Tag: Samkhya

  • Atheistic Hinduism Carvaka, Founder Brahaspati, Deva Guru

    Indian Philosophy, Hinduism does not shun those who deny the existence of God.

    It is taken as a point of view of Life.

    Though philosophical arguments were engaged in rebutting the Carvakas, there not harassed nor branded as Atheists and ostracized.

    Carvakas, Lokayatas Indian Philosophical System.image.jpg
    Carvakas, Lokayatas Indian Philosophical System.

    They were present during the Rig Vedic period, some 5000 years back and their later work is dated to be around 600 BC.

    The CarvakaSyatem, the Indian Atheistic Hedonist Syatem is also also called  Lokayata.,(worldly wise)

    The flip side of this is that the Charvaka’s first Text,the primary source, which is lost to us , is credited to Bruhaspati, the Guru,Preceptor of the Devas!

    This shows that though one is a Realized soul, Bruhaspati is One, one is not averse to exploring the other views as well and even propagated one so that to who ever these thoughts appealed they might follow.

    Kapila, who is an Avatar of Lord Vishnu is the founder of Samkhya Philosophy,which denies God!

    Samkhya is considered s one of the most respected philosophical systems of India.

    Hinduism does not differentiate between one who believes in God and one who does not.

    Astika system is one that believes in the Authority of the Vedas and others who do not accept the Vedas, Sabda, as the authority are called Nastikas.

    Carvakas, Jainism, Buddhism and Ajivika are Nastika systems.

    What does Carvakas say?

    Carvakas do not believe in God, Vedas.

    They do  not believe in Rebirth and Karma or ceremonies.

    They take Perception only as the means of knowledge and deny even inference as an Instrument of Knowledge.

    Inference, the process by which, we come to know of things by things that are present before us.

    The presence of electricity is inferred by the results it produces,like Light, Sound .

    Carvakas, do not admit this knowledge , saying that the conditions for this inference may not always be correct.

    They imply that One result may be caused by more than one Cause.

    This is rebutted by Advaita and it proves that Inference is an essential tool, by describing Parinamavada and Vivartahvada, that is Cause is contained in the Effect and Effect in the Cause.

    I shall write on this in detail.

    For the Carvakas, Pleasure is the only Goal.

    On Death, Birth, origin of the Universe , they brush every thing aside by saying it is Nature.

    They do not go into the point of what Nature is.

    This enquiry is done by the Astika systems like Samkhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaiseshika,Mimamsa and Vedanta, apart from Vedas, which deals with this subject in detail.

    Cārvāka means “agreeable speech” or “sweet talkers” (चारु, cāru – agreeable, pleasant or sweet and वाक, vāk – speech). Its traditional name, Lokāyata (Sanskrit: लोकायत) signifies “directed towards, aiming at the world” (लोक, loka which means “worlds, abode, place of truth, people”, and आयत, āyata means “extended, directed towards, aiming at”

    Some observations by Carvaka.

    ‘The Carvaka epistemology holds perception as the primary and proper source of knowledge, while inference is held as prone to being either right or wrong and therefore conditional or invalid Perception are of two types, for Carvaka, external and internal. External perception is described as that arising from the interaction of five senses and worldly objects, while internal perception is described by this school as that of inner sense, the mind. Inference is described as deriving a new conclusion and truth from one or more observations and previous truths. To Carvakas, inference is useful but prone to error, as inferred truths can never be without doubt. Inference is good and helpful, it is the validity of inference that is suspect – sometimes in certain cases and often in others. To the Cārvākas there were no reliable means by which the efficacy of inference as a means of knowledge could be established…

    Cārvākas denied metaphysical concepts like reincarnation, extracorporeal soul, efficacy of religious rites, other worlds (heaven and hell), fate and accumulation ofmerit or demerit through the performance of certain actions.Cārvākas also rejected the use of supernatural causes to describe natural phenomena. To them all natural phenomena was produced spontaneously from the inherent nature of things.

    The fire is hot, the water cold, refreshing cool the breeze of morn;
    By whom came this variety ? from their own nature was it born.

    Consciousness and afterlife.

    There is no other world other than this;
    There is no heaven and no hell;
    The realm of Shiva and like regions,
    are invented by stupid imposters.

    —Sarvasiddhanta Samgraha,  Verse 8 [

    The Sarvasiddhanta Samgraha states the Carvaka position on pleasure and hedonism as follows,

    The enjoyment of heaven lies in eating delicious food, keeping company of young women, using fine clothes, perfumes, garlands, sandal paste… while moksha is death which is cessation of life-breathe… the wise therefore ought not to take pains on account ofmoksha.

    A fool wears himself out by penances and fasts. Chastity and other such ordinances are laid down by clever weaklings.

    —Sarvasiddhanta Samgraha,  Verses 9-12
    No independent works on Cārvāka philosophy can be found except for a few sūtras composed by Brihaspati. The 8th century Tattvopaplavasimha of Jayarāśi Bhaṭṭa withMadhyamaka influence is a significant source of Carvaka philosophy. Shatdarshan Samuchay and Sarvadarśanasaṅ̇graha of Vidyaranya are a few other works which elucidate Cārvāka thought.
    Lord Rama had a detailed discussion with Jabali, a Carvaka, Please read my post on this.
    Reference and Citation.
  • Shiva Not Mentioned In Vedas Sahasranama

    The term Shiva means  ‘Auspicious.

     

    Shiva does not seem to be mentioned in the Vedas.

