Tag: Sri Lanka

  • Top Ten World Cup Knocks.

    How come Tendulkar’s knock against Pakistan is missing?
    1. Sourav Ganguly (India) – 183 (158 balls, 17 fours, 7 sixes) v Sri Lanka, Taunton, 1999 

    Ganguly provided a taste of what T20 might be like with his towering hits that almost cleared the outskirts of the town, let alone Taunton’s tiny ground. After stuttering in their opening encounter against South Africa and choking in a space of six balls from Henry Olonga against Zimbabwe, India needed to win big against Sri Lanka. Ganguly’s innings ensured just that and provided the momentum for a place in the Super Sixes. However, the early setbacks cost India the chance of further qualification.

    2. Viv Richards (West Indies) – 181 (125 balls, 16 fours, 7 sixes) v Sri Lanka, Karachi, 1987

    Richards walked in to bat on a hat-trick and by the time he departed, he had scored the highest score (then) in a World Cup. He went about his business in such a savage manner that Desmond Haynes’ 105 almost seemed pedestrian by comparison. It was a perfect riposte to two back-to-back losses in World Cups for the West Indies (1983 finals to India; opening encounter against England in 1987). Although, they exited before the semi-finals, Richards had once again stamped his authority on the World Cup.

    3. Matthew Hayden (Australia) 158 (143 balls, 14 fours, 4 sixes) v West Indies, North Sound, 2007

    Hayden imposed himself on the home side with an innings of various gears. It was an uncharacteristic innings, given it was Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke and Shane Watson who provided the impetus while the big man almost played a ‘sheet anchor’ role by his standards. Having not opened his account for 18 deliveries, he got to his 50 in 72 deliveries, and it was only in the 45th over that he really went into overdrive. Despite a glimpse of Brian Lara’s class, there was no stopping Australia.

    4. Adam Gilchrist (Australia) 149 (104 balls, 13 fours, 8 sixes) v Sri Lanka, Bridgetown, 2007

    Clive Lloyd (1975), Viv Richards (1979), Aravinda de Silva (1996), Ponting (2003) and Gilchrist (2007). It is a Who’s Who list of batsmen who left their indelible mark on World Cup finals. After a rather tepid tournament by his standards, Gilchrist — with a squash ball inside his gloves — treated the cricket ground akin to a squash court. His brutal assault propelled Australia, and although Sanath Jayasuriya and Kumar Sangakarra made a game of it, they could not stop Australia from winning the 2007 World Cup for the third consecutive time.

    5. AB de Villiers (South Africa) 146 (130 balls, 12 fours, 5 sixes) v West Indies, St George’s, 2007

    With the West Indies already out of contention for a semi-final slot, Lara experimented with some debatable team selection and bowling decisions. But nothing can be taken away from the knock of De Villiers, who ensured that South Africa’s shock defeat to Bangladesh was an aberration.

    Although Sarwan tried gamely, South Africa eased through to the semis where, again, their fragile batting was exposed by the Australians, thus re-invigorating the tag of ‘chokers’.

    6. Rahul Dravid (India) 145 (129 balls, 17 fours, 1 six) v Sri Lanka, Taunton, 1999

    Indian cricket is replete with Dravid’s feats in some monumental partnerships and this extremely crucial 318-run partnership with Ganguly was no less momentous. The fact that he scored at a very impressive strike rate almost went unnoticed as he was finding the gaps and using his pull shots but not hitting the towering sixes that regularly came at the other end. However, Mr Dependable was there when India needed him most.

    7. Andrew Symonds (Australia) 143* (125 balls, 18 fours, 2 sixes) v Pakistan, Johannesburg, 2003

    In Australia’s first match of the 2003 World Cup as defending champions, they were stunned by the Pakistani fast bowling attack with Gilchrist, Hayden, Damien Martyn and Jimmy Maher back in the hutch within the Powerplay. Ponting and Symonds rebuilt the innings and a sedate start assumed fierce proportions once Ponting departed. Symonds took a liking to Shahid Afridi’s bowling and did not spare the Ws (Wasim and Waqar) in the death overs either. Pakistan never really got going and Australia were off and running.

    8. Herschelle Gibbs (South Africa) 143 (141 balls, 19 fours, 3 sixes) v New Zealand, Johannesburg, 2003

    A feeling of deja vu must have crept in when Gibbs scored another century at the World Cup and lost another crucial match. Rewind to ‘You just dropped the World Cup, mate’ quip from Steve Waugh in 1999 when Gibbs dropped a sitter after having scored 101 and let Australia off the hook. Fast forward four years, and this time it was the Kiwi skipper, Stephen Fleming, who upstaged Gibbs’ heroic effort with sheer class and grace. It was a tournament where bad luck, rain, Messrs Duckworth & Lewis, and common sense (or lack of it) conspired to eliminate the hosts.

    9. Dave Houghton (Zimbabwe) 142 (137 balls, 13 fours, 6 sixes) v New Zealand, Hyderabad, 1987

    Another heartbreak story for another valiant centurion. Zimbabwe had always threatened to be giant slayers in their performances against India and Australia in 1983. They nearly did it again, chasing a respectable 243 to win. Houghton played one of the most majestic innings and almost single handedly won the match for Zimbabwe. Unfortunately, the rest of the batting line up let him down with tennis scores of 1-5-12-4-5-2-1. When Zimbabwe fell short by three runs, all neutral cricket fans must have been equally dejected.

    10. Scott Styris (New Zealand) 141 (125 balls, 3 fours, 6 sixes) v Sri Lanka, Bloemfontein, 2003

    To round off the theme with a hat-trick of centuries in losing causes, Styris was the sole survivor amidst a sinking ship with only a fighting 32 from Chris Cairns to prop up the New Zealand total. New Zealand never really came close to challenging the relatively imposing total of 272 from Sri Lanka.

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/cricket-world-cup-2011/news/Top-10-World-Cup-batting-knocks/articleshow/7499086.cms

  • World Cup 2011 Fixtures( Dates).

     

    World Cup 2011, Feb-April 2011

    Date Match Venue Time (IST)
    Feb 19, 2011 Bangladesh vs India Dhaka 1400
    Feb 20, 2011 New Zealand vs Kenya Chennai 0930
    Feb 20, 2011 Sri Lanka vs Canada Hambantota 1430
    Feb 21, 2011 Australia vs Zimbabwe Ahmedabad 1430
    Feb 22, 2011 England vs Netherlands Nagpur 1430
    Feb 23, 2011 Pakistan vs Kenya Hambantota 1430
    Feb 24, 2011 South Africa vs West Indies New Delhi 1430
    Feb 25, 2011 Australia vs New Zealand Nagpur 0930
    Feb 25, 2011 Bangladesh vs Ireland Dhaka 1400
    Feb 26, 2011 Sri Lanka vs Pakistan Colombo 1430
    Feb 27, 2011 India vs England Bangalore 1430
    Feb 28, 2011 Zimbabwe vs Canada Nagpur 0930
    Feb 28, 2011 West Indies vs Netherlands New Delhi 1430
    March 1, 2011 Sri Lanka vs Kenya Colombo 1430
    March 2, 2011 England vs Ireland Bangalore 1430
    March 3, 2011 South Africa vs Netherlands Mohali 0930
    March 3, 2011 Pakistan vs Canada Colombo 1430
    March 4, 2011 New Zealand vs Zimbabwe Ahmedabad 0930
    March 4, 2011 Bangladesh vs West Indies Dhaka 1430
    March 5, 2011 Sri Lanka vs Australia Colombo 1430
    March 6, 2011 England vs South Africa Chennai 0930
    March 6, 2011 India vs Ireland Bangalore 1430
    March 7, 2011 Kenya vs Canada New Delhi 1430
    March 8, 2011 Pakistan vs New Zealand Pallekele 1430
    March 9, 2011 India vs Netherlands New Delhi 1430
    March 10, 2011 Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe Pallekele 1430
    March 11, 2011 West Indies vs Ireland Mohali 0930
    March 11, 2011 Bangladesh vs England Chittagong 1430
    March 12, 2011 India vs South Africa Nagpur 1430
    March 13, 2011 New Zealand vs Canada Mumbai 0930
    March 13, 2011 Australia vs Kenya Bangalore 1430
    March 14, 2011 Bangladesh vs Netherlands Chittagong 0900
    March 14, 2011 Pakistan vs Zimbabwe Pallekele 1430
    March 15, 2011 South Africa vs Ireland Kolkata 1430
    March 16, 2011 Australia vs Canada Bangalore 1430
    March 17, 2011 England vs West Indies Chennai 1430
    March 18, 2011 Ireland vs Netherlands Kolkata 0930
    March 18, 2011 Sri Lanka vs New Zealand Mumbai 1430
    March 19, 2011 Bangladesh vs South Africa Dhaka 0900
    March 19, 2011 Australia vs Pakistan Colombo 1430
    March 20, 2011 Zimbabwe vs Kenya Kolkata 0930
    March 20, 2011 India vs West Indies Chennai 1430
    March 23, 2011 First Quarter-final Dhaka 1400
    March 24, 2011 Second Quarter-final Ahmedabad 1430
    March 26, 2011 Third Quarter-final Dhaka 1400
    March 25, 2011 Fourth Quarter-final Colombo 1430
    March 29, 2011 First Semi-final Colombo 1430
    March 30, 2011 Second Semi-final Mohali 1430
    April 2, 2011 FINAL Mumbai 1430

     

  • Bush facing Torture charge ,cancels visit to Switzerland.

