Tag: Tatra

  • Army Procurement procedures,Middlemen and Bribe Can not be avoided

    It is not a simple job of going to a manufaturer and and ordering the goods one needs .

    The Defence department has well defined procedures in place.

    ‘It has been the constant endeavour of the Ministry of Defence, Government of India to introduce increased levels of transparency and accountability in the Defence Acquisition process. In this effort, the first step was the Defence Procurement Procedure – 2005, which has now been reviewed and revised along with the Fast Track Procedure – 2001 and the Procedure for Indigenous Warship Building. In addition, most importantly, a procedure for the development of systems based on indigenous research and design, categorized as ‘MAKE’, has now been formulated. This bridges a critical gap that existed hitherto, and would provide the requisite framework for increased participation of Indian industry in the defence sector.

    Some of the important features of Defence Procurement Procedure – 2006 include:

    • all major decisions pertaining to the procurement process to be taken simultaneously for reducing the timeframe for acquisitions;
    • enhanced transparency by placing the generic requirements of the Services on Ministry of Defence website and generating vendor registration through Internet;
    • increased transparency in the conduct of field trials;
    • ‘Integrity Pact’ made compulsory for all contracts above Rs. 100 crores;
    • an ‘Offset‘ obligation for all contracts above Rs. 300 crores.

    The Defence Procurement Procedure – 2006 provides comprehensive policy guidelines for all Capital acquisitions for the Armed Forces. The Defence Procurement Procedure 2006 is available at the Ministry of Defence Website www.mod.nic.in.

    http://www.ciidefence.com/defence_propro.asp?id=4

    Directorate of Quality Assurance (Armaments) – DQA (A)

    This discipline is responsible for the quality assurance and the related activities with respect to difference types of Armaments and connected areas.

    • Weapons
    • Small Arms
    • Ammunition and Military Explosives
    • Metallurgy
    • Instruments and Optical and Opto-Electronics

    Directorate of Quality Assurance (Vehicles) – DQA (V)

    It is responsible for the quality assurance of all kinds of vehicles needed by the Army. The vehicles include the common usage vehicles, Armoured and fighting vehicles, other heavy and specialist as also various kinds of trailers and transportation.

    http://mod.nic.in/product&supp/body1.htm

    As a first step, the organisation is to be registered with The Sales Tax,SSI/NSIC as the case may be, submit Income Tax returns Proof and bank Details to be able to enroll as a vendor.

    Apart from this, you have a host of other paper work associated depending on the nature of the product.

    Then comes Technical bid.

    For a tender one has to know what exactly the customer wants and what are the leeway  available as all products may not meet with specific requirements.

    You need inside information for all this as also for other necessary paperwork.(especially for Payment, you need inside contacts)

    This is very difficult for even an experienced man who knows commercial operations.

    No doubt the Foreign Companies will know nothing of these and they will be totally at a loss.

    So, they appoint a an Agent in India and a Liaison man to take care of all these.

    The Agent/liaison man is paid a service charge of 1.5% – 2% on the total value(expenses are separate and they are on actuals)

    To promote a Product these people get inside information and this facilitates less hassle and quick paper movement.

    In the process,palms are greased and the decision maker is also taken into account and the amount is negotiated and finalised.

    We may not approve of this , but this is a fact.

    Even for a product which is a Monopoly this procedure is adopted.

    Case in point is BEML promoting Tatra.

    One would imagine that since BEML is a Nodal Agency for the Ministry of Defence and the Tatra is built as per the specification of the Defence requirements and none else can supply this, BEML has easy sailing in getting the order and most importantly payments.

    Nothing can be farther from Truth.

    In fact they have to be extra careful and resourceful as they would find it difficult to pay the bribe as it would be difficult to accommodate  in A Governmental Organisation.

    But they will do this as they have to dispose of production and they have targets to meet.

    So the procedure as explained above may not be Right but this is what happens.

    On Tatra this must have happened.

    So long as the Product is good quality wise, it is ok.

    This whole exercise is distasteful but these are facts of Life and none can change it as things stand now.

     

     

  • Tatra Scam , VK Singh Has No Answer.

    Army Chief VK Singh is becoming the Raj Narain of The Indian Army.

    First he raised his age issue , where it was evident to every one he was not honest, to say the least.

    He produced two dates of Births,1950 and 1951.

    He accepted all the promotions due to him based on 1950 DOB and when the retirement issue came up, he started saying that his DOB was 1951 and even went to the extent of filing a case in the Supreme Court against the Government.

    Unlike him, the Court had the sense to have the matter sorted out out side the Court as it does not augur well for the Country Defence Chief and The Government fighting in Public and VK Singh did abide by the Defence Ministry’s DOB  of 1950.

    Now he has disclosed in an interview in The Hindu that he was offered a bribe of Rs. 14 Crore for favouring Tatra Trucks  and that he had informed the Defence Ministry of this affair -Mind you,the did not make this revelation to his Supreme Commander,The President of India -he announced it in an interview to a National Newspaper!

    Not content with this, may be connected with this issue, a letter from VK Singh to The Prime Minister surfaced about the lack of equipments to the Army and the general preparedness of The Indian Armed Forces.

    1.If the complaint is true why did not VK Singh record this in writing to the Defence Minister( who has stated that he received the complaint some time back)?

    In fact KK Singh seems to have been requested to do so by the Defence Minister A.K.Antony.

    2.Why did VK Singh, through the Army Head quarters recommend an Army Officer  -not Tejinder Singh ,for promotion about whom he raised corruption issues?

    3.The Army has been using Tatra Trucks for nearly 30 Years.

    Why VK Singh did not raise this issue till the date of his retirement?

    Now he orders a CBI enquiry, which again is not his powers to do so.

    He could have raised it when he was a Senior Officer or at least after he became the Army Chief.

    VK Singh now declares that he has no  issues with the Defence Ministry.

    He adds that the Army Chief is a part of the Government, he has no issues with the Defence Ministry, the release of the letter addressed to the PM is ‘high treason’ and he has no hand in the letter becoming Public!

    Does he believe in what he says?

    As per procedure he should have addressed the letter to the Defence Minister or in the worst case should have addressed the Supreme Commander,The President of India.

    PM does not enter the picture direct.

    Now Tatra CMD has refuted his allegation in toto saying that only the Technologyis provided by Tatra and the Trucks are, are manufactured with 40 % Foreign Components and  sold by BEML ,their Agent  in India.

    BEML is the nodal agency for Defence procurement.

    The man accused by VK Singh ,Tejinder Singh has filed a defamation suit against VK Singh.

    As I blogged earlier it is time VK Singh is sacked and stripped of his decorations.

    VK Singh is not honest in stopping the corruption and is using this as an issue to win sympathy and gain popularity as an Honest Man after he had been  proved to be less than honest in DOB affair.

    However this does not mean that there is no Corruption in The Army in Procurement.

    This has to be investigated and stopped.

    I shall blog on How a Defence order is secured.

    800 × 600 - TATRA Truck
    Tatra Truck

    “The CBI on Friday registered a case into Army chief Gen V K Singh‘s Rs 14-crore bribery offer into the alleged irregularities in the supply of the all-terrain, all-weather Tatra trucksto the Army through defence PSU BEML after 1997.

    UK-based businessman Ravi K Rishi and his company Vectra has been named in the FIR. Rishi was questioned by the agency on Friday since he is currently in the national Capital for the ongoing ”DefExpo-2012′.

    The agency will send a Letter Rogatory (LR) to the Czech Republic soon to get more information on the case that has been registered under Section 420 (cheating) and the Prevention of Corruption Act on the basis of a complaint from the defence ministry and independent sources.

    The agency on Friday evening also received a reply from Gen V K Singh in which he reportedly told CBI officials that he was offered a bribe. “He has offered to provide more details soon but he did not mention the bribe amount,” said a senior CBI official.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tatra-truck-deal-CBI-files-FIR/articleshow/12475873.cms

    Tatra Sipox (U.K.) Ltd, the company whose Tatra off-road vehicles are extensively used by the Army and is now in the eye of a storm over alleged bribery allegations, has written to the Defence Secretary seeking his sanction to take appropriate legal action against the Army Chief, General V.K. Singh, on grounds of “slander, libel and defamation.”

    Though Gen. Singh, in an interview to The Hindu, had not mentioned by name either the Tatra vehicle, the name of the person who attempted to offer him a bribe of Rs. 14 crore to clear an order to buy 600 “substandard” vehicles, or the company the bribe giver represented, it has been widely assumed that the vehicle is Tatra, the official is Lt. Gen. (retd.) Tejinder Singh, and that he was doing so on behalf of Tatra Sipox. However, a press release issued by the Army did mention Lt. Gen. (retd.) Tejinder Singh’s name as the person who made the bribe offer to the Army Chief.

    Lt. Gen. (retd.) Tejinder has since denied that he offered the Army Chief a bribe.

    “UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS”

    In a letter addressed to the Defence Secretary, Shashi Kant Sharma, Tatra Sipox claimed that Gen. Singh’s defamatory and “false and unfounded allegations” caused deep harm to Tatra’s reputation. The letter also states that Tatra, which supplies trucks to BEML under licence, has “no reason or occasion to have to approach Gen. V.K. Singh.”

     http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3259279.ece

    In a sensational claim, Army Chief General VK Singh has alleged that he was offered a bribe of Rs 14 crore by an equipment lobbyist in order to have a tranche of 600 sub-standard vehicles of a particular make cleared for purchase. The Army Chief in an interview to ‘The Hindu’ also claimed that he was targeted on his date of birth because he had cracked down on corruption cases.

    The army chief also said he discussed the issue with Defence Minister AK Antony .

    The Army Chief said the incident took place several months ago when a retired officer came to him and told him the deal would get him a certain sum of money. The Army Chief said such incidents have taken place in the past as well and many senior officers of the Indian Army had made the deal.

    VK Singh, in the interview, was quoted saying, “One of the men had the gumption to walk up to me and tell me that if I cleared the tranche, he would give me Rs 14 crore. He was offering a bribe to me, to the Army Chief. He told me that people had taken money before me and they will take money after me. I went straight to Mr. Antony and reported the matter. I told him, if you think I’m a misfit, I will walk out.”

    The Army Chief went on to add, “It was because I had cracked down on corruption that I was targeted on my date of birth. But things are fast unravelling and you will soon see the hand behind the drama. You will soon see who the sutradhar of the play is.”

    The Army Chief added that after the topic was broached he threw the officer in question out from his office and informed the Defence Minister about the incident.

    http://www.timesnow.tv/I-was-offered-Rs-14-cr-bribe-Army-Chief/articleshow/4398827.cms