     

    However Shiva’s Name appears in the Sri Rudra,

     

    Shiva, one among the Trinity of Hinduism
    Lord Shiva

     

    ‘Namasivaaya Cha. Sivadharaaya cha’

     

    “His  rise to a major position in the pantheon was facilitated by his identification with a host of Vedicdeities,including PurushaRudraAgniIndraPrajāpatiVāyu, and others”

     

    The difficulty arises when tries to identify Shiva with Iswara is the fact that Iswara means Personal God.

     

    This term Isvara appears for the first time in Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra, where the meaning is Personal God.

     

    Among the six systems of Hindu philosophy, early Samkhya and Mimamsa do not consider the concept of Ishvara, i.e., a supreme being, while later Samkhya, YogaVaisheshika,Vedanta and Nyaya believe in the existence of an Ishvara..

     

     It is in origin, The term ‘Shiva’ a nominalized adjective meaning “capable, able, being in control”, like īśa “owning, possessing” derived from a root īś- “to own, possess; rule over”, ultimately cognate with English own (Germanic *aigana-, PIE *aik-). The theological meaning “the Supreme Being” first arises in the Manu Smriti, while īśa is used as a name of Rudra somewhat earlier, in the Shvetashvatara Upanishad(c. 300 BCE), considered the first evidence of the development of that deity, the later Shiva, into a supreme, cosmological god.

    In Saivite traditions of Hinduism, the term is used as part of the compound “Maheshvara” (“great lord”) as a name for Shiva. In Mahayana Buddhism it is used as part of the compound “Avalokiteśvara” (“lord who hears the cries of the world”), the name of a bodhisattva revered for her compassion. When referring to divine as female, particularly in Shaktism, the feminine Īśvarī is sometimes used.

    According to Purans Shiva is different from Rudra, Rudra being an Amsa, Manifestation of a part of Shiva.

    Shiva has been given the following Prime Attributes in terms of functionality,

    1. Visweswara,
    2. Mahadeva,
    3. Triyambaka,
    4. Thripuraanthaka,
    5. (Thrikaakgni) Kaala,
    6. (Kallakgni) Rudra,
    7. Neelakanta,
    8. Mrthuyunjaya,
    9. Sarveswara,
    10. Sadashiva,

    Rudra is one among and Chief of 11 Rudras, Ekadasa Rudras,

     

    Rudra a manifestation of Shiva
    The Rudras

     

    he Ramayana tells they are eleven of the 33 children of the sage Kashyapa and his wife Aditi, along with the 12 Adityas, 8 Vasus and 2Ashvins, constituting the Thirty-three gods.

    The Vamana Purana describes the Rudras as the sons of Kashyapa and Aditi.

     The Matsya Purana notes that Surabhi – the mother of all cows and the “cow of plenty” – was the consort of Brahma and their union produced the eleven Rudras.

    Here they are named Nirriti, Shambhu, Aparajita Mrigavyadha, Kapardi, Dahana, Khara, Ahirabradhya, Kapali, Pingala and Senani – the foremost.[4] The Harivamsa, an appendix of the Mahabharata, makes Kashyapa and Surabhi – here, portrayed as his wife – the parents of the Rudras.[3][5] In another instance in the Mahabharata, it is Dharma (possibly identified with Yama) who is the father of the Rudras and the Maruts.[1]

    Rudra, identified with the Puranic Shiva (pictured) is associated with the Rudras.

    The Vishnu Purana narrates that Rudra – here identified with Shiva – was born from the anger of the creator-god Brahma.

    The furious Rudra was in Ardhanari form, half his body was male and other half female. He divided himself into two: the male and female. The male form then split itself into eleven, forming the eleven Rudras. Some of them were white and gentle; while others were dark and fierce.

    They are called Manyu, Manu, Mahmasa, Mahan, Siva, Rtudhvaja, Ugraretas, Bhava, Kama, Vamadeva and Dhrtavrata.

    From the woman were born the eleven Rudranis who became wives of the Rudras. They are Dhi, Vrtti, Usana, Urna, Niyuta, Sarpis, Ila, Ambika, Iravatl, Sudha and Diksa. Brahma allotted to the Rudras the eleven positions of the heart and the five sensory organs, the five organs of action and the mind.Other Puranas call them Aja, Ekapada (Ekapat), Ahirbudhnya, Tvasta, Rudra, Hara, Sambhu, Tryambaka, Aparajita, Isana and Tribhuvana.

    In one instance in the epic Mahabharata, the Rudras are eleven in number and are named Mrgavadha, Sarpa, Nirriti, Ajaikapad, Ahi Budhnya, Pinakin, Dahana, Ishvara, Kapalin, Sthanu and Bhaga.

    While Kapalin is described the foremost of Rudras here, in theBhagavad Gita – a discourse by the god Krishna in the epic – it is Sankara who is considered the greatest of the Rudras. Both Kapalin and Sankara are epithets of Shiva

    .In another instance, they are described as sons of Tvastr and named: Vishvarupa, Ajaikapad, Ahi Budhnya, Virupaksa, Raivata, Hara, Bahurupa, Tryambaka, Savitra, Jayanta and Pinakin.

     While usually the Rudras are described to eleven, in one instance in the Mahabharata; they are said to be eleven thousand and surrounding Shiva.

    The eleven groups of hundred are named: Ajaikapad, Ahi Budhnya, Pinakin, Rta, Pitrrupa, Tryamabaka, Maheshvara, Vrsakapi, Sambhu, Havana and Ishvara..

    It seems to me that though Shiva is not mentioned in the Vedas directly,considering the meanings of the Attributes to the  Nirguna Brahman,

    The Reality, it would seem that the term Shiva is an indicator of the Nirguna Brahman in its entirety without Name and Form but called as Shiva to

    enable us to understand the Concept of Nirguna Brahman as Auspicious.

    Shiva Sasranama.

    Citation.

    Shiva 

    Rudra

     

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta