Tag: Telangana Rashtra Samithi

  • Wiki Leaks exposes All Parties.Politicians Bought and sold.

    What few knew has been confirmed by Wiki Leaks.

    Government is run on money power shamelessly and the politicians brazenly talk about ‘eradicating Corruption.’

    Congress from Bofors , Shibu Soren,2G scam,ISRO,Defense Deals right upto this expose has been reveling incorruption.You can not accuse them for being corrupt.

    Where will they go for money for Shibu Sorens,Deve Gowdas,Ajith Singh &Co.

    BJP is not pristine pure either.

    How was it that Gadkari’s benami  has been allotted a flat in Adarsh Society?

    What is Ranjan Bhattachraya  doing with Niira Radia?

    What about Promod Mahajan?

    Deve Gowda/Ajith Singh etc will go in for money.

    Not Karunanidhi.

    He knows he can reap more in Telecoms and even offer an incentive to Congress.

    ‘Politics is the last Refuge of a Scoundrel’-never has been truer.

    * itlalics in the article are my comments.

    NEW DELHI 00001972 002 OF 004

    4. (SBU) The special session of parliament to consider the confidence vote will begin on July 21 and conclude with a vote on July 22. Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Vayalar Ravi claimed on July 15 that the government would prevail in the July 22 confidence vote with over 280 votes cast in its favor. Kuldip Bishnoi, an estranged Congress Party MP who had been suspended for floating the idea of forming his own party in December 2007, confirmed his intention to defect in the confidence vote. (This development was apparently expected by party insiders and not a leading indicator of further fragmentation within the party.) Consulate Chennai reported on July 17 that the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) has publicly stated it will vote against the UPA. One of its three members of parliament has broken from the party, but is unlikely to support the government because the TRS has positioned the trust vote as a statehood issue, so voting for the UPA would mean voting against Telangana interests.

    TRS would go against the Government ,not because of Nuclear issue per se, but because of its ‘position on Telengana’ Strange Logic of Patriotism!

    ” It also claimed that PM Singh was upset with the BJP for allegedly recanting on an “”understanding”” that it would support the deal. The article concludes that if the government survives the July 22 vote, PM Singh’s priority would be to implement flagship social programs to thank his party for rallying behind him.

    BJP had an ‘understanding’-and recanted What was the understanding and why was it recanted?

    Votes For Sale – – –

    8. (SBU) Behind the scenes, the Congress Party machine is working overtime. Sonia Gandhi reportedly plans to meet Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) leader Shibu Soren and Janata Dal Secular (JD-S) leader H.D. Deve Gowda. Retaining the support of JMM’s five seats and the JD-S’s three seats is reportedly vital to the UPA government’s strategy. In exchange for retaining the support of the three votes of the Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD), the Congress Party has reportedly pledged its support to rename Lucknow’s Amausi airport after Chaudhary Charan Singh, father of RLD leader Ajit Charan Singh, who may also get a cabinet seat.

    Sonia Gandhi, and Rahul Gandhi were committed to the nuclear initiative and had conveyed this message clearly to the party. Sharma said that PM Singh and others were trying to work on the Akali Dal (8 votes) through financier Sant Chatwal and others, but unfortunately it did not work out.
    Going through a Financier?’
    ‘It did not work out’ Amount not sufficient?
    10. (S) Sharma’s political aide Nachiketa Kapur mentioned to an Embassy staff member in an aside on July 16 that Ajit Singh’s RLD had been paid Rupees 10 crore (about $2.5 million) for each of their four MPs to support the government. Kapur mentioned that money was not an issue at all, but the crucial thing was to ensure that those who took the money would vote for the government. Kapur showed the Embassy employee two chests containing cash and said that around Rupees 50-60 crore (about $25 million) was lying around the house for use as pay-offs. 

    11. (S) Another Congress Party insider told PolCouns that Minister of Commerce and Industry Kamal Nath is also helping to spread largesse. “”Formerly he could only offer small planes as bribes,”” according to this interlocutor, now he can pay for votes with jets.””

    “”What If””s: No Vote or a UPA Defeat

    Satish Sharma cannily declared in Press meet that’Nachiketa has never been my aide’
    He did not say he does not know him.
    Related:

    NEW DELHI: Five days before the Manmohan Singh government faced a crucial vote of confidence on the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal in 2008, a political aide to Congress leader Satish Sharma showed a U.S. Embassy employee “two chests containing cash” he said was part of a bigger fund of Rs. 50 crore to Rs. 60 crore that the party had assembled to purchase the support of MPs. The aide also claimed the four MPs belonging to Ajit Singh’s Rashtriya Lok Dal had already been paid Rs. 10 crore each to ensure they voted the right way on the floor of the Lok Sabha.

    In a cable, dated July 17, 2008, sent to the State Department ( 162458: secret), accessed by The Hindu through WikiLeaks, U.S. Charge d’Affaires Steven White wrote about a visit the Embassy’s Political Counselor paid to Satish Sharma, who is described as “a Congress Party MP in the Rajya Sabha … and a close associate of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi considered to be a very close family friend of Sonia Gandhi.”

    Mr. Sharma told the U.S. diplomat that he and others in the party were working hard to ensure the government won the confidence vote on July 22. After describing the approaches the Congress leader said had been made to the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Akali Dal, Mr. White drops a bombshell of a revelation:

    “Sharma’s political aide Nachiketa Kapur mentioned to an Embassy staff member in an aside on July 16 that Ajit Singh’s RLD had been paid Rupees 10 crore (about $2.5 million) for each of their four MPs to support the government. Kapur mentioned that money was not an issue at all, but the crucial thing was to ensure that those who took the money would vote for the government.”

    Lest this should be construed by the visiting diplomats as an empty boast, Mr. Sharma’s aide put his money where his mouth was: “Kapur showed the Embassy employee two chests containing cash and said that around Rupees 50-60 crore (about $25 million) was lying around the house for use as pay-offs.”

    Independently, Mr. Sharma told the Political Counselor “that PM Singh and others were trying to work on the Akali Dal (8 votes) through financier Sant Chatwal and others, but unfortunately it did not work out.” He said “the Prime Minister, Sonia Gandhi, and Rahul Gandhi were committed to the nuclear initiative and had conveyed this message clearly to the party.” Efforts were also on to try and get the Shiv Sena to abstain. Further, “Sharma mentioned that he was also exploring the possibility of trying to get former Prime Minister Vajpayee’s son-in-law Ranjan Bhattacharya to speak to BJP representatives to try to divide the BJP ranks.”

    The cable makes it clear the Congress campaign to buy votes was not confined to the cash-filled war chests that Nachiketa Kapur and Satish Sharma had gathered.

    “Another Congress Party insider told PolCouns that Minister of Commerce and Industry Kamal Nath is also helping to spread largesse. ‘Formerly he could only offer small planes as bribes,’” according to this interlocutor, ‘now he can pay for votes with jets.’”

    Despite these efforts, the U.S. Embassy concluded that the UPA maintained only a “precarious lead” in the forthcoming confidence vote. “Our best guess at this time show the government maintaining its slim majority with the anticipated vote count at about 273 in favor, 251 opposed, and 19 abstentions.”

    The prediction was impressively close to the mark. Prime Minister Singh got 275 votes in favour with 256 against and 10 abstentions.

    Just before the vote, the BJP produced cash on the floor of the House and alleged that this was the money the government had used to try and buy the support of MPs. But subsequent investigations ran aground. The secret U.S. Embassy cable, however, is likely to reignite Opposition allegations that bribery was resorted to on a massive scale to ensure the UPA won the 2008 vote of confidence.

    The fact that Congress politicians could speak so freely to American diplomats about their bribing spree during the run up to the confidence vote — and that the latter could be so blasé about the subversion of democracy — underlines the all-encompassing but ultimately corrosive nature of the “strategic partnership” the two governments were trying to build.

    As for Mr. Kapur, his candid display of crores of rupees to be used by the Congress as “pay offs” for the trust vote was not seen by the U.S. Embassy as compromising his democratic credentials in any way. In November 2008, he was sent to the U.S. under the State Department’s I-Vote 2008 programme as an observer for that year’s presidential election. “The move to invite international observers”, he wrote in a blog post, “reflects the open and democratic nature of the American society.”

    http://www.hindu.com/2011/03/17/stories/2011031758500100.htm

  • SriKrishna Committee On Telengana-Time to firm.

    Nothing new has been said in the report.

    Discussion on this subject shall lead to nowhere.

    Telengana people are.rather the politicians have made up their mind and are misleading the people..A mistake was committed earlier in forming linguistic states.Andhra blackmailed and got it,despite Sardar Patel’s objection.

    We are paying for it.

    Time to be firm with unified Andhra Pradesh.

    It should also be mandated to provide fixed percentage of budget for Telengana, Rayalaseema and Coastal Andhra.

    This function may be transferred to Central List( only the %  of allocation);

    monitoring by CAG

    Story:

    Jan 6: This was just the sort of reaction that the government feared as an aftermath of the Srikrishna Committee report being made public. The nerve centre of the Telangana agitation, the Osmania University has erupted in protests in response to the recommendations given out by the report.

     

    The pro-Telangana protestors engaged in stone pelting and caused bodily harm to police personnel stationed there. The protestors have called for a bandh on Friday in protest. The students turned violent and has burned a city bus making the climate in Hyderabad volatile and sensitive.

     

    The reactions from various parties can be termed “mixed” with the Telugu Rashtra Samithi (TRS) threatening to go on fast soon. The TRS and the BJP has rejected the proposals of the committee outright and said that they still root for a separate Telangana state. The TRS also suggested that a bill be introduced in the Budget session of Parliament even at thecost of a mass-fasting by Congress MLAs and MPs who supports the existence of a separate Telangana state.