    What about Rajapakshe of Sri Lanka for Genocide of Tamils?

    6 February 2011

    Former US president George W. Bush has cancelled a planned visit to Geneva on February 12, according to reports in the Tribune de Genève newspaper. The cancellation comes ahead of expected protests and possible legal action against the former president.

    On Friday, Amnesty International sent Genevoise and Swiss federal prosecutors a detailed factual and legal analysis of President Bush’s criminal responsibility for acts of torture he is believed to have authorised. Amnesty International concluded that Switzerland had enough information to open a criminal investigation against the former president.

    Such an investigation would be mandatory under Switzerland’s international obligations if President Bush entered the country.

    The organisers of the event President Bush was expected to attend told the Tribune de Genève that they decided to cancel the visit because of the “controversy” it has generated.  They denied that the potential criminal investigations against the former president were a factor in the decision.

    Amnesty International has repeatedly called on US authorities to investigate the responsibility of the highest US officials for torture, and of President Bush in particular, most recently after the publication of his memoirs in November.

    The USA has failed to open investigations that can adequately examine the former president’s potential criminal responsibility for these acts, and all indications are that it will not do so.

    “To date, we’ve seen a handful of military investigations into detentions and interrogations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo.  But none of these has had the independence and reach necessary to investigate high-level officials such as President Bush,” said Salil Shetty, Secretary General of Amnesty International.

    “Meanwhile, there has been virtually zero accountability for crimes committed in the CIA’s secret detention program, which was authorized by then-President Bush.”

    Anywhere in the world that he travels, President Bush could face investigation and potential prosecution for his responsibility for torture and other crimes in international law, particularly in any of the 147 countries that are party to the UN Convention against Torture.

    “As the US authorities have, so far, failed to bring President Bush to justice, the international community must step in,” said Salil Shetty.

    http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/president-bush-cancels-visit-switzerland-2011-02-06

  • War Criminals of Sri Lanka, Wiki Leaks.Video.

     

    Mahinda Rajapashe

     

     

    Please read my blogs under Tamils/Tamils in Sri Lanka./videos.

    Whole world is keeping quiet.

    Killers are being felicitated.

    [TamilNet, Saturday, 05 February 2011, 1

    2:11 GMT]
    The Sierra Leone war crimes tribunal in The Hague has granted Charles G. Taylor, 62, the former Liberian president, who has been on trial charged with 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity, the right to use two leaked American diplomatic cables as evidence to challenge the court’s impartiality. While the leaked information in the Taylor case was used by Taylor’s lawyer to raise doubts on the courts independence and suggested the prosecution was political, Sri Lanka‘s leaked cables from the US Embassy contain incriminating information on the complicity of Rajapakse family, Ex-SLA Commander Sarath Fonseka, and Tamil paramilitaries in war-crimes and crimes against humanity on Tamil civilians, legal sources in Washington said.

    The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) was set up jointly by the Government of Sierra Leone and the United Nations. It is mandated to try those who bear the greatest responsibility for serious violations of international humanitarian law and Sierra Leonean law committed in the territory of Sierra Leone since 30 November 1996.

    While the statute governing the SCSL provides concurrent jurisdiction to the SCSL and National Courts of Sierra Leone, the SCSL is given primacy and the SCSL can request the Sierra Leone Court to “defer to SCSL’ s competence in the Rules of procedure and Evidence.”

    The first cable – dated March 10th – quotes the US ambassador to Liberia, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, as saying that “all legal options should be studied to ensure that Taylor cannot return to destabilise Liberia”.

    The second, dated April 15th, allegedly revealed that sensitive information about the trial was leaked to the US embassy in The Hague by “unnamed contacts” in the court and the office of the prosecutor.

    Taylor insists his war crimes trial is based on “lies”. He claimed in a written application that the US cables “raise grave doubts about the independence and impartiality” of his trial.

