Tag: Tribunal

  • Tamils Killing Sri Lanka Guilty Permanent People’s Tribunal

    The Permanent People’s Tribunal , an international body has indicted Sri Lanka as Guilty of war crimes in killing the Tamils, under the guise of ending Terrorism in the Island Nation.

    Channel 4 exposed the gruesome killing of innocent Tamilians point-blank, children and women included.

    Earlier Human Right Watch has had the same view.

    Child Killed in Sri Lanka
    Child Killed

    Recently David Cameron, PM, UK, met with the survivors of the Genocide when he attended the CHOGM Summit in Colombo.

    After an assessment of evidences presented by eyewitnesses and experts, judges of the Permanent People’s Tribunal reached unanimous consensus that the Sri Lankan state was guilty of crimes of genocide against the Eezham Tamils and that the genocide is continuing even after the end of the military operations against the LTTE. Concluding the four day session with a press conference at Bremen on Tuesday, the judges also noted that the Sri Lankan military did not have capacity to commit genocide on its own and that it was supported by the UK-USA-India axis. While the judges held the USA and the UK to be complicit in the genocidal process, they were of the opinion that more evidence was needed as regards India’s role.”

    The PPT Report on Tamils Killing by Sri Lanka.


    The Second Session of the Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka concluded today in Bremen, Germany, with
    the presentation of its verdict. The panel of eleven judges unanimously found Sri Lanka guilty of the
    crime of genocide against the Eelam Tamil people, and that this crime continues today.

    The Tribunal specified that the victims are in this case the Eelam Tamils as a national group.

    The Tribunal  found that genocide against the Eelam Tamil group has not yet achieved the total
    destruction of their identity. The genocidal coordinated plan of actions reached its climax on May 2009,
    but it is clear that the Sri Lanka Government project to erase the Eelam Tamil identity, corroborated by
    the above mentioned conduct, shows that genocide is a process and that process is ongoing.  The
    genocidal strategy changed once the perpetrators gained control of the territory. The killings are being
    transformed into other forms of conduct, but the intention to destroy the group and its identity remains
    and continues, through causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the Eelam Tamil group…

    The Tribunal considers that the proofs established, beyond any reasonable doubt that the following acts
    were committed by the Government of Sri Lanka
    (a) Killing members of the group, which includes massacres, indiscriminate shelling, the strategy of
    herding civilians into so‐called “No Fire Zones” for the purpose of massive killings, targeted assassinations
    of outspoken Eelam Tamil civil leaders who were capable of articulating the Sri Lankan genocide project
    to the outside world
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, including
    acts of torture, inhumane or degrading treatment, sexual violence including rape, interrogations
    combined with beatings, threats of death, and harm that damages health or causes disfigurement
    or injury.
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction
    in whole or in part, including
    * expulsions of the victims from their homes, * seizures of private lands, * declaring vast areas as military
    High Security Zone (HSZ) to facilitate the military acquisition of Tamil land

    Further, the Tribunal considered evidence related to
    (d) Imposingmeasuresintended to prevent births within the group
    including forced sterilization and coerced contraception of Eelam Tamil women.  Further investigation is
    required on the extent of this practice in other regions before a determination is made on whether these
    could be considered genocidal acts.

    The UK and USA were found to be guilty of complicity in the crime of genocide, including
    ‐‐ complicity by procuring means, such as weapons, instruments or any other means, used to commit
    genocide, with the accomplice knowing that such means would be used for such a purpose;
    ‐‐ complicity by knowingly aiding or abetting a perpetrator of a genocide in the planning or enabling acts
    thereof;

    Recognizing that the Sri Lankan state alone did not have the capacity to achieve their genocidal
    ambitions, and given the evidence presented, the Tribunal believes that the UK, the USA and India are
    guilty of complicity in genocide. However, given time constraints the Tribunal decided to withhold its
    decision pending the consideration of additional evidence as to the possibility that India, as well as other
    States, are indeed guilty of complicity in the crime of genocide against the Eelam Tamils.

    More than 30 direct eye‐witnesses and experts testified in support of the Prosecution’s case, providing
    evidence on various alleged crimes that could be determined to constitute the crime of genocide, as well
    as on the legal and historical background and the charges of complicity.

    Download the File at,

    Source:

    http://www.tamilnewsnetwork.com/2013/12/11/sri-lanka-guilty-of-genocide-ppt-verdict/

    As to India’s Complicity in this Genocide, a Post follows.

  • Parents Abuse By Children India Law For Maintenance Details FAQs

    We find in India, senior citizens being abused and ill-treated by their children.

    Children abandon parents India
    Parents abandoned India

    Many dump their parents in OLd Age Homes.

    This behaviour is not restricted to the poorer sections alone.

    Affluent sections also resort to this, dumping parents in old age Homes , verbal abuse and  refuse to maintain them.

    I have a few posts on this under Lifestyle/India.

    The population of the Senior citizens has been increasing over the years.

    The Projected Population aged 60+ by sex as on 1st March 2001-2026, as per the Report of the Technical Group on Population Projections constituted by the National Commission on Population, May 2006 published by the Office of the Registrar General, India is as under:

    (In million)

    Year Males Females Persons
    2001 34.94 35.75 70.69
    2006 40.75 42.83 83.58
    2011 48.14 50.33 98.47
    2016 58.11 59.99 118.10
    2021 70.60 72.65 143.24
    2026 84.62 88.56 173.18

    What are the main features of elderly population of India?