    One of the first party to come out with opinion on the report was the Praja Rajyam Party that welcomed the recommendation for a United Andhra. The TDP leaders came out with varied reactions and said that it was up to the Centre to come out with a feasible solution rather than “plying with people’s sentiments.”

    http://news.oneindia.in/2011/01/06/osmania-university-turns-violent-telangana-report.html

    Related:

    SUMMARY OF THE REPORT OF COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATION ON THE SITUATION IN ANDHRA PRADESH

     

    1.      Shri Justice B. N. Srikrishna report was submitted to the Government on 30.12.2010.  The Terms of Reference of the Committee are enclosed.
    2.      In its 461 pages Report (along with Volume II containing Appendices), the Committee has examined in great detail the following issues:
    (i)                 Developments in Andhra Pradesh – A Historical Background
    (ii)               Regional Economic and Equity Analysis
    (iii)             Education and Health
    (iv)              Water Resources, irrigation and Power Development
    (v)                Public Employment Issues
    (vi)              Issues Relating to Hyderabad Metropolis
    (vii)            Sociological and Cultural Issues
    3.      Based on the analysis of the above parameters the Committee has examined in detail the issues pertaining to current demand for a separate State of Telangana as well as the demand for maintaining the present status of keeping the State united.  After going into all aspects of the situation as well as keeping in view the local, regional and the national perspectives, the Committee has put forward the following solutions/possible options as the best way forward:
    (i) Maintaining Status Quo
    The Committee is of the unanimous view that it would not be a practical approach to simply maintain the status quo in respect of the situation.  Some intervention is definitely required and though maintaining the existing status quo is an option, it is favoured the least.
    (ii) Bifurcation of the State into Seemandhra and Telangana; with Hyderabad as a Union Territory and the two States developing their own capitals in due course
    There is a definite likelihood of serious backlashes in the Telangana region and an overall consideration the Committee found this option was also not practicable.
    (iii) Bifurcation of State into Rayala-Telangana and coastal Andhra regions with Hyderabad being an integral part of Rayala-Telangana
    This scenario is not likely to be accepted either by the pro-Telangana or by the pro-united Andhra protagonists.  While this option may have economic justification, the Committee believes that this option may not offer a resolution which would be acceptable to people of all three regions.
    (iv) Bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh into Seemandhra and Telangana with enlarged Hyderabad Metropolis as a separate Union Territory.  This Union Territory will have geographical linkage and contiguity via Nalgonda district in the south-east to district Guntur in coastal Andhra and via Mahboobnagar district in the south to Kurnool district in Rayalaseema
    This is likely to receive stiff opposition from Telangana protagonists and it may be difficult to reach a political consensus in making this solution acceptable to all.
    (v) Bifurcation of the State into Telangana and Seemandhra as per existing boundaries with Hyderabad as the capital of Telangana and Seemandhra to have a new capital
    The Committee feels that this option has to be given consideration.  The continuing demand for a separate Telangana has some merit and is not entirely unjustified.  In case this option is exercised the apprehensions of the coastal Andhra and the Rayalaseema people and others who were settled in Hyderabad and other districts of Telangana with regard to their investments, properties, livelihood and employment would need to be adequately addressed.  Considering all aspects, the Committee felt that while creation of separate Telangana would satisfy a large majority of people from the region, it will also throw up several other serious problems.  Therefore after taking into account of the pros and cons the Committee did not think it to be the most preferred, but the second best option.  Separation is recommended only in case it is unavoidable and if this decision can be reached amicably amongst all the three regions.
    (vi) Keeping the State united by simultaneously providing certain definite Constitutional / Statutory measures for socio-economic development and political empowerment of Telangana region – creation of a statutorily empowered Telangana Regional Council
    In this option it is proposed to keep the State united and provide Constitutional / Statutory measures to address the core socio-economic concerns about the development of the Telangana region.  This can be done through the establishment of a statutory and empowered Telangana Regional Council with adequate transfer of funds, functions and functionaries.  The Regional Council would provide a legislative consultative mechanism for the subjects to be dealt with by the Council.
    The united Andhra option is being suggested for continuing the development momentum of the three regions and keeping in mind the national perspective.  With firm political and administrative management it should be possible to convey conviction to the people that this option would be in the best interest to all and would provide satisfaction to the maximum number of people in the State.  It would also take care of the uncertainty over the future of Hyderabad as a bustling educational, industrial and IT hub/destination.  For management of water and irrigation resources on an equitable basis, a technical body, i.e. Water Management Board and an Irrigation Project Development Corporation in expanded role have been recommended.  The above course of action should meet all the issues raised by Telangana people satisfactorily.
    The Committee discussed all aspects of this option and while it acknowledges that there will be certain difficulties in its implementation, on balance, it found it the most workable option in the given circumstances and in the best interest of the social and economic welfare of the people of all the three regions.  The core issue being one of the socio-economic development and good governance, the Committee, keeping the national perspective in mind, is of the considered view that this option stands out as the best way forward.