe but not adopting. shree Ramkrashna Paramhans teach Tantra Vidhya from “Yogini ” Tantra means short cut of meeting the God. Ravan is the example.
Only sanatan dharma telling that every one have right to be God; The ” 64 kala ” is teach by Sandipani Rushi; and we know that lord Krishna is master of 64 Kala; he known as God; in a fact Rushi sandipani should know as God; But he tell that I am not God; Krishna is God.
Darshan Pathak
Whats your opinion about Isckon?
They give importance to Only Krishna and interpret everything in a lopsided way.But they are pious in general, notwithstanding manipualtions and Politics in their organisation.Some are really very pious and learned but mostly they are driven like a MNC.And their devotion to krishna resembles church. Personally i do not attach much importance to it.To me their temple is a Picnic spot.
Namaste, There are quite a few Youtube videos in which some of the white ISKCON followers state they follow ISKCON since it replicates the trinity
HolyFather/Spirit/Son=Parmatama/Atma/Krishna. Most of the time they keep on claiming ISKCON teaches the principle of “For the love of God” just like in Christianity. Some are truly faithful while rest of them are running a scam.
True.
Veda is the book of ethics. From born to die; man is passing from this tunnel 1. social. 2. economics. 3. politics. 4.physics. 5. religion. How to live happy and peace fully among this tunnel; this ethics are given in Vedas. It has less concern with race.
The bravery; and adventure is fundamental ethics of Sanatan dharma.
Rig-Veda- ” we became a fire to break the mountain. Our life usually as soft as lotus; but for attacking enemy we become as fire. With our brightness;and bravery; we make attacking enemy ash;crush down all difficulties come along the ways. If any mountain hinders our progress; we break it. ” 4-2-15
Atharva- Veda 11-1-2. ‘ o powerful friends; come on ; let make planet full of movements; we have lost lots of in sleep; now let standup by making ourselves out of rest. Let make an ideal society;by deleting ignorance; illiteracy; injustice.’
Sanatan Dharma [Veda ] is not only for spiritual events;
from born to die man is passing from 1. social. 2. economics. 3. politics. 4.physics. 5. religion. tunnel . How to pass this tunnel with peace and joy; that ethics are shown in Vedas. This ethic has less concern with race and gender.
our Sants [sanyasi ] are not reading Veda. Our all god are warrior;and rich; then why we are not?
Darshanchandra N. Pathak.
Ramanan,
An interesting site. I have a question to which I am seeking an answer – perhaps you can help. A little background first. I wrote an introductory book “Our Heritage Revisited : A glimpse into ancient Indian texts” which is available at http://www.amazon.in/dp/B00YF1DOGM.
After completing the Shruti texts, I moved onto the Smritis – the Itihaas and the Purans when my daughter, while reading the draft, commented : No portion of the Veds (including the Upanishads) really talk of Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesh, Ganesh, Devi etc. How did the transition take place.?
The Agams do provide a clue but to my mind there are several missing links – especially in the practices as seen from Uttar Pradesh where I come from. Can you throw any light on this?
sir, there are some articles and theories that tells sukrachariya ( the asura guru) has a big influence on Islam! What is ur say on this? Do you have any information/ source about this?
And, Sir, Ur blog has a lot of information that makes us ( sanathana dharma followers=Hindus ) to take pride on it!
Sukracharya had nothing to do with Islam.As I had mentioned in a few Posts here is an attmpt to seek legitimacy among Hindus, by vested interests saying that Islam/Christianity are from Hinduism.There ae also quotes from the Bhagavatha Purana about Islam, where Islam was anticipated.Please read my Post on this.Thanks.Regds.