    The Tribunal judges, however, denied Taylor’s request to investigate and identify the sources within the court’s chamber, prosecution and registry who provided the US government with the information in the cables, saying “the evidence does not demonstrate whether these ‘contacts’ have any relationship with the US government capable of interfering with the independence or impartiality of the Court or any organ of the Court.”

    Spokesperson for Tamils Against Genocide (TAG), a US-based activist group said, “this precedent setting decision by the United Nation’s sponsored war-crimes tribunal will likely guide similar evidence admissibility determinations in ICC and ICJ proceedings. When geopolitical conditions converge and UN members haul Sri Lanka to the ICC, the alleged war-criminals then have to confront Ambassadors Butenis and Robert O’Blake’s statements in a legal setting.”

    Ambassador Butenis

    Ambassador Butenis

    A January 2010 cable from US Embassy in Sri Lanka, made public by Wikileaks acknowledges that U.S. is cognizant of the fact that “responsibility for many alleged crimes rests with the country’s senior civilian and military leadership, including President Rajapaksa and his brothers and opposition candidate General Fonseka.” Ambassador Butenis further reasons the lack of progress in internal investigations: “There are no examples we know of a regime undertaking wholesale investigations of its own troops or senior officials for war crimes while that regime or government remained in power.”

    Robert O'Blake, Former Ambassador to Sri Lanka

    Robert O’Blake, Former Ambassador to Sri Lanka

    Another WikiLeaks cable, dated 18th May 2007 from US embassy in Colombo, accuses Defense Secretary Gotabaya Rajapakse of giving orders to Sri Lanka Army (SLA) commanders in Jaffna not to interfere with Tamil paramilitaries who are “doing “work” that the military cannot do because of international scrutiny. The work referred to in the cable includes extra-judicial killings, extortion, abduction and prostitution by the Tamil paramilitary groups EPDP and Karuna Group. Both groups are led by Ministers in the present ruling Government in Sri Lanka.

    “When Tamils continue with determination seeking justice and truth amid the cacophony of empty voices from the United Nations, and members of the international community, WikiLeaks has unexpectedly created unprecedented legal difficulty for the alleged war-criminals in Sri Lanka. WikiLeaks is an indispensible institution to the oppressed peoples,” TAG spokesperson added.

    http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=33516

    Related:

    Sri Lankan President responsible for massacre of Tamils.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/01/wikileaks-sri-lanka-mahinda-rajapaksa
    29.12.10   Rajapakse fares worst in WikiLeaks damages, says Boston Glob..
    17.12.10   WikiLeaks: Gotabaya sanctioned extra-judicial killings by Pa..
    05.12.10   Defending WikiLeaks
    04.12.10   Leaked documents reveal UK lacking practical approach and In..
    30.11.10   Wikileaks show US probing UN’s position on Sri Lanka

    External Links:

    SCSL: The Special Court for Sierra Leone
    AFP: US contributes funds to Taylor war crimes trial
    RNL: Taylor lawyers to use US cables in court challenge
    NYT: U.S. Diplomatic Cables Allowed in Liberian’s Trial
    RNL: Charles Taylor trial resumes
    USGov: The U.S. Provides $4.5 Million to Fund Special Court for Sierra Leone Trial of Charles Taylor
  • Srilanka-Tamil Drowned in violent Police attack,Video.

    If this is not State sponsored terrorism,what else is?

    A 26-year-old man with mental health problems drowned during an attack by three policemen in October. The scene was caught on camera; resulting in the arrest of the officers involved. But two months later, and the men are yet to be sentenced.

    Police received a complaint about Balawarnam Sivakumar, a mechanic and ethnic Tamil from the town of Ratmalana, south of Colombo, on the morning of Oct. 30 2009. He was said to have been throwing stones at trains and dancing by the road, semi-naked, in a threatening manner in Bambalapitiya, a suburb of the capital.

    The police say that when they tried to arrest him, he threw stones at them and then ran into the sea. The policemen were joined by two civilians in threatening Sivakumar with large sticks; one of them hitting him. Sivakumar is seen begging the officers to let him come ashore, but after continued attacks he retreats into the water and shortly afterwards is seen floating lifelessly.

    The footage, filmed by an off-duty cameraman who happened to be in a building on the coastline, also shows dozens of onlookers on the shore. On Nov. 1, after the video had been handed over to the local press, the three officers involved were arrested. The identification parade which would lead to their trial however has been repeatedly postponed, most recently after the death of one of the suspects on Jan. 1.