    Ans. The profile of the elderly population indicates that:

    1. a majority of them are in rural areas;
    2. feminization of the elderly population; and
    3. increase in the number of older-old (persons above 80 years) and
    4. a large percentage (30%) of the elderly are below the poverty line.
    What is the share of the older persons in the total population of the Country?

    Ans. The percentage share of the projected population aged 60+ in the total projected population by sex on 1st March 2001-2026, India, is as under:

    Year Males Females Persons
    2001 6.60 7.10 6.90
    2006 7.10 8.00 7.50
    2011 7.70 8.70 8.30
    2016 8.70 9.80 9.30
    2021 10.20 11.30 10.70
    2026 11.80 13.10 12.40

    Following are the procedures and FAQs on the subject.

    The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents under Senior Citizens Act 2007.

    Click to view the pdf.

    http://www.helpageindia.org/pdf/The-Maintenance-and-Welfare-of-Parents-and-Senior-Citizens-Act-2007.pdf

    How to go about and FAQs.

    he Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007

    What are the important features of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007?

    Ans. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 envisages providing need-based maintenance to the parents/grand parents from their children. Tribunals will be set up for the purpose of settling the maintenance claims of the parents in a time bound manner. Lawyers are barred from participating in the proceedings of the Tribunals at any stage.

    The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 also contains enabling provisions like protection of life and property of senior citizens, better medical facilities, setting up of old age homes in every district, etc.

    What is the applicability of the Act?

    Ans. The Act extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir and it applies also to citizens of India outside India (Section 1(2))

    When will the Act come into force in the States?

    Ans. The Act come into force in a State on such date as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint (Section 1(3)).

    What is the definition of Child/children under the Act?

    Ans. The Act defines “children” as son, daughter, grandson and granddaughter who are not minor.

    What is the definition of Maintenance under the Act?

    Ans. The “Maintenance” includes provision for food, clothing, residence and medical attendance and treatment;

    What is the definition of a Senior Citizen under the Act?

    Ans. A “senior citizen” means any person being a citizen of India, who has attained the age of sixty years or above;

    Who are eligible for claiming maintenance under the provisions of the Act?

    Ans. The Act provides that a senior citizen including parent who is unable to maintain himself from his own earning or out of the property owned by him, shall be entitled to make an application for claiming maintenance.

    Whether a person other the claimant can file application on his/her behalf?

    Ans. An application for maintenance may be made

    1. by a senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be; or
    2. if he is incapable, by any other person or organization authorized by him; or
    3. the Tribunal may take cognizance suo motu.

    Whether there is any provision for the Tribunal to order subsistence allowance to the claimant during the proceedings?

    Ans. The Tribunal may, during the pendency of the proceeding regarding monthly allowance for the maintenance under this section, order such children or relative to make a monthly allowance for the interim maintenance of such senior citizen including parent and to pay the same to such senior citizen including parent as the Tribunal may from time to time direct.

    What is the time limit for disposing an application for claiming maintenance?

    Ans. An application filed under sub-section (2) for the monthly allowance for the maintenance and expenses for proceeding shall be disposed of within ninety days from the date of the service of notice of the application to such person. However, the Tribunal may extend the said period, once for a maximum period of thirty days in exceptional circumstances for reasons to be recorded in writing.

    What is the monitoring mechanism for implementation of the Act by the States?

    Ans. The Act has been enacted in pursuance of the provisions of Article 41 read with Entry 23 of the Concurrent List (Schedule VII) of the Constitution of India. State Governments are required to notify the Act and frame Rules for implementing the provisions of the Act.

    However, Section 30 of the Act enables the Central Government to give directions to State Governments for carrying into execution of the provisions of the Act. Further, Section 31 of the Act provides for periodic review and monitoring of the progress of implementation of the Act by the State Governments. The Ministry will act in accordance with these provisions to ensure effective implementation of the provisions of the Act by the States.

    Has any timeframe has been prescribed for setting up of Tribunals by the States?

    Ans. The State Government are required to constitute for each Subdivision one or more Tribunals as per the need within a period of six months from the date of the commencement of this Act.

    What is the effect of the order of maintenance?

    Ans. A maintenance order made under this Act shall have the same force and effect as an order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and shall be executed in the manner prescribed for the execution of such order by that Code.

    Who can appeal to the appellate Authority under the Act?

    Ans. Any senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be, aggrieved by an order of a Tribunal may, within sixty days from the date of the order, prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal:

    That is the time limit for an appellate authority to dispose of the appeal?

    Ans. The Appellate Tribunal is required to make endeavours to pronounce its order in writing within one month of the receipt of an appeal.

    Is there any penal provision for enforcement of maintenance order of the Tribunal?

    Ans. Yes, the Maintenance Order given by the Tribunal will have the same effect as the maintenance order passed under Section 125 of Cr. PC. This will include imprisonment upto One month and issue a warrant for levying the amount due in the manner provided for levying fines.

    What are the provisions about revocation of will?

    Ans. As per the provision of Act, a senior citizen can seek to revoke any property, which has been transferred in favour of children/relative on the condition that such children/relative would provide maintenance to him but are not providing the same. The tribunals are empowered to declare such transfers as void on the applications of such parent.

    Is any penalty/imprisonment is for the children who abandon their parents?

    Ans. Yes, the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 contains penal provisions to discourage abandonment of parents by their children by imprisonment for a term of 3 months and a fine upto Rs. 5000/- or both on the children.

    http://www.helpageindia.org/pdf/The-Maintenance-and-Welfare-of-Parents-and-Senior-Citizens-Act-2007.pdf

    http://socialjustice.nic.in/faqs2.php#q4

    http://ramanisblog.in/tag/elder-abuse/