    WARNING – YOU MAY FIND THESE IMAGES UPSETTING

    http://observers.france24.com/content/20101223-best-amateur-videos-2010-tsunami-red-shirts-moscow-bomb-tamil-violence?ns_campaign=nl_obs_en&ns_mchannel=email_marketing&ns_source=emv_NL%20OBS%2029122010%20EN&ns_linkname=best-of-videos&ns_fee=0&ns_campaign=NL%20OBS%2029122010%20EN&ns_fee=fee&ns_linkname=img:best-of-videos&ns_mail_job=1106771542&ns_mail_uid=1016290975677&ns_mchannel=email&ns_robot=partner-emailvision&ns_service=mail&ns_source=EMV

    Related:

    This story became an embarrassment for the police”

    X, who wishes to remain anonymous, is a member of Europe-based activists “Journalists for Democracy in Sri Lanka“. He says he spent 17 years working for Sinhalese publications before being exiled, along with dozens of others, for reporting “wrongly” on the war against the Tamils.

     

    I don’t think the police, who, incidentally, were Sinhalese [80% of police officers in Sri Lanka are Sinhalese] knew that Sivakumar was Tamil until he started shouting in the sea. At that point, they would have realised immediately – most Tamils have strong accent when speaking Sinhalese. We can’t say that they were particularly brutal because he was Tamil. However, there are some observations which I find concerning.

     

    Around three months ago there was another case of police brutality; two men were shot at point blank range in Colombo. When those youths, who were Sinhalese, were attacked by the police, the surrounding public responded very differently. They tried to attack the police and protect the youths. When Sivakumar was attacked however, the public not only stood and watched, but also helped the police; two of them joining the officers in the sea, and according to local news reports, others fetching the sticks with which the officers threatened him.

    Even the compensation was different. The families of the Sinhalese boys shot by police received one million rupees [€6,000], whereas Sivakumar’s family received only 100,000 rupees [€600].

    You’d think that the police would have realised Sivakumar was mentally unstable. Seeing as he was trying to stop the traffic by dancing in his underwear, I find it unlikely that they perceived him sane.

    It’s only because of the video evidence that this story became an embarrassment for the police. Before the video emerged the local press reported that ‘a person jumped into the sea in trying to escape the police and drowned’. It would have ended there, save for the video, which couldn’t be ignored. They are going to take their time in trying the policemen. One of them died of a heart attack at the beginning of January, leaving only two remaining.

    At a preliminary hearing in December only one of the four or five eye witnesses called to bear witness said they believed the police were in the wrong. The others said that they would like to see them pardoned; that Sivakumar’s death was inevitable; that the police weren’t trying to hit him, but just scare him. I’m not optimistic. History proves that when it’s the police against Tamil civilians, the police usually win. I’m pretty sure they’ll get off scott free.

    http://observers.france24.com/content/20100111-tamil-man-drowned-during-police-attack-balawarnam-sivakumar

    Unidentified gang of eight persons severely assaulted a Tamil journalist Lenin Raja, 28 in Wattala area in Colombo when he was returning home after duty at Vetri FM electronic media operating from Colombo Tuesday night around 11:00 p.m. Lenin Rajah rushed with the injuries to Wattala Police Station made a complaint in this regard.

    Lenin Rajah was later admitted to the nearby government hospital, media sources said.

    He was seriously injured in an attack on the Vetri FM station by an unidentified gang in July this year.

    http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=33035

    -[TamilNet, Tuesday, 14 December 2010, 22:20 GMT]
    The Government of Sri Lanka is alleged to have been involved in crippling the business activities of the Tamil traders in Jaffna peninsula to make way for the Sinhalese to capture it, Jaffna traders who have been subjected to harassment by officers from Criminal Investigation Department of Colombo Police.

    A team of intelligence officers from Colombo was interrogating the traders in Jaffna during the first week of December at the office of the traders association in Jaffna alleging the traders of financial dealings with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in the past.

    The CID has thereafter summoned 20 leading traders to Colombo for further interrogations at the Fourth Floor of the CID headquarters, traders in Jaffna said.

    The CID team before leaving to Colombo had also warned the Jaffna Traders’ Association that it would return to conduct another round of interrogation.

    Already a leading Tamil businessman in Jaffna was taken to Colombo and was being detained there.

    Officials of the Jaffna Traders Association expressed fear that the veiled threats and harassments by the CID were tactics aimed at making inroads for southern businessmen. After military subjugation and development subjugation, Colombo was now engaged in economic subjugation of the business elite of the Tamils in key cities of the Tamil homeland, the traders said.

    The three SL government-sponsored pogroms of 1958, 1977 and 1983 were mainly aimed at crippling Tamil trade in the south, especially in Colombo.

    http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